iMac's Mac OS X Snow Leopard supports ExFAT


Recommended Posts

You dont have the kext. Only the latest iMac's shipped with the kext. 10.6.5 will ship with the kext.

Oh, I see.

But that?s pretty strange that there?s two versions of 10.6.4 in the wild ... I thought Apple would be the type of company to say "let?s simply things, let?s just release it alone or along with 10.6.5 when it?s done or 10.6.5 right away".

I don?t think this format is going to change my world though, for now, but it?s good to see Apple rolling out the driver to support it.

It?d be nicer to see a new file system in the next iteration of OS X. Really small files are really killing my iMac :p I?m currently developing a website and last time I moved it into a new directory, it took like 2 minutes and it?s just 10MB lol.

Small files are automatically defragmented by Mac OS X.

Yes. You can format every drive as exFAT.

Yeah, forgot about the automatic defragmentation. I guess this explains it, but I’ve read back in the time of the upcoming of ZFS that HFS+ wasn’t good with smaller files.

Every drive? Even my main HD where OS X is stored? :p

I never really understood why Apple and Microsoft couldn't ally and make one unique File System to beat them all. Or maybe the International Standards Organization should make one and obligate people to use it, but I guess it doesn't work like that in real life.

This whole thing is bothering me because it's a pure technicality, it should be transparent to the user.

But I believe it’s not a good idea to install OS X in that... or the installation process will simply reformat it under HFS+...

You can't install Mac OS X on a non-HFS+ drive. That doesn't change the fact though that technically there's nothing preventing you from formatting your Macintosh HD or any other internal drive you might have as exFAT.

Recap: Disk Utility allows you to format any drive as exFAT. It isn't limited to SDHC cards only.

Yeah, forgot about the automatic defragmentation. I guess this explains it, but I?ve read back in the time of the upcoming of ZFS that HFS+ wasn?t good with smaller files.

ZFS main problem is that it requires at least a 64bit CPU along with minimum 4GB of memory or otherwise the whole experience is very painful to say the least.

I never really understood why Apple and Microsoft couldn't ally and make one unique File System to beat them all. Or maybe the International Standards Organization should make one and obligate people to use it, but I guess it doesn't work like that in real life. This whole thing is bothering me because it's a pure technicality, it should be transparent to the user.

I can understand having operating system specific file systems given the value added perspective of integration between the OS and the underlying file system in the internal hard disk but there is no reason why there can't be a patent and royalty free file system to make life easier when transferring files between different machines.

All of the major operating systems support installing pluggable file systems, so making up a brand new file system and having R/W support under Linux/Windows/OS X isn't very hard. Of course, it's never perfect, Windows only supports auto-mounting if the filesystem is a built in type, installed filesystems need to be manually mounted and given a drive letter.

I used to use EXT3 on my external hard drive when I was dual booting Linux and Windows. To do it properly I had to edit the file system header to report itself as NTFS so Windows would do something with it, while Linux just ignored the type and mounted it properly.

All of the major operating systems support installing pluggable file systems, so making up a brand new file system and having R/W support under Linux/Windows/OS X isn't very hard. Of course, it's never perfect, Windows only supports auto-mounting if the filesystem is a built in type, installed filesystems need to be manually mounted and given a drive letter.

I used to use EXT3 on my external hard drive when I was dual booting Linux and Windows. To do it properly I had to edit the file system header to report itself as NTFS so Windows would do something with it, while Linux just ignored the type and mounted it properly.

Would that kind of spoofing work for a scenario like plugging a USB flash drive into a PS3? It would be handy to get the PS3 to be able to read different file systems rather than just FAT32, so if I just tried to get it to tell the PS3 it's FAT32, would that be sufficient? I guess the real question is, when you report a EXT3 drive to Windows as an NTFS does it mount it and read/write to it as if it's NTFS? Because if the PS3 is incapable of reading/writing to anything but FAT32, then simply spoofing probably wouldn't be enough... :(

Would that kind of spoofing work for a scenario like plugging a USB flash drive into a PS3? It would be handy to get the PS3 to be able to read different file systems rather than just FAT32, so if I just tried to get it to tell the PS3 it's FAT32, would that be sufficient? I guess the real question is, when you report a EXT3 drive to Windows as an NTFS does it mount it and read/write to it as if it's NTFS? Because if the PS3 is incapable of reading/writing to anything but FAT32, then simply spoofing probably wouldn't be enough... :(

It wouldn't be enough. He merely spoofed Windows into thinking it was NTFS so the drive would auto-mount. He still had to install EXT3 extensions onto the system for Windows to be able to read the EXT3 filesystem.

Would that kind of spoofing work for a scenario like plugging a USB flash drive into a PS3? It would be handy to get the PS3 to be able to read different file systems rather than just FAT32, so if I just tried to get it to tell the PS3 it's FAT32, would that be sufficient? I guess the real question is, when you report a EXT3 drive to Windows as an NTFS does it mount it and read/write to it as if it's NTFS? Because if the PS3 is incapable of reading/writing to anything but FAT32, then simply spoofing probably wouldn't be enough... :(

Something like that only works because the actual extension for the EXT3 filesystem is there. So unless you would find a way to add exFAT (or whatever) support to the PS3's firmware it wouldn't work.

Edit Elliott beat me to it.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The laptop in the bedroom is an Acer with i7-10510U CPU. Acer's website states they will not be upgrading it so I had little choice other than disable secure boot. I know next to nothing on these matters so hopefully it will be fine.
    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
    • Look up 'inflation' kid. Ask an AI for the numbers between both games.
    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!