Blocking Windows Update via Router


Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

We've got a bit of an issue at the moment, we're using DeepFreeze to lock down our PCs on the call floor, the issue is that they're all redownloading Windows Updates automatically every morning. Now I'm going to go around and disable this so we can manually do it once every few months but immediately we need to have Windows Update blocked as our internet connection is barely functioning right now.

Can anyone tell me what Domains / Ports etc Windows Update on Windows XP uses?

Thanks

Chris

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/984862-blocking-windows-update-via-router/
Share on other sites

i believe update.microsoft.com is the hostname of the windows update servers, not sure about the port though, leme see if i can track it down (Y)

edit: windows update services use port 80 and 443, lol

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb490846.aspx

Windows update uses the following DNS for updates;

update.microsoft.com

windowsupdate.microsoft.com

you could block these at the firewall if your router supports DNS blocking that would be the simple option i guess.

If you have a Windows Server you could implement a group policy?

EDIT: Riggers beat me to it

Hey guys,

Blocking those two hostnames seams to have done the job for now, well enough at least. I'll update these PCs manually in a few weeks then disable Windows Update on them.

Which group policy are you guys talking about?

They're hooked up to a Server 2008 R2 Domain Controller.

Through Group policy you can control Windows Update, ideally you would do this with WSUS (free) to give you a centralized control of updates allowing you to control what does and what does not get installed

Then when you want to apply an update you OK it in WSUS and all the machines will download it per the scheduling you have already laid out

  On 24/03/2011 at 14:23, Teebor said:

Through Group policy you can control Windows Update, ideally you would do this with WSUS (free) to give you a centralized control of updates allowing you to control what does and what does not get installed

Then when you want to apply an update you OK it in WSUS and all the machines will download it per the scheduling you have already laid out

This, also you can have deepfreeze thaw during a scheduled time period so that updates can be applied. Say between 3am to 5am on thrusdays for example (a time that usually no one is working).

Yeah, controlling Windows Update via Group Policy isn't really worth it, nor is WSUS, When we move to a Windows Multipoint Server base or move from XP to 7 then I'll worry about such things. These machines are used for a basic Java app and nothing else, so updates are barely important, they're even firewalled off from 99.9% of the web.

I'll just let them be and disable automatic updates soon as I get time.

Spending time fixing up PCs from the dark ages isn't my concern, ensuring it doesn't affect the productivity of the office is my concern. lol.

  On 24/03/2011 at 15:59, Vegetunks said:

Yeah, controlling Windows Update via Group Policy isn't really worth it, nor is WSUS, When we move to a Windows Multipoint Server base or move from XP to 7 then I'll worry about such things. These machines are used for a basic Java app and nothing else, so updates are barely important, they're even firewalled off from 99.9% of the web.

I'll just let them be and disable automatic updates soon as I get time.

Spending time fixing up PCs from the dark ages isn't my concern, ensuring it doesn't affect the productivity of the office is my concern. lol.

30 min gets you wsus and the appropriate group policies in place (even to disable windows updates for those specific machines, this would take 5 min if you have a domain). Dunno how it isnt worth it. Dunno how WSUS isn't worth free.

computer configuration

admin templates

windows components

windows update

Configure automatic updates

"If the status is set to Disabled, any updates that are available on Windows Update must be downloaded and installed manually. To do this, go to http://windowsupdate.microsoft.com or click Start, click Programs (or click All Programs), and then click Windows Update."

This is a computer setting so it applies only to computers, add the computers that you want to apply this gpo to not the users within the group policy management console in active directory.

On the Domain Controller, Start, Administrative tools, Group Policy Management Console.

Make a new group policy under the main domain name, edit the policy. I will provide screen shots in my next post, I will start getting them done now.

when you are in the group policy management console, you single click on the policy on right it displays scope tab, at the bottom of the scope tab there is security filtering. add computers in there. You will have to modify the object type to include computers to be able to add them.

then on a computer that is going to be effected by the group policy you can force it to apply by going to a command prompt and typing in:

gpupdate

to verify that this has been applied you can either use the gpresults command or going to start run rsop.msc and navigating to the windows update section. All pcs will follow suit within 15-45 min, you may want to schedule a one time thaw so that these updates can take place and be in there always, even after a reboot.

Very powerful the group policies are, I would suggest making group policies as granular as possible. They can really lock down a computer. The computer configuration section applies to computers, the user configuration section applies to users. If you change something to the computer configuration and try to apply that to users it will will not apply and if you change something in the user configuration and have that apply to computers it will not apply.

You can make groups and apply policies to groups (you can put computers in a group).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Come the hell on, do we need clickbait titles? "Overwatch 2" - 11 characters "a popular multiplayer hero shooter" - 34 characters What's the purpose here - delivering news or titles for clicks? I think we all know the answer. You're straying into "Number 7 on this list will SHOCK you" territory and while it may work on some crappy sites, this is why they are crappy sites. Just tell the story! Go back and look at popular articles that made Neowin what it was. Did they have headlines of "New OS from major technology conglomerate has astonishing new feature" or is it likely to tell the story succinctly and then elaborate within the content?
    • You can now generate video clips with sound using Veo 3 in Google Vids by David Uzondu Last month, we reported that Google was adding its Veo 2 video generation model into the Google Vids editor. The company has now followed that by rolling out its latest Veo model, Veo 3, which was unveiled at I/O 2025 and went viral recently for its shockingly realistic clips. The main addition this time is the ability to generate both video and synchronized audio directly from a text prompt. Anyone with a compatible Google Workspace plan can now generate 8-second clips right inside a Vids project. You find the "Generate video" icon in the editor, pick Veo 3, and then type out what you want to see and hear. Google's examples include things like a spokesperson delivering a line for a product demo or an employee giving an intro to a safety video. The model is good enough to generate dialogue that actually syncs with the character’s lips. Once you create a clip, you can just insert it into your video. And, if the audio it spits out is garbage, you have the option to mute the clip. The generated clips are currently capped at 720p resolution and run at 24FPS, a far cry from the 4K potential Veo 3 has as a standalone model. Still, getting functional audio generation built-in is a huge step. This native sound capability is what really sets it apart from competitors like OpenAI's Sora, which primarily generates silent videos. Google began pushing out the feature recently, but do not worry if you do not see it immediately in your account. The company is doing a gradual rollout that can take up to 15 days to complete, so your access will depend on which wave your account is in and whether your company's admin uses the Rapid or Scheduled Release track. Access is fairly widespread for paying customers on Google Workspace, including those on Business Standard and Plus, as well as Enterprise Standard and Plus plans. It is also available for Essentials, Nonprofits, and even the lower-tier Business Starter and Enterprise Starter plans. For now, the AI generation only understands prompts in English, and all videos are invisibly watermarked to identify them as AI-generated.
    • My dear freedonX, have you thought about giving Linux a try? If you don't want to be nagged, that's surely the best place to go. And as long as you stick to something simple, you won't need to touch the command line once.
    • For windows, you have winget and chocolatey. For linux, you've got other package managers depending of the base, apt, dnf, zypper, pacman... I dunno about Mac, but even if it doesn't have an accessible package manager, there surely is a store, or worst case, http requests, curl, wget, or something similar.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Kurotama earned a badge
      First Post
    • Collaborator
      Carltonbar earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Explorer
      MusicLover2112 went up a rank
      Explorer
    • Dedicated
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Rookie
      CHUNWEI went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      270
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      248
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      201
    5. 5
      snowy owl
      168
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!