iMac's Mac OS X Snow Leopard supports ExFAT


Recommended Posts

I just found something interesting: ExFAT support in Mac OS X Snow Leopard v10.6.4 (build 10F2090)

screenshot20100930at172.png

screenshot20100930at171.png

screenshot20100930at174.png

Notice how the extension dates from July 17th, 2010, while Mac OS X v10.6.4 was released June 15th.

Some people confirmed they don't have it on their older Macs even with Mac OS X Snow Leopard v10.6.4 installed. Apparently this is currently unique to the iMac (mid 2010) and perhaps other 2010 Macs.

screenshot20101001at135.png

I just found something interesting: ExFAT support in Mac OS X Snow Leopard v10.6.4 (build 10F2090)

Notice how the extension dates from July 17th, 2010, while Mac OS X v10.6.4 was released June 15th.

Some people confirmed they don't have it on their older Macs even with Mac OS X Snow Leopard v10.6.4 installed. Apparently this is currently unique to the iMac (mid 2010) and perhaps other 2010 Macs.

The funny thing is that I noticed that yesterday when I was formatting my usb drive :woot: but I thought it just came with 10.6.4....I guess everyone else will get it with 10.6.5

Major differences between exFAT and FAT32?

exFAT (Extended

File Allocation Table), (also sometimes referred to as FAT64) is a proprietary, patent-pending[2] file system suited especially for USB flash drives,[citation needed]

introduced by Microsoft for embedded devices in Windows Embedded CE

6.0, in their desktop operating systems Windows Vista Service Pack 1[3]

and Windows 7, and in their server operating system Windows Server 2008.[4] exFAT can be

used where the NTFS file system is not a feasible solution, due

to data structure overhead, or where the file size or directory restrictions of

previous versions of the FAT file

system are unacceptable. Windows XP and Windows Server 2003

(both x86 and x64) users can add support for exFAT by installing an update from

Microsoft.[1] An experimental, open source Linux

kernel module that supports the reading of exFAT files is currently under

development.[5] A FUSE-based

full-featured implementation is currently in beta status.[6]

A proprietary, read/write solution, licensed and derived from the Microsoft

exFAT implementation, is available for Android, Linux and other operating

systems from Tuxera.[7]

A proprietary, full-featured implementation?XCFiles?is available from Datalight.[8]

A third party open source driver is available for DOS.[9]

The advantages over previous File Allocation Table (FAT) file system versions include:

  • Scalability to large disk sizes: 64 ZiB[10] theoretical max, 512 TiB recommended max, raised from the 2 TiB limit of FAT32 partitions. Note that the built-in Windows XP format utility limits new FAT32 partitions to 32 GiB.[1]
  • Cluster size up to 32 MiB[1]
  • Subdirectory size up to 256 MiB[1]
  • File size limit of 16 EiB[11] (Limited by volume size), raised from close to 4 GiB in FAT32[1]
  • Free space allocation and delete performance improved due to introduction of a free space bitmap
  • Support for up to 2,796,202 files per subdirectory[2] [12], increased from 65,536
  • Support for access control lists (not supported yet in Windows Vista SP1)[13]
  • Support for TFAT, a transactional file system standard (optionally WinCE activated function)
  • Provision for OEM-definable parameters to customize the file system for specific device characteristics
  • Support for UTC timestamps (starting with Vista SP2)[14]
  • Timestamp granularity of 10 ms (better than previous FAT versions' 2 s, but worse than NTFS's 100 ns)[2]

The disadvantages compared to previous FAT versions include:

  • Windows XP and Windows Server 2003 users must have Service Pack 2 or later and install an update to support exFAT
  • Windows Vista must be Service Pack 1 or later for exFAT support
  • Devices formatted using exFAT cannot be read by any version of Windows prior to Windows XP or by any version of DOS or OS/2 (unless emulated as otherwise).
  • Devices using exFAT are unable to use Windows Vista's ReadyBoost capability (Windows 7 adds support for ReadyBoost on exFAT formatted drives and enables a larger ReadyBoost cache due to the removal of the 4GB file size limit of FAT32)[15]
  • Microsoft has not released the official exFAT file specification, and a license from Microsoft is required in order to make and distribute exFAT implementations[16]
  • Limited or no support outside PC environment at present ? most current consumer electronics, such as televisions and A/V receivers, can only handle previous FAT versions (this may change with the new SDXC cards and Memory Stick XC requiring exFAT)

Awesome, shame I cannot use EXT4 on my iMac, I'm not a big fan of HFS+ seams to get filesystem corruption every other week.

Thanks Guys.

Then something on your machine isn't working right.

Really?

Then something on your machine isn't working right.

You know I actually had something like that happing to my Mac Pro. Every other week Disk Utility would throw out a whole list of red errors when checking my internal HDD. Fixing it would get rid of the errors but after so many restarts they would just randomly appear again. As a response I threw about every disk checking utility at the HDD and not a single bad sector/error was found by any of them. Everything worked as expected (performance wise), the OS didn't give any errors etc. Only repairing permissions would take longer. Occasionally Spotlight would screw up but then fix itself. Formatting the drive and reinstalling Mac OS X would solve nothing. I even tried multiple Mac OS X Install DVDs just to be sure that wasn't it either. I had a professional check my HDD and he couldn't find any hardware related issues either. I'm pretty sure the problem didn't exist when my 2009 Mac Pro still ran Mac OS X Leopard.

To this very day I still don't know what was wrong. You guys tell me.

You know I actually had something like that happing to my Mac Pro. Every other week Disk Utility would throw out a whole list of red errors when checking my internal HDD. Fixing it would get rid of the errors but after so many restarts they would just randomly appear again. As a response I threw about every disk checking utility at the HDD and not a single bad sector/error was found by any of them. Everything worked as expected (performance wise), the OS didn't give any errors etc. Only repairing permissions would take longer. Occasionally Spotlight would screw up but then fix itself. Formatting the drive and reinstalling Mac OS X would solve nothing. I even tried multiple Mac OS X Install DVDs just to be sure that wasn't it either. I had a professional check my HDD and he couldn't find any hardware related issues either. I'm pretty sure the problem didn't exist when my 2009 Mac Pro still ran Mac OS X Leopard.

To this very day I still don't know what was wrong. You guys tell me.

Has to be some kind of defect or compatibility issue with the drive or other piece of hardware. I had an issue with an external drive a little similar to this, where the drive would not mount all the time and the Time Machine backup operating would sometimes fail. None of the scanning tools detected any problem and it eventually stopped working.

These were the errors for interest sake:

Verifying volume “Macintosh HD” Performing live verification. Checking Journaled HFS Plus volume. Checking extents overflow file. Checking catalog file. Missing thread record (id = 856973) Incorrect number of thread records Checking multi-linked files. Checking catalog hierarchy. Invalid volume directory count (It should be 146552 instead of 146553) Checking extended attributes file. Checking volume bitmap. Checking volume information. The volume Macintosh HD was found corrupt and needs to be repaired. Error: This disk needs to be repaired. Start up your computer with another disk (such as your Mac OS X installation disc), and then use Disk Utility to repair this disk.

Apple claimed nothing was wrong with the hardware.

At that point, I would have bought a new drive, cloned the contents of it to the new drive (if possible), swapped them out, and used the old "problematic" drive as an external.

It would be risky, because I'd be assuming the issue is with the HDD, but if it worked it would pay off.

These were the errors for interest sake:

Verifying volume “Macintosh HD” Performing live verification. Checking Journaled HFS Plus volume. Checking extents overflow file. Checking catalog file. Missing thread record (id = 856973) Incorrect number of thread records Checking multi-linked files. Checking catalog hierarchy. Invalid volume directory count (It should be 146552 instead of 146553) Checking extended attributes file. Checking volume bitmap. Checking volume information. The volume Macintosh HD was found corrupt and needs to be repaired. Error: This disk needs to be repaired. Start up your computer with another disk (such as your Mac OS X installation disc), and then use Disk Utility to repair this disk.

Apple claimed nothing was wrong with the hardware.

I'm having the exact same problem with my October 2009 MacBook Pro. Has been happening since I bought, after a couple of reboots it would randomly come back with that error. This was with the stock hard drive and a new one I put in it. Apple checked it and they couldn't find anything wrong. :blink: I don't know where I stand really atm. All the Apple Genius bar staff was interested in was that Disk Utility fixed it. (I've also reformatted so much that I've lost count).

When you say Spotlight was messing up, did it try and rebuild the index every so often? That's what happens to mine.

Also, this error sometimes appears until I repair the drive:

post-81815-12859203233406.png

There must be a piece of hardware that is conflicting, don't think I will find out though.

exFAT support? Cool.

I've been slowly transitioning my flash drives over to using exFAT, but every so often I seem to end up on an old XP system or such, so I've resorted to bringing the patches along with me and upgrading the system when nobody's looking.

Is this really unique to the 27-inch iMac (mid 2010)? I still have my second 27-inch iMac standing in a box waiting to be picked up by TNT and that one has exFAT support as well. Rudy confirmed it as well on his Core i5 27-inch iMac (mid 2010). Someone on another forum claims his 21,5-inch iMac (also mid 2010) does in fact not have exFAT support.

Isn't that weird? :/

Is this really unique to the 27-inch iMac (mid 2010)? I still have my second 27-inch iMac standing in a box waiting to be picked up by TNT and that one has exFAT support as well. Rudy confirmed it as well on his Core i5 27-inch iMac (mid 2010). Someone on another forum claims his 21,5-inch iMac (also mid 2010) does in fact not have exFAT support.

Isn't that weird? :/

It seems like the recently shipping 27" iMacs have a slightly newer version of 10.6.4 on them (maybe to include some newer drivers). ExFAT support could've just slipped in with that.

Like I've said though: it is coming to 10.6.5 (presumably to all Macs).

Yeah, it would be unique to the iMac, that's the only Mac currently with SD card support (I think)

It seems silly for Apple to only include exFAT support to those Macs, it's not limited to SDXC cards.

At this point is seems as if it's unique to the 27-inch iMac as some 21,5-inch iMac owners have claimed on another forum that they don't have it. Also you can format any drive as exFAT. Be it a SDHD card, USB-key, internal or external HDD.

exFAT support? Cool.

I've been slowly transitioning my flash drives over to using exFAT, but every so often I seem to end up on an old XP system or such, so I've resorted to bringing the patches along with me and upgrading the system when nobody's looking.

ive been doing the same - trying to use exFAT as much as i can now. nice to see it can interface w/ OSX too :cool:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google begins rolling out its post-Epic Play Store billing model next week by Karthik Mudaliar Google has confirmed that its redesigned Play Store billing and fee structure will take effect on June 30, 2026, in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Economic Area. The changes will let eligible developers offer their own payment systems or send users to an external website for purchases, while separating Google’s platform service fee from the cost of using Google Play Billing. The rollout puts concrete dates and detailed rate cards behind the broader Android policy overhaul Google announced in March. That announcement followed a proposed settlement with Epic Games intended to resolve their long-running disputes over app distribution and payments, although the U.S. portion of the agreement still requires court approval. Under the new billing choice program, developers selling digital content or services can display an alternative payment option alongside Google Play Billing. They may also direct users to their own websites to complete a purchase. Developers can use Google’s standard payment-choice screen or design one that complies with the company’s user-interface rules. Choosing another payment processor does not eliminate Google’s cut altogether. The company will continue charging a service fee for transactions associated with apps distributed through Google Play, regardless of whether payment is handled by Google, an alternative provider, or a developer’s website. Google argues that this fee covers the value and infrastructure provided by Android and the Play Store. For developers earning up to $1 million annually, the service fee will generally be 10 percent. That rate also applies to auto-renewing subscriptions. When Google Play Billing is used in the U.S., U.K., or EEA, Google will add a separate 5 percent billing fee, and developers processing payments elsewhere will not pay that additional charge. This means Google’s familiar flat 30 percent commission is disappearing, but developers will not necessarily see a dramatic reduction on every transaction. An in-app purchase from an existing user processed through Google Play Billing can still reach a combined 30 percent. The biggest savings are likely to come from subscriptions, smaller developers covered by the $1 million tier, and companies able to move customers to their own payment infrastructure. Google is also offering lower rates through its Apps Experience and revamped Games Level Up programs. Apps and games that satisfy the company’s requirements can qualify for 15 percent service fees on new-install transactions and 20 percent on existing-install transactions. The criteria include performance and reliability standards, support for additional Android device categories, and selected platform features. Those program rates are scheduled to become available in the initial markets and Australia on September 30. For consumers, the immediate effect will depend on whether developers adopt alternative payments and pass any savings on through lower prices. For developers, however, June 30 begins a more flexible but considerably more complicated Play Store economy in which distribution, billing, install dates, revenue thresholds, and program participation can each affect Google’s final cut. Google is also separately developing a Registered App Stores program designed to simplify the installation of qualifying third-party stores. That initiative is expected to arrive with a major Android release later in 2026 and will launch outside the U.S. first. Google says the rest of the world will receive the changes by September 30, 2027, although billing rates for markets outside the US, UK, and EEA have not yet been announced.
    • 38% off a super insane price is still an INSANE price.
    • 1TB Samsung T9 and Samsung 9100 PRO SSDs are now selling at great prices by Fiza Ali Amazon is now offering the 1TB variant of Samsung T9 and Samsung 9100 PRO SSD at great prices with limited-time 38% and 39% discounts, respectively, so you may want to check them out if you have been looking to upgrade your storage solution. The Samsung T9 connects via a USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 (20Gbps) interface and delivers sequential read speeds of up to 2,000MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 1,950MB/s, making it suitable for transferring large files, backing up data, and handling high-resolution media content. When it comes to the security features, the SSD includes AES 256-bit hardware encryption to help protect sensitive data. Designed for portability, the drive is reportedly resistant to drops from heights of up to 3 metres. Furthermore, it operates within a temperature range of 0°C to 60°C and can be stored at temperatures between -40°C and 85°C. Samsung Magician Software is included for drive management, firmware updates, performance optimisation, and health monitoring. Finally, the T9 is certified to multiple international standards, including CE, FCC, UL, UKCA, and RoHS 2 compliance, and is backed by a five-year limited warranty as well. 1TB Samsung T9 SSD: $179.99 (Amazon US) - 38% off The Samsung 9100 PRO uses the M.2 2280 form factor and connects through a PCIe 5.0 x4 interface with NVMe 2.0 support. Built with Samsung V-NAND TLC flash memory, an in-house controller, and 1GB of low-power DDR4X cache memory, the 9100 PRO is engineered for high-performance computing and gaming workloads. Furthermore, the SSD delivers sequential read speeds of up to 14,700MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 13,300MB/s. Random performance is rated at up to 1,850,000 IOPS for reads and up to 2,600,000 IOPS for writes, depending on system hardware and configuration. The drive supports TRIM, S.M.A.R.T monitoring, automatic garbage collection, and device sleep mode to help maintain performance and efficiency over time. In terms of security features, it includes AES 256-bit encryption, TCG Opal support, and IEEE 1667 compliance. The 9100 PRO operates within a temperature range of 0°C to 70°C, is rated for 1.5 million hours MTBF, and can reportedly withstand shocks of up to 1,500G for 0.5 milliseconds. Finally, Samsung Magician Software is also included for firmware updates, performance monitoring, drive management, and optimisation. 1TB Samsung 9100 PRO SSD: $206.99 (Amazon US) - 39% off Alternatively, you can also check out other SSD deals here. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • This is about the already discredited 2025 announcement. Not the current one, which I've heard nothing negative about in the academic literature.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!