Sandy Bridge build


Recommended Posts

I'm looking at replacing my current computer (5 year old Core 2 Duo) with a brand new i5 2500K based system, and I'd like some opinions on the parts I'm looking at.

  • PSU: Corsair TX-650 (650w)
  • RAM: G Skill 8G(2x4G) DDR3 1600Mhz PC12800 RL 9-9-9-24(CL9D-8GBRL)
  • CPU: Core i5 2500k
  • Mobo: Asus P8P67 Pro
  • HDD: Seagate SATAIII 1TB 7200RPM 32mb * 2
  • Cooler: Noctua NH-U12P SE2
  • Case: Fractal Design, Define R3, Black Pearl

I hate to say it, but I picked the motherboard just because a magazine mentioned it, although reading up on it makes it out to be a pretty good board, and it's apparently reliable (good overclocker). As for the graphics card, I picked an Nvidia GTX570, but since Nvidia is releasing a 590 model anytime now, I'd like to wait until after that's been released to see how it affects the price of the 580, if it brings it down enough I could afford to get that instead of the 570.

Now, can anybody foresee any problems with this selection? and has anybody used these parts and can vouch for their quality (or alternatively tell me they're crap and steer me towards something better)

Edit: Swapped out the cooler and hard drives.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/980178-sandy-bridge-build/
Share on other sites

I have the same mobo.... eeehhhh. Not sure I'd recommend it. The EFI is super buggy it's really not even funny.

I think I'd recommend you go with a Gigabyte board as they're the only brand that is staying with BIOS until they actually perfect their EFI. ASUS definitely pushed out their EFI before it was properly tested. Gigabyte will provide EFI updates for their boards once it's ready.

Some notable bugs:

- System won't resume from sleep if you overclock (more specifically, if you enable PLL Overvoltage, which you have to)

- System always takes for-freaking-ever to POST

- Random settings don't stick/reset on reboot

- Unpredictable system stability. Might boot with certain OC just fine one time, completely fails to POST the next

- And much, much more...

This isn't just based on my experience btw. This has all been confirmed by many others in various forums.

haha, wow, ok. I've got a Gigabyte board in my current system and while there are some small issues it's been a good board overall. And it's good to hear that Gigabyte will be providing an EFI upgrade.

I don't really have an opinion as of now to help you pick out. I'm just curious, why are you getting a new machine?

While there's nothing wrong with it, it's 5 years old and starting to show it's age, it's having problems playing newer games and even some websites can slow it down a bit. I won't be getting rid of it, it'll find a new use somewhere.

Corsair RAM and PSUs are top notch, I've always had good luck with them. I would probably go with 2x4GB kit (like CORSAIR Vengeance 8GB kit) instead of 4x2GB. That way you'll have space for future updates and possibly avoid some stability issues by reducing the load on the mobo.

I have Asus P8P67 Pro and it's a brilliant motherboard, new BIOS is fantastic to use and after you have played with it there is no going back. Just make sure you get B3 revision chipset which fixes the SATA issues.

I haven't had or seen Fractal Design's cases personally but I have only heard good things about them.

Some notable bugs:

- System won't resume from sleep if you overclock (more specifically, if you enable PLL Overvoltage, which you have to)

- System always takes for-freaking-ever to POST

- Random settings don't stick/reset on reboot

- Unpredictable system stability. Might boot with certain OC just fine one time, completely fails to POST the next

- And much, much more...

This isn't just based on my experience btw. This has all been confirmed by many others in various forums.

First one isn't a BIOS issue, it's Intel side "problem" and has been known for a long time (it's not limited to Sandy Bridge). Personally I'm running stable at 4.5Gz without PLL overvoltage, you don't need it unless you shoot for the 5GHz barrier.

Rest are pretty much isolated issues (most were able to fix them by clearing CMOS as far as I can tell), if you search for Gigabyte issues you will find similar load of bugs (for reference see HardOCP review: http://www.hardocp.com/article/2011/01/27/gigabyte_p67aud4_motherboard_review/6). Brand new chipset, brand new issues.

Corsair RAM and PSUs are top notch, I've always had good luck with them. I would probably go with 2x4GB kit (like CORSAIR Vengeance 8GB kit) instead of 4x2GB. That way you'll have space for future updates and possibly avoid some stability issues by reducing the load on the mobo.

I have Asus P8P67 Pro and it's a brilliant motherboard, new BIOS is fantastic to use and after you have played with it there is no going back. Just make sure you get B3 revision chipset which fixes the SATA issues.

I haven't had or seen Fractal Design's cases personally but I have only heard good things about them.

I will admit the EFI is very nice to work with and look at, but have not not been experiencing any bugs with it? Perhaps the B3 rev fixes more than just SATA issues.

Edit: Nvm. See above.

So what stability issues would I be looking at with the RAM? the only 2x4 kit is $180, while the 4x2 is $115.

Edit: Upgradability would be nice, but by the time I need 16GB or so I'd think RAM prices would go down by a fair bit (and I upgrade very infrequently, I managed to skip AGP and DDR1 in between one system upgrade)

Edit 2: There's actually a problem with the cooler I picked, it's 160mm tall while the case allows for 165mms of clearance, and I don't know if that's counting the space behind the mobo, etc.

I have the same mobo.... eeehhhh. Not sure I'd recommend it. The EFI is super buggy it's really not even funny.

I think I'd recommend you go with a Gigabyte board as they're the only brand that is staying with BIOS until they actually perfect their EFI. ASUS definitely pushed out their EFI before it was properly tested. Gigabyte will provide EFI updates for their boards once it's ready.

Some notable bugs:

- System won't resume from sleep if you overclock (more specifically, if you enable PLL Overvoltage, which you have to)

- System always takes for-freaking-ever to POST

- Random settings don't stick/reset on reboot

- Unpredictable system stability. Might boot with certain OC just fine one time, completely fails to POST the next

- And much, much more...

This isn't just based on my experience btw. This has all been confirmed by many others in various forums.

Asus is pretty good w/ their BIOS updates... have you updated?

what does "takes for-freaking-ever to POST" really mean? how many seconds does it take from the time you press the power button to the time it starts loading the OS?

that PSU is fine and all, but honestly, you should buy the "most watts" you can afford. you're talking about buying a 570, 580, 590... i wouldnt get anything under 700W. my 750W PSU can handle a 580, but not two. i'd love to have the option of buying 2 high-end cards one day, but i cant w/ this PSU.

Some Asus board are slow at post.. P6X58-D Premium takes like 5-7 secs before it even shows the POST screens (E-Z memory is slow, even if you setup your own settings), and I know the P5W-DH would do this over a USB Emulation bug.. Once they are past post tho, they are great boards. Always a lot of options in the bios and very stable. Been an Asus fan for a long time.. Still have a setup with a P2B here working great. :) Thats a 13 year old board and still works great. :)

As for corsair, the PSU's and RAM from them are top notch. Just watch some of the PSU's, went through 2 AX-1200's as they had noisy caps..

...

that PSU is fine and all, but honestly, you should buy the "most watts" you can afford. you're talking about buying a 570, 580, 590... i wouldnt get anything under 700W. my 750W PSU can handle a 580, but not two. i'd love to have the option of buying 2 high-end cards one day, but i cant w/ this PSU.

I'm not looking at getting the 590, it's just a choice between the 570/580. And an SLI setup is doubtful, because of the time it'd take me to get another 570/580, and that the motherboard only really has 1 x16 socket (the second x16 socket is actually split between the other x1 sockets, plugging anything into them slows down the x16 socket). A 750w PSU is only like $30 more, so if I don't keep adding costs it's possible.

If there's that much price difference, then it's probably not worth it. When I was shopping (in US) the price difference was around $10.

I'd assume it's just supply, other brands are either radically cheaper or much more expensive (other 8GB kits from Corsair are 2x as much, etc.)

Yeah, you should be able to hit 4.5GHz easy for a 2500K.

Gigabyte boards are fine. I have a P67A-UD5 in my current system, and it's a solid board. It's much better than most Gigabyte boards in the past, and just in my personal opinion I think they've built a better ASUS board than ASUS themselves. Just saying. Of course after writing that my ASUS contact had a little chat with me :laugh:

Just off topic @ The_Decryptor: "Remember: 50% of the population is of below average intelligence." Average != median. :p

Specs look fine, may want to check the RAM is rated to run at 1.5v as this is best for Sandy Bridge. The older 1.65v modules work fine, but long term - probably not, I read in various forums that 1.65v this is too much for the memory controller to handle on the CPU.

Hmm, yeah that could be a problem. The only Corsair memory at 1.5v is a 4GB stick, and 2 of them cost more than a single 8GB kit. There's a 8GB kit of G.Skill RAM that's 1.5v and the same cost as the 8GB Corsair kit, but I've heard mixed things about them (Some things tell me it's awesome, some things tell me otherwise, etc.).

Although really at the end of the day, if it works I don't care. When I picked the memory for my current build I didn't even bother looking at the clocks :laugh:

Buy a 2x4GB RAM kit instead of a 4x2GB RAM kit. It doesn't cost a whole lot more and makes it much cheaper to upgrade RAM later. If the Corsair one costs that much more, go with a different brand. I got my 2x4GB G.SKILL RAM kit for $110 and it is DDR3-1600 like the Corsair RAM you want to purchase.

Take a look at benchmarks for RAM overclocking on Sandy Bridge. You barely get any extra performance by going for faster RAM and faster timings since they don't have an FSB anymore. Anything over DDR3 1600 for a 2500K is overkill, and the 1600 doesn't get you a whole lot more performance over 1333.

The memory's ok, but I think the importing costs would hurt :laugh: (I'm in Australia)

And thanks for those links (Y), the cooler in those pictures is taller than the NH-U12P SE2 (only by 2mm though), so if the taller one fits then so should the shorter one.

  • 2 weeks later...

I finally got the parts today, and christ this thing flies.

The first game I tested was Garry's Mod, with everything maxed out at 1920x1080 I hit the internal engine limit of 300fps and stayed there. JS scripts that used to take 10+ seconds to execute now complete in <500ms, etc.

The software that comes with the mobo does automatic overcloking, so right away it had it running at 4.3Ghz.

There's also a calibration mode where it'll try out a whole bunch of settings to see what works, but I haven't tried that yet.

Not sure if you still got the cooler or how it fit, but got myself corsair H70 which seems to be good for entry level liquid cooling certainly if your overclocking too and seems to generally fit well with most cases that support a 120mm fan at the rear.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16835181013&Tpk=corsair%20H70

just a suggestion since it's good value for it's price and stuff and compares to the higher end air cooling solutions (huge ones) :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!