Spiders - Like, Hate or Scared?


  

150 members have voted

  1. 1. Spiders - Like, Hate or Scared?

    • Like
      39
    • Hate
      49
    • Scared Of
      62
  2. 2. Do You Remove Them or Kill Them?

    • Remove, Carefully
      32
    • Remove, Not So Carefully
      15
    • Kill It
      86
    • Capture It / Keep It / Leave It Be
      17
  3. 3. Which Ones Do You Dislike the Most?

    • Fast Ones
      51
    • Slow Ones (that don't move)
      2
    • Big Body, Short Legged Ones
      17
    • Tiny Body, Long Legged Ones
      19
    • HUGE GREAT BIG GIANT ONES (Bigger than your hand)
      57
    • Tiny Ones
      4


Recommended Posts

I'm scared of them, but at the same time I like them. They're actually really neat. As long as they don't come in the house, I have no problem with them and just leave them alone. If they come in the house though, all bets are off. I'm too afraid of them to try and pick them up and put them out, so I just kill them.

I used to hate them, but that all changed at 15 years old when I got bitten by a radioactive spider while on a school field trip. It changed my whole perspective on life.

:laugh: Well if you don't have an unclelet me tell you something - "With great power comes great responsibilty". :rofl:

I don't really mind them tbh, I have a couple of them in the corners of my bedroom which are pretty good at catching moths. :p Only time I'd ever move a spider is if it's stuck in the bath/sink. I don't know why someone would want to kill one :(

Spiders don't bother me in the least. Not afraid of them, and I'll typically leave them alone. Usually beneficial to leave them be, unless they're poisonous of course.

Unless they're one of those cocky little buggers that like to come down from the ceiling right in front of your face and give you a little surprise, then they probably will get smushed.

What does scare the living bejezus out of me are these little buggers. Puts me into a panic every time I see one.

56681b4aa97bf43cea08aeb8648c850b7e66fb0d.jpg

Neutral. If they don't bite me then I don't bite them.

However, I usually remove them from the house (one way or another) as they don't pay rent.

:laugh:

I like them, I am not scared of them at all and generally do feck all to them unless they are poisonous, of which there are none in England iirc so whenever I do see one I usually just let it climb onto my hand observe it for a while and then show it the way out for the same reason Fred posted :p

Spiders are way cool, Moths however can burn in the deepest depths of animal hell. Passionately hate those things. Wait till you hear one scream :|

I don't mind certain ones that don't look too dangerous, but others I despise. If I don't have to be in the area of it, it will live. If it is in my area, it will die! :p

Spiders don't bother me in the least. Not afraid of them, and I'll typically leave them alone. Usually beneficial to leave them be, unless they're poisonous of course.

Unless they're one of those cocky little buggers that like to come down from the ceiling right in front of your face and give you a little surprise, then they probably will get smushed.

What does scare the living bejezus out of me are these little buggers. Puts me into a panic every time I see one.

56681b4aa97bf43cea08aeb8648c850b7e66fb0d.jpg

wtf is that? do you live in hell? lol, Where is it's head, or is it double headed?

wtf is that? do you live in hell? lol, Where is it's head, or is it double headed?

I believe that is a form of centipede, we had those in the house all the time in SC. They are not harmful but god they are freaky.

EDIT: Here you go: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scutigera_coleoptrata aka House Centipede.

As someone else said, I am not afraid of spiders unless they catch me off guard. I had a small one lower itself about 4 inches in front of my face once which scared the crap out of me, but once I knew it was there I took steps to get rid of it without a problem.

I freaking hate fast spiders though, such as Wolf Spiders in SC, those things run fast as hell (they don't make webs, they hunt their prey) and, for as fast as they move, they are very large (anywhere from 2-4 inches for just their body).

Worst bug I have ever seen though IMO is: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scolopendra_polymorpha

Scolopendra_polymorpha_1.jpg

Worst freaking thing ever, and my father kept it as a pet to torture me and my sister! :(

EDIT: Just for reference, the picture above is an adult (I think) which generally grow up to 7-8 inches in length.

Spiders keep to themselves, as do I. My old house I was living in a basement, I let the spiders stay and they helped get rid of any bugs that were in the room, except those pesky centipedes. Midwest basement owners probably know what I mean.

I believe that is a form of centipede, we had those in the house all the time in SC. They are not harmful but god they are freaky.

EDIT: Here you go: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scutigera_coleoptrata aka House Centipede.

As someone else said, I am not afraid of spiders unless they catch me off guard. I had a small one lower itself about 4 inches in front of my face once which scared the crap out of me, but once I knew it was there I took steps to get rid of it without a problem.

I freaking hate fast spiders though, such as Wolf Spiders in SC, those things run fast as hell (they don't make webs, they hunt their prey) and, for as fast as they move, they are very large (anywhere from 2-4 inches for just their body).

Worst bug I have ever seen though IMO is: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scolopendra_polymorpha

Scolopendra_polymorpha_1.jpg

Worst freaking thing ever, and my father kept it as a pet to torture me and my sister! :(

EDIT: Just for reference, the picture above is an adult (I think) which generally grow up to 7-8 inches in length.

That desert centipede made me cringe at first, but after looking at it carefully, its kinda cool. The segments are translucent so you can see its insides. I don't ever want to see one in person though.

I rather like them, I think they're neat and they prey on other bugs which I do dislike.

I'd kill one if it was a danger to me but we don't have spiders like that in the UK. The big ones (> 2 inch diamter legs) freak me out a bit but I'll just chuck them outside. Generally I leave them be.

Where's the option for "meh"?

I won't let them crawl over me or anything, but they aren't scary. I steer clear of redbacks, and kill them if they are around the house, because they can actually hurt me.

Edit: Also, where is the topion for "leave them be"?

Pretty bias poll towards the poor spiders.

+1

I voted "Like" but I don't really like them :/ But I wouldn't say I hate them.... I just don't really care about them

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
    • After I installed KB5095093, the volume on my ARM laptop won't go above 20%. It's stuck on the hearing protection level, which is pretty much useless if you want to listen to anything. I rolled back.
    • Amazon Prime Day slashes Samsung's newest Galaxy Watch Ultra by 45 percent by Karthik Mudaliar Samsung’s flagship Android smartwatch has received one of its steepest Prime Day cuts. Amazon has dropped the 2025 Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra in Titanium Blue to $357.24, saving buyers around $292 from its $649.99 list price. That's a 45 percent discount (purchase link below). The 47mm Galaxy Watch Ultra uses a titanium casing and a 1.5-inch Super AMOLED display with a resolution of 480 x 480 and peak brightness of 3,000 nits. It includes LTE connectivity, Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi, NFC, and dual-frequency L1+L5 GPS for more accurate outdoor route tracking. The 2025 model has 64GB of storage, a 590mAh battery, sapphire crystal glass, 10ATM water resistance, IP68 protection, and MIL-STD-810H durability testing. Its health and fitness tools include heart rate monitoring, sleep coaching, Energy Score, Running Coach, body composition analysis, temperature sensing, and ECG support, where available. This model is best suited to Android users who regularly run, hike, cycle, or train outdoors and want cellular access without carrying a phone. The larger battery, rugged construction, bright display, and dedicated Quick Button also make it a stronger option than Samsung’s regular Galaxy Watch models for extended workouts and demanding environments. Grab the Titanium Blue Galaxy Watch Ultra before the Prime Day price resets: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) [Sold and Shipped by Amazon] Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Google begins rolling out its post-Epic Play Store billing model next week by Karthik Mudaliar Google has confirmed that its redesigned Play Store billing and fee structure will take effect on June 30, 2026, in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Economic Area. The changes will let eligible developers offer their own payment systems or send users to an external website for purchases, while separating Google’s platform service fee from the cost of using Google Play Billing. The rollout puts concrete dates and detailed rate cards behind the broader Android policy overhaul Google announced in March. That announcement followed a proposed settlement with Epic Games intended to resolve their long-running disputes over app distribution and payments, although the U.S. portion of the agreement still requires court approval. Under the new billing choice program, developers selling digital content or services can display an alternative payment option alongside Google Play Billing. They may also direct users to their own websites to complete a purchase. Developers can use Google’s standard payment-choice screen or design one that complies with the company’s user-interface rules. Choosing another payment processor does not eliminate Google’s cut altogether. The company will continue charging a service fee for transactions associated with apps distributed through Google Play, regardless of whether payment is handled by Google, an alternative provider, or a developer’s website. Google argues that this fee covers the value and infrastructure provided by Android and the Play Store. For developers earning up to $1 million annually, the service fee will generally be 10 percent. That rate also applies to auto-renewing subscriptions. When Google Play Billing is used in the U.S., U.K., or EEA, Google will add a separate 5 percent billing fee, and developers processing payments elsewhere will not pay that additional charge. This means Google’s familiar flat 30 percent commission is disappearing, but developers will not necessarily see a dramatic reduction on every transaction. An in-app purchase from an existing user processed through Google Play Billing can still reach a combined 30 percent. The biggest savings are likely to come from subscriptions, smaller developers covered by the $1 million tier, and companies able to move customers to their own payment infrastructure. Google is also offering lower rates through its Apps Experience and revamped Games Level Up programs. Apps and games that satisfy the company’s requirements can qualify for 15 percent service fees on new-install transactions and 20 percent on existing-install transactions. The criteria include performance and reliability standards, support for additional Android device categories, and selected platform features. Those program rates are scheduled to become available in the initial markets and Australia on September 30. For consumers, the immediate effect will depend on whether developers adopt alternative payments and pass any savings on through lower prices. For developers, however, June 30 begins a more flexible but considerably more complicated Play Store economy in which distribution, billing, install dates, revenue thresholds, and program participation can each affect Google’s final cut. Google is also separately developing a Registered App Stores program designed to simplify the installation of qualifying third-party stores. That initiative is expected to arrive with a major Android release later in 2026 and will launch outside the U.S. first. Google says the rest of the world will receive the changes by September 30, 2027, although billing rates for markets outside the US, UK, and EEA have not yet been announced.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!