Recommended Posts

Last Saturday, I took the plunge and bought an 21.5 inch low-end model iMac. Here's a review of the machine for those interested. (Mac OS and the related user experience isn't discussed in this review--You either like it or you don't, and there are far better articles out there that describe it in depth.)

Background

My last computer was a Rev. A MacBook purchased in June 2006. I primarily use and prefer Mac OS, but I've worked frequently with Windows and have no problem with using it. I mostly use my computer for web browsing and chatting (these days). Other things I do include basic word processing for school and some web development. I consider myself pretty good with computers on an amateur level.

I decided to get an iMac over a Mac laptop because it offers better specs for approximately the same cost.

Specifications

- Intel Core i3 at 3.06GHz (probably a 540)

- 4GB (2x 2GB) of 1333MHz DDR3 SDRAM, four slots for up to 16GB

- ATI Radeon HD 4670 with 256MB of GDDR3 memory

- 21.5 inch widescreen display with an IPS panel and LED backlight, native resolution at 1920x1080

- 500GB 7200-rpm SATA hard drive

- Slot-loading SuperDrive, SDXC card slot, iSight webcam, internal speakers / mic, AirPort Extreme with support for 802.11n, Bluetooth 2.1 + EDR

- 4x USB 2.0, 1x FireWire 800, Mini DisplayPort, Gigabit Ethernet, headphones port, line in

- Comes with Magic Mouse and Apple Wireless Keyboard

I also bought a Moshi ClearGuard CS for the keyboard.

First Impressions

Coming from a 13 inch MacBook, the 21.5 inch screen is massive. The industrial design and packaging are what you would expect of Apple, but mine has a minor cosmetic defect that I didn't catch while checking the machine in the store. Setting the machine up couldn't be simpler: Plug in the power cord, turn on the mouse and keyboard (batteries already in place), press the power button, follow the on-screen instructions, and it's all set. The whole process, including unboxing, took less than ten minutes.

The Screen

The screen, despite a defect (read on), feels very good during normal use. Everything looks crisp and text looks great. The maximum brightness is blindingly bright, but unlike my old MacBook, turning the brightness all the way down does not turn off the backlight. (I now use Ctrl+Shift+Eject to turn off the display.) Since it has a glass front, the glare is horrible, especially with low brightness (I can see a silhouette of myself), but seeing as the machine will be staying indoors, it's not a major issue for me. The viewing angle is excellent.

Now, the defect: There have been many reports of a yellow tinge on iMac screens, and apparently mine has it too. According to a serial number decoder, my iMac was manufactured this month. For me, it isn't noticeable during normal use, however performing a test for the issue shows that it's present.

I'm not returning the machine because the issue doesn't bother me too much and doesn't seem to worsen as the display stays on for longer (some people report that to be the case), and also because local AASPs (no official Apple retail presence here) seem reluctant to deal with the issue properly. However, if it gets worse / noticeable, I'm certainly going to go to Apple about it.

What this amounts to is that if you're a casual user, the display is great. But if you do any serious work with graphics / images at all, you should probably skip this model or demand a perfect machine until you are sure you have one.

The Keyboard and the Mouse

I've always loved my MacBook's keyboard, and since this one is basically the same thing with some minor differences, I find it just as good--Well, almost. Apple had hard-coded a feature into their keyboards that made Caps Lock harder to trigger accidentally. While most people appreciate the feature, as one of the few people who do [Caps] -> [Letter] -> [Caps] to type capital letters (I know it's silly), this has proven to be pretty annoying.

The Magic Mouse is a love or hate thing, and personally I like it a lot. Instead of trying to rest my hand on it's surface, I find myself leaving it on my desk, holding it with my thumb and ring finger only when I need to move the pointer. Inertial scrolling feels great (I just leave it on the desk and flick my index finger across the surface), and there are third-party tools that turn the mouse into a multi-touch Swiss Army knife, though personally I don't see the appeal. There seems to be some intermittent issues with the iMac being unable to detect the mouse after I switch it off and turn it back on, though so far it hasn't become much of a problem yet. EDIT: After turning it back on, click to get the mouse detected.

The ClearGuard I got for my keyboard worsens the tactile feedback considerably. If you are someone who has very clean hands and good hygiene, I'd suggest not getting it. However, considering how dirty my MacBook keyboard became, I'm reluctant to take it off. I don't see other solutions superior to Moshi's offering, though.

Performance

Seeing as I don't perform many hardware-intensive tasks, it's hard for me to gauge the iMac's performance. Booting up is quick, though there's an odd 5-second-ish pause between pressing the power button and hearing the startup chime / seeing the screen light up. Subjectively, the machine feels very snappy during everyday tasks.

The Radeon HD 4670 is (according to other reviews) a substantial improvement from the integrated GeForce 9400M previously offered in the low-end model, but I don't have games to test it with. It's worthy to note that the card's still inferior compared to those of PCs in the same range.

The iMac runs very quietly. The top of the machine is very warm / hot to the touch, but from what I've been reading, it's normal. I just hope there are mechanisms in place to prevent overheating.

Conclusion

The iMac is a pleasure to use, and despite some issues, it largely holds up to my expectations. For what I do, the thing is a massive overkill, however if funds are not a issue, it's a great computer for the casual user who occasionally needs more power.

Pros

- Great user experience all around if you like Apple's way of doing things

- Good value for money for a Mac (Apple Tax isn't going away any time soon)

Cons

- Pricey--It's about twice as expensive as a similarly spec'ed PC

- Widespread reports of screen defects make it completely unsuitable for graphics work, or anyone who is picky about their displays

- You may really hate the Magic Mouse

Pictures

Taken with a camera phone, so please excuse the quality.

DSC00005.JPG

The iMac (and my lamp and headphones :p)

DSC00006.JPG

The Apple Wireless Keyboard (with ClearGuard) and the Magic Mouse

DSC00004.JPG

The cosmetic defect

Any questions, please ask. :) I may possibly update this review in a few weeks to report on my impressions after using it for a while.

Reviews from others

Engadget (glowing)

CNET (3.5/5 stars)

Macworld (4/5 mice)

Additional Observations

9/7 - The ports on the back are pretty hard to reach, but Hell will have to freeze over before Steve Jobs lets ports be placed on the front.

9/7 - Magic Mouse and Apple Wireless Keyboard are both heavy on the batteries: 89% left on the mouse, 92% on the keyboard (accuracy unknown).

9/7 - If you place two fingers on the Magic Mouse at the same time, your click is always interpreted as a left click. So far I haven't found that an issue, but some people might. (It's a technical limitation though--The mouse has no way of knowing which finger you pressed down with.)

9/19 - The keyboard arbitrarily disconnects a couple of times each day. Not a huge problem, but a nuisance nonetheless.

9/19 - The power usage of the mouse and the keyboard aren't as bad as I'd thought, at least according to the stats provided by the OS.

9/19 - Haven't been noticing the yellow tinge at all, even if I look for it.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/935788-imac/
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

i'd be curious what you think of the graphics card capaiblities since i'd like to try out some light gaming on it.

I don't have graphic intensive games to test it with, but Age of Empires III for Mac runs smoothly with everything on the highest settings supported. The Macworld review says that "the new $1199 iMac, with its dedicated ATI Radeon HD 4670 graphics processor, has its biggest performance gain in graphics performance, with a frame rate in our Call of Duty 4 test that was near four times that of the older 3.06GHz Core 2 Duo iMac, which uses an integrated nVidia GeForce 9400M graphics processor." In actual statistics, they "ran a Timedemo at 1024-by-768 with 4X anti-aliasing on in Call of Duty 4," getting 81.3 fps.

Here's a screenshot of how Age of Empires looks. Whereas my old MacBook (naturally) lagged horribly at this stage, the game was still running very smoothly. (Yes I cheated, in order to take the screenshot.)

http://img541.imageshack.us/img541/2343/screenshotev.png (3.5 MB)

Keep in mind that it's a Radeon HD 4670 with only 256MB of RAM, and graphics drivers are generally inferior in Mac OS. These factors may affect the performance of newer games.

On a unrelated note, the machine's really quiet--The only time it was apparently audible was when I was disc burning. My brother's laptop, which is further away from me, sounds much louder from where I sit.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/935788-imac/#findComment-593175964
Share on other sites

Booting up is quick, though there's an odd 5-second-ish pause between pressing the power button and hearing the startup chime / seeing the screen light up.

My 27" iMac does this too. The startup chime signifies that the internal diagnostics have passed successfully (I think it checks the very core components - CPU, motherboard, etc), so I guess the tests on this machine take longer to complete than on other machines?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/935788-imac/#findComment-593175986
Share on other sites

On a unrelated note, the machine's really quiet--The only time it was apparently audible was when I was disc burning. My brother's laptop, which is further away from me, sounds much louder from where I sit.

That seems great at first, but ends up being a major flaw. You will want to turn the fans up some. Believe me.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/935788-imac/#findComment-593175992
Share on other sites

That seems great at first, but ends up being a major flaw. You will want to turn the fans up some. Believe me.

What do you do with your computer though? Will watching YouTube videos make my computer overheat? :s (That's what always cranked up the fans in my old MacBook. I think it's the hardware acceleration and whatnot that's making the difference.)

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/935788-imac/#findComment-593176030
Share on other sites

What do you do with your computer though? Will watching YouTube videos make my computer overheat? :s (That's what always cranked up the fans in my old MacBook. I think it's the hardware acceleration and whatnot that's making the difference.)

I've got the previous C2D iMac, and the fans have only ever decided to go full-tilt on me when I left it running for a week by accident. :rofl:

Other than that it's quiet, but it's definitely very warm to the touch.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/935788-imac/#findComment-593176040
Share on other sites

Other than that it's quiet, but it's definitely very warm to the touch.

Yeah if the outside is that warm imagine how hot it is inside.

I recommend using the istat pro dashboard widget and check your temps occasionally. On stock fan speeds the iMacs get very hot quickly. Atleast my 24" one does. So warm that the screen burns in.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/935788-imac/#findComment-593176078
Share on other sites

First, congratulations on your purchase.

I have the last of the iMac 24's, and it also heats up, but this is not usually a problem because my office temp is set at 68 degrees.

Also there is the problem of the screen burn in when it gets warm, however, when you turn off the machine or put it to sleep it clear up. I do heavy work in the area of editing books for a couple of large publishing houses so my machine get a great deal of daily use. Also, iTunes is running during working hours (need the music to keep me focused on my work), hence, that adds to the heating situation.

Look forward to hear what you have to say after a couple of weeks. :yes:

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/935788-imac/#findComment-593176214
Share on other sites

My friend wanted to get a Mac for video, picture and music editing. He also wanted to be able to play some FPS games since Steam had just come out for Mac at the time but his budget for the computer was only good enough for the basic low end iMac which we both agreed was not powerful enough. So we decided to build a custom PC instead. There is such a difference in what you can buy in PC parts compared to the Mac in total. We managed to create a great computer with amazing specs and most are future proofed as well. I have always wanted a Mac just to play with but I could never deal with the cost of one :( Only way I can see myself getting one is if I ever had an extra soul or two to sell to Steve Jobs :p

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/935788-imac/#findComment-593192680
Share on other sites

Dose anyone know if the screen problem is wide spread on the high end 27 inch model? I rather have a nice screen for my photos to do work on if possible, but yeah, I love Macs, just too damn costly for the specs, lol.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/935788-imac/#findComment-593193302
Share on other sites

Dose anyone know if the screen problem is wide spread on the high end 27 inch model? I rather have a nice screen for my photos to do work on if possible, but yeah, I love Macs, just too damn costly for the specs, lol.

Hey there, I purchased a (refurbished)27" and did not encounter the screen issue at all, and I did run the tests to check for it. The only issue with the screen was a fleck of dust behind the glass.

<rant>

I had the machine for nearly 2 months before I returned it for a full refund, without a restocking fee. Not due to a defect but misinformation from an Apple rep which led to an incorrect purchase to replace a machine (Macbook Pro) that really wasn't as 'dead' as he would have liked me to believe.

The only thing I miss is the amazing display, and that mouse/keyboard. The main downside is that while they admitted their mistake, I still had to pay return shipping, and I had to rebuild my PC desktop which I had actually sold off to a friend.

</rant>

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/935788-imac/#findComment-593193444
Share on other sites

I'm looking into getting one of these since i'm fed up with Windows and want to try macs.

Nice review, i'd be curious what you think of the graphics card capaiblities since i'd like to try out some light gaming on it.

So you think you can somehow "escape" from a problem by buying a Mac?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/935788-imac/#findComment-593193974
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Update: My impression after a few weeks

It's been some 1.5 months since I got the iMac, so I thought I'd update the review with some of my current impressions, after the "new gadget" feeling has worn off.

- The problem with the wireless keyboard arbitrarily disconnecting got annoying. Turning the keyboard off and back on didn't fix it, nor did taking out the batteries and putting them back in, or repairing it with the iMac. A few days ago, on a whim, I tried swapping the batteries of the keyboard and the Magic Mouse around, and somehow (knock wood) it seems to have fixed it. I haven't experienced any disconnections in the past few days.

- I'm still amazed by the machine's quietness. I really can't hear it at all, and so far (again, knock wood) no issues with overheating.

- Still not noticing the yellow tinge. :)

- This is not an issue for me, but if you're getting an iMac and want to keep the machine pristine, be careful when you plug things into the ports on the back. The aluminium case gets scratched easily.

- My biggest gripe with the machine now is actually not related to the iMac itself, but rather with Mac OS. 99% of the time, it's really fast--Safari opens without "bouncing" in the dock even if it's a cold start, and I'm really enjoying how I can watch YouTube videos without having my CPU fan spin up like crazy. However, there seem to be more arbitrary beachballs than there were on my old MacBook with Leopard. But since this is a software issue, I look forward to seeing it improved as bugs get fixed.

In summary, I'm arguably happier with the machine now than I was when I just bought it, since I'm no longer that worried about all the issues I heard about before I made my purchase. It's a great computer.

(Though I've also been liking Windows 7 more and more as I got more chances to use it, heh.)

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/935788-imac/#findComment-593278002
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The sweet release of death has never looked more appealing.
    • Meh, just another dongle-haven downgrade compared to my Surface Pro 7+. Whenever I decide to upgrade in the next decade or so, it certainly won't be another microslop Surface with this enshitification trend they've been having after the Surface Pro 7+. Hopefully a future generation of the Framework 12 will be a real upgrade...
    • This could exactly be how our Sun ends but it's not as simple by Sayan Sen Image by Drew Rae via Pexels An international team led by Université de Montréal (University of Montreal) PhD student Érika Le Bourdais has found that the ancient white dwarf star LSPM J0207+3331 is still pulling in planetary debris, even though it has been cooling for about three billion years. White dwarfs are dense, Earth-sized stellar remnants left behind when Sun-like stars exhaust their nuclear fuel and shed their outer layers. The star, located 145 light-years away in the constellation Triangulum, is the oldest and coldest white dwarf known to have a surrounding disk of dust. The star was first spotted in 2019 by a citizen scientist through the Backyard Worlds: Planet 9 project. Its cool temperature immediately suggested that it was very old, since white dwarfs gradually lose heat over time. Using the W. M. Keck telescopes in Hawaii, astronomers later confirmed that the star shows infrared signals consistent with dust rings formed by asteroids breaking apart under its strong gravity. Such infrared excesses occur when a star emits more infrared light than expected, often because warm dust surrounding it absorbs and re-radiates energy. “This discovery challenges our understanding of planetary system evolution,” said Le Bourdais. “The fact that we still see planetary debris being accreted three billion years after the star became a white dwarf suggests that asteroids, comets, and even planets can remain in orbit around these stars for a very long time.” Spectroscopic analysis—a technique that studies light to identify the chemical elements present in an object—revealed thirteen heavy elements in the star’s atmosphere: sodium, magnesium, aluminium, silicon, calcium, titanium, chromium, manganese, iron, cobalt, nickel, copper, and strontium. Normally, heavy elements sink quickly in hydrogen-rich white dwarfs, making them hard to detect. “We expected to see only a few elements, but we found dozens!” explained Le Bourdais. The research paper adds more detail. The absence of carbon features suggests the debris came from a carbon-volatile-depleted source. The abundance pattern shows slight deficits of magnesium and silicon compared to iron but otherwise resembles Earth-like material. This points to a differentiated rocky body—one whose materials have separated into distinct layers such as a metallic core and rocky mantle—with a metallic core fraction higher than Earth’s. In other words, the star is accreting the remains of a large rocky object, similar in structure to Earth or the asteroid Vesta. “White dwarfs offer one of the only ways we can directly measure the composition of exoplanets,” said Patrick Dufour, co-author and professor at Université de Montréal. “When planetary debris come too close, they are torn apart by the star’s gravity and end up polluting its atmosphere, leaving a detailed chemical fingerprint of its composition.” The team also detected weak Ca II H & K line core emission, making this only the second known isolated polluted white dwarf to show this feature. These are specific spectral signatures produced by ionised calcium and can indicate unusual physical activity in a star’s upper atmosphere. The finding suggests that extra physical processes may be happening in or above the star’s upper atmosphere. The study stresses the importance of including heavy elements in model atmosphere calculations, since leaving them out can distort the inferred structure and lead to inaccurate stellar parameters. Earlier work suggested the star’s infrared excess came from two dust rings. The new analysis shows that a single silicate dust disk—a ring composed largely of rock-forming minerals rich in silicon and oxygen—can explain the observed signal at 11.6 μm, simplifying the picture of the system’s structure. The question of how debris ended up falling into the star so late remains open. One idea is that giant planets in the system slowly destabilised smaller bodies over billions of years. Another possibility is that a passing star disturbed the orbits of debris. “Future observations with the James Webb Space Telescope or archival data found in the European Space Agency’s Gaia mission could help distinguish between a planetary rearrangement and the gravitational effect of a close stellar encounter,” said John Debes, co-author and researcher at the Space Telescope Science Institute. Dufour noted that hydrogen-rich white dwarfs are the most common type, and the coolest among them are the oldest stars in the galaxy. “We didn't have the habit of looking for signs of accretion in them. This unique case motivates us to expand our search to more of these stars.” The findings show that even after billions of years, planetary systems can remain active and complex. Substantial accretion events—the gradual accumulation of surrounding material onto a celestial object—can still occur long after a star’s death, offering a rare window into the composition and fate of distant worlds. Source: University of Montreal, IOPScience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Doesn't DDG mainly use Bing?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Week One Done
      oliviaexpo earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      485
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      228
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      70
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      58
    5. 5
      neufuse
      56
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!