23rd James Bond Movie Officially Announced!


Recommended Posts

Casino Royale was great, didn't understand anything of the whole story of Quantum of Solace though. Shame they killed Vesper, I liked her (in a non-sexual way).

I liked her in a highly sexual way :shifty:

I got tired of seeing bond having stupid gadgets like a Grill inside his watch and a Sauna inside the lining of his pockets and constant one liners that made your teeth stand on end...bleugh.

If they can repeat Casion Royale then i'll be happy. Straight to the point, no nonsense neck breaking gun slanging mo'fo.

Hopefully more Casino Royale and far far less Quantum of Solace.

This.

Casino Royale is definitely one of the best Bond films in the series, and it also has in my opinion, the best Bond theme as well as the best opening. :)

I still think Goldeneye is the best Bond film of the lot, but I don't want to see Daniel Craig's Bond turn into the classic Bond, because I think it'd be too inappropriate for him. Pierce Brosnan (my favourite Bond :) ) was so good at the classic Bond; suave personality, and could pull off the cheesiest puns without making you cringe. :p

I much prefer Dniel Craig after watching a documentary about the agents of the time that the James Bond character is based on, Daniel Craig's portayal is much more accurate to the types of people who would have really done this kind of thing

Which documentary? Please do tell!

I for one, like Craigs portrayal

Which documentary? Please do tell!

I for one, like Craigs portrayal

It was a documentray on The History Channel or Discovery about Ian Fleming and the person he based James Bond on (during WW2) quite interesting!

I don't know why people slam Quantum of Solace so badly. I think it's fine film. It's Beautifully shot and really well edited too.

I might watch again tonight to verify it, but from what I remember the story is chaotic and doesn't make much sense.

This.Casino Royale is definitely one of the best Bond films in the series, and it also has in my opinion, the best Bond theme as well as the best opening. :)

+1 I love "You Know My Name".

  • 3 weeks later...
According to Deadline Javier Bardem has been offered a starring role alongside Daniel Craig in Bond 23. No details have been revealed as to whom he will play, but given this is the first major casting news it is likely to be the villain. Bardem played a villain in his Oscar-winning turn in No Country For Old Men two years ago so he?s no stranger to this type of role.

Earlier this week Judi Dench confirmed her return, and said she couldn?t wait to get working with Craig again and new director Sam Mendes (Road to Perdition, Jarhead). The script for Bond 23 has been written by Neal Purvis, Robert Wade and John Logan, and a release date of November 9, 2012 has been set.

If Javier Bardem accepts the offer to play the potential villian we should be hearing casting news on the next Bond girl soon, and maybe they?ll announce the official title.

[x]

uEesF.jpg

Ralph Fiennes is rumored to be in talks to join Bond 23.

The Daily Mail is currently circulating the rumor that Fiennes' reps are in discussions with the film?s producers and director Sam Mendes. If the reports turn out to be legit and they come to an agreement, he?d play a ?darkly complex? character. There are not any further details available now.

That might seem to conflict with previous reports stating that Javier Bardem was offered the movie?s bad guy role. The tabloids rumor does state that this is a different part from Bardem?s. It's possible that his character could be a mix of good and bad. This is likely just another fake story from the tabloid. We'll keep you posted as the story develops.

It's not the most awesome bond movie, but it beats any Brosnan movie witht he guy being all playboy and no agent. yeah, bond is a playboy, but he's a playboy with style and also an agent. Brosnan was all playboy and little else.

but it was an enjoyable movie, but didn't feel to much like a bond movie though.

My Reasons why QOS let Casino Royale down:

Opening, The really good on foot chase scene vs a very average car chase which switched viewing angles way to much you couldn't tell what has happening a lot but doesn't ruin a movie clearly it was OK.

The Music, compared to Casino Royale opening it already put my mood down, the songs just not James Bond which is suppose to be strong and charming not loud and screaming.

The plot, it was so dragged out and expanded it really made it hard to remember and average. It was dull as well because he is motivated by revenge which again is so average how many films is the good guy motivated by revenge ?

Boring, it was boring overall I seen it in the Cinema and I still felt bored they focused to much on the plot trying to make it really expansive and huge but there wasn't a lot to actually happen thus making it boring.

It's an average action film which = one of the worst bond films.

Brosnan ruined the franchise for me. Craig was never a good choice for Bond, ut would be like putting Jason Statham in the role. He should stick to things like Layer Cake as he is far better suited into those type roles. It almost feels to me like Casino Royale and QoS were nothing but attempts to steal some of the Jason Bourne film's thunder buy throwing out all the humorous parts that made Bond films what they are.

I thought Pierce was great as Bond. He wasn't the best when it came to action but he was entertaining. Craig is much better, reminds me of Connery (blonde hair aside). Neither of them ruined the series as they are both great actors. The blame falls on the directors and screenwriters. The last few Pierce movies really blew, much like QoS. However GoldenEye and Casino Royale were some of the best.

I'm really looking forward to Bond 23. They need to keep it character driven and not action driven. All the action sequences in QoS seemed forced and unnecessary. Most notably the plane sequence. The action in Casino Royale and GoldenEye were perfect. They drove the story further without unnecessary violence. The free-run sequence at the beginning of Casino Royale is one of my favourites of all time. Hopefully Sam Mendes can recapture some of Martin Campbell's bond magic. He's easily my favourite director from the series.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
    • I had a feeling this was coming. Picked up my first Mac ever last Saturday. Glad I did.
    • In a major surprise there is actually some good deals for the first time in years. At least for me.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      419
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!