Yanike's IE9 Tab/Address bar Concept


Recommended Posts

Having the address bar in tabs really wouldn't work. It's too short in the video with one tab open and would be ridiculous with ten or more.

On mouse-over the first tab could side over the other tabs if space becomes an issue. Obviously the tab has to grow larger than seen in the video.

The way I see it the real issue would probably become the interfaces with hidden elements like itself that would become too dynamic, confusing the hell out of people.

On mouse-over the first tab could side over the other tabs if space becomes an issue. Obviously the tab has to grow larger than seen in the video.

The way I see it the real issue would probably become the interfaces with hidden elements like itself that would become too dynamic, confusing the hell out of people.

Possibly but that would be a usability nightmare with lots of textbox flickering. I'm not really sure what the benefit if this approach would be. The vertical space savings don't really outweigh the nuisance IMO.

On mouse-over the first tab could side over the other tabs if space becomes an issue. Obviously the tab has to grow larger than seen in the video.

The way I see it the real issue would probably become the interfaces with hidden elements like itself that would become too dynamic, confusing the hell out of people.

It looks like a great idea for me. I agree with .Neo.

On mouse-over the first tab could side over the other tabs if space becomes an issue. Obviously the tab has to grow larger than seen in the video.

Exactly. It's just short in the video I made. The active tab should show normal size when hovered and then stretch when needed.

naaaah, hiding the address would a huge security risk. Certainly after all the work the browser vendors have done lately (colored addresses for TSL and insecure sites, highlighting the domain). Going with your design would be a huge step back towards making people notice the domain they are on.

naaaah, hiding the address would a huge security risk. Certainly after all the work the browser vendors have done lately (colored addresses for TSL and insecure sites, highlighting the domain). Going with your design would be a huge step back towards making people notice the domain they are on.

nope. you can still have all that with this concept. all you have to do is hover the tab. the tabs can also change colors and show security risk icons for bad sites.

also, when a page is loading the tab will be showing the address bar until the page finishes loading. so, you will know what page you are on before the address bar goes away.

nope. you can still have all that with this concept. all you have to do is hover the tab. the tabs can also change colors and show security risk icons for bad sites.

also, when a page is loading the tab will be showing the address bar until the page finishes loading. so, you will know what page you are on before the address bar goes away.

unless the page loads to fast or the user is distracted for a moment or ... still not a good idea :)

Nope, seems too confusing and others have said it's dangerous to hide the address of the site you are visiting. Remember IE9 will be used by "generally" but NOT ALWAYS less technical people, hiding elements from them is silly and dangerous. You really want people to have mouse over the address bar, every time to check is the site they are using is secure for transactions? Or that they haven't been re-directed at the last minute?

Even on my laptop, my pages load way to fast to see the final url of my 5 homepages starting up.

What was the blue bar sliding across the top of the page? Progress bar?

You would be better off using the big blank space at the top for the address bar or tabs bar, than trying to combine them.

quotes by "DavidM"

"Nope, seems too confusing and others have said it's dangerous to hide the address of the site you are visiting. Remember IE9 will be used by "generally" but NOT ALWAYS less technical people, hiding elements from them is silly and dangerous. You really want people to have mouse over the address bar, every time to check is the site they are using is secure for transactions? Or that they haven't been re-directed at the last minute?"

No. The tabs can be used to show popup and click notifications (for redirects, fraud site, errors, etc.), use colors and icons for security and other reasons. The tabs can also just show an icon and a button to click that says "Security Risk" that explains things. This will be better than anything out now. You won't use a site when your tab turns into a security risk tab.

Even the address bar in browsers doesn't show the full address without scrolling or hovering it anyway.

94157435_4e457598bd_o.jpg

Why take up so much space or a toolbar for an address bar when you can combine them and the new tab system can do the same thing and more?

You can also show a quick guide to new users that IE has anyways to explain new features to people not so technical.

"What was the blue bar sliding across the top of the page? Progress bar?"

Yes.

No. The tabs can be used to show popup and click notifications (for redirects, fraud site, errors, etc.), use colors and icons for security and other reasons. The tabs can also just show an icon and a button to click that says "Security Risk" that explains things. This will be better than anything out now. You won't use a site when your tab turns into a security risk tab.

Even the address bar in browsers doesn't show the full address without scrolling or hovering it anyway.

IMG ~Snipped ~

Why take up so much space or a toolbar for an address bar when you can combine them and the new tab system can do the same thing and more?

You can also show a quick guide to new users that IE has anyways to explain new features to people not so technical.

"What was the blue bar sliding across the top of the page? Progress bar?"

Yes.

You still want people to move their mouse up to their address bar to check something that should be clearly visible to the novice/intermediate user. You're right they don't show the whole address but they still show vital information just with a quick glance, without the need to move anything. My address bar stretches from side to side, so I always see as much of the address as possible (and usually all of it).

You are still making "drastic UI changes" to a product that is well established and that causes problems for the people Microsoft wants to be happy, just ask Google about that whole background fiasco. They were writing news stories about it for Pete's sake, people were up in arms, shouting from the roof tops about a BACKGROUND of all things, everything else was still the same but it didn't matter. Microsoft will be cautious and probably mix a little chrome minimalism in to their already fairly clean interface.

You still want people to move their mouse up to their address bar to check something that should be clearly visible to the novice/intermediate user. You're right they don't show the whole address but they still show vital information just with a quick glance, without the need to move anything. My address bar stretches from side to side, so I always see as much of the address as possible (and usually all of it).

You are still making "drastic UI changes" to a product that is well established and that causes problems for the people Microsoft wants to be happy, just ask Google about that whole background fiasco. They were writing news stories about it for Pete's sake, people were up in arms, shouting from the roof tops about a BACKGROUND of all things, everything else was still the same but it didn't matter. Microsoft will be cautious and probably mix a little chrome minimalism in to their already fairly clean interface.

I know the changes will be drastic, but it's evolution. People will always complain. lol they complain about tabs being on top or bottom. They complain at first and then stop and start enjoying it.

Moving the address bar into the tab will simplify things. Some people get confused with tabs and how to use them. If you move the address bar into the tab, it will make it simplier for users to identify which tab they are using and about to navigate. It's more confusing for members to have all these search bars and toolbars to use. I've seen people with thousands (not literary) of toolbars on their PC and they don't even use them. They even get confused on which to use. Mainly because programs install toolbars on systems and users end up with lots of them.

Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!

toolbar400gif-thumb.gif

It would be simpler for users to click on a tab and use the tab's address bar knowing that THAT navigation bar will control that tab correctly.

ie9yanikeconcept.png

Possibly but that would be a usability nightmare with lots of textbox flickering. I'm not really sure what the benefit if this approach would be. The vertical space savings don't really outweigh the nuisance IMO.

Mac OS X manages to execute animations without flickering interface elements. You're saying Windows is incapable of doing so?

That said, I think tabs should just have their own bar.

Nice.

I do find it funny though because yesterday (some 13 hours+) ago, I posted this on the front page news ;)

I mean maybe they could have come up with some cool idea that the address bar becomes part of the tab bar - ie when you click on a tab it expands to allow you to enter an address. But that just seems like a stretch.

I think there really are two extremes and nothing in the middle here. Either you use one or two tabs per window, or you have a dozen or more. In the latter case, even having the tabbar in its own toolbar doesn't really fix the issue of shortened tabs.

I personally like the QuickTabs feature, since you can see everything and manipulate tabs. It really gives you more information without much more effort (Ctrl + Q). Ultimately, I think the entire concept of a tabbar is going to change to something more efficient. What is a tabbar other than a horizontal menu that gets smaller and smaller, the more items you put on it? It does not scale gracefully, and should be replaced.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Glad these prices are starting to come down, but that is still crazy. I bought the 2TB 9100 Pro (slightly more expensive version with PCIe 5.0) last year for $240.
    • The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months by Sayan Sen Yesterday, we covered a really good deal wherein you can get a 4TB TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 NVMe PCIe Gen4 SSD for a low price of just $400 with a special discount coupon. That's just $100 per TB, making it a very good offer during these hard times. The deal is still live, so you can check it out in its dedicated article here if you do not want to miss out. Meanwhile, if you don't have that kind of budget but still wish to buy an SSD for a good price, the 2TB variant of the TeamGroup SSD at $280 its lowest price in over three months. Meanwhile, those seeking 2TB but faster performance can check out Samsung's 990 PRO, which has hit the lowest price also in the last quarter or so, as it's on sale for $370 (purchase links under the specs table down below). Thus, you want a faster drive, get the 990 Pro, or you want more capacity, grab the TeamGroup 4TB linked in the first para. The 990 PRO is a PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD and still one of the fastest drives available today for under $500. Speaking of fast, sequential reads and writes are rated at 7450 MB/s and 6900 MB/s, respectively. The random throughputs for reads and writes are 1400K IOPS and 1550K IOPS, respectively. The 990 PRO is based on Samsung's 7th Gen V-NAND flash, and it too is TLC. It packs 2 gigs of LPDDR4 DRAM cache, which helps the random performance. The endurance rating for this is 1200 TBW (terabytes written), which should be sufficient for most users. The Samsung 990 PRO is compatible with the PlayStation 5, but if you are going to use the 990 PRO on a PC, check out the Samsung Magician app that lets you track your drive's health, update its firmware, customize various settings, and more. The tech specs are given below: Specification TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 2TB Samsung 990 PRO 2TB Interface PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe 1.4 PCIe Gen 4.0 x4, NVMe 2.0 Form Factor M.2 2280 M.2 2280 Controller InnoGrit Controller Samsung In-house Controller NAND Flash 3D TLC 3D TLC DRAM Cache None (HMB supported) 2GB LPDDR4 Sequential Read (Max) 5,000 MB/s 7,450 MB/s Sequential Write (Max) 4,500 MB/s 6,900 MB/s Random Read (4K) Up to 600,000 IOPS Up to 1,400,000 IOPS Random Write (4K) Up to 700,000 IOPS Up to 1,550,000 IOPS TBW (Endurance) 1,300 TBW 1,200 TBW MTBF 3,000,000 hours 1,500,000 hours Operating Temperature 0°C to 70°C 0°C to 70°C Storage Temperature -40°C to 85°C -40°C to 85°C Shock Resistance 1,500G / 0.5ms 1,500G / 0.5ms Heatsink Patented Graphene Heat Spreader No Get them at the links below: Samsung 990 PRO SSD 2TB (MZ-V9P2T0B/AM): $369.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 2TB SSD (TM8FFE002T0C129): $279.99 (Sold by TeamGroup, Shipped by Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • If you can't spell a simple word that 2nd graders learn, your entire argument is suspect.
    • And here goes the "Won't someone think of the children" brigade. Get stuffed mate. This has NOTHING to do with making the internet safe. It's about tracking adults, spying on your online activity, and sending the boys around when they don't like something you post. Also, again, parliament have voted TWICE against this, and Starmer is going ahead anyway. THAT is anti-democratic bullsh**. They will use this law to track you, they will use this law to control you, and they will use this law to punish you if they don't like what you do, even if it's legal. And your data? Say bye bye to that. It'll be on the darkweb in weeks. I'm not some rando online. I've been an IT professional for 40 years, many of it in security. I know exactly what this means and what will happen to your data. I do not consent and I will not comply.
    • "...but it may not be Microsoft's fault" seems like a reasonable way to tease what is going on without leaving the user with a false impression that an update is the problem. A title isn't a summery, it is meant to entice the user to read the article. It should not contain a misleading premise; which this title does not. You could maybe complain that the first paragraph should have included that detail. The writing style popularized over 100 years ago in newspapers will cover the most important information as soon as possible with details and nuance added later; the idea being that with each new paragraph you have less of the reader's focus.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      520
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!