Why do no PC laptops have a touchpad as nice as Apples?


Recommended Posts

Here we go again, another Mac/PC thread.

Just for what it's worth : I find the trackpad on Apple laptops good. I find the trackpads on a number of PC laptops good as well.

I guess it's just personal preference?

Its almost like a perpetual motion machine. We all complain about them, yet they never stop. :p

<Snipped>

"I use a Mac for photo/video/sound editing or... (insert one of the general artsy professions you NEED a mac for)". Anyone who tends to use the argument usually can't tell you WHY Apple computers are superior for such things.

Well I believe that some time ago Macs were actually superior at those things (or so I've read / heard). Nowdays I would say they're quite evenly matched...Windows probably does have an edge when it comes to Adobe products though (They seem to run better on Windows, plus some of them even have x64 support...not sure if the mac adobe applications support 64bit yet).

Edited by Anaron

Now I love win7 and like my mac, but everything I wanna move back to a PC laptop its the dang trouchpad that keeps me from doing it. Why has the PC laptop makers not caught up to the Apple touch pad?

I've often wondered the same thing. I haven't seen any answers in this thread either.

Wow...just..wow. Almost, but not quite there Synaptics.

relax bud, osx takes/borrows ideas from windows and other manufacturers. i mean the core of osx (darwin) isn't even theirs. it's open source meaning random people contribute to osx core too...

My answer would be because Apple makes the machines directly.

Windows laptops/netbooks are made by 3rd parties.

I think it would be very hard to say that there isn't any laptop trackpad as good/better than an Apple trackpad. The fact is Apple makes ALL Macbooks, and Windows laptops/netbooks are ALL made by 3rd parties (not Microsoft). There is no quality control (Windows) because the company making the OS isn't making the actual hardware, so they have no say in it. Apple has every say in how the hardware is made. That's the difference.

My answer would be because Apple makes the machines directly.

Windows laptops/netbooks are made by 3rd parties.

I think it would be very hard to say that there isn't any laptop trackpad as good/better than an Apple trackpad. The fact is Apple makes ALL Macbooks, and Windows laptops/netbooks are ALL made by 3rd parties (not Microsoft). There is no quality control (Windows) because the company making the OS isn't making the actual hardware, so they have no say in it. Apple has every say in how the hardware is made. That's the difference.

(Y) this is the reason

Thread Cleaned

Enough with the petty bickering. This isn't a PC vs. Mac thread. Discuss more about the topic at hand and less about the finer points of the Mac and Windows operating systems.

Because there really is no need for a glass touchpad on Windows PCs.

1. Multitouch - Windows doesn't support multitouch to the extent that Mac OSX does (I personally think multitouch stuff on a touchpad is stupid, but hey thats a different topic).

2. Size - The algorithm MS uses to calculate mouse acceleration on Windows is far better than Apple's one.

Design wise, sure the touchpad on Apple's macbook pros look a lot nicer and is slightly smoother (glass vs. plastic) but I couldn't live without buttons...yes I know you can just tap the touchpad but that's just annoying imo.

Windows supports multitouch

Windows supports multitouch

I'm not saying that it doesn't...just Apple did it better. Now that's because of what Matrix XII mentioned.

Since Apple controls the software and hardware, they can tailor the two to fit their needs. Windows on the other hand is dependent on OEMs and how well they can code their things...sometimes they code / make it well and it works beautifully, other times they code / make it terribly and it just turns into a giant mess.

Actually, second to Apple's trackpads, my favourite laptop pointer is the Thinkpad trackpoint. The precision you can get from those (when they don't stick and drift lol) is better than I've gotten from any touchpad.

Trackpoints are awesome, I miss having one =(

But it's good to see more laptop manufacturer's are using them too...like the new Dell latitude's have one!

I have a Dell E6500 with one and it isn't nearly as good as the Thinkpad's IMHO. The finger grip is concave and sunken into the keyboard instead of giving you a convex surface to roll you finger on.

My dream "work" laptop for things like Photoshop and 3D work and also casual browsing would be a trackpad as simple, seamless, and responsive as Apple's and a trackpoint as nice and precise as the Thinkpad's.

I don't like multitouch track pads, that includes apples, and my Envy 17. Though my Envy is near apple "quality", after a driver update a few months ago. That's one thing engadget did not do in there review was update there drivers, if they did none of the track pad issues they had would have affected them. I generally take a wireless mouse with me everywhere I go

you have good taste in music too, cheer for a better hockey team and we'll be golden ;)

hahaha never! We're going to win the cup this year!! :D

Seems like there are a lot of Mac vs PC threads lately :s

...and those commercials aren't even on the air anymore!

Because we use multi-button mice? No matter how much you dress up a touchpad it will always be an inferior control device. And the rare times I do use it, a $400 budget Lenovo pad is just as functional. I've also used many Dell/HP/Sony pads that are better than Apple's in feel and precision. Sloppily accelerated 'glass' only makes noobs happy.

Seems like there are a lot of Mac vs PC threads lately :s

...and those commercials aren't even on the air anymore!

haha! I think this is all we have going for us at the moment. We can't laugh at Justin Long anymore, so we have to declare warfare on Neowin. :p

P.S: Have I missed any priceless quotes from 'treemonster' yet?

I find the exact opposite. I can't stand Apple's touchpad, it's absolute ****. It just doesn't work, if I try to do something simple, it'll accidentally perform another behavior. Hate working on my friend's macbook pro, always have to plug in a mouse to be able to do anything.

Because we use multi-button mice? No matter how much you dress up a touchpad it will always be an inferior control device. And the rare times I do use it, a $400 budget Lenovo pad is just as functional. I've also used many Dell/HP/Sony pads that are better than Apple's in feel and precision. Sloppily accelerated 'glass' only makes noobs happy.

+1 i don't care how good a track pad is, i'd rather be using a mouse. less work, less awkward ways to move my hand. when i do use trackpads though i like them to have smooth textures, tactile feedback and all.

unforunately for a mouse you can't always use one with your laptop or netbook. sitting on a bench with the laptop on your lap for example. but in that scenario i dislike typing with the laptop on my lap too. so more often then not i find a table to sit at and set up my mouse and mouse pad i take with me with my netbook when i travel.

I find the exact opposite. I can't stand Apple's touchpad, it's absolute ****. It just doesn't work, if I try to do something simple, it'll accidentally perform another behavior. Hate working on my friend's macbook pro, always have to plug in a mouse to be able to do anything.

i felt the same way about my asus netbook's multi touch trackpad. it was unreliable to try and use it. after a few sessions i gave up and dug out one of my old mice. works way better.

the best trackpad i've used yet was my dell laptop for work a few years ago. had dedicated portions of the pad makred for scrolling windows. used it for browsing and spreadsheet work just fine. was less anoying and frustrating to use than any multi touch pad i've tried. but still not as good as a mouse.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Nudge me when they bring back hardware audio acceleration so I can get my EAX 5 back. We've evolved graphics to real-time path tracing, but regressed audio some 15 years back in time with this stupid software audio stack.
    • Ocenaudio 3.19.4 by Razvan Serea  Ocenaudio is a full featured, fast and easy to use audio and music editor. It is the ideal software for people who need to edit and analyze audio files without complications. Ocenaudio also has powerful features that will please more advanced users. To assist ocenaudio development, a powerful toolset of audio editing, analysis and manipulation called Ocen Framework was created. ocenaudio is also based on Qt framework, a well known library for cross-platform development. Cross-platform support ocenaudio is available for all major operating systems: Microsoft Windows, Mac OS X and Linux. Native applications are generated for each platform from a common source, in order to achieve excelent performance and seamless integration with the operating system. All versions of ocenaudio have a uniform set of features and the same graphical interface, so the skills you learn in one platform can be used in the others. VST plugins support Ocenaudio supports VST (Virtual Studio Technology) plugins, giving its users access to numerous effects. Like the native effects, VST effects can use real-time preview to aide configuration. Real-time preview of effects Applying effects such as EQ, gain and filtering is an important part of audio editing. However, it is very tricky to get the desired result by adjusting the controls configuration alone: you must listen the processed audio. To ease the configuration of audio effects, ocenaudio has a real time preview feature: you hear the processed signal while adjusting the controls. The effect configuration window also includes a miniature view of the selected audio signal. You can navigate on this miniature view in the same way as you do on the main interface, selecting parts that interest you and listening to the effect result in real time. Multiselection for delicate editions To speed up complex audio files editing, ocenaudio includes multi-selection. With this amazing tool, you can simultaneously select different portions of an audio file and listen, edit or even apply an effect to them. For example, if you want to normalize only the excerpts of an interview where the interviewee is talking, just select them and apply the effect. Eficient edition of large files With ocenaudio, there is no limit to the length or the quantity of the audio files you can edit. Using an advanced memory management system, the application keeps your files open without wasting any of your computer's memory. Even in files several hours long, common editing operations such as copy, cut or paste happen almost instantly. Fully featured spectrogram Besides offering an incredible waveform view of your audio files, ocenaudio has a powerful and complete spectrogram view. In this view, you can analyze the spectral content of your audio signal with maximum clarity. Advanced users will be surprised to find that the spectrogram settings are applied in real time. The display is updated immediately when altering features such as the number of frequency bands, window type and size and dynamic range of the display. Ocenaudio 3.19.4 changelog: Adds fallback fonts so every language and symbol displays correctly Improves autosave and session recovery stability Improves region navigation and display Fixes a crash when the level meter is used on displays with a scaling greater than 200% Fixes memory corruption when using the silence selection tools Fixes crashes when closing a file while effects are still being processed Fixes a freeze when applying effects to many files at once (macOS) Fixes crashes related to audio devices on Windows Fixes invalid file names when exporting regions whose label is used as the file name Other bug fixes and improvements Download: Ocenaudio 64-bit | Portable | ~40.0 MB (Freeware) Download: Ocenaudio for Linux and Mac OS View: Ocenaudio Homepage | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 by Razvan Serea Hasleo Disk Clone is a free and all-in-one disk cloning software for Windows 11/10/8/7/Vista and Windows Server that can help you migrate Windows OS to another disk, clone one disk to another disk or clone one partition to another location quickly and efficiently. Completely Free Windows Migration and Disk/Partition Cloning Software Migrate Windows from one disk to another without reinstalling Windows, apps. Clone one disk to another and makes the data on 2 disks are exactly the same. Clone a partition to another location without losing any data. Easily adjust the size and location of the destination partition. Convert MBR to GPT or convert GPT to MBR by cloning. Creation of Windows PE emergency disk. Extremely fast cloning speed and multi-language support. Supported OS: Windows Vista/Server 2008 or later, fully compatible with GPT and UEFI. Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 changelog: Fixed an issue that caused disk enumeration to fail Fixed an issue where WinPE created under Windows ARM64 26H1 did not work properly Download: Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 | 32.3 MB (Freeware) Link: Hasleo Disk Clone Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • This got me thinking, would you rather a self driving car prioritise protecting its passengers or everyone else? I'd choose the one that keeps me and my kids safest. At some point, these cars have to make those choices already, don't they? Wonder if we have a way to find out what way they lean.
    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      553
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      78
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!