New iPod Touch 'retina' Display - Not the same as iPhone?


Recommended Posts

So, I was really looking forward to the new iPod touch HOPING apple wouldn't screw ipod touch fans over again with another crappy release, and it appears they haven't fully disappointed. It's only missing a couple things I was hoping for:

GPS

iPhone 4 design

iPhone 4 quality camera

Now, in this video @ Engadget, I noticed that the screen has some major color shift at non normal viewing angles. It's right next to an iPhone 4 so the difference is like night and day.

I'd like to see more proof of this before I seriously consider upgrading my old 16GB 2g touch. If anyone could take video (showing color-shift) of a new touch when they get one... preferably next to an iPhone 4, that'd be awesome.

I'm quite surprised at the lack of GPS, especially considering Apple keeps promoting their MobileMe service that lets you track the device if it's stolen (another problem, it doesn't have any 3g data component, so it can only be tracked while it's connected to a wireless access point, which is a manual process)

Everything else is good, but the lack of GPS means I'd be much more likely to just buy a second hand 3Gs.

In other words, you should've bought an iPhone by the sounds of it...

Nah, I'm not paying $400 + $100 a month for something I don't need (data/phone). Wifi suffices for anything mobile I need to do on my Touch.

Did they include vibrate support this time for gaming? Does the microphone on the back work for voice apps such as Shazam and the Talking Tom Cat?

Did they include vibrate support this time for gaming? Does the microphone on the back work for voice apps such as Shazam and the Talking Tom Cat?

Vibrate? No, pretty sure they didn't (it'd be kinda stupid anyway).. microphone, probably.. also, I believe the microphone is at the bottom on the opposite side of the sync port where the headphone jack is.

Now, in this video @ Engadget, I noticed that the screen has some major color shift at non normal viewing angles. It's right next to an iPhone 4 so the difference is like night and day.

Yeah, you can definitely see this effect at the ~0:20 mark.

I was almost set on buying the new ipod touch, but after this, not so sure. Even though they advertise it as if its the same retina display from iPhone 4, you can clearly see in the video that its not the same thing.

Of course they aren't going to make the touch nearly as good as the iPhone 4. They don't want to cannibalize iPhone sales. This is the same reason the new nano lost many of the things the older models had, like a video camera, video playback and a larger display: it's all engineered so that you'll want the bigger and more expensive model.

Of course they aren't going to make the touch nearly as good as the iPhone 4. They don't want to cannibalize iPhone sales. This is the same reason the new nano lost many of the things the older models had, like a video camera, video playback and a larger display: it's all engineered so that you'll want the bigger and more expensive model.

The Camera on the Nano was ditched because of the new Camera on the Touch, one of the reasons why the Nano was radically changed also.

We'll more likely see a cold day in hell than SJ allowing 3G on the iPod touch

True but let me point out also that with the new iPod touch, they also added mic built-in which is great. I don't need to use a damn headset with mic anymore. This new iPod is a winner in everything over the previous model.

There's no reason why the iPod Touch 'retina display' would be any different from the iPhone 4 one. I'd suggest looking at the device in person when it's available in an Apple Store instead of relying on videos shot under whatever odd lighting conditions.

I'm quite surprised at the lack of GPS, especially considering Apple keeps promoting their MobileMe service that lets you track the device if it's stolen (another problem, it doesn't have any 3g data component, so it can only be tracked while it's connected to a wireless access point, which is a manual process)

Everything else is good, but the lack of GPS means I'd be much more likely to just buy a second hand 3Gs.

The lack of a good quality GPS in these cellphone devices prevents me one replacing my dedicated GPS unit.

Maybe next year we will see smartphones with good quality GPS based on something like the SiRFstar IV

Maybe GPS or 3G data plan will be add to the next version of iPod touch. Every year they add a new feature to the iPod Touch.

That is called an iPhone! the iPod touch will never get GPS, unless Apple redesign the Maps app to allow you to cache maps to the device (I wish they would! loved that feature of my previous phone [Nokia N95]). As for being able to access the phone network for data, what is the point? if you want that then what you want is an iPhone not an iPod touch. Not to mention that could seriously cannibalize the iPhone sales too, I'm sure Apple will block being able to make phone calls on it but with something like Skype or just jailbreak it to allow phone calls (I'm sure you could) you got yourself a cheap iPhone! I am also aware the iPad has a 3G version but that is a completely different device! Well that is my 2 cents, take with a grain of salt.

That is called an iPhone! the iPod touch will never get GPS, unless Apple redesign the Maps app to allow you to cache maps to the device (I wish they would! loved that feature of my previous phone [Nokia N95]). As for being able to access the phone network for data, what is the point? if you want that then what you want is an iPhone not an iPod touch. Not to mention that could seriously cannibalize the iPhone sales too, I'm sure Apple will block being able to make phone calls on it but with something like Skype or just jailbreak it to allow phone calls (I'm sure you could) you got yourself a cheap iPhone! I am also aware the iPad has a 3G version but that is a completely different device! Well that is my 2 cents, take with a grain of salt.

I believe you, but also you need to understand that they add new features every year to the iPod touch. GPS may not come soon or not even in the next model but I am truly believe that Apple may add in two or three years an iPod touch with GPS built in. They don't need to have a full GPS , they may add that to the map app only. I don't think Apple will add a full GPS to the iPod touch.

I'm quite surprised at the lack of GPS, especially considering Apple keeps promoting their MobileMe service that lets you track the device if it's stolen (another problem, it doesn't have any 3g data component, so it can only be tracked while it's connected to a wireless access point, which is a manual process)

Everything else is good, but the lack of GPS means I'd be much more likely to just buy a second hand 3Gs.

Agreed. Not only that, but TomTom and Navigon would probably make a killing if iPods supported GPS. I know I'd use it for such a purpose. My iPod spends the majority of its time plugged into the radio in my car. GPS seems almost like common sense.

videos shot under whatever odd lighting conditions.

See the video again, that effect cannot be made usin 'odd lighting conditions', this type of color shift only happens in TN screens. Since we know that the iphone 4 screen is and IPS screen we can conclude it's a much lower quality screen, like it or not.

1. Who looks at their iPod Touch in a way that exhibit that issue?

2. At the point of an odd viewing angle in the video, the iPhone displays a mostly black screen which doesn't tell much, regardless if it's IPS or TN.

I also recommend checking one out in a store to see how much of a problem this would be to you.

I know my iPod caches map data, but I'm not sure how much it caches.

But still, the iPod OS reports it supports geolocation to apps, the camera app stores that information in any pictures it takes, but the iPod itself doesn't actually support geolocation (unless you use the WiFi method, but that only works if you are connected to an open, known WiFi point. I had to add mine to the Skyhook DB by hand to get any info)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
    • I had a feeling this was coming. Picked up my first Mac ever last Saturday. Glad I did.
    • In a major surprise there is actually some good deals for the first time in years. At least for me.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      419
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      169
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      70
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!