F1: FIA confirms 2011 regulations, team orders allowed


Recommended Posts

Following 2010?s final meeting of its World Motor Sport Council (WMSC) in Monaco on Friday, Formula One racing?s governing body, the FIA, has outlined regulation changes that will come into force over the next three seasons.

Among the major revisions for next season are the removal of the ban on team orders, the introduction of driver-adjustable rear wings, the effective outlawing of double diffusers, stricter bodywork deflection tests and a requirement for gearboxes to last five rather than four Grand Prix weekends. The 2011 regulations are expected to be published by the FIA in their entirety soon.

Technical changes for 2012 will include the use of biomass-derived fuels and tighter suspension regulations. The biggest changes, however, will come in 2013 with the introduction of a new engine formula (see related story), replacing the current 2.4 litre V8s with 1.6 litre four-cylinder units.

Related statement from the WMSC:

A number of changes were made to the Sporting and Technical Regulations for 2011, including:

- The article forbidding team orders (39.1) is deleted. Teams will be reminded that any actions liable to bring the sport into disrepute are dealt with under Article 151c of the International Sporting Code and any other relevant provisions

- Amendments to the list of penalties Stewards are permitted to apply

- Revisions to driving and driver conduct

- A limit on the width of the fast lane in the pits

- The introduction of a regulation permitting the Race Director to close the pit lane during a race for safety reasons

- The re-introduction of intermediate tyres for 2011

- Penalties to be applied to any driver who fails to use both specification of dry weather tyre during the race

- An amendment requiring gearboxes to be used for five consecutive races, instead of four

- Clarification on when cars can overtake the safety car

- A refinement to the principles of the regulations already agreed concerning moveable rear wings

- A better definition of the reference plane, and reinforcement of bodywork deflection tests, especially at the front of the reference plane

- The allowance for anti-intrusion panels to protect drivers? legs

Amendments to the 2012 Technical Regulations were made in the following areas:

- Team communications will be made available to broadcasters

- The inclusion of fuel compounds produced from biomass

- A limitation on suspension uprights

Source: Formula 1

- The article forbidding team orders (39.1) is deleted. Teams will be reminded that any actions liable to bring the sport into disrepute are dealt with under Article 151c of the International Sporting Code and any other relevant provisions

... So they're encouraging race fixing?! :blink:

... So they're encouraging race fixing?! blink.gif

I wouldn't got that far.

As it says, other part of the rules can be used for bringing the sport into disrepute etc (which arguably fixing a race does).

I think the problem was that obviously the rule was being ignored every now and again, so it wasn't doing what it was supposed to do.

Team orders have been part of F1 for ages. Teams have likely been exercising them more or less subtly countless times in the past years - a buggered up pit stop here, a braking problem there.

Also, F1 is a team sport. I have no problem with team orders; what I do have a problem with, and will continue to be punished, are overly blatant team orders like Austria 2002.

Also, F1 is a team sport. I have no problem with team orders; what I do have a problem with, and will continue to be punished, are overly blatant team orders like Austria 2002.

Yea, but that was Barrichello's fault, because Todt said that Rubens knew what to do beforehand but didn't do it, and he was on the radio to him many many times but he would not slow down and let Michael take the lead, instead he elected to do it in the most obvious way possible.

I still don't get that regulation about intermediate tyres, they have always been in F1, the only difference is that Bridgestone called them "wets". Personally I would like to see the monsoon tyres brought back, the races of late that have been started behind the SC, or delayed could have gone ahead with monsoon tyres

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • They already threw the Ultra 1st gen under the bus?
    • Right, Google... because that's who this is going to. Google, the company who's entire business model is geared around ad revenue and your personal data.
    • That is the natural course for regulations. First to protect the consumer. Then to protect the business/industry from upstart competition. There are countless examples across history.
    • I have never been a huge fan of libre, it feels really good but exactly when you need an advance feature for data wrangling it falls short every time or has bugs. I am all for euro office if they can deliver a good and usable alternative to MS office with backing of govt function.
    • Go on, I'll bite. How does windows (nice comment on an 'article' which doesn't actually involve it ) lock users out of their data then? Been using it since 3.1 back in 92 and not once have I been locked out of my data? Perhaps you mean Bitlocker? In which case the average user (who doesn't mess about) will have been forced to use a MSA, and in which case the recovery key would have been saved to said account..... If the user did happen to bodge around and not use an MSA then Bitlocker wouldn't have become live (as it cannot without a safe place to store the key) I want to point out Bitlocker and MSA are not connected and you can of course force it on without a safe place to store the key, but you do that with your eyes open. So your standard consumer who knows no better sets up an MSA, gets bitlocker and a recovery key stored off box, with a route to reset their password. All of this notwithstanding the fact, if your data is important, you back it up, no ifs, no buts, no-ones responsibility other than your own. Important data lives in at least two locations, one of which is offline and recovery is tested, otherwise that data wasn't really that important. Disks, fail, laptops get lost, phones end up down the toilet, tablets get stolen, if your only copy of data is on a single device you're doing it wrong.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      Captain_Eric earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • One Month Later
      amusc earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      229
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      86
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      78
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!