About complex network architecture design and its term


Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I have few questions puzzling me for few weeks, hope someone can guide me through as the scenario below:

Background:

Enterprise terminal clients (PC/laptop) most likely will classify into Active Directory/Cluster/Domain, and they use site-to-site VPN connection many times, this would be easier to take care of. The overall network architecture is as below:

Center -> Local Branch AD/Cluster/Domain, joined by local system with different department object unit (OU) in the domain -> these users/clients will need to grant access into specify domain in the entire AD because they are categariezed into different department/team/group.

-> Different region may have many AD/Cluster/Domain, they sometime have trusted bridge connection or site-to-site VPN connection in order to fastern certain process that need time to travel all the way back to Center

Case 1:

If one of the client system is transferring from one outlet / branch to the other one, would it be fine if this client system removed from the old domain/AD? Would that impact the entire network structure?

Case 2:

If one of the server that has a site-to-site VPN connection / trusted bridge connection to another branch, and eventually they decided to brake up the 2, what is/are the impact and would this affect the connectivity from Center to both these branches (in term of server connection). How or what should have done to avoid this?

Queries:

My udnerstanding is in AD, there are many different type of domains that served different purpose. And every single system/server is consider as object unit (OU) and they would join to either one of the domain in the AD in order to share data.

If the enterprise is big enough, and the server/major system will brake into Cluster.

-> What is/are the differences of Active Directory and Domain?

-> They is a domain controller and how can this affect the entire network structure?

Thank you all.

Regards,

A Domain is a group of computing systems or services on a network based on DNS and are most likely to be under single Administrative Control. Where, computing Systems may include any computer that the organization have, and Computing Serivces may represent any network services that is made available with the support of DNS.

Microsoft Active Directory is a repository (think of it as a database) of AD objects (resources and security principles) stored or managed in a hierarchical structure (like a tree structure). AD objects can be organized and managed into AD with help of Sites, Forests, and Domains, OUs.

I will add more as I get time.

Wow I hope you aren't charging people for your time. I don't know where to begin with what's wrong with that.

I'll have a go anyway as much as I can be bothered . . .

If one of the client system is transferring from one outlet / branch to the other one, would it be fine if this client system removed from the old domain/AD? Would that impact the entire network structure?

How or what should have done to avoid this?

Intersite replication perhaps? A basic of AD. Read up on what a domain is first and not domain name. You really need to understand the basics

They is a domain controller and how can this affect the entire network structure?

Expand please, It wont affect your "Network Infastructure" It would affect your domain infastruture ALOT

My udnerstanding is in AD, there are many different type of domains that served different purpose. And every single system/server is consider as object unit (OU) and they would join to either one of the domain in the AD in order to share data.

If the enterprise is big enough, and the server/major system will brake into Cluster.

Again NO! It doesnt break into cluster automatically. Again I think you need to read up on Windows clustering. And No thats not what an OU is.

You have a lot to understand about Active Directory and Domains

Where did you get this from??

"Enterprise terminal clients (PC/laptop) most likely will classify into Active Directory/Cluster/Domain"

Is this something you wrote?? Or is it out of some book?? To be honest its pretty much gibberish..

"Local Branch AD/Cluster/Domain, joined by local system with different department object unit (OU) in the domain"

Again --- Where did this come from.. Its Gibberish as well.

"Case 1:

If one of the client system is transferring from one outlet / branch to the other one, would it be fine if this client system removed from the old domain/AD? Would that impact the entire network structure?"

How I'm reading this. Can you move a client system (Member PC) from one Active directory domain to another.. Yes this is not a problem never was, never will be.. What impact would it have on the network structure??? Um that would be ZERO, a client means nothing -- there can be hundreds to thousands of them, they have nothing to do with the network structure at all. Worse case is if there were other clients that need to talk to this client. But as far as AD goes clients (Member PCs) have nothing to do with anything.

Case 2?? have no idea what your talking about.. Sure you can have location to location network connections.. But without understanding your overall connection topology its impossible to say what impact if any it would have.. You have not laid out any sort of topology for network connectivity between locations, nor any sort of AD Hierarchy. Are these locations part of the same forest? Are their trusts between forests or domains? Are they child domains, etc.

"there are many different type of domains that served different purpose"

Serve different purposes?? I believe your talking about a Forest, or domain or a child domain - as to serving different purposes??? Not sure what your asking??

'If the enterprise is big enough, and the server/major system will brake into Cluster"

Again at loss to understand what your wanting to ask even? Yes if the need is there then you might want to cluster servers to provide for High Availability.. But this really has nothing to directly do with Active directory. Clustering is a way to provide for fail over or load balancing.

"> What is/are the differences of Active Directory and Domain?"

Again are you confusing the term domain as used within active directory with general DNS (Domain Naming System) as used on the internet for example neowin.net is a domain?

A domain in active directory refers to all objects in a common database, now you never even mention Trees which would be either a single domain, or domain and its children -- ie all domains that fall under the same namespace. And you also make no mention of Forests which would be made up of trees and represent the security boundary of an active directory.

As to how a Domain Controller affects network structure?? Again not sure what your asking.. Network structure is outside the hierarchy of a AD structure. Yes normally you would design your active directory around your current network structure. For placement of DCs and breakup of sites, etc. But your AD structure does not dictate your network structure -- but network structure might dictate placements of of your DCs

Its not always about what the OP understands, but who else might read the thread and pickup some info, etc. ;)

Exactly! I love reading over various networking threads, especially those you have commented on. Not sure if I'll ever be a system admin, but I'm studying management information systems right now so I'm familiar (not an expert) in most of the information being discussed. With this topic, I definitely learned more about AD's. :p

Where did you get this from??

"Enterprise terminal clients (PC/laptop) most likely will classify into Active Directory/Cluster/Domain"

Is this something you wrote?? Or is it out of some book?? To be honest its pretty much gibberish..

"Local Branch AD/Cluster/Domain, joined by local system with different department object unit (OU) in the domain"

Again --- Where did this come from.. Its Gibberish as well.

"Case 1:

If one of the client system is transferring from one outlet / branch to the other one, would it be fine if this client system removed from the old domain/AD? Would that impact the entire network structure?"

How I'm reading this. Can you move a client system (Member PC) from one Active directory domain to another.. Yes this is not a problem never was, never will be.. What impact would it have on the network structure??? Um that would be ZERO, a client means nothing -- there can be hundreds to thousands of them, they have nothing to do with the network structure at all. Worse case is if there were other clients that need to talk to this client. But as far as AD goes clients (Member PCs) have nothing to do with anything.

Case 2?? have no idea what your talking about.. Sure you can have location to location network connections.. But without understanding your overall connection topology its impossible to say what impact if any it would have.. You have not laid out any sort of topology for network connectivity between locations, nor any sort of AD Hierarchy. Are these locations part of the same forest? Are their trusts between forests or domains? Are they child domains, etc.

"there are many different type of domains that served different purpose"

Serve different purposes?? I believe your talking about a Forest, or domain or a child domain - as to serving different purposes??? Not sure what your asking??

'If the enterprise is big enough, and the server/major system will brake into Cluster"

Again at loss to understand what your wanting to ask even? Yes if the need is there then you might want to cluster servers to provide for High Availability.. But this really has nothing to directly do with Active directory. Clustering is a way to provide for fail over or load balancing.

"> What is/are the differences of Active Directory and Domain?"

Again are you confusing the term domain as used within active directory with general DNS (Domain Naming System) as used on the internet for example neowin.net is a domain?

A domain in active directory refers to all objects in a common database, now you never even mention Trees which would be either a single domain, or domain and its children -- ie all domains that fall under the same namespace. And you also make no mention of Forests which would be made up of trees and represent the security boundary of an active directory.

As to how a Domain Controller affects network structure?? Again not sure what your asking.. Network structure is outside the hierarchy of a AD structure. Yes normally you would design your active directory around your current network structure. For placement of DCs and breakup of sites, etc. But your AD structure does not dictate your network structure -- but network structure might dictate placements of of your DCs

:blush:

Thanks Budman and yes, sorry to say, basic network knowledge is fine for me, but to be honest, those are kinda unknown to me. Sincerely thanks for your precious time replying with comprehensive points and questions that make me think and learn more.

I will try to sort all the questions that were put back to me one by one with my friend ~ Google. Thanks, hope the next time i come here again with different level of network knowledge :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
    • Windows 11 gets new audio improvements in the latest builds by Taras Buria Today's Experimental builds (26H1 and Future Platforms, formerly Canary) pack several audio-related improvements. If your device is enrolled in the Experimental Channel (26H1), you can download build 28120.2315, while those in the Future Platforms version have build 29613.1000 to try. Here is what is new in build 29613.1000: [Audio] Following up on our previous improvements, we’re making some more adjustments to Settings > System > Sounds based on your feedback. Namely, we’ve updated the “All sound devices” page so: You now have the ability to change default devices from this page. Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. We’ve adjusted the page design slightly so now you can filter whether you’re viewing input or output devices. We’ve added toggles so you can choose if you want to hide or show disabled, disconnected, and unplugged devices on this page. We’ve also updated the input and output audio properties page for devices in Settings to now include jack information for those that need it. And here is the changelog for build 28120.2315: This update includes a small number of minor bug fixes and improvements. [Accessibility] This update improves caption style responsiveness by redrawing captions immediately for caption style changes. If no current caption is visible, a sample caption string is displayed. [Audio] This update improves the reliability of the inbox HD Audio driver. You can find the official release notes for build 28120.2315 here and for build 29613.1000 here.
    • I agree with what I think you are saying, just not in the way you are saying it. Like any tool, the amount it represents your work is perorational to the effort you put into it. It is similar to why 2nd grade math students learning to add and subtract are not allowed to use calculators, but a high-school calculous student is. For the 2nd grader, that tool would completely replace the work they are doing, for the calculous student the same tool allows them to work far more effectively while in no way replacing their effort or knowable. If you spend 30 seconds writing a prompt, then the image that comes out is no more "yours" than if you found the same image with a Google Image search. However, many of these generative tools also support highly iterative processes that allow back and forth, and merging generated images with photos or human created images. I am sure you would agree that a human spending hours of time working on a project, even if AI was involved in the process, still reflects that human's work.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      575
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      189
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      78
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!