iTunes modifies Apple's UI defaults dramatically


Recommended Posts

Has anyone else noticed that iTunes 10 has moved the buttons that control the window size and hidden state?

It's a pretty dramatic change. I hope this is not the way that the rest of their UI is going in 10.7, whenever that eventually gets revealed.

The attached image is from the full player, and not the mini-player.

post-326182-12836144070655.png

No, I did not notice those at all...

They only did it so the controls are at the top of the window - they take up so much vertical space anyway so they're just slimming down iTunes in that respect. I don't expect it to be the new default - just like the scrollbars that I think were in iTunes 7 aren't.

iTunes has always been the little UI playground for Apple. Sometimes, changes make it into OS X. Most of the time, they don't.

As for the vertical widgets, they make sense in iTunes. The top bar is large enough to support them vertically. When they were horizontal, they had to take up a certain amount of vertical space for pretty much no reason. Also, while yes, the minimize and zoom buttons are inconsistent with their normal locations, the close button is still in the right place (and it's probably the most frequently used button).

Not really a fan of many of the slight tweaks they've done to iTunes but you do soon get used to them.

For anyone how can't live with the changes made to the minimize, maximize, close buttons simply run the following code in terminal to resort to the old style:

defaults write com.apple.iTunes full-window -boolean YES

or if you can't stand any of the changes click here

I didn't care for the vertical window widgets at first, but now I appreciate what Apple was attempting to do with it, save some vertical space by getting rid of the unnecessary title bar, and now I'd like to see that change made in 10.7 for any applications that only have a single window and thus the title bar is pointless.

I also wish 10.7 will standardize to the pastel scroll bars of iTunes 5.x-present. I don't like that I have to use a third-party hack like Aqua Extreme just to bring some consistency to the overall OS UI.

It hardly saves any space and I personally would loathe using window buttons vertically like that. Would be a PIA to use.

Until you actually used OS X and realized you press the minimize and zoom buttons (especially on iTunes) just about...never. :p

In fact, in the 8 years I've used OS X, I think I've pressed the zoom button less than 10 times on any application.

It hardly saves any space and I personally would loathe using window buttons vertically like that. Would be a PIA to use.

People actually click on those window widgets? Cmd+W, Cmd+M and Cmd+Q are so much quicker.

And this is their new logo?

145454-itunes_10_icon.jpg

What happened, Apple? :huh:

For all the hate the icon receives, none of the replacements that I've seen have been able to execute the idea better. Maybe equally, but not really better. Staying consistent and crisp at a plethora of sizes (16x16, 32x32, 48x48, 64x64, etc. all the way up to 512x512) is a huge challenge, and none of them have really been able to do that as well as the official one. Also, absolutely none of them have challenged the general idea behind the icon (getting rid of the CD).

Edit: Another large problem, specifically on OS X, is that while the Dock can be small, it doesn't seem to use the different sizes that the designer defines in the ICNS file. So, while KoL's icon is beautiful, the well-detailed border begins to muddy at around 48x48 in the Dock. He's created a separate, beautiful state for the 48x48 icon, but the Dock won't use it.

Edited by Elliott

I didn't care for the vertical window widgets at first, but now I appreciate what Apple was attempting to do with it, save some vertical space by getting rid of the unnecessary title bar, and now I'd like to see that change made in 10.7 for any applications that only have a single window and thus the title bar is pointless.

I also wish 10.7 will standardize to the pastel scroll bars of iTunes 5.x-present. I don't like that I have to use a third-party hack like Aqua Extreme just to bring some consistency to the overall OS UI.

I agree, on a 13" laptop its great to have any extra space for looking at actual content, that being the music.

I would love to see this ons such things as Firefox and programs where the title bar is useless, especially with browsers where tabs hold the title of the page.

It hardly saves any space and I personally would loathe using window buttons vertically like that. Would be a PIA to use.

Sure it's not big, but it saves some space, the title bar is essentially useless anyway for such programs.

And I don't know about you, but I don't spend a lot of time pressing the buttons, and when I do its pretty easy to just move the mouse vertically in the direction I want as opposed to horizontally.

People are making way too big of a deal out of this, and being far too dramatic.

I would love to see this ons such things as Firefox and programs where the title bar is useless, especially with browsers where tabs hold the title of the page.

This is the biggest thing I miss from the Safari 4 dev preview. They weren't the first to do tabs on top, but they did them in such an efficient and space-saving way (using the title bar). I wish there was still an option to put them back on top.

post-17580-12836267774458.jpg

iTunes just needs a new UI... Maybe not for OS X as it fit's in with the rest of the silver... But on Windows needs a BIG redesign, I don't really like the look on Windows 7. It should fit in with Aero and have some windows native colours.

This is the biggest thing I miss from the Safari 4 dev preview. They weren't the first to do tabs on top, but they did them in such an efficient and space-saving way (using the title bar). I wish there was still an option to put them back on top.

post-17580-12836267774458.jpg

I know. I hate that Apple took away that option and didn't make it available in the final build.

and now I'd like to see that change made in 10.7 for any applications that only have a single window and thus the title bar is pointless.

It won't work for all applications. It only works in iTunes because the controls take up so much vertical space in the first place. In most apps you would be unnecessarily increasing the vertical height of the toolbars to fit the traffic lights in, and then you would be unnecessarily shifting the toolbar buttons to the right as well.

I think iTunes for Windws' UI whole idea is to go against Windows native UI.

I think it's true what you said. If you take a look at QuickTime in Windows you will see how ugly and old fashion is still QuickTime. They had not update the GUI since Windows 2000.

I think iTunes for Windws' UI whole idea is to go against Windows native UI.

The idea is also to go against Mac OS X' GUI, so no real difference there. Surely people don't seriously expect Apple to give iTunes a native look and feel on Windows if they don't even provide one on Mac OS X? :laugh:

I'd also like to think that iTunes and QuickTime for Windows are Apple's way of saying thank you to Microsoft for all the amazing looking and well performing Microsoft applications on Mac OS we had and have to put up with for all this time.

I'd also like to think that iTunes and QuickTime for Windows are Apple's way of saying thank you to Microsoft for all the amazing looking and well performing Microsoft applications on Mac OS we had and have to put up with for all this time.

What you give is what you get.

I guess with the release of the updated Office, Apple might have to do something about Quicktime on Windows. Maybe.

I assumed the goal of iTunes 10 was just to upset people.. and they are doing a rather good job at it.

Just like every Facebook layout change that people end up liking. People just hate change.

There are a few rub points in iTunes 10, but overall it's better than iTunes 9. I don't get the hate.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Waymo recalls self-driving software after cars enter closed freeway work zones by Paul Hill Waymo, the self-driving car maker owned by Alphabet – the parent company of Google –, has recalled some of its fifth-generation Automated Driving Systems (ADS). It did so after some of its cars drove through closed construction zones. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the affected vehicles were capable of driving through a closed freeway construction zone and continuing to drive at speed. The listing on the NHTSA website says that Waymo is currently developing a solution to fix this issue, but in the meantime, freeway driving is being restricted. Waymo will update its ADS software so that vehicles can detect when they can avoid entering construction zones. According to the Safety Recall Report, on April 20, 2026, Waymo’s Field Safety Committee began meetings reviewing an event from April 11, 2026, and five events from April 19, 2026, where Waymo’s autonomous vehicles didn’t recognize and drove past ramp closure signs into the pre-planned freeway construction zones. This took place in Phoenix, Arizona. Separately, on May 18, 2026, seven Waymo vehicles entered freeway lanes with active construction in the San Francisco Bay Area by driving between cones that were placed to show the lane was closed. On the back of both of these events, Waymo restricted freeway driving until it could address the issue. In June, Waymo’s Safety Board reviewed the issue and additional information related to ADS performances around construction zones; then, as a result, it decided to conduct a recall. This development is not good for Waymo as it adds to a growing list of technical hiccups its cars have experienced. Ultimately, it will lead to more scrutiny from lawmakers around the world who will be more cautious about letting autonomous vehicles on their roads without tighter regulation. For readers in areas where Waymo operates, does this news make you more wary about stepping into one of these vehicles?
    • I'm still on Windows 10 22H2 because I didn't want to deal with all the issues in Windows 11, so I waited almost a week before installing the latest Patch Tuesday update (KB5094127), I went ahead and did it, and it was a huge mistake—ever since then, my File Explorer has seen a performance drop of about 30% when transferring large files... Once again, Microsoft has outdone itself! This update cannot be uninstalled, either through the Control Panel (via Settings) or by accessing Advanced Startup Options. The only possible alternative would be to use system restore points, but I’d have to reinstall all app and driver updates (and there’s no guarantee it would work). Or there’s the “nuclear option” of a in-place repair without losing files or apps, but even then, all my customizations would be lost! Microsoft just can’t help but mess everything up! Way to go, Microsoft! But I still don’t want your c****y Windows 11!
    • Microsoft: Windows 11 could finally solve a major issue across AMD, Nvidia, and Intel GPUs by Sayan Sen While Microsoft has been trying to improve it, Windows 11 is definitely not flawless, as even today some issues are taking a year to publicly acknowledge. However, one area of trouble that may finally see much better results soon is graphics driver crashes. Work on graphics driver timeouts, also called Timeout and Detection Recovery (TDR), is not new as the latest WDDM 3.2 also has specific improvements regarding it. Windows Display Driver Model (WDDM) version 3.2 is supported on Windows 11 24H2 and 25H2. However, with the upcoming version 26H2, TDR crash diagnosis could go to the next level as Microsoft is introducing a new DirectX 12 API feature called "DirectX Dump Files". Similar to how system memory dump files work when a system crashes or freezes or encounters any such major issue, DirectX Dump Files (DDF) will essentially record a snapshot of the GPU execution right at the moment a graphics-related crash or hang or freeze occurs, so that developers can better understand and diagnoze these TDR and timeout detection errors. The dump will be available as a .dxdmp file for analysis and it will be a comprehensive dump file generated with detailed insights about the hardware, drivers, Windows, as well as the affected application. This should be another welcome change in this department. Earlier at GDC 2026, when the technology was first debuted, Microsoft had shared more details regarding it. The company had explained how DDF is designed to gather data from every layer of the graphics stack into a single file, eliminating the need for developers to manually correlate logs from multiple tools. As mentioned above, the dump can contain a lot of useful details like GPU hardware state information such as register values, shader program counters, page fault virtual addresses, shader memory data, and command buffers. Alongside that, it also captures DirectX runtime and kernel information, including D3D objects, pipeline state objects, device error data, adapter details, and CPU call stacks. Microsoft says the feature has been built around two primary use cases: retail device removals and local device removals. The former allows developers to collect crash information from end users' systems in the field, while the latter helps QA teams and developers investigate issues on test machines. Developers will also be able to include up to 2 MB of custom application data through new D3D12 APIs, providing additional context for troubleshooting. In addition, Microsoft is introducing three dump collection modes ranging from zero-overhead capture, which has no runtime performance impact on supported hardware, to higher-detail modes that collect more vendor-specific debugging data. On compatible Tier 2 hardware, zero-overhead dumps will be enabled by default, meaning developers may begin receiving useful crash diagnostics without making any code changes. The table below explains the three tiers: Tier Description NO_OVERHEAD Enables crash capture with no runtime cost and is suitable for broad deployment MEDIUM_OVERHEAD Provides a balance, capturing additional diagnostic data with moderate impact HIGH_OVERHEAD Collects the most detailed GPU and driver state available, enabling deeper investigation at the cost of higher runtime overhead In terms of availability, the company expects broader release to be around the fall of 2026, which should be right around the time when Windows 11 version 26H2 lands. Right now, DirectX Dump Files are available as a preview and currently, only AMD has the compatible AgilitySDK Developer Preview driver version 26.10.07.02. You can find the official announcement post here on Microsoft's website.
    • And with SO much better perf than the laggy mess that is Files.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      BizSAR earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      598
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      190
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      80
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      76
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!