L.A. Noire news


Recommended Posts

This game is being published by Rockstar, but it's not developed by Rockstar so I don't know how much "GTA" is in this game.

Does anyone know if this is Biondi's first game?

True, I just got that "Mafia II" free-roaming vibe from it. Like I said, it's not a bad thing.

New info about the trailer...

That trailer was stunning, but it could have been all cutscenes, sure cutscenes created within the game, but still not playable.

Not so, Rockstar tells Kotaku.

The trailer includes a blend of playable footage and cutscenes. Rockstar tells us that because of the tech behind the game there is no difference between the gameplay and cutscenes. Of course we can't say whether we agree until we see the game in action ourselves.

Keep in mind, though, the premise behind this game: You are a detective. This isn't meant to be a shooter, it's meant to be an interactive whodunit. Because of that, the game, we're told, is full of interactive moments that are driven by dialogue; like interrogating suspects. That's where a healthy chunk of the trailer comes from.

http://kotaku.com/5687713/spotting-the-gameplay-in-la-noires-new-trailer-and-why-it-may-not-matter

Kotaku just posted a preview. One part of the preview has me going :/

If there's an antecedent to L.A. Noire, a point of reference that will help gamers adjust expectations, it is Capcom's Phoenix Wright series. That game too is filled with conversations and the management of an expanding list of leads and evidence. There are two key differences, one obvious, both potentially great. The first is visual. Phoenix Wright is essentially a text-driven game with simple cartoon artwork to illustrate its investigations and courtroom cross examinations. L.A. Noire is not just a visually deep three-dimensional game, but it's one with the best facial animations I've ever seen. Rockstar's proprietary Motion Scan capture technology manages to make every one of the game characters not only seem to have a real and distinct face, but lets them emote with a spectacular array of expressions. You really can be presented with a smirk, a curled lip, a winked eye, a furrowed brow, and other expressions that convey or conceal the truth of a character's emotion. This means that interrogations and interviews in this game, the heart of the gameplay, have the potential thrill of the real verbal jousting that arises from being faced with, well, a person with a real face. (One visual pitfall for Rockstar here is that characters' body language is nowhere near as nuanced as the facial animation, presenting a potentially distracting sense of human heads atop relatively stiffer bodies.)

The subtler distinction from the Phoenix Wright series and from most games that include conversation is that the player should expect to be lied to. They will be given false leads. Their prey will waste their time. Games are usually filled with honest and obvious characters who fill your quest log with proper tasks that lead to guaranteed rewards. According to Rockstar, that is not the case here and the poor investigative player will find themselves getting the runaround as they chase red herrings.

  • 4 weeks later...

Another preview this time by Joystiq

http://www.joystiq.com/2010/12/10/la-noire-preview-hold-it/#continued

But, LA Noire isn't Grand Theft Auto set in the 1940s. It's not Red Dead Redemption without horses. Perhaps the best comparison I can offer is this: it's a big-budget, M-rated Phoenix Wright.
When I first saw the LA Noire trailer, I shared the same question that many of you had: "Why didn't they show actual gameplay in this trailer?" Having seen the game in action, I can say that the trailer is the gameplay. Watching how people respond to you, listening to the intonation of their voice, and looking for subtle changes in their expression is vital in figuring out who you can trust. The fact that you can "read" people this way is rather revolutionary, a testament to how spectacular the motion capture system is.
I can't help but wonder if the mainstream media will somehow campaign against Rockstar's latest for tackling such dark themes, like rape and exploitation. "You're going to see a lot of dead, naked bodies," the rep forewarned about the game's more gruesome content.
  • 1 month later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Pretty much my most anticipated game of the year. Especially after watching all of the behind the scenes videos on the Rockstar site a few weeks back, I am completely and utterly sold. I am also pretty much a sucker for all things Noir, and I absolutely love the whole idea of being a detective and having to really analyze facial movements, subtle reactions, etc. Cannot wait to play it.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think the car analogy is more this: Left hand drive, basic commands on the left side of the infotainment screen. Right hand drive, basic commands on the right side of the infotainment screen. Granted, you're not swapping between the two often so it's doesn't really work. But it's to do with the proximity of you (your mouse, or the driver) to the controls.
    • I mean, the old one was broken and so stupidly complex for many users, so I don't see that as a feasible option. A context menu needs to be simple to use, and for me the Windows 11 style actually worked really well for me, and many others. I used to have to scroll the damn context menu just to get to "file properties" in Windows 10. That was not a good experience, and I'm sure you'd agree. What they're trying to do is make it the best of both worlds, as clearly you'd prefer the Win10 style. I'm curious how they're going to do this.
    • The "Show more options" has its place, as does the simpler context menu, but it should perhaps be a separate fly-out rather than relaunching the entire, old context menu. The old context menu was getting absurd in Windows 10. Often I'd have to make the context menu scroll just to get to "File properties" on my old laptop. Even without much installed, the amount of items was just too much. It's a context menu, not a "do all" menu. Making it configurable is fraught with challenges too, so I'm interested to see how Microsoft tackles this one.
    • I don't hate the new menus, I am not a fan of the lack of features and how they went live when they clearly are not complete. The menu itself presents much better than the previous - but what's lacking (IMO) is: 1) Any kind of automated manipulation such as: "this goes on the new menu because you use this feature more often on this filetype" "this is rarely used and will fall back to the old menu" 2) Any kind of user manipulation such as: "a UI to add/remove/order items to the new menu"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      I2D earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      The Norwegian Drone Pilot earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Very Popular
      s0nic69 earned a badge
      Very Popular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      484
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      258
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      84
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      64
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      63
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!