Microsoft: Xbox 360 S The Best Box We've Ever Built


Recommended Posts

204402-xbox-360-s-2_original.jpg

It's smaller, shinier, and back in black: Microsoft's new Xbox 360 took many by surprise at E3 this June, though some of us had speculated for months that a 'slim' model was in the works. More than just a component and size shrink, Microsoft added 802.11n wireless (previously a $100 external USB adapter) and packed in its premier 250GB hard drive without adjusting the standard system's $300 price tag. What changed inside and why? How'd they make it quieter? Will t really reduce your electric bill? And why does it automatically shut down if it gets too warm? I spoke with Microsoft's Senior Director of Xbox Product Management, Albert Penello, to find out. (The first part of the interview is here.)

My link

One of the better interviews I have read from MS in a long time. The guy actually answered the questions without doing the run around.

Really interesting read. Always good to get straight to the people in the know and hear this kind of stuff rather than having it washed through the usual marketing bull**** filter. Would love to hear similar interviews from designers of other products for big products / companies!

Thanks for the link!

Really interesting read. Always good to get straight to the people in the know and hear this kind of stuff rather than having it washed through the usual marketing bull**** filter. Would love to hear similar interviews from designers of other products for big products / companies!

Thanks for the link!

Agreed I quite like hearing about what things go through their minds when they're making design decisions although this one isn't really technical.

It's an upgrade all right, but what took them so long? This stuff should've been done the first time.

that's what happens when you have retarded monkeys engineering the thing so you can get it out a year before sony or nintendo release their hardware

It's an upgrade all right, but what took them so long? This stuff should've been done the first time.

Costs for one and probably the fact that they took longer in testing the new design compared to the old one to make sure noise, heat and the whole RRoD issues got taken care of.

Off the bat I and others who have an S can tell you that noise is pretty much gone, I could hear my original for the most part though it didn't bother me like it did others, though now with the S I have to get right next to eat and put my ear up close to hear the big fan working. Even when a disc is in the drive spinning away I still can't hear it that well without getting close. To me MS has done a great job with noise and heat, mine doesn't let out much heat at all compared to my original one, and they're both in the same location (on my desk which is a few feet away from my TV (studio apartment etc) so it's not in some sorta cabinet.

I expect this new design to go strong and win over some gamers who were scared away by the RRoD issues.

That was actually better than I was expecting. I'm not necessarily a technical person but I find this sort of detail much more interesting to read about than your typical promotional bumf, and it is actually starting to convince me to upgrade to a slim model.

It's an upgrade all right, but what took them so long? This stuff should've been done the first time.

I hate it when people say that.

The Valhalla chip would have cost hundreds to make and even more R&D costs, it would have boosted the 360 launch price to well over PS3 costs. Plus, wireless G would have added even more additional costs to it (they didn't even have wireless adapters out on the 360 launch IIRC).

The reason why it's been done NOW instead of THEN is due to technical progression.

I hate it when people say that.

The Valhalla chip would have cost hundreds to make and even more R&D costs, it would have boosted the 360 launch price to well over PS3 costs. Plus, wireless G would have added even more additional costs to it (they didn't even have wireless adapters out on the 360 launch IIRC).

The reason why it's been done NOW instead of THEN is due to technical progression.

Well said (Y)

I hate it when people say that.

The Valhalla chip would have cost hundreds to make and even more R&D costs, it would have boosted the 360 launch price to well over PS3 costs. Plus, wireless G would have added even more additional costs to it (they didn't even have wireless adapters out on the 360 launch IIRC).

The reason why it's been done NOW instead of THEN is due to technical progression.

What do you think you're doing bringing logic into the equation?! GTFO :angry:

nice article, and though i'm very happy with the redesign so far, i do have a couple complaints. first off, did they have to make the touch buttons so damn sensitive? i mean you don't even have to touch them, merely moving something in front results in activation. second, the chiming...that's really annoying, as they're freakin loud. i don't want my console yodelling every time i do something, so i'm forced to do everything through the controller. at least give us a way to turn those off. the person who thought of adding those chimes...seriously, you belong in the same support group as the genius who concocted the ring of light.

That was a good read - nice find AWBrian (Y)

As for the redesign, I think it's fantastic with what they've achieved and couldn't be happier except for maybe being able to turn off the chimes when using the touch buttons - I keep forgetting to use the pad of a night-time and then the second I touch the button, "BING!", I've woke the house up :p

meh, just give us the next gen xbox console with 1080p 60fps 3D capable HDMI 1.4b/1.5 (whichever will support 60fps for 3D 1080p). USB3 ports and maybe even the upcoming lightpeak standard. Make it more of a multimedia centre that it should be and of course use Bluray or BDXL (100GB+ i think). BDXL would hamper pirating as there would be very few readers/writers out there and standalone players.

meh, just give us the next gen xbox console with 1080p 60fps 3D capable HDMI 1.4b/1.5 (whichever will support 60fps for 3D 1080p). USB3 ports and maybe even the upcoming lightpeak standard. Make it more of a multimedia centre that it should be and of course use Bluray or BDXL (100GB+ i think). BDXL would hamper pirating as there would be very few readers/writers out there and standalone players.

All brilliant ideas to push the cost of the hardware well out of many people's reach for no real reason...

All brilliant ideas to push the cost of the hardware well out of many people's reach for no real reason...

Haha, ya, I mean do we really need another repeat of "$599 dollars!!!!!!" At some future E3?

yes, we do, that's how things get pushed forward - and it doesn't have to be $600, the PS2 was a huge leap over the PS1 a mere five years apart, and it only retailed for $300 at first - and yes, i remember even that was a big deal, people complained that it wasn't $249 or something like that. ahh good old 2000.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • After I installed KB5095093, the volume on my ARM laptop won't go above 20%. It's stuck on the hearing protection level, which is pretty much useless if you want to listen to anything. I rolled back.
    • Amazon Prime Day slashes Samsung's newest Galaxy Watch Ultra by 45 percent by Karthik Mudaliar Samsung’s flagship Android smartwatch has received one of its steepest Prime Day cuts. Amazon has dropped the 2025 Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra in Titanium Blue to $357.24, saving buyers around $292 from its $649.99 list price. That's a 45 percent discount (purchase link below). The 47mm Galaxy Watch Ultra uses a titanium casing and a 1.5-inch Super AMOLED display with a resolution of 480 x 480 and peak brightness of 3,000 nits. It includes LTE connectivity, Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi, NFC, and dual-frequency L1+L5 GPS for more accurate outdoor route tracking. The 2025 model has 64GB of storage, a 590mAh battery, sapphire crystal glass, 10ATM water resistance, IP68 protection, and MIL-STD-810H durability testing. Its health and fitness tools include heart rate monitoring, sleep coaching, Energy Score, Running Coach, body composition analysis, temperature sensing, and ECG support, where available. This model is best suited to Android users who regularly run, hike, cycle, or train outdoors and want cellular access without carrying a phone. The larger battery, rugged construction, bright display, and dedicated Quick Button also make it a stronger option than Samsung’s regular Galaxy Watch models for extended workouts and demanding environments. Grab the Titanium Blue Galaxy Watch Ultra before the Prime Day price resets: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) [Sold and Shipped by Amazon] Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Google begins rolling out its post-Epic Play Store billing model next week by Karthik Mudaliar Google has confirmed that its redesigned Play Store billing and fee structure will take effect on June 30, 2026, in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Economic Area. The changes will let eligible developers offer their own payment systems or send users to an external website for purchases, while separating Google’s platform service fee from the cost of using Google Play Billing. The rollout puts concrete dates and detailed rate cards behind the broader Android policy overhaul Google announced in March. That announcement followed a proposed settlement with Epic Games intended to resolve their long-running disputes over app distribution and payments, although the U.S. portion of the agreement still requires court approval. Under the new billing choice program, developers selling digital content or services can display an alternative payment option alongside Google Play Billing. They may also direct users to their own websites to complete a purchase. Developers can use Google’s standard payment-choice screen or design one that complies with the company’s user-interface rules. Choosing another payment processor does not eliminate Google’s cut altogether. The company will continue charging a service fee for transactions associated with apps distributed through Google Play, regardless of whether payment is handled by Google, an alternative provider, or a developer’s website. Google argues that this fee covers the value and infrastructure provided by Android and the Play Store. For developers earning up to $1 million annually, the service fee will generally be 10 percent. That rate also applies to auto-renewing subscriptions. When Google Play Billing is used in the U.S., U.K., or EEA, Google will add a separate 5 percent billing fee, and developers processing payments elsewhere will not pay that additional charge. This means Google’s familiar flat 30 percent commission is disappearing, but developers will not necessarily see a dramatic reduction on every transaction. An in-app purchase from an existing user processed through Google Play Billing can still reach a combined 30 percent. The biggest savings are likely to come from subscriptions, smaller developers covered by the $1 million tier, and companies able to move customers to their own payment infrastructure. Google is also offering lower rates through its Apps Experience and revamped Games Level Up programs. Apps and games that satisfy the company’s requirements can qualify for 15 percent service fees on new-install transactions and 20 percent on existing-install transactions. The criteria include performance and reliability standards, support for additional Android device categories, and selected platform features. Those program rates are scheduled to become available in the initial markets and Australia on September 30. For consumers, the immediate effect will depend on whether developers adopt alternative payments and pass any savings on through lower prices. For developers, however, June 30 begins a more flexible but considerably more complicated Play Store economy in which distribution, billing, install dates, revenue thresholds, and program participation can each affect Google’s final cut. Google is also separately developing a Registered App Stores program designed to simplify the installation of qualifying third-party stores. That initiative is expected to arrive with a major Android release later in 2026 and will launch outside the U.S. first. Google says the rest of the world will receive the changes by September 30, 2027, although billing rates for markets outside the US, UK, and EEA have not yet been announced.
    • 38% off a super insane price is still an INSANE price.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!