Batman 3 "The Dark Knight Rises"


Recommended Posts

Awesome trailer. And it's probably logic to assume that those thumblers are indeed of Batman's private army. Someone mentioned this already that Batman would gather up his own little army.

Not sure what's going on, but the "download" links on apple's trailer page don't work, they just redirect to the main trailers page. Will have to check out the youtube version.

Indeed.

Avenger will, no doubt, be a hit, in every way, and it may even surpass The Dark Knight Rises in Box Office but The Dark Knight Rises will still be superior to it.

I have no doubt about it that both will be good movies, but this one is in another class

I doubt very much that the Avengers will surpass The Dark Knight Rises. The Dark Knight was one of thee highest grossing of all time: Number 10 World Wide. Domestically only Titanic and Avatar grossed more than it.

It is also the number #1 Comic Book Adaptation movie of all time. Looking past Spiderman 1 - 3, which are respectively 2 to 4 on the all time Comic Book Adaptation movie list, only Ironman comes closest: grossing approximately less than 50% of the total gross of The Dark Knight.

I believe just like with TDK: the TDKR will also gross above the billion mark.

I doubt very much that the Avengers will surpass The Dark Knight Rises. The Dark Knight was one of thee highest grossing of all time: Number 10 World Wide. Domestically only Titanic and Avatar grossed more than it.

It is also the number #1 Comic Book Adaptation movie of all time. Looking past Spiderman 1 - 3, which are respectively 2 to 4 on the all time Comic Book Adaptation movie list, only Ironman comes closest: grossing approximately less than 50% of the total gross of The Dark Knight.

I believe just like with TDK: the TDKR will also gross above the billion mark.

I truly hope so

One thing is crystal clear though, one of these two will break Avatar' record.

I think it showed just enough to wet the appetite, not to much like most other trailers these days.

oh I agree. Infact I would have shown half what it should. I just generally think it was pretty poorly constructed as I trailer. But from that trailer the film looks awfully bland; it looks like a TV film.

CGI looked really poor, but I think in the final movie it's gonna be better.

I sure hope so. But it still looks like a dumb scene.

I did like Banes voice though...

I doubt either movie will break Avatar's record. Avatar was unexplainable lol. TDKR will be epic though. I really hope this movie is like 2.5 to 3hrs long though too. I feel that it needs to be to finish out the story. On another note, I agree that the CGI football scene really did look pretty bad. Very obvious it wasn't real. I'm not sure how they'll be able to fix it or make it look more realistic without completely redoing the whole thing, because it looks so bad. Then again, I'm not sure how important it is to the movie, but with something as simple as that looking that bad, I really hope Nolan isn't using very much CGI in the rest of the movie. I know he tried to keep most of it real, but we'll see. Also the scenes with the batwing, not sure how that will look either. The leaked videos of it on the truck made it look like it had a very strange motion while it was moving.

I really hope this movie is like 2.5 to 3hrs long though too. I feel that it needs to be to finish out the story.

So long as they don't force it to be that length. I felt TDK could have easily been cut down. The whole boat thing near the end of TDK was just awful; they should have cut that whole thing out.

With regards to some of the comments on this thread, it is good to know that humans like Christopher Nolan are capable of arrogance. Why would anyone take the suggestion of removing the climax boat scene from The Dark Knight, or believing that the CGI in the football scene was any less spectacular than the cartoon called Avatar?

All you guys saying the football scene looked "horrible" have your CGI expectations set way too high. Hardly anything looks real with CGI, get over it.

Have you seen transformers in 3D at the cinema? Poor CGI never breaks the immersion there, all is done very well (they did crash ILMs computers after all :p ), football scene looks like it was rendered with low / medium quality settings (probably they have been rushing the trailer).

U kiddin'?

Nope. Don't get me wrong, I think the reasons for the boat scene were sound, but it was so tedious & poorly played out, it just wasn't believable. I felt like I was watching a poor TV show. It feel in sharp contrast to many other scenes which were far too brief.

All you guys saying the football scene looked "horrible" have your CGI expectations set way too high. Hardly anything looks real with CGI, get over it.

My critique was not solely about the CGI. There was no place for that scene in the trailer; out of context it just looks dumb. And if the CGI isn't going to be of a certain quality then they should think up something else.

My critique was not solely about the CGI. There was no place for that scene in the trailer; out of context it just looks dumb. And if the CGI isn't going to be of a certain quality then they should think up something else.

It's part of Bane's terrorizing of Gotham, so how exactly is it "out of context"? If it were, say, the first of many crimes he commits, what great setting like an American football game?

I still don't see understand how infinitely awful the CGI was that several here keep making it out to be. Could it have looked better? Yeah, but it sure could have looked far worse. I think it's fine. Maybe I don't consider myself an expert. I should stop since this will only be a revolving discussion with no one conceding.

It's part of Bane's terrorizing of Gotham, so how exactly is it "out of context"? If it were, say, the first of many crimes he commits, what great setting like an American football game?

Fair point, but I feel it seems like they are forcing an action scene in to a trailer which just doesn't really look it has a place in a Batman film... if that makes sense. meh, i am probably being a bit anal :pinch:

I still don't see understand how infinitely awful the CGI was that several here keep making it out to be. Could it have looked better? Yeah, but it sure could have looked far worse. I think it's fine. Maybe I don't consider myself an expert. I should stop since this will only be a revolving discussion with no one conceding.

It doesn't look awful... but it just doesn't look right, kind of like a made for TV film. It's also partly the color tones and cinematography. It just looks odd to me.

One thing is crystal clear though, one of these two will break Avatar' record.

I do not know about that. Avatar was using gimmick 3D and charging almost 50% more per ticket so the TDK and TDKR will unfortunately never be able to gross as much. It is , at least in TDK's case, considered a far better movie though.

It doesn't look awful... but it just doesn't look right, kind of like a made for TV film. It's also partly the color tones and cinematography. It just looks odd to me.

They JUST finished filming and there is approximately 7 months to the release date........

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      576
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      78
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!