Batman 3 "The Dark Knight Rises"


Recommended Posts

nevermind it IS actually another trailer... just SAW it wow!

Warner Bros might as well put it up online early, to ease everyone's pain.

Can NEVER undertand the corps attitude in taking down videos while it is what generates buzz!

nevermind it IS actually another trailer... just SAW it wow!

Warner Bros might as well put it up online early, to ease everyone's pain.

Can NEVER undertand the corps attitude in taking down videos while it is what generates buzz!

Well in this case they are prob hoping someone will go see the Sherlock movie to see the trailer. Just like to see the prolouge you have to goto some special IMAX theater...

You seemed to!

Nope:

I am not watching the opening sequence as it will, for me, ruin the movie.

I however, somehow want to watch the trailer.

But I may not watch it either. I am sooo hyped.

Did the same with Inception. Never saw the trailer until I saw the movie itself.

I dont know about russians but in a lot of countries it's common for people to use two first names. I have two first names for example.

Two first names isn't bad, but in the case I highlighted a first name is used as surname. It's definitely not common in Russia.

Damn, always late to the good stuff, guess i'll try and hunt it down online somewhere.

*Edit* Just saw it, quality is bad and the audio etc so it hurts the trailer, with a good HD version we'll get a real idea of things. Besides, trailers don't really do movies justice, some movies have good ones and are actually good but just as many (if not more) have good looking trailers but end up being average or below average movies (or just suck bad).

It's always better to just see the movie itself if you think you'll enjoy it.

  • Like 1

Two first names isn't bad, but in the case I highlighted a first name is used as surname. It's definitely not common in Russia.

It's all based on a comic book. There are way more things other than the names that are not very realistic. Seems a bit unnecessary to nitpick a characters name and how authentic it may or may not be.

What's wrong with making things authentic?

Nothing is wrong with it, but if you're going to blame someone, blame the person that created the character, not the movie maker. If you want to nitpick about names, just look at the main character "Bruce Wayne". Both "Bruce" and "Wayne" are first names. Just because it may not be common doesn't mean it doesn't (or won't ever) happen (I don't know anything about Russia or Russian names, just saying).

Nothing is wrong with it, but if you're going to blame someone, blame the person that created the character, not the movie maker. If you want to nitpick about names, just look at the main character "Bruce Wayne". Both "Bruce" and "Wayne" are first names. Just because it may not be common doesn't mean it doesn't (or won't ever) happen (I don't know anything about Russia or Russian names, just saying).

As I said in the initial post, I didn't know that it is based on a comics book character. English names are different though, because there is often a tendency to use first names for both name and surname. Russian is different though and I never met a Russian person whose name was constructed in such fashion. But enough of that, let's see that HQ trailer and a prologue in the cinema.

>

If you want to nitpick about names, just look at the main character "Bruce Wayne". Both "Bruce" and "Wayne" are first names.

Yup. Here in the Midwest many locales are named after Revolutionary War General "Mad" Anthony Wayne; Wayne County MI (contains the Detroit metro area), Wayne MI (city in Wayne Co.), Fort Wayne (historic fort outside Detroit), Fort Wayne Indiana, etc etc. Gen. Wayne was a fascinating character.

"First" names as last names are far to common to make an issue of it, and more than a few owners of long Russian (and other nationalities) names have Americanized/Anglicized them by shortening, phoneticising or both to make the argument silly.

What's wrong with making things authentic?

I am all for authentic when it is appropriate sure. If they were authentic, Batman would be out of commission half the time as he would have a nasty case of jock itch as the groin area of the Bat Suit definitely would be a breeding ground for bacteria. LOL

I make a joke but I think you get my point, some comic books authenticity serves them well. Some it does not matter, and that is what makes them comic books. (Y)

I have no idea why this keeps happening to me but first the teaser didn't run in front of my showing of Harry Potter and tonight the full trailer did not run in front of my showing of Sherlock Holmes. Not to mention that The Hunger Games also just had a 30 second teaser even though the full trailer was released online over a month ago. I'm not sure if this is Warner Bros incompetence or that of the two different theaters I went to.

I have no idea why this keeps happening to me but first the teaser didn't run in front of my showing of Harry Potter and tonight the full trailer did not run in front of my showing of Sherlock Holmes. Not to mention that The Hunger Games also just had a 30 second teaser even though the full trailer was released online over a month ago. I'm not sure if this is Warner Bros incompetence or that of the two different theaters I went to.

I think they found out you were there, so they cut it off

IGN posted this about the midnight showing of M:I 4, and mentioned why the prologue was shown in front of it, and not Sherlock Holmes, which is a WB movie. Basically, they had this to say:

However, since the WB film wasn't booked into IMAX, it missed out on pairing with its own Dark Knight Rises preview. As a result, the Bat-profits were plucked up by Paramount, giving them a considerable financial gain.

Edit: This seems to be specific to the IMAX versions of the movies, so I'm not sure about the traditional format.

I think they found out you were there, so they cut it off

They must be tracking me through foursquare.

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTL-CbGXh8ifKpBzCFeY7xgDe4mMWGJK9qjDELTs8OTlZqMcfbm

IGN posted this about the midnight showing of M:I 4, and mentioned why the prologue was shown in front of it, and not Sherlock Holmes, which is a WB movie. Basically, they had this to say:

Edit: This seems to be specific to the IMAX versions of the movies, so I'm not sure about the traditional format.

Yeah I knew I wasn't going to get to see the prologue but a new trailer was suppose to be up in normal theaters as well I thought.

It's not fair we have to wait this long

I think I'm going to go into a drug-induced coma until July 19 at 11:59pm. :D

But seriously, great trailer. This trailer appears to be a little different from the one that played this weekend but great none-the-less.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      576
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      78
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!