What time is it... Really?


Recommended Posts

Many of you will soon be adjusting your clocks either one hour ahead or one hour back, depending on your location. And I am yet again reminded that no one really knows for sure what year it is.

Arguably the majority of the world recognizes it as the year 2,010 (2010). But this is completely based on the religious belief on when a single "religious being" lived & died. rolleyes.gif But this of course take out of count, the many years before this "believed" being lived or died.

Upon further reflection GMT (Greenwich Mean Time, established since 1884) has been replaced with UTC (Coordinated Universal Time, established since 1972). And it is worth noting that this UTC is based partly with UT (Universal Time), to which there are arguably 6 version of (UT1, UT0, UT1R, UT2, UT2R, UTC).

On top of all this... Not every county in the world adjust their clocks back & forth. Some keep a continued time all year around.

To make up for this lost time, we of course have added the idea of a "leap year" in which every 4 years we add an extra day. But if you do the math, that "leap year" does not fully account for every last second & as time continues to add... Those seconds become minutes, hours, days.... And of course, what about all the years before the calender included a "leap year"....

So what time is it? blink.gif

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/951474-what-time-is-it-really/
Share on other sites

Let's have some fun then

According to Judaism the year is 5771

The Christian calendar says it's 2010

And the Muslim calendar says it's 1431 AH

hmmmm, who to believe

I bet just about every major religion has it as a different year, this can be fun :)

*edit*

According to the Hindus it's 3102 BCE

I do software devt for an airline. The schedules are set in local time relative to each airport. Daily operational data are kept in UTC. Dispatchers can flip their displays between local and Zulu as needed. Before .NET 3.5 I had to code all the timezone translations manually. 3.5 introduced the TimeZone class which provided the necessary TZ conversions, but it still lacks a fully TZ-aware DateTime class. I had to write a custom class for that, to encapsulate the conversions and provide code for elapsed time calculations. Major PITA!

Arguably the majority of the world recognizes it as the year 2,010 (2010). But this is completely based on the religious belief on when a single "religious being" lived & died. rolleyes.gif But this of course take out of count, the many years before this "believed" being lived or died.

Actually, most historians today use C.E. (Common Era) and B.C.E (Before Common Era) for dates. These dates actually aren't based on Jesus birth, since he was actually born (using 'pivotal' dates, that is, dates attested to and confirmed from both Biblical and secular sources) in 2 B.C.E.

Using B.C. ('Before Christ') and A.D. (Anno Domini, Latin for 'Year of the Lord') are really not used anymore since they really aren't historically accurate. As far as Leap Years are concerned, there are other safetys imposed to keep run away leap years from messing us up. If you'll remember, 2000 was a leap year, but 1900 wasn't. Why? Because only years beginning centuries that are equally divisible by 4 are made leap years.

the only real number should be when the Earth was created, and not when Humans decided to keep count

or since the Big Bang, as Humans are not the center of everything

so about 20GY ( or 80GY )

you forgot the dinosaurs age, time didnt started with the birth of jesus, dalai lama, velociraptors, or even when the earth was created.

The most correct answer for the time in our universe is year 13.7 billion... but then again we have einstein theory of relativity, so the time we live in this planet is different of the time we live when flying on a plane.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • "just $100 per TB"? Just? Are we trying to make this seem like the new normal? Kinda weird to make it sound like that is not a ridiculously expensive asking price.
    • The reviews you refer to mean nothing. Where there is no journalism there is no reason to call the gaming media's opinion pieces "reviews". For GP games there is indeed a metric for success - increasing subscriptions. Which turns in revenue. The only circumstance in which subs do not rise when great is being released is a Game Pass system where the company is close to fully saturated with customers in a subscription. However, in that case as the theory goes you spend aplenty in all kind of games - from shady live service cash cows and customer offending agitprop crap in purple colours to robust and entertaining single player games. And keep a solid level of profitability. Ignoring the simply innocuous but mid games MGS has released primarily of the second kind.
    • Report: Microsoft to use AWS to help GitHub deal with a major surge in demand by Pradeep Viswanathan Thanks to the surge of coding AI agents, GitHub's usage has skyrocketed over the past 12 months. To meet this demand, GitHub started with a plan in October 2025 to increase capacity by 10x. However, by early this year, the company realized that it needed 30x scale. This rapid growth has caused severe strain on the platform's reliability, resulting in several small outages over the past few months. In April, GitHub published a long blog post explaining the steps it is taking to resolve these reliability issues. In the post, the company also confirmed that it is working toward a multi-cloud architecture for better resilience. Today, Business Insider reported that GitHub is turning to Amazon Web Services to help deal with a major surge in AI-driven coding activity. It is important to note that GitHub is still in the process of moving completely to the Azure cloud. The current plan is to move the platform fully to Azure by 2027 so that it can scale better as per developer demand. Therefore, the current decision to utilize AWS might be part of a short-term plan to meet immediate demand. A Microsoft spokesperson confirmed that GitHub is using multiple cloud providers with the following statement: For Microsoft, the decision highlights the operational pressure behind the AI boom. GitHub has to stay reliable for developers at a time when rivals such as Codex, Cursor, Claude Code, and other AI coding tools are gaining attention. And the decision to use AWS for computing capacity seems practical given the circumstances.
    • It's growing on me, however, your right, it make better usability sense if the tabs were bellow the address bar.
    • Qwen 3.6 is better value per dollar, and you can run it locally for free.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      vjlex earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Conversation Starter
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      Console General earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      517
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      106
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!