Spiders - Like, Hate or Scared?


  

150 members have voted

  1. 1. Spiders - Like, Hate or Scared?

    • Like
      39
    • Hate
      49
    • Scared Of
      62
  2. 2. Do You Remove Them or Kill Them?

    • Remove, Carefully
      32
    • Remove, Not So Carefully
      15
    • Kill It
      86
    • Capture It / Keep It / Leave It Be
      17
  3. 3. Which Ones Do You Dislike the Most?

    • Fast Ones
      51
    • Slow Ones (that don't move)
      2
    • Big Body, Short Legged Ones
      17
    • Tiny Body, Long Legged Ones
      19
    • HUGE GREAT BIG GIANT ONES (Bigger than your hand)
      57
    • Tiny Ones
      4


Recommended Posts

I'm scared of them, but at the same time I like them. They're actually really neat. As long as they don't come in the house, I have no problem with them and just leave them alone. If they come in the house though, all bets are off. I'm too afraid of them to try and pick them up and put them out, so I just kill them.

I used to hate them, but that all changed at 15 years old when I got bitten by a radioactive spider while on a school field trip. It changed my whole perspective on life.

:laugh: Well if you don't have an unclelet me tell you something - "With great power comes great responsibilty". :rofl:

I don't really mind them tbh, I have a couple of them in the corners of my bedroom which are pretty good at catching moths. :p Only time I'd ever move a spider is if it's stuck in the bath/sink. I don't know why someone would want to kill one :(

Spiders don't bother me in the least. Not afraid of them, and I'll typically leave them alone. Usually beneficial to leave them be, unless they're poisonous of course.

Unless they're one of those cocky little buggers that like to come down from the ceiling right in front of your face and give you a little surprise, then they probably will get smushed.

What does scare the living bejezus out of me are these little buggers. Puts me into a panic every time I see one.

56681b4aa97bf43cea08aeb8648c850b7e66fb0d.jpg

Neutral. If they don't bite me then I don't bite them.

However, I usually remove them from the house (one way or another) as they don't pay rent.

:laugh:

I like them, I am not scared of them at all and generally do feck all to them unless they are poisonous, of which there are none in England iirc so whenever I do see one I usually just let it climb onto my hand observe it for a while and then show it the way out for the same reason Fred posted :p

Spiders are way cool, Moths however can burn in the deepest depths of animal hell. Passionately hate those things. Wait till you hear one scream :|

I don't mind certain ones that don't look too dangerous, but others I despise. If I don't have to be in the area of it, it will live. If it is in my area, it will die! :p

Spiders don't bother me in the least. Not afraid of them, and I'll typically leave them alone. Usually beneficial to leave them be, unless they're poisonous of course.

Unless they're one of those cocky little buggers that like to come down from the ceiling right in front of your face and give you a little surprise, then they probably will get smushed.

What does scare the living bejezus out of me are these little buggers. Puts me into a panic every time I see one.

56681b4aa97bf43cea08aeb8648c850b7e66fb0d.jpg

wtf is that? do you live in hell? lol, Where is it's head, or is it double headed?

wtf is that? do you live in hell? lol, Where is it's head, or is it double headed?

I believe that is a form of centipede, we had those in the house all the time in SC. They are not harmful but god they are freaky.

EDIT: Here you go: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scutigera_coleoptrata aka House Centipede.

As someone else said, I am not afraid of spiders unless they catch me off guard. I had a small one lower itself about 4 inches in front of my face once which scared the crap out of me, but once I knew it was there I took steps to get rid of it without a problem.

I freaking hate fast spiders though, such as Wolf Spiders in SC, those things run fast as hell (they don't make webs, they hunt their prey) and, for as fast as they move, they are very large (anywhere from 2-4 inches for just their body).

Worst bug I have ever seen though IMO is: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scolopendra_polymorpha

Scolopendra_polymorpha_1.jpg

Worst freaking thing ever, and my father kept it as a pet to torture me and my sister! :(

EDIT: Just for reference, the picture above is an adult (I think) which generally grow up to 7-8 inches in length.

Spiders keep to themselves, as do I. My old house I was living in a basement, I let the spiders stay and they helped get rid of any bugs that were in the room, except those pesky centipedes. Midwest basement owners probably know what I mean.

I believe that is a form of centipede, we had those in the house all the time in SC. They are not harmful but god they are freaky.

EDIT: Here you go: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scutigera_coleoptrata aka House Centipede.

As someone else said, I am not afraid of spiders unless they catch me off guard. I had a small one lower itself about 4 inches in front of my face once which scared the crap out of me, but once I knew it was there I took steps to get rid of it without a problem.

I freaking hate fast spiders though, such as Wolf Spiders in SC, those things run fast as hell (they don't make webs, they hunt their prey) and, for as fast as they move, they are very large (anywhere from 2-4 inches for just their body).

Worst bug I have ever seen though IMO is: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scolopendra_polymorpha

Scolopendra_polymorpha_1.jpg

Worst freaking thing ever, and my father kept it as a pet to torture me and my sister! :(

EDIT: Just for reference, the picture above is an adult (I think) which generally grow up to 7-8 inches in length.

That desert centipede made me cringe at first, but after looking at it carefully, its kinda cool. The segments are translucent so you can see its insides. I don't ever want to see one in person though.

I rather like them, I think they're neat and they prey on other bugs which I do dislike.

I'd kill one if it was a danger to me but we don't have spiders like that in the UK. The big ones (> 2 inch diamter legs) freak me out a bit but I'll just chuck them outside. Generally I leave them be.

Where's the option for "meh"?

I won't let them crawl over me or anything, but they aren't scary. I steer clear of redbacks, and kill them if they are around the house, because they can actually hurt me.

Edit: Also, where is the topion for "leave them be"?

Pretty bias poll towards the poor spiders.

+1

I voted "Like" but I don't really like them :/ But I wouldn't say I hate them.... I just don't really care about them

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!