Recommended Posts

Hi, this is probably going to seem a little nuts. But I'm trying to ban/block the BBC news web site via the hosts file on my computer. The reason I want to do this is because it's a huge timewaster and I am a bit addicted to it. You can literally spend hours a day on and off going back to and visiting it.

These are the addresses I have tried in my host file so far:

0.0.0.0 www.bbc.co.uk/news/

0.0.0.0 bbc.co.uk/news/

0.0.0.0 www.bbc.co.uk/news

0.0.0.0 bbc.co.uk/news

0,0.0.0 feeds.bbci.co.uk/news

0.0.0.0 feeds.bbci.co.uk

127.0.0.1 feeds.bbci.co.uk

127.0.0.1 feeds.bbci.co.uk/

127.0.0.1 www.bbc.co.uk/news/

127.0.0.1 www.bbc.co.uk/news

127.0.0.1 bbc.co.uk/news/

127.0.0.1 bbc.co.uk/news

127.0.0.1 news.bbc.co.uk

127.0.0.1 news.bbc.co.uk/

127.0.0.1 feeds.bbci.co.uk/

0.0.0.0.0 feeds.bbci.co.uk

127.0.0.1 212.58.246.80

127.0.0.1 212.58.246.81

127.0.0.1 212.58.246.82

127.0.0.1 212.58.246.83

127.0.0.1 212.58.246.84

127.0.0.1 212.58.246.85

127.0.0.1 212.58.246.86

127.0.0.1 212.58.246.87

127.0.0.1 212.58.246.88

127.0.0.1 212.58.246.89

0.0.0.0.0 212.58.246.80

0.0.0.0.0 212.58.246.81

0.0.0.0.0 212.58.246.82

0.0.0.0.0 212.58.246.83

0.0.0.0.0 212.58.246.84

0.0.0.0.0 212.58.246.85

0.0.0.0.0 212.58.246.86

0.0.0.0.0 212.58.246.87

0.0.0.0.0 212.58.246.88

0.0.0.0.0 212.58.246.89

They are all BBC news addresses. But nothing I do seems to work. I'm in danger of flunking my exams if I can't just find a way to casually remind myself that visiting the site isn't a good idea. It's just too easy and tempting, as it's always the first thing that pops up on Google when I type news.

I'm using Ubuntu, so maybe there's another way I can block it too?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/975926-cannot-banblock-bbc-news-site/
Share on other sites

Ok first thing **** like this is invalid

www.bbc.co.uk/news/

same with

0.0.0.0.0 212.58.246.89

You got 5 octets there, and you don't point an IP address at another IP address anyway.

The host file is used to resolve hostname to a IP.. if you want to point it at something that will not work then point it the machines loopback, ie 127.0.0.1

Correct would be

say

127.0.0.1 www.bbc.co.uk feeds.bbci.co.uk bbc.co.uk otherhostnamesyouwanttoblock.

Second is ubuntu even using hosts file first? Check your nsswitch.conf

edit:

"That's the whole BBC web site. I only want to block the news. "

its IMPOSSIBLE to block a /directory with a hosts file! PERIOD!! You can only block host names.. so if it was something like news.bbc.co.uk you could block - but you can not bock www.something.tld/NEWS with a host file without blocking everything at www.something.tld

Use opendns.com and then block the domain names using their manual URL blocking methods.

Or your router probably has a domain filter built in it.

Yeah but it wants a numerical IP address for the site being blocked and the subnet mask and the port and then do the same for my own IP address (the source and destination etc.), subnet mask and so on - and you have to enter them all one at a time. Which means if I have to enter all of the above addresses it would take for ever and be a real pain.

Anyway if blocking the above addresses in my host file doesn't work, then why should it work if I block them on my router?

Surely there's one address that if you block it, it is guaranteed to block the bbc news site? Or maybe it really is impossible?

Are you serious lol! I would much rather waste my time on the BBC than Facebook etc. Anyway

Pinging the BBC resolves to 212.58.244.66. A simple WHOIS returns this . . . You would need to block that entire range :-)

% This is the RIPE Database query service.

% The objects are in RPSL format.

%

% The RIPE Database is subject to Terms and Conditions.

% See http://www.ripe.net/db/support/db-terms-conditions.pdf

% Information related to '212.58.224.0 - 212.58.255.255'

inetnum: 212.58.224.0 - 212.58.255.255

org: ORG-BA34-RIPE

netname: UK-BBC-991005

descr: BBC

descr: Kingswood Warren,

descr: Tadworth,

descr: KT20 6NP

country: GB

admin-c: BB231

tech-c: SL108-RIPE

status: ALLOCATED PA

mnt-by: RIPE-NCC-HM-MNT

mnt-lower: BBC-MNT

mnt-routes: BBC-MNT

changed: [email protected] 19991008

changed: [email protected] 20011217

source: RIPE

organisation: ORG-BA34-RIPE

org-name: BBC

org-type: LIR

phone: +443030409777

fax-no: +442088118815

e-mail: [email protected]

admin-c: BBC-RIPE

mnt-ref: BBC-MNT

mnt-ref: RIPE-NCC-HM-MNT

mnt-by: RIPE-NCC-HM-MNT

changed: [email protected] 20040415

changed: [email protected] 20040426

changed: [email protected] 20070813

changed: [email protected] 20070829

changed: [email protected] 20071012

changed: [email protected] 20101213

changed: [email protected] 20101213

changed: [email protected] 20101213

source: RIPE

address: BBC Brandon Butterworth BBC Centre House, 56 Wood Lane W12 7SB London UNITED KINGDOM

person: Brandon Butterworth

address: British Broadcasting Corporation

address: BBC Centre House

address: 56 Wood Lane

address: London

address: W12 7SB

address: England, GB

phone: +44 3030409777

fax-no: +44 2088118815

e-mail: [email protected]

nic-hdl: BB231

mnt-by: BBC-MNT

changed: [email protected] 19931118

changed: [email protected] 19960920

changed: [email protected] 20031211

changed: [email protected] 20101213

source: RIPE

person: Simon Lockhart

address: BBC Internet Services

address: Maiden House

address: Vanwall Road

address: Maidenhead

address: SL6 4UB

address: England, GB

phone: +44 1628 407720

fax-no: +44 1628 407701

e-mail: [email protected]

nic-hdl: SL108-RIPE

mnt-by: BBC-MNT

changed: [email protected] 20010528

changed: [email protected] 20030207

source: RIPE

% Information related to '212.58.240.0/20AS2818'

route: 212.58.240.0/20

descr: BBC

origin: AS2818

mnt-by: BBC-MNT

changed: [email protected] 20090109

source: RIPE

% Information related to '212.58.224.0/19AS2818'

route: 212.58.224.0/19

descr: BBC

origin: AS2818

mnt-by: BBC-MNT

changed: [email protected] 20090109

source: RIPE

No he does not need to block the entire range if he resolves something.domain.tld to 127.0.0.1 - none of that comes into play at all.

most routers allow you to block based on URL, so site.domain.tld/NEWS could be blocked -- host file is used to resolve a host to an IP.. /News is not a host - so you can not block that with resolving a host to an invalid IP.

If you want to block based on URL then sure most routers do that -- or just set it as a blocked site in your browser for that matter.. But you can not do it with a host file.

Here this will prob do what you want

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/blocksite/

BlockSite is an extension, which automagically blocks websites of your choice. Additionally, this extension will disable all hyperlinks to these websites, by just displaying the link text without the clicking functionality.

Ok first thing **** like this is invalid

www.bbc.co.uk/news/

same with

0.0.0.0.0 212.58.246.89

You got 5 octets there, and you don't point an IP address at another IP address anyway.

The host file is used to resolve hostname to a IP.. if you want to point it at something that will not work then point it the machines loopback, ie 127.0.0.1

Correct would be

say

127.0.0.1 www.bbc.co.uk feeds.bbci.co.uk bbc.co.uk otherhostnamesyouwanttoblock.

Second is ubuntu even using hosts file first? Check your nsswitch.conf

edit:

"That's the whole BBC web site. I only want to block the news. "

its IMPOSSIBLE to block a /directory with a hosts file! PERIOD!! You can only block host names.. so if it was something like news.bbc.co.uk you could block - but you can not bock www.something.tld/NEWS with a host file without blocking everything at www.something.tld

So it can't be done? How about nsswitch.conf, or adding some rule (I don't know how to do it) to the ubuntu firewall? Where is nsswitch.conf located?

no firewall would not work either that would be blocking WHOLE host, not just some directory on it.. Use the addon I linked to -- sounds like it will do exactly what you want, and even will remove the link on your google searches to that url if Im reading it right.

nsswitch tells the machine in what order and what services to use for name resolution, ie dns hosts, or hosts then dns that sort of thing - again not what your looking to do.

What your looking to do is block on specific URI -- which not the function of a firewall, that is a content filters via a proxy, you could do it with squid proxy for example. Your looking to do specific content filtering which has nothing to do with name resolution from a name to an IP. What your wanting can not be done with name resolution manipulation or firewalling because /NEWS is not a host nor is in an IP, nor is at a specific PORT, etc. Sure some firewalls have the ability to do URI filtering - but in general you block based on IP, PORT not some specific URI your browser is trying to access on a specific host. URI filtering is not related to the general feature set of a firewall which is protocol, ip, port based -- ie you could block UDP, ICMP, TCP you could block an IP, you could block a specific port via a specific protocol - ie allow UDP 53 but block TCP 53 sort of thing.

Try the addon on linked to.

No he does not need to block the entire range if he resolves something.domain.tld to 127.0.0.1 - none of that comes into play at all.

most routers allow you to block based on URL, so site.domain.tld/NEWS could be blocked -- host file is used to resolve a host to an IP.. /News is not a host - so you can not block that with resolving a host to an invalid IP.

If you want to block based on URL then sure most routers do that -- or just set it as a blocked site in your browser for that matter.. But you can not do it with a host file.

Here this will prob do what you want

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/blocksite/

BlockSite is an extension, which automagically blocks websites of your choice. Additionally, this extension will disable all hyperlinks to these websites, by just displaying the link text without the clicking functionality.

That extension is borked. I tried using it for a while and it gives a bunch of false positives.

False positives? On what -- are you not just putting in the SPECIFIC URI you want to block?? Don't pick any sort of adblocking or malware blocking - just have it block that specific URI.

Ok - I just did a simple test and sure looks to work to me.. So there is a specific host called news.bbc.co.uk btw - noticed it on the main page in the links to news.

So here is how I setup blockedsite

post-14624-0-35412000-1297795047.jpg

Here is with it not blocking

post-14624-0-87506800-1297795071.jpg

now here its blocked -- notice the links are now just text and not links anymore

post-14624-0-52373200-1297795108.jpg

I tried typing in news.bbc.co.uk into my browser - would not work, etc.. So what are you saying is a false positive its giving??

False positives? On what -- are you not just putting in the SPECIFIC URI you want to block?? Don't pick any sort of adblocking or malware blocking - just have it block that specific URI.

No if I block BBC news (or anything) I'll get regular annoying pop-ups on most (unrelated) pages I visit saying that some element or other of the content on that page has been blocked and I need to add it to my whitelist. It doesn't matter what site I visit.

Not to be rude, but wouldn't it just be easier and more profitable in the long run to... I dunno, develop some self-control?

Crazy idea, I know...

Bad habits are hard to break. I'm not the only guy who's ever been addicted to a web site. I suspect you have to at some point or other. Sometimes you can break the habit, but like any addiction if it's always there, it's too easy to slip back.

I just edit a previous post - I tested it an works just freaking fine if you ask me!!

Your not WHITELISTING!!! you would have to whitelist everything you want to visit that way.. Look on my settings I did for blocksite in previous post.

edit: set it up exactly how I did -- now show me a false positive example!

btw there is a host called news.bbc.co.uk -- and you could block that.. But thats not going to stop bbc.co.uk/NEWS or www.bbc.co.uk/NEWS etc.. since those are not hosts but a specific URI

Bad habits are hard to break. I'm not the only guy who's ever been addicted to a web site. I suspect you have to at some point or other. Sometimes you can break the habit, but like any addiction if it's always there, it's too easy to slip back.

I know they are hard to break--and I honestly was not trying to be rude. I'm just saying, if you can develop that discipline, it will serve you well in all areas of life.

I've definitely been addicted/spent too much time on websites before (*cough*Neowin*cough*), but can't recall ever neglecting anything really important like schoolwork in favour of it.

I know they are hard to break--and I honestly was not trying to be rude. I'm just saying, if you can develop that discipline, it will serve you well in all areas of life.

I've definitely been addicted/spent too much time on websites before (*cough*Neowin*cough*), but can't recall ever neglecting anything really important like schoolwork in favour of it.

It happens. Just look at the army of Facebook freaks.

I just edit a previous post - I tested it an works just freaking fine if you ask me!!

Your not WHITELISTING!!! you would have to whitelist everything you want to visit that way.. Look on my settings I did for blocksite in previous post.

edit: set it up exactly how I did -- now show me a false positive example!

btw there is a host called news.bbc.co.uk -- and you could block that.. But thats not going to stop bbc.co.uk/NEWS or www.bbc.co.uk/NEWS etc.. since those are not hosts but a specific URI

No you misunderstand. It doesn't work. It works for a while - and then after a bit when you visit a random site , it starts to give the annoying pop-up about content being banned. The whitelist is irrelevant, it's just part of the message in the annoying pop-up that if you don't want some part of the content on such-and such random site blocked, you need to add it to your white list.

It just gets a bit annoying after a while.

I think I'm going to have to just give up and admit that the BBC news site (on it's own) just can't be blocked.

Well no **** warning can get annoying ;) Just turn them off -- you want it to block stuff that has those specific URI in them correct!!! Which is what you want it to do, but no I would not warning everytime it does it ;)

This is what your talking about?

post-14624-0-50457400-1297796555.jpg

I don't know how to do it on my router. It wants a specific numerical IP address, and nothing I tried works. OpenDNS might work, but I have a dynamic IP and there's no IP updater agent that I know of for Ubuntu./

So look at the WHOIS Info I posted and do that.

HINT 212.58.240.0/20 and 212.58.224.0/19

If you are using DynDNS there is an updater for Ubuntu. I cant remember what its called though Im not at my Ubuntu Box

Well no **** warning can get annoying ;) Just turn them off -- you want it to block stuff that has those specific URI in them correct!!! Which is what you want it to do, but no I would not warning everytime it does it ;)

This is what your talking about?

post-14624-0-50457400-1297796555.jpg

Yeah, I turned the warnings off. That might work. BTW OpenDNS sucks slightly. It's a bit of a blunt hammer. I still can't block bbc.co.uk/news, because as you said I can only block the whole domain. If I select to block news, then it bans me from using Neowin too! (And every site that can vaguely be categorised as 'news')

However it is useful for some things.

If you have a dynamic IP and Ubuntu you can do this:

sudo apt-get install ddclient

For anyone that wants it here is a working copy of my ddclient.conf

# Configuration file for ddclient generated by debconf
#
# /etc/ddclient.conf
daemon=300
syslog=yes
mail=root
mail-failure=root
pid=/var/run/ddclient.pid
ssl=yes
use=web, web=myip.dnsomatic.com
protocol=dyndns2
server=updates.opendns.com
login=your_email_address_goes_here
password=your_OpenDNS_password_goes_here
the_name_of_the_network_you_chose_for_OpenDNS_goes_here

and finally /etc/default/ddclient:

# Configuration for ddclient scripts 
run_ipup="false"
run_daemon="true"
daemon_interval="300"

Don't forget to change the DNS servers on your router to the OpenDNS servers as I initially did.

Then hopefully you should be able to forget about it.

^ what part of blocking an IP do you people not understand.. he wants to just block www.bbc.co.uk/NEWS not www.bbc.co.uk

This is not possible via IP, if he blocks the IP or resolves to the wrong IP for that host www.bbc.co.uk sure he will not have access to /NEWS but he wont have access to www.bbc.co.uk either.

If you have changed your mind and your ok with blocking the whole SITE bbc.co.uk -- then do that via your host file or router if supports it or for that matter opendns, etc. BTW I don't believe opendns will block www.site.tld/NEWS -- I don't see how its possible, its DNS service not a webfiltering server(proxy).. If you when your machines wants to go to www.bbc.co.uk it gets the IP for that Fully Qualified domain name via dns.. Which is going to be exactly the same if you want to got to www.bbc.co.uk/NEWS

as to this statement "but I have a dynamic IP and there's no IP updater agent that I know of for Ubuntu./"

So -- how often does your IP change??? I have had the same dynamic IP for prob a year now, only reason it changed is I changed the interface on my router so my mac changed - if I wanted to keep the old one I could of change set its mac to my old one, etc.

Just because your ISP assigns you an IP via dhcp does not mean its going to change -- is your router on 24/7/365?? Then highly doubt it will change ever! And if it does, ok then access the opendns site and it will update your IP. the only reason you would have to worry about updating opendns with your IP is if your IP was changing daily.. Which might happen if you actually turn off your router or if directly connected via your PC with no router, etc. If you device is turned off for an extended period.

If you want to just block /NEWS your going to need use something that blocks specific URI, if your router does not do it - and you don't like the perfectly good solution I already gave you - the firefox addon with warning messages turned OFF.

Blocking just /NEWS is not possible via hosts file, firewall, opendns or any other name resolution, IP blocking solution.. Now if your ok with blocking the whole site www.bbc.co.uk, bbc.co.uk, bbci.co.uk, news.bbc.co.uk, etc.. then sure that can be done with host file, router even it sounds like, opendns, etc. keep in mind that machine will cache the IPs to these sites so changing your host file will not instantly block it, you would have to clear its local cache (reboot would do it) Even doing it on your router if this is dns based, your client will still have it cached -- so again, going to have to clear the local machines cache. Same goes for opendns.

But if you just want to block specific URI here is another solution

This should work and exactly what you ask for blocking sites that waste your time ;)

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/leechblock/

LeechBlock is a simple productivity tool designed to block those time-wasting sites that can suck the life out of your working day. All you need to do is specify which sites to block and when to block them.

As to what your router can do -- what is the exact make and model number of your router so we can look at the manual for it and see!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Passkeys: Think of them like a broken heart necklace. Imagine one of those heart necklaces that breaks into two matching pieces. One person keeps one half, and the other person keeps the other half. With passkeys, the website has one half, and you have the other half. If the website gets hacked and someone steals its half, that stolen piece is useless by itself. It cannot unlock your account without your matching half. This particular heart necklace is one of a kind, there is only one in existence. Your half of the necklace has to be stored somewhere. It might be stored on your phone, tablet, computer, security key, or a password manager that can sync it between all your devices. A security key is a small physical device that you keep with you, kind of like a house key, car key, or flash drive. I would not usually recommend a security key as the first option for the average person. For most people, it is easier to use their phone, computer, or a password manager that can sync passkeys between their devices. A security key is more like a spare key you keep in a safe place, just in case you lose access to your other devices or your password manager. Some security keys plug into your computer. Some plug into your phone or tablet. Some get tapped against your device. The idea is simple: a security key can hold another passkey for the same website. Think of it like creating a second one-of-a-kind heart necklace for the same account. One necklace could be paired with your password manager, while another necklace could be paired with your security key. That means the website has more than one matching half on file. One half matches the passkey in your password manager. Another half matches the passkey stored on your security key. So, if you lose access to your phone, computer, or password manager, you would still be able to log in using the passkey stored on your security key. Think of it like keeping an extra special necklace piece on a tiny keychain, stored somewhere safe. The website still has the matching half for that security key, but your half is safely stored inside the little key. A passkey does not automatically exist on every device you own. It lives wherever you save it. If your half is stored on one device, then that device is the one that has the matching piece. For example, if you create the passkey on your Windows computer and it is only saved to that computer, your iPhone does not automatically have that same half. If you create it on your iPhone and it only stays on that iPhone, your Android phone does not automatically have it either. That is where password managers come in. A password manager can act like a protected jewelry box for your passkeys. Instead of your half of the necklace being locked to only one device, the password manager can securely sync that half to your other approved devices. For example, Apple Passwords and iCloud Keychain can sync passkeys between your Apple devices. Google Password Manager can sync passkeys with your Google account. But password managers such as 1Password and Bitwarden can sync passkeys between everything, your phones, tablets and computers. Now, you might ask: “What happens if I lose access to the device that has my passkey?” That depends on where your passkey was saved and what recovery options the website gives you. If your passkey was synced through a password manager, you may be able to sign in from another device that has access to that same password manager. For example, if your passkey is saved in iCloud Keychain, Google Password Manager, 1Password, or Bitwarden, another approved device may still have access to it. If your passkey was saved only on one phone, computer, or security key, and you lose that device, then you may not have your half of the necklace anymore. In that case, you would usually need to use the website’s backup login or account recovery options. A lot of websites that support passkeys still let you fall back to your regular password. So if you lose access to your passkey, the site may still let you log in with your password, a code sent to your email, a text message, a recovery code, or some other account recovery process. That is convenient, but it is also important to understand: if the website still allows password login, then your password still matters. Passkeys are safer than passwords, but if your account still has a password as a backup, you should still use a strong, unique password and turn on two-factor authentication if the website offers it. This is why it is a good idea to have more than one safe way back into important accounts. For example, you might keep your passkey in a syncing password manager, add a second trusted device, save recovery codes somewhere safe, or set up a backup security key. A passkey is very secure, but just like a real key, you need a backup plan in case you lose access to it. Now, you might ask: “What stops a hacker from copying my half of the necklace?” That’s the important part: your half is protected. It is not something you type in, and it is not something the website gets to keep. Think of your half as being locked inside a tiny safe on your phone, computer, security key, or password manager. That safe only opens when you approve it with your fingerprint, face, PIN, or device password. When you log in, the website does not need to see your half. It only needs proof that your half matches its half. Your actual half is not handed over to the website. This is different from a password. With a password, you type the secret into the website. If you type it into a fake website, the hacker now has it. With a passkey, you are not typing your secret into the website. Your device is proving you have the matching half without giving the half away. That also helps protect you from fake websites. If someone makes a fake login page that looks like the real site, your device can tell it is not the real match. It will not use your passkey there. Now, could someone use your passkey if they stole your device, got into your password manager, or somehow unlocked the safe that holds your half? Yes, that is why your device password, PIN, fingerprint, face unlock, and password manager security still matter. But a hacker cannot just steal your passkey from the website or trick you into typing it into a fake page like they can with a password. That is why passkeys are safer than passwords. The two matching pieces have to come together, like two lovebirds who were once separated and are finally reunited.
    • Newegg offers insane combo deal on Amazon Prime Day 2026 that beats Steam Machine by Sayan Sen Building a PC is undoubtedly difficult nowadays but with this epic combo deal, Newegg is trying to make it as easy for you as it is possible. If you are making a new one or even upgrading an old system to a new Windows 11 device, this combo bundle is truly unmissable as you get AMD's Ryzen 9800X3D, a compatible X870 motherboard, a 240mm AIO liquid cooler and finally a Samsung 990 PRO SSD all for under $1000 (purchase link under the specs table down below). This should beat out the newly launched Steam Machine from Valve in terms of performance and performance per dollar especially if you are willing to set Linux up on it. Essentially with this combo you will get the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D 8-core 3D V cache CPU, Samsung's 990 PRO 2TB NVMe SSD, the MSI MAG X870 TOMAHAWK WIFI ATX Motherboard, and finally the Cooler Master Elite Liquid 240. Thanks to that massive vertically stacked L3 cache, the X3D desktop processors, including the 9800X3D, also come with the benefit of not needing fast memory. Even DDR5-5600 should be plenty for it. The technical specifications of the Ryzen 7 9800X3D are given in the table below: Specification Value Architecture Zen 5 Cores / Threads 8 / 16 Base Clock 4.7 GHz Max Boost Clock Up to 5.2 GHz L1 Cache 640 KB L2 Cache 8 MB L3 Cache 96 MB Total Cache 104 MB CPU Core Process TSMC 4nm FinFET I/O Die Process TSMC 6nm FinFET Socket AM5 Default TDP 120W Max Temperature (Tjmax) 95°C Thermal Solution Not included Memory Type DDR5 Max Capacity 256 GB Memory Speeds 2x1R: DDR5-5600 2x2R: DDR5-5600 4x1R: DDR5-3600 4x2R: DDR5-3600 PCIe Version PCIe 5.0 PCIe Lanes (Total/Usable) 28 / 24 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10Gbps) 4 USB 2.0 1 Graphics Cores 2 CU RDNA 2 Frequency 2200 MHz DisplayPort over USB-C Yes Overclocking Unlocked Up next we have the tech specs for the MSI MAG X870 TOMAHAWK WIFI Motherboard: Specification Value Chipset AMD X870 CPU Support AMD Ryzen 9000 / 8000 / 7000 Series Desktop Processors Socket AM5 Memory Slots 4 × DDR5 UDIMM Maximum Memory Capacity 256GB Memory Support DDR5 8400–5600 MT/s (OC), DDR5 5600–4800 MT/s (JEDEC) Integrated Graphics Outputs 1 × HDMI 2.1 FRL (up to 8K 60Hz) 2 × USB4 Type-C with DisplayPort 1.4 HBR3 (up to 4K 60Hz) Expansion Slots PCI_E1: PCIe 5.0 x16 (CPU) PCI_E2: PCIe 3.0 x1 (Chipset) PCI_E3: PCIe 4.0 x4 (Chipset) Audio Realtek ALC4080 Codec 7.1-Channel USB High Performance Audio Supports up to 32-bit/384kHz playback on front panel S/PDIF output M.2 Slots 4 × M.2 M2_1: PCIe 5.0 x4 (CPU, 22110/2280) M2_2: PCIe 5.0 x4 (CPU, 2280/2260) M2_3: PCIe 4.0 x2 (Chipset, 2280/2260) M2_4: PCIe 4.0 x4 (Chipset, 2280/2260) SATA Ports 4 × SATA 6Gb/s RAID Support RAID 0, 1, 5, 10 for M.2 NVMe storage devices Rear USB Ports 4 × USB 2.0 3 × USB 5Gbps Type-A 2 × USB 10Gbps Type-A 1 × USB 10Gbps Type-C 2 × USB4 40Gbps Type-C Front USB Headers 4 × USB 2.0 4 × USB 5Gbps Type-A 1 × USB 20Gbps Type-C LAN Realtek 8126-CG 5G LAN Wireless Wi-Fi 7 (M.2 Key-E module pre-installed) Supports 2.4GHz / 5GHz / 6GHz bands Up to 5.8Gbps Supports 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be Bluetooth Bluetooth 5.4, MLO, 4KQAM Internal Power Connectors 1 × 24-pin ATX Power 2 × CPU Power Connectors 1 × PCIe 8-pin Power Connector Fan Headers 1 × CPU Fan 1 × Combo Fan (Pump/System) 6 × System Fan RGB Headers 3 × Addressable V2 RGB (JARGB_V2) 1 × RGB LED (JRGB) Other Internal Headers 1 × EZ Conn-header 2 × Front Panel Headers 1 × Chassis Intrusion 1 × Front Audio 1 × TPM 2.0 Header Debug Features 4 × EZ Debug LEDs 1 × EZ Digit Debug LED Rear I/O Ports Clear CMOS Button Flash BIOS Button HDMI 2 × USB 40Gbps Type-C 1 × USB 10Gbps Type-C 4 × USB 10Gbps Type-A 3 × USB 5Gbps Type-A 4 × USB 2.0 5G LAN Port Wi-Fi/Bluetooth Antenna Connectors Audio Connectors Form Factor ATX The Samsung 990 PRO is a PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD and still one of the fastest drives available today for under $500. Speaking of fast, sequential reads and writes are rated at 7450 MB/s and 6900 MB/s, respectively. The random throughputs for reads and writes are 1400K IOPS and 1550K IOPS, respectively. The 990 PRO is based on Samsung's 7th Gen V-NAND flash, and it too is TLC. It packs 2 gigs of LPDDR4 DRAM cache, which helps the random performance. The endurance rating for this is 1200 TBW (terabytes written), which should be sufficient for most users. The Samsung 990 PRO is compatible with the PlayStation 5, but if you are going to use the 990 PRO on a PC, check out the Samsung Magician app that lets you track your drive's health, update its firmware, customize various settings, and more. The tech specs are given below: Specification Value Interface PCIe Gen 4.0 x4, NVMe 2.0 Form Factor M.2 2280 Controller Samsung In-house Controller NAND Flash 3D TLC DRAM Cache 2GB LPDDR4 Sequential Read (Max) 7,450 MB/s Sequential Write (Max) 6,900 MB/s Random Read (4K) Up to 1,400,000 IOPS Random Write (4K) Up to 1,550,000 IOPS TBW (Endurance) 1,200 TBW MTBF 1,500,000 hours Operating Temperature 0°C to 70°C Storage Temperature -40°C to 85°C Shock Resistance 1,500G / 0.5ms Heatsink No Get the combo deal at this link: AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D, Samsung 990 PRO 2TB, MSI MAG X870 TOMAHAWK WIFI motherboard, Cooler Master Elite Liquid 240: $784.99 + $25 off with promo code FTTF77: $759.99 (Sold and Shipped by Newegg US) Good to know This Newegg deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • I heard from a lot of people that driver support for the latest games when RDNA first came out (Radeon 5000 series) was pretty bad, but if you didn't buy the card on day one, or were not trying to play the latest titles, then you were isolated from that issue. Other than that, it's been good and only getting better.
    • Meta launches new AI glasses in 26 styles and Muse Spark multimodal capabilties by Pradeep Viswanathan Meta today announced a new line of Meta Glasses in partnership with EssilorLuxottica. The new AI glasses build on the company’s existing smart glasses portfolio, which is sold under the Ray-Ban Meta and Oakley Meta brands. The new Meta Glasses start at just $299, are compatible with prescription lenses, and will be available in 26 styles across different colors, lenses, and frames. At launch, Meta Glasses will be available in three frame styles. The Meta Adventurer features a clean rectangular design and comes in Standard and Large sizes. The Meta Fury is a bolder frame for users who want a stronger look. Meta Glasses by Kylie is a slim oval frame designed in collaboration with Kylie Jenner. Similar to existing Meta AI Glasses, the new Meta Glasses include a dedicated action button that can be used to quickly access Meta AI or launch a favorite feature. They also feature open-ear speakers for calls, music, and more. Meta has also included a multi-mic array with wind noise reduction for calls and messaging. Users can capture photos and videos hands-free using voice commands. Meta claims more than eight hours of battery life, while the portable charging case can provide up to 40 additional hours. As expected, Meta Glasses come pre-loaded with Meta AI powered by Muse Spark from day one. Muse Spark is the first model from Meta Superintelligence Labs with improved multimodal capabilities. The same Meta AI upgrade is also now available on existing Ray-Ban Meta and Oakley Meta Glasses in the US and Canada via an update. With the Muse Spark-powered AI assistant, Meta AI in the new glasses can provide smarter answers, understand what the user is seeing, and help with daily tasks such as calendar management and navigation. Meta also announced an upcoming feature called the dynamic photo feature, which captures multiple frames and recommends the best one. Pedestrian navigation is also coming soon to these glasses. Meta is also adding support for 14 new live translation languages, including Japanese, Mandarin Chinese, Hindi, and Korean. The new Meta Glasses are available starting today through Meta.com, Best Buy, Amazon, LensCrafters, Sunglass Hut, and select retailers.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      468
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      166
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      104
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      87
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!