Blocking Windows Update via Router


Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

We've got a bit of an issue at the moment, we're using DeepFreeze to lock down our PCs on the call floor, the issue is that they're all redownloading Windows Updates automatically every morning. Now I'm going to go around and disable this so we can manually do it once every few months but immediately we need to have Windows Update blocked as our internet connection is barely functioning right now.

Can anyone tell me what Domains / Ports etc Windows Update on Windows XP uses?

Thanks

Chris

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/984862-blocking-windows-update-via-router/
Share on other sites

i believe update.microsoft.com is the hostname of the windows update servers, not sure about the port though, leme see if i can track it down (Y)

edit: windows update services use port 80 and 443, lol

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb490846.aspx

Windows update uses the following DNS for updates;

update.microsoft.com

windowsupdate.microsoft.com

you could block these at the firewall if your router supports DNS blocking that would be the simple option i guess.

If you have a Windows Server you could implement a group policy?

EDIT: Riggers beat me to it

Hey guys,

Blocking those two hostnames seams to have done the job for now, well enough at least. I'll update these PCs manually in a few weeks then disable Windows Update on them.

Which group policy are you guys talking about?

They're hooked up to a Server 2008 R2 Domain Controller.

Through Group policy you can control Windows Update, ideally you would do this with WSUS (free) to give you a centralized control of updates allowing you to control what does and what does not get installed

Then when you want to apply an update you OK it in WSUS and all the machines will download it per the scheduling you have already laid out

  On 24/03/2011 at 14:23, Teebor said:

Through Group policy you can control Windows Update, ideally you would do this with WSUS (free) to give you a centralized control of updates allowing you to control what does and what does not get installed

Then when you want to apply an update you OK it in WSUS and all the machines will download it per the scheduling you have already laid out

This, also you can have deepfreeze thaw during a scheduled time period so that updates can be applied. Say between 3am to 5am on thrusdays for example (a time that usually no one is working).

Yeah, controlling Windows Update via Group Policy isn't really worth it, nor is WSUS, When we move to a Windows Multipoint Server base or move from XP to 7 then I'll worry about such things. These machines are used for a basic Java app and nothing else, so updates are barely important, they're even firewalled off from 99.9% of the web.

I'll just let them be and disable automatic updates soon as I get time.

Spending time fixing up PCs from the dark ages isn't my concern, ensuring it doesn't affect the productivity of the office is my concern. lol.

  On 24/03/2011 at 15:59, Vegetunks said:

Yeah, controlling Windows Update via Group Policy isn't really worth it, nor is WSUS, When we move to a Windows Multipoint Server base or move from XP to 7 then I'll worry about such things. These machines are used for a basic Java app and nothing else, so updates are barely important, they're even firewalled off from 99.9% of the web.

I'll just let them be and disable automatic updates soon as I get time.

Spending time fixing up PCs from the dark ages isn't my concern, ensuring it doesn't affect the productivity of the office is my concern. lol.

30 min gets you wsus and the appropriate group policies in place (even to disable windows updates for those specific machines, this would take 5 min if you have a domain). Dunno how it isnt worth it. Dunno how WSUS isn't worth free.

computer configuration

admin templates

windows components

windows update

Configure automatic updates

"If the status is set to Disabled, any updates that are available on Windows Update must be downloaded and installed manually. To do this, go to http://windowsupdate.microsoft.com or click Start, click Programs (or click All Programs), and then click Windows Update."

This is a computer setting so it applies only to computers, add the computers that you want to apply this gpo to not the users within the group policy management console in active directory.

On the Domain Controller, Start, Administrative tools, Group Policy Management Console.

Make a new group policy under the main domain name, edit the policy. I will provide screen shots in my next post, I will start getting them done now.

when you are in the group policy management console, you single click on the policy on right it displays scope tab, at the bottom of the scope tab there is security filtering. add computers in there. You will have to modify the object type to include computers to be able to add them.

then on a computer that is going to be effected by the group policy you can force it to apply by going to a command prompt and typing in:

gpupdate

to verify that this has been applied you can either use the gpresults command or going to start run rsop.msc and navigating to the windows update section. All pcs will follow suit within 15-45 min, you may want to schedule a one time thaw so that these updates can take place and be in there always, even after a reboot.

Very powerful the group policies are, I would suggest making group policies as granular as possible. They can really lock down a computer. The computer configuration section applies to computers, the user configuration section applies to users. If you change something to the computer configuration and try to apply that to users it will will not apply and if you change something in the user configuration and have that apply to computers it will not apply.

You can make groups and apply policies to groups (you can put computers in a group).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • hi thanks for input. those two modems are supported  thankfully. i really am leaning towards the b12 though since there's a few complaints of the cm3000 and its chipset (drops and whatnot), although those might just be vocal minority complaints.
    • A PDF or text file is all you need for Copilot to generate a PowerPoint for you in seconds by Usama Jawad Assistive AI is all the rage these days. In the past few hours alone, we have witnessed AI summaries on YouTube, context-aware text generation capabilities in Google Sheets, Gemini tools on the cloud, the availability of additional AI models with smarter defaults in Visual Studio, and chat summarization on WhatsApp. Now, Microsoft has detailed an upcoming Copilot capability in PowerPoint. Microsoft has outlined a streamlined approach to creating PowerPoint presentations within seconds using a PDF or text file, and a natural language prompt as input. Previously, you could just ground Word files for this purpose, so support for additional formats is certainly welcome. In order to generate a slide deck using Copilot, you can simply open a PowerPoint presentation in the platform of your choice and click the Copilot button. In the resulting Copilot pane, select the "Create a presentation from a file" option, which allows you to type in the name of a PDF or text file stored on the cloud or browse for files in OneDrive or SharePoint manually using the "Attach cloud files" button. You can then refine your prompt by adding details about items that you'd like Copilot to focus on and click the "Send" button. This will generate the slide deck which you can rearrange or add more topics to, before you create the final version of the presentation. Of course, this is a particularly useful feature in many scenarios including those which require you to create a slide deck based on some detailed documentation that you have already completed. That said, it's obviously worth vetting any content that Copilot creates, since data inaccuracy is still a concern when it comes to AI models. This feature is available to Insiders across PowerPoint for web, Windows, and Mac for the following versions: Windows: Version 2409 (Build 18025.20000) or later Mac: Version 16.88 (Build 24082514) or later That said, you do need an Enterprise Copilot license in order to utilize the AI assistant in this way.
    • >For instance, if you are watching a tutorial, you could ask for a summary or even for a quiz on the main points. At that point, the content creator should get their cut, Google. Instead: >If people are getting everything they need from a summary without ever clicking through, there's not much reason to watch the actual video. That means fewer views, less watch time, and less money. Do content creators get to write their own summaries or turn off Google's summary content thievery? Somehow I doubt it...
    • I know with my isp they will only support certain models. You might want to check with them,
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      jfam earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      TheRingmaster earned a badge
      First Post
    • Conversation Starter
      Kavin25 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      Leonard grant earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pcdoctorsnet earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      552
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      205
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      180
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      147
    5. 5
      Som
      119
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!