Batman 3 "The Dark Knight Rises"


Recommended Posts

Um, HIGHLY impractical. Yes, she made it, but the material prevented her from filming for more than a few minute at a time. not to mention that all that shine makes it really hard to blend into the night ;)

So, basically, you're saying her suit was impractical because of "real life" reasons like that? That would also mean batman's suit was impractical as well, because it was a big, thick, rubber suit that didn't allow michael keaton to turn his head (much like the suit in batman begins, but that one was supposedly much lighter lol). All of these super hero costumes, for all intents and purposes, are impractical. However, in the movie itself, I didn't see it as impractical. I saw it for what it was in that "world." Our world? Yeah, no way it'd work, in the movie world though, different story. Plus, Michelle Pfeiffer was hot back then, so we ignored it anyway lol.

An inside source is claiming that Tom Hardy's Bane will do what his comics counterpart famously did to Batman and break his back in the first act of the movie. This seems more or less completely ridiculous, considering Batman would then have to be more or less completely absent from a good chunk of the movie. Still, breaking the Bat is the one iconic thing Bane ever did, so this rumor is unlikely to go away anytime soon. [ComicBookMovie]

Meanwhile, a couple shooting locations have emerged. The mayor of Bucharest, Romania, has announced that Christopher Nolan will be filming some scenes in Bucharest, as well as a few others elsewhere in central Romania. One reported location includes the salt mine in Turda, which may (or much more likely may not) be significant. Also, another inside source says the movie will film inside London's Pinewood Studios, and that the filming will involve "one of the biggest sets ever built at the studios in Pinewood since it's been open." Considering Nolan's previous track record, the use of Pinewood itself is hardly unrealistic, nor is the construction of a gigantic set, but both of these should just be considered rumors for now. [Man of Steel Movie News]

Finally, star Christian Bale has softened on the topic of Batman 4, saying that, as long as Christopher Nolan wants to do it, he's on board:

"All I know is the likelihood that this will be the last one. Well, I wouldn't say definitely. If Chris goes, 'Hey, I've got another story I think could be interesting,' then yeah, great, I'd go do that. I always assumed it would be three, but I could be wrong."

[Worst Previews]

An inside source is claiming that Tom Hardy's Bane will do what his comics counterpart famously did to Batman and break his back in the first act of the movie. This seems more or less completely ridiculous, considering Batman would then have to be more or less completely absent from a good chunk of the movie. Still, breaking the Bat is the one iconic thing Bane ever did, so this rumor is unlikely to go away anytime soon. [ComicBookMovie]

[Worst Previews]

THat's what i've been saying all along! It's how it ends!!! :angry: :angry:

anyway off topic: Rappeh, thrice teh band? Or just Thrice?

THat's what i've been saying all along! It's how it ends!!! :angry: :angry:

anyway off topic: Rappeh, thrice teh band? Or just Thrice?

Conan's Chat Show is starting a campaign to get Thrice to be used more in real life :p

So, basically, you're saying her suit was impractical because of "real life" reasons like that? That would also mean batman's suit was impractical as well, because it was a big, thick, rubber suit that didn't allow michael keaton to turn his head (much like the suit in batman begins, but that one was supposedly much lighter lol). All of these super hero costumes, for all intents and purposes, are impractical. However, in the movie itself, I didn't see it as impractical. I saw it for what it was in that "world." Our world? Yeah, no way it'd work, in the movie world though, different story. Plus, Michelle Pfeiffer was hot back then, so we ignored it anyway lol.

Um, how is a jewel thief supposed to steal when their suit is shiny as hell and squeaks ;)

I can see how the movie would play out if Batman's back is broken at the beginning of the movie. First, I can see another animated movie which chronicles Bane's arrival in Gotham, his rise in the underworld, ending with the showdown between Bane and Batman. The movie would pick up there, and ends with Bane breaking Bruce's back. The first part of the movie would focus on the injured Bruce leaving Gotham in order to recover and to rebuild Batman (which fits the whereisbrucewayne.com domain mentioned during the summer). The second part of the movie would be about Batman's return to a Gotham, dealing with Catwoman, and finally taking down Bane.

With all this talk about Catwoman, people seem to be missing the very big detail that Anne Hathaway was cast as "Selena Kyle" and "not" Catwoman. Sure, they might use that to throw us off, but honestly, I'd be surprised if "Catwoman" is actually in the movie for any significant amount of time. But hey, it's all just speculation anyway I guess.

Tim Burton directed Batman and Batman Returns.

Michelle-Pfeiffer-catwoman-selina-kyle-8971857-446-480.jpg

Michelle Pfeiffer pulled it off. I just don't see how Anne will fit the role, but maybe I will eat my words in 2 years.

man that photo invites some serios photoshopping :shiftyninja:

Robin Williams for 'Dark Knight Rises'?

Robin Williams will appear as Dr Hugo Strange in The Dark Knight Rises, insiders have suggested.

The 59-year-old comedian, who came close to securing both the role of The Joker in Tim Burton's 1990 re-imagining and The Riddler in 1995's Batman Forever, is believed to be the subject of a tantalising tweet from Batman On Film which teases: "RW as Strange? Hmm..."

Batman News has noted that the poster correctly identified the presence of Bane in Christopher Nolan's superhero sequel prior to the confirmation of Tom Hardy's casting in the role. The website adds that another reliable source has frequently claimed that Strange will make an appearance.

Insiders have previously hinted that the Rises plot will be based on comic-book storyline 'Prey', in which Strange is portrayed as a psychotic psychologist tasked with helping Gotham police capture Batman.

Williams stated last summer that he would "do Batman in a second" should he be offered a part.

The Dark Knight Rises, which includes Anne Hathaway's Catwoman amongst its confirmed villains, is due for release on July 20, 2012.

Source

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Maradona if hydration breaks had existed in Mexico 86.
    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!