PSN Automatic Renewal and Issues I have with it...


Recommended Posts

Well, December 18th was the last time I renewed my PSN+ subscription. 3 months went by, and it just happened to be that a friend of mine needed some money, so I gave them my card to hold onto for a bit ( trust is no issue, and this isn't the problem lol ). So March 18th comes, and I figure they charged my card for it already, as on the 19th and 20th of March I was still a PSN+ member. So on March 19th, I helped my sister by baby sitting my nephew, and she said I could order a pizza and get some downloaded content for MVC3 as my reward lol. So March 20th, at 11:30 in the morning, I input her CC info onto my account, order the MVC3 Downloadable characters, and think all is good. I use the restroom, come out, and with in those 10 minutes, Sony decided that at 11:40 am on a Sunday would be the best time to I guess renew my PSN+ subscription. So my sister's CC gets charged an additional $20 bucks. Now money isn't the issue here. I can afford it, she can, and I am going to pay her back. Here is the issue.

So this automatic renewal just goes whenever it wants basically, and Sony says , that since it was a automatic renewal, they have no ways of giving a refund or changing the charge to another card. I ask them, " So If I was to actually press through the store and verifications for a purchase, I could still get a refund, but something that happens automatically, without my knowing of when or consent of on what, is something I just have to deal with?" And they said Yes. I told them that if this was a automatic renewal, it should be charged to my original card I set it up on, and not the card I just put in 10 minutes ago to just make 1 purchase.

Ya, it isn't much, but it is enough to frustrate me. Sooo, if you have any renewing subscriptions, I recommend going to account management, transaction details, and then turning off the auto renewal. It really does you no good in the long run, as the only safety is that Sony will get what they want lol.

To me, this is just horrible customer service and business practice. Not only is the renewal not set up for the same day of the first purchase, but more on a random, at any point near the day, type of renewal. Doesn't matter how much you ask them to even change the charge to another card, they will refuse to help you. It has left me with a bitter feeling towards Sony, and if there was another way of getting some things than using the PS Store, I surely would. As I do not feel that they are putting the customers on a even field of respect and business.

I dont have PSN+ but if they have a automatic renewal system they should email people a few days before the subscription renews to let them know they are going to charge them so people can cancle if they like. Charging any card you put in instead of the one you used to buy the subscription is just silly I cant believe Sony did that. I am a little worried about having my card info on my console and I juist found out Amazon lets me buy PSN games and they have a PSN+ subscription cards also. I buy a game from Amazon and they give me a code to put into the PSN store.

I dont have PSN+ but if they have a automatic renewal system they should email people a few days before the subscription renews to let them know they are going to charge them so people can cancle if they like. Charging any card you put in instead of the one you used to buy the subscription is just silly I cant believe Sony did that. I am a little worried about having my card info on my console and I juist found out Amazon lets me buy PSN games and they have a PSN+ subscription cards also. I buy a game from Amazon and they give me a code to put into the PSN store.

I just wrote to the BBB about this. I believe that if they are going to hold me to a "contract" of terms, then the contract must follow the same rules as all contracts. If one party is on lesser grounds due to the contract, then that contract is null and void in the state of Texas. Both party members must be equals, and to do something like this is just under handed and horrible.

Like I mentioned before, its not about the money, its about the ethics and way they went about it. Just despicable.

They certainly should give a warning email about this. I subscribed for the free 30 day trial of Qrocity. Next thing I know I get an email from Sony saying that my subscription has been extended another month and ?9.99 had been taken from my wallet! Wasn't a happy guy, but I guess now I'm a bit more thorough in what I click subscribe to.

They certainly should give a warning email about this. I subscribed for the free 30 day trial of Qrocity. Next thing I know I get an email from Sony saying that my subscription has been extended another month and ?9.99 had been taken from my wallet! Wasn't a happy guy, but I guess now I'm a bit more thorough in what I click subscribe to.

lol you doddo!

You can turn off your automatic subscriptions on the PS3 under account settings.

lol you doddo!

You can turn off your automatic subscriptions on the PS3 under account settings.

Wouldn't have minded if it was a service I was getting use out of but quite frankly it's next to useless. Rather use Vidzone and at least see the video too.

They certainly should give a warning email about this. I subscribed for the free 30 day trial of Qrocity. Next thing I know I get an email from Sony saying that my subscription has been extended another month and ?9.99 had been taken from my wallet! Wasn't a happy guy, but I guess now I'm a bit more thorough in what I click subscribe to.

This is like that for every subscription service that offers a free trial.

This is like that for every subscription service that offers a free trial.

Yeah my problem was that I used it so little I had forgotten all about it, was only when I got the email that I remembered about it.

Delta, it wasn't about the money, it was about how they went getting it, and how they wanted to then put the problem on someone else other than just admitting it was their wrong doing. No reason I or my sister should have to do extra work to get money back from them that was taken wrongfully.

BUUUT.....

Just 1 day after filing with the BBB, I get a call from Sony in California. They have apologized for charging my sisters card and gave a refund. Sad that it took that measure, but at least it was corrected now.

They know they weren't in the right on that. No way does entering a card on a system give them full authorization to use it for anything I have not already purchased with that card. I wouldn't have had an issue if they had done this the correct way, and just charged the original card that was used for it. But instead, they now have another complaint on the BBB list and had to admit their mistake.

Just remember people, don't let companies try this crap on you. Push as hard as you can lol.

Just remember people, don't let companies try this crap on you. Push as hard as you can lol.

(Y) Fully agree. people are way to complacent with these big time companies. Nice to see it was resolved, not nice it happened in the first place.

Eh Sony is pretty dirty when it comes to purchases on PSN. Heck, they use no form of encryption whatsoever and your credit card info is out in the open.

Are you sure, wasn't this just a feature of the custom firmware that was doing this?

Are you sure, wasn't this just a feature of the custom firmware that was doing this?

Yes it's completely untrue, just like the nonsense about people being able to ban anyone on PSN.

Update: A document written by the hackers has clarified what they did and what privacy and security risks they believe the PlayStation 3 poses. The PS3's connection to PSN is protected by SSL. As is common to SSL implementations, the identity of the remote server is verified using a list of certificates stored on each PS3. The credit card and other information is sent over this SSL connection. So far so good; this is all safe, and your web browser depends on the same mechanisms for online purchases.

The concern raised by the hackers is that custom firmwares could subvert this system. A custom firmware can include custom certificates in its trusted list. It can also use custom DNS servers. This raises the prospect of a malicious entity operating his own proxies to snaffle sensitive data. He would distribute a custom firmware that had a certificate corresponding to his proxy, and that used a DNS server that directed PSN connections to the proxy. His proxy would decrypt the data sent to it, and then re-encrypt it and forward it to the real PSN servers.

Such a scheme would be transparent to PSN users (except for any potential performance reduction caused by the proxying), and would give the attacker access to all the information that the PS3 sends to Sony. This information is shown to be extensive, but apart from the credit card data, probably not too sensitive or unreasonable.

As flaws go, the risks here are not substantial. There is no generalized ability for hackers to grab credit cards from PSN users; only those using specially devised custom firmwares would be at risk. Essentially the same risk could be faced by anyone downloading a pirated version of Windows: extra certificates could be added to those normally trusted, along with suitable DNS entries, to allow interception of any traffic destined for, say, amazon.com. In practice, the risk of either of these is slight, and in any case, trivially avoided: don't use custom firmware.

The original story is below, but note that the claims originally made by the hacker quoted in the article are unsubstantiated.

http://arstechnica.com/gaming/news/2011/02/report-psn-hacked-showing-stunning-lack-of-credit-card-security.ars

Ah I wasn't aware of that. My understanding wasn't that hackers could get to it (I guess I shouldn't have said "wide open") but rather Sony employees can see all of your numbers if they so choose to take it.

In my defense tho it's not like I keep up to date on Sony news/trolling :p

Eh Sony is pretty dirty when it comes to purchases on PSN. Heck, they use no form of encryption whatsoever and your credit card info is out in the open.

In my defense tho it's not like I keep up to date on Sony news/trolling :p

:whistle:

Ah I wasn't aware of that. My understanding wasn't that hackers could get to it (I guess I shouldn't have said "wide open") but rather Sony employees can see all of your numbers if they so choose to take it.

Well not being funny that's the same as most places where you give your details.... any worker that works within that organisations web payments probably has access to them. Only giving them as much trust as you do when you hand a card over in a store etc.

lifes_good.jpg

Oh my :laugh:

Well not being funny that's the same as most places where you give your details.... any worker that works within that organisations web payments probably has access to them. Only giving them as much trust as you do when you hand a card over in a store etc.

Not really, most legit sites that you give your credit card to encrypt your details (and while it's transferring it should be encrypted).

The PS3, however, was sending credit card details to sony in plain text.

Not really, most legit sites that you give your credit card to encrypt your details (and while it's transferring it should be encrypted).

The PS3, however, was sending credit card details to sony in plain text.

It was sending details via SSL, same as any other website would do.

As mentioned in the thread, it's only the custom firmwares that are doing away with that process.

Not really, most legit sites that you give your credit card to encrypt your details (and while it's transferring it should be encrypted).

The PS3, however, was sending credit card details to sony in plain text.

Major reading fail :laugh: Try again buddy!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Waymo recalls self-driving software after cars enter closed freeway work zones by Paul Hill Waymo, the self-driving car maker owned by Alphabet – the parent company of Google –, has recalled some of its fifth-generation Automated Driving Systems (ADS). It did so after some of its cars drove through closed construction zones. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the affected vehicles were capable of driving through a closed freeway construction zone and continuing to drive at speed. The listing on the NHTSA website says that Waymo is currently developing a solution to fix this issue, but in the meantime, freeway driving is being restricted. Waymo will update its ADS software so that vehicles can detect when they can avoid entering construction zones. According to the Safety Recall Report, on April 20, 2026, Waymo’s Field Safety Committee began meetings reviewing an event from April 11, 2026, and five events from April 19, 2026, where Waymo’s autonomous vehicles didn’t recognize and drove past ramp closure signs into the pre-planned freeway construction zones. This took place in Phoenix, Arizona. Separately, on May 18, 2026, seven Waymo vehicles entered freeway lanes with active construction in the San Francisco Bay Area by driving between cones that were placed to show the lane was closed. On the back of both of these events, Waymo restricted freeway driving until it could address the issue. In June, Waymo’s Safety Board reviewed the issue and additional information related to ADS performances around construction zones; then, as a result, it decided to conduct a recall. This development is not good for Waymo as it adds to a growing list of technical hiccups its cars have experienced. Ultimately, it will lead to more scrutiny from lawmakers around the world who will be more cautious about letting autonomous vehicles on their roads without tighter regulation. For readers in areas where Waymo operates, does this news make you more wary about stepping into one of these vehicles?
    • I'm still on Windows 10 22H2 because I didn't want to deal with all the issues in Windows 11, so I waited almost a week before installing the latest Patch Tuesday update (KB5094127), I went ahead and did it, and it was a huge mistake—ever since then, my File Explorer has seen a performance drop of about 30% when transferring large files... Once again, Microsoft has outdone itself! This update cannot be uninstalled, either through the Control Panel (via Settings) or by accessing Advanced Startup Options. The only possible alternative would be to use system restore points, but I’d have to reinstall all app and driver updates (and there’s no guarantee it would work). Or there’s the “nuclear option” of a in-place repair without losing files or apps, but even then, all my customizations would be lost! Microsoft just can’t help but mess everything up! Way to go, Microsoft! But I still don’t want your c****y Windows 11!
    • Microsoft: Windows 11 could finally solve a major issue across AMD, Nvidia, and Intel GPUs by Sayan Sen While Microsoft has been trying to improve it, Windows 11 is definitely not flawless, as even today some issues are taking a year to publicly acknowledge. However, one area of trouble that may finally see much better results soon is graphics driver crashes. Work on graphics driver timeouts, also called Timeout and Detection Recovery (TDR), is not new as the latest WDDM 3.2 also has specific improvements regarding it. Windows Display Driver Model (WDDM) version 3.2 is supported on Windows 11 24H2 and 25H2. However, with the upcoming version 26H2, TDR crash diagnosis could go to the next level as Microsoft is introducing a new DirectX 12 API feature called "DirectX Dump Files". Similar to how system memory dump files work when a system crashes or freezes or encounters any such major issue, DirectX Dump Files (DDF) will essentially record a snapshot of the GPU execution right at the moment a graphics-related crash or hang or freeze occurs, so that developers can better understand and diagnoze these TDR and timeout detection errors. The dump will be available as a .dxdmp file for analysis and it will be a comprehensive dump file generated with detailed insights about the hardware, drivers, Windows, as well as the affected application. This should be another welcome change in this department. Earlier at GDC 2026, when the technology was first debuted, Microsoft had shared more details regarding it. The company had explained how DDF is designed to gather data from every layer of the graphics stack into a single file, eliminating the need for developers to manually correlate logs from multiple tools. As mentioned above, the dump can contain a lot of useful details like GPU hardware state information such as register values, shader program counters, page fault virtual addresses, shader memory data, and command buffers. Alongside that, it also captures DirectX runtime and kernel information, including D3D objects, pipeline state objects, device error data, adapter details, and CPU call stacks. Microsoft says the feature has been built around two primary use cases: retail device removals and local device removals. The former allows developers to collect crash information from end users' systems in the field, while the latter helps QA teams and developers investigate issues on test machines. Developers will also be able to include up to 2 MB of custom application data through new D3D12 APIs, providing additional context for troubleshooting. In addition, Microsoft is introducing three dump collection modes ranging from zero-overhead capture, which has no runtime performance impact on supported hardware, to higher-detail modes that collect more vendor-specific debugging data. On compatible Tier 2 hardware, zero-overhead dumps will be enabled by default, meaning developers may begin receiving useful crash diagnostics without making any code changes. The table below explains the three tiers: Tier Description NO_OVERHEAD Enables crash capture with no runtime cost and is suitable for broad deployment MEDIUM_OVERHEAD Provides a balance, capturing additional diagnostic data with moderate impact HIGH_OVERHEAD Collects the most detailed GPU and driver state available, enabling deeper investigation at the cost of higher runtime overhead In terms of availability, the company expects broader release to be around the fall of 2026, which should be right around the time when Windows 11 version 26H2 lands. Right now, DirectX Dump Files are available as a preview and currently, only AMD has the compatible AgilitySDK Developer Preview driver version 26.10.07.02. You can find the official announcement post here on Microsoft's website.
    • And with SO much better perf than the laggy mess that is Files.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      BizSAR earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      598
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      190
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      80
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      76
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!