Recommended Posts

Internet Explorer's sandbox is robust. It's more likely that your father's problem comes from add-ons like Flash etc.

Yes. There is a market for VMware vulnerabilities.

So if you get a virus in VM ware there is a chance for it to "come out of the box" and go after you're normal OS?

Im tempted to load the site on my Macbook pro. but I dont want it connected to anything of mine if its still there.

What can I use to check out the site? I've gone to websites that scan other websites, however they all say the site is clean, i just dont want to risk it.

How do I turn on the IE Sandbox on IE 8?

I might go download the Trial of KAV internet Security. and goto the site then. and hope it doesnt mess with anything

So if you get a virus in VM ware there is a chance for it to "come out of the box" and go after you're normal OS?

Im tempted to load the site on my Macbook pro. but I dont want it connected to anything of mine if its still there.

If you have a mapped drive in the VM to a drive on your actual windows machine, then the malware could spread over the network.

If you have a mapped drive in the VM to a drive on your actual windows machine, then the malware could spread over the network.

Damn. How do I go about changing that?

Also just to be clear, if I use Sandboxie, ANY virus/spyware cannot touch my actual windows install correct?

Chrome and IE8 are already sandboxed on Vista and Windows 7. I've never needed more than that, despite generous amounts of surfing shady sites with each browser I've never caught a single piece of malware on Vista or 7. But sandboxes are not magic bullets, for instance an infected browser, even in a sandbox or VM, can still steal any information you input into that browser, such as credit card numbers or bank login credentials. I made a site that may help, it's at http://bulletproof-windows.blogspot.com so check it out, it has lots of tips for securing Vista/7 and browsers on those OSes. I describe (well, link to a site that describes) how to sandbox FF on Vista/7, together with noscript that may be a good solution. Unless you are running .exe's off the internet, you should be pretty safe with whichever browser you choose on Vista/7 (can't say the same for XP) because of all the exploit-prevention stuff that was added to Windows after XP.

Chrome and IE8 are already sandboxed on Vista and Windows 7. I've never needed more than that, despite generous amounts of surfing shady sites with each browser I've never caught a single piece of malware on Vista or 7. But sandboxes are not magic bullets, for instance an infected browser, even in a sandbox or VM, can still steal any information you input into that browser, such as credit card numbers or bank login credentials. I made a site that may help, it's at http://bulletproof-windows.blogspot.com so check it out, it has lots of tips for securing Vista/7 and browsers on those OSes. I describe (well, link to a site that describes) how to sandbox FF on Vista/7, together with noscript that may be a good solution. Unless you are running .exe's off the internet, you should be pretty safe with whichever browser you choose on Vista/7 (can't say the same for XP) because of all the exploit-prevention stuff that was added to Windows after XP.

Thanks!

Damn. How do I go about changing that?

Also just to be clear, if I use Sandboxie, ANY virus/spyware cannot touch my actual windows install correct?

Only the 32bit version of Sandboxie can guarantee that no virus/spyware cannot touch your actual windows install. The 32bit version (only compatible with 32bit windows, not 64bit) goes down to the kernel to sandbox the malware. In 64bit versions of windows Microsoft created patch guard to keep people out of the kernel. In turn Microsoft created some Kernel Level API's basically saying "This is all we will allow you to do". While the access MS gives the deveopers is good, it's not great. So the developer of sandboxie does not guarantee his product in a 64bit environment.

Only the 32bit version of Sandboxie can guarantee that no virus/spyware cannot touch your actual windows install. The 32bit version (only compatible with 32bit windows, not 64bit) goes down to the kernel to sandbox the malware. In 64bit versions of windows Microsoft created patch guard to keep people out of the kernel. In turn Microsoft created some Kernel Level API's basically saying "This is all we will allow you to do". While the access MS gives the deveopers is good, it's not great. So the developer of sandboxie does not guarantee his product in a 64bit environment.

Awe. Well I used sandboxie, i am on windows 7 64BIT. I uninstalled MSE, and installed KAV Internet security and turned everything to high. Used the sandboxie to goto the site. NOTHING popped up saying it was malware or virus. So I assume its good. I did a full scan and nothing.

Scanning with malwarebytes too.

It clearly points to that the issue shouldn't occur if you're running a non-IE browser unless you've enabled the said feature of auto-open.

Exactly my issue. You appear to be making a sweeping judgement that 1). IE is always susceptible to such issues. 2). all other browsers aren't, unless you've enabled said feature.

For the record: a few months ago I was running an up-to-date Firefox. I do not have that option set. I managed to get malware due to a *slightly* out of date Java install. (Ever since then I've kept enabled plugins at a bare minimum.)

J_R_G: could you create a site for XP users if possible?

I did not make the site for Vista/7 out of some short-sightedness or something like that, XP lacks ASLR (and some other things) that make it pretty much easy to infect once you have a 0-day vulnerability, which are easy enough to find in any complex code-base. Not really MS' fault though, when XP was made, there were no x86 CPUs with DEP, and without DEP, ASLR is useless. MS added DEP to XP, but without DEP *and* ASLR the system is pretty easy to infect, even if you run sandbox applications like sandboxie or run as a standard user it's very easy for malware to infect the browser process and steal all your stuff like bank/paypal credentials, credit card #s and so on that you input into the browser. Whatever the reason (too much testing and development to add ASLR to XP, or what have you) XP is really never going to be a 'secure' OS by modern standards, so I don't see the point of really trying to act like it is, it's much better to concentrate on securing an OS that already has a fundamentally secure foundation, like Vista or Win 7 (or modern apple/oss equiv.)

BUT - you can still just use common sense and apply some things from my security blog to XP, like run as standard user (hard to do without UAC, folder virtualization, and so on though that are only in Vista+), use sandboxie, enable DEP for all processes, run MSE and secunia vulnerability scanner, keep OS + apps updated, etc.

But my main advice would be, that if you really care about security, just upgrade to Win 7 (preferably x64.)

Exactly my issue. You appear to be making a sweeping judgement that 1). IE is always susceptible to such issues. 2). all other browsers aren't, unless you've enabled said feature.

For the record: a few months ago I was running an up-to-date Firefox. I do not have that option set. I managed to get malware due to a *slightly* out of date Java install. (Ever since then I've kept enabled plugins at a bare minimum.)

Again, read what I post; the post was done on the basis of the original poster running firefox from the get-go therefore I question how he got infected with it. Either read the post or shut up.

Firefox is secure by itself. Just avoid going to malicious sites to start with.

A) Not true

B) Useless advice without add-ons to tell you what not to go to

1) Install NoScript, this makes FF secure by default

2) Install Web of Trust, this tells you which sites are unreliable

3) If WoT doesn't give a rating, don't turn any scripts on, and you're good

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Same Internet Archive seemed to grab the new version https://web.archive.org/web/20...d/Setup_MakeMKV_v1.18.4.exe Here's the link to an additional file it periodically downloads https://web.archive.org/web/20260213092148/https://www.makemkv.com/sdf.bin I think update's keys, etc. To manually trigger this update, put the sdf.bin file in the root of where the program is installed. When you launch the program it will pick up the file and import it. Typically put it here: C:\Program Files (x86)\MakeMKV\sdf.bin
    • Windows 11 KB5094126, KB5093998 bugging out Office apps but it may not be Microsoft's fault by Sayan Sen Microsoft last week released Windows 11 KB5094126 and KB5093998 as the latest Patch Tuesday updates. Following that the company also published the accompanying dynamic updates under KB5094149, KB5095971, and KB5094156. Although the tech giant did not acknowledge any major problems, some users online reported various issues ranging from OneDrive and Dropbox access problems, BitLocker recovery lockouts, to blue screens and BSODs. You can read about them in this dedicated piece. While there is still no confirmation about those problems from Microsoft the company has admitted to another bug which we did not report on. The tech giant has confirmed it has received reports of an issue in which certain third-party applications may be unable to launch Microsoft Office apps or open Office documents after installing the Patch Tuesday. This affects both Windows 11 as well as Windows 10. The company says the problem impacts a subset of applications that rely on OLE (Object Linking and Embedding) automation to communicate with Microsoft Office programs. According to Microsoft, affected scenarios involve third-party software attempting to open Office applications or documents from within their own interface. In such cases, the Office program may fail to launch altogether, or the requested document may not open. Oddly there may not be any error message, which probably makes the issue difficult to diagnose. The bug affects several Office products, including Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Access, and other apps in the Microsoft Office suite when they are launched through the affected software. These include tax and accounting software such as CCH Engagement and Workpaper Manager, dental practice management solutions like Dentrix and Softdent, as well as the popular research and reference management tool Zotero. Microsoft adds that other applications using similar Office integration methods could also experience the same problematic behavior. To understand the issue it is important to look at OLE, the Microsoft technology involved. OLE allows different applications to work together and share data, while its Automation feature lets one program control another. Thus this enables third-party software to launch Microsoft Office apps, open documents, and perform tasks automatically without requiring users to switch between programs. Because many accounting, healthcare, research, and business applications rely on OLE automation to interact with Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and other Office apps, any disruption can break those workflows. As a result, affected software may be unable to open Office documents or launch Office applications even though the programs themselves continue to work normally. At the moment the company has not provided a permanent fix though it has confirmed that engineers are actively working on a resolution, which will be delivered through a future Windows update. As such additional details will be shared once more information becomes available. In the meantime, Microsoft recommends a simple workaround for affected users whic is to open the Office application or document directly rather than launching it through the third-party program. For enterprise customers and organizations managing larger deployments, Microsoft says an additional mitigation is available. Admins experiencing the problem on their managed devices are advised to contact Microsoft Support for business to obtain and apply the workaround.
    • It saddens me when cars are such dull colours now. Mine is bright metallic blue and I absolutely adore it for standing out in contrast to that depressing backdrop of traffic.
    • Sparkle 2.20.0 by Razvan Serea Sparkle is a free, open-source Windows optimization tool designed to make your PC faster, cleaner, and more private. With Sparkle, you can easily debloat Windows by removing unnecessary apps and services, disable Microsoft tracking to enhance privacy, and apply performance tweaks to boost speed. Its cleaner removes junk and temporary files, while every change is safe and fully reversible. Sparkle also features a modern, user-friendly interface with automatic updates, making system maintenance simple. Explore over 39 tweaks, from disabling telemetry and hibernation to optimizing network and game settings, all aimed at customizing and enhancing your Windows experience. Sparkle supports Windows 10 and 11. Sparkle 2.20.0 changelog: Debloat Tweak has animated border New homepage loading UI New Tweak Modal (Markdown Supported) Refactored GPU Detection Added Tests with vitest Added foobar2000 to apps Added Localsend to apps Updated Modal Styles Added styles for disabled inputs Added Animated Border to debloat-windows tweak Bumped dependencies Refactor System info logic for speed Tweak info modals now support Markdown Added Clear System info cache to settings Redesigned Home Page Loading UI Changed Some Icons around the app Download: Sparkle 2.20.0 | Portable | ~100.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Sparkle Website | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • lol it was a typo, fixed! haha imagine an actual 4TB Gen4 NVMe for $40 in 2026
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Conversation Starter
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      Console General earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      517
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      184
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      106
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!