• 0

Why you shouldn't use Dev-C++


Question

Old myths are tough to dispel, and among these, that Dev-C++ is somehow still a good IDE today. Teachers recommend it in universities (yes!) and beginners don't understand why their perfectly legit programs don't compile.

Someone at cplusplus.com'sums posted a good article about it recently, so I thought I'd spread the word. Hopefully the more it'll spread the less Dev-C++ will be used.

  Quote
Why we've deprecated Dev-C++

It all boils down to one reason:

Dev-C++ hasn't been updated since 2005.

From there, there are 3 main problems with the lack of any updating.

The included MinGW is obsolete.

The many known bugs may never be fixed.

The IDE lacks the features of more modern IDEs.

I'll go over each of these in order.

The included MinGW is obsolete.

MinGW is an irregular acronym which stands for "Minimalist GNU for Windows". It includes a various set of tools commonly found on many *nixes including the g++ compiler and gdb debugger, which Dev-C++ makes use of.

A problem with Dev-C++ not being updated in computer centuries is that the bundled MinGW is several years old, and as a result the compiler doesn't work nearly as well on new systems as a hot-out-of-the-oven dish of MinGW's g++ would. It's a whole major version behind... Read the rest at C++ : Forum : Articles : Why we've deprecated Dev-C++.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/986680-why-you-shouldnt-use-dev-c/
Share on other sites

24 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

People who still program in dev-c++ need to just quite programming. It's like still programming in Visual Studio 6. You ain't learning standard C++. Hell you ain't even getting anything beneficial from it. Except hacks to get around pre-ansi C++ standard, that pretty much won't even work on today's standard compilers. If your class still requires you to use Dev-C++. You might as well slap them and quit. Because you are just learning how to programming pre-ansi pre-C++ standard.

  • 0

People still use Dev-C++? Holy outdated moly Batman!

I did actually hear a rumour at one point that Dev-C++ is still active, you just have to download and compile from their SVN repo. This is just a rumour though, Eclipse is still better, so there's no point bothering :p

  • 0

They force us to use it in my university (UWS).

Although most of us in class would prefer to use somethin else, unfortunately all of our assignments and whatnot that we submit are all complied and checked in Dev C++.

To add, they also changed the dedicated computers for the Computing students to Macs. We are advised to virtually boot Windows 7. Why they bought 500+ macs, just to boot a virtual copy of Windows 7 is beyond me.

  • 0
  On 02/04/2011 at 15:53, Majesticmerc said:

People still use Dev-C++? Holy outdated moly Batman!

I did actually hear a rumour at one point that Dev-C++ is still active, you just have to download and compile from their SVN repo. This is just a rumour though, Eclipse is still better, so there's no point bothering :p

Universities in particular can be quite slow to adapt and update what they teach.

When I was at uni in 2006, one of the classes I took was heavily into NetBIOS. What a waste of time.

  • 0

The main reason that it's used in universities I believe is that it's one of the only single-install packages that gets you up and running for standard C programming. No messing with cygwin or minGW, just one installer. Especially for an intro class the ease of setup is important, you don't want to spend weeks out of the semester trying to get everyone set up to compile programs.

I remember trying VC++ Express once to do a C programming assignment, and it seemed to me like it wasn't really set up for that. I ended up just using XCode (which has a standard project template for a plain, no-frills, platform agnostic command-line C application) while everyone else had weird errors with Dev C++.

I witnessed once a program that looked perfectly fine. I read over the whole thing a few times, and it would not compile. Finally they quit Dev C++, loaded it back up with the same project file, and it compiled just fine! :blink:

I'm sure that if there were an alternative free IDE that was easy to install, modern, well supported, and less buggy and had a simple C program template that it would gain usage fairly quickly. Also being GCC-based or at least very GCC-compatible is important. Lots of professors I know code on OSX or Linux systems.

VC++ Express is great, especially for being a free app, but to me it seems pretty cluttered and also overkill for an Intro to C class.

  • 0
  On 16/04/2011 at 10:27, Stetson said:

The main reason that it's used in universities I believe is that it's one of the only single-install packages that gets you up and running for standard C programming. No messing with cygwin or minGW, just one installer.

Well the question IMHO should be: If they are using Windows why do they use cygwin or minGW? If they want to use Unix-tools, why not use a Linux to begin with?

  On 16/04/2011 at 10:27, Stetson said:

I remember trying VC++ Express once to do a C programming assignment, and it seemed to me like it wasn't really set up for that. I ended up just using XCode (which has a standard project template for a plain, no-frills, platform agnostic command-line C application) while everyone else had weird errors with Dev C++.

Personally I never had problems with VC++ Express to do C-programming, but I never did C99, which is not fully supported in VC++ Express - and never will be for that matter?

  • 0
  On 16/04/2011 at 10:27, Stetson said:
I'm sure that if there were an alternative free IDE that was easy to install, modern, well supported, and less buggy and had a simple C program template that it would gain usage fairly quickly. Also being GCC-based or at least very GCC-compatible is important. Lots of professors I know code on OSX or Linux systems.
Code::Blocks?
  • 0

When I took my C++ class last semester they made us use Dev-C++. I absolutely hated it. (Granted, this was at a Community College, but they did have access to Visual Studio 2008 (They wouldn't update to 2010 for whatever reason).

Now whenever I program in C++ I use my copy of VS 2010, but my classes are more focused on VB now anyway.

  • 0
  On 16/04/2011 at 11:15, MFH said:

Well the question IMHO should be: If they are using Windows why do they use cygwin or minGW? If they want to use Unix-tools, why not use a Linux to begin with?

While the professors can use Linux all they want, chances are the 200 kids sitting in the lecture hall have Windows laptops, with a few Macbooks here and there.

  On 16/04/2011 at 20:23, Dr_Asik said:

Code::Blocks?

I believe that still requires you to do your own install of Cygwin or MinGW.

  • 0
  On 31/03/2011 at 03:29, ZekeComa said:

People who still program in dev-c++ need to just quite programming. It's like still programming in Visual Studio 6. You ain't learning standard C++. Hell you ain't even getting anything beneficial from it. Except hacks to get around pre-ansi C++ standard, that pretty much won't even work on today's standard compilers. If your class still requires you to use Dev-C++. You might as well slap them and quit. Because you are just learning how to programming pre-ansi pre-C++ standard.

If somebody builds a working program that does what they intended it to do in Dev-C++ then they have succeeded in what they set out to do and certainly don't need to "just quite programming." :rolleyes:

  • 0
  On 17/04/2011 at 07:46, ZekeComa said:

I wouldn't suggest using Code::Blocks, it's a crappy IDE. If you're Windows use Visual Studio 2010, Linux use KDevelop4, Mac OS X, use XCode.

Care to elaborate why Kdevelop would be better than Code::Blocks on Linux? I've used both and Code::Blocks seemed more intuitive and robust. Although now I'd probably use Monodevelop.
  • 0
  On 17/04/2011 at 07:46, ZekeComa said:

I wouldn't suggest using Code::Blocks, it's a crappy IDE. If you're Windows use Visual Studio 2010, Linux use KDevelop4, Mac OS X, use XCode.

Visual Studio 2010 C++ doesn't have Intellisense for CLI projects, so it's better to use VC++ 2008 for Windows Forms.

  • 0

What kind of uni would force you to use a particular IDE? That's bizarre :/ I guess I was really fortunate, we used whatever we wanted on whatever OS we wanted after the first few weeks (when they baby'd those who needed it). The uni itself had both Windows and Linux machines, too. Good teachers and choice ftw!

As for Dev-C++, I had forgotten it existed :p Not sure I've used it for about five years.

  • 0
  On 18/04/2011 at 13:37, Laura said:

What kind of uni would force you to use a particular IDE? That's bizarre :/ I guess I was really fortunate, we used whatever we wanted on whatever OS we wanted after the first few weeks (when they baby'd those who needed it). The uni itself had both Windows and Linux machines, too. Good teachers and choice ftw!

At my College, for anything MS Based we had to use Windows XP. We also had to use Visual Studio 2005, last year of college we got to upgrade to 2008 for VB, C#, And C++. Any database stuff was all MSSQL with the standard MS IDE for MSSQL. For Java we could use any IDE however the Teacher wanted us to use NetBeans and all examples he did would be in NetBeans.

We had a couple web-design classes which aside from the DreamWeaver and Photoshop requirements, we could use any text-editor for PHP, HTML. However all ASP websites had to be written in Visual Studio 2005.

We got to do minor Linux work.. however it was for Linux, and for the purpose of learning, not as an everyday sort of thing (was for a networking/security course). Our School was one of the MS based Schools so we had the Full MSDNAA and Dreamspark and all that.

  • 0
  On 18/04/2011 at 13:27, TechFreak:) said:

Visual Studio 2010 C++ doesn't have Intellisense for CLI projects, so it's better to use VC++ 2008 for Windows Forms.

Agreed, this is completly ridiculous though. I'm lucky enough to be using VS2010 Ultimate but there's no freakin intellisense at all for C++/CLI, and stuff like Go To Definition is flaky at best. That's what you get for a product that costs thousands of dollars?
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Comments like these are genuinely fascinating to me because they're so far from anything I experience as a daily user of Win 11 since the first public beta. AI stuff? Have it turned off completely, never pops up anywhere. Forced MS account? Yes, they strongly recommend it and kinda push it lately during big updates and such, but it's still not forced. Pop up dialogs when you're not using Edge? Yeah, I vaguely remember seeing some reminders about using Edge a long time ago. I just clicked them away and kept using Vivaldi as usual (but frankly, I'd still much rather use Edge than Chrome - which I'm forced to use at work - I've grown to dislike Google a lot more than Microsoft lately, even if I am still deeply rooted in their ecosystem unfortunately). Awful context menus? A single simple tweak will get you the old context menus. Search in Windows using Bing? People use search in Windows for anything else than to search for local files or apps? Why? I just don't get a lot of the complains people have about Win 11.
    • Nice, but if you change the colour, the folder no longer shows image preview on the actual folder icon.
    • Taiwan hits Huawei and SMIC with new export restrictions by David Uzondu Taiwan has added Huawei and Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation, or SMIC, to its export control entity list. According to CNBC, this means companies in Taiwan now need a special license to ship certain high-tech goods to these two mainland Chinese firms. The conflict has been escalating for a while. The United States government, for instance, has been going after Huawei since at least 2019, putting the telecom equipment maker on its own Entity List over national security fears. The worry has always been about Huawei's connections to the Chinese government and the potential for its network gear to be used for spying. The United Kingdom eventually followed suit, ordering all Huawei 5G equipment to be ripped out of its networks by 2027. Remember, in December 2020, the US added SMIC to its Entity List over its alleged ties to the Chinese military. The goal was to choke off the chipmaker's access to the tools it needs to produce the most advanced semiconductors. Despite all the pressure, the two firms managed to collaborate and produce a 7nm chip for Huawei's Mate 60 phone, which annoyed some people in Washington who thought the sanctions had completely crippled China's chipmaking ambitions. This new blacklisting from Taiwan just tightens the screws even more. Last year, research firm TechInsights found a TSMC-made chip inside a Huawei AI training card. That was a huge "oh no" moment because it showed that, despite all the American restrictions, Huawei was still getting its hands on advanced Taiwanese silicon. That discovery led directly to the U.S. Commerce Department leaning on TSMC to shut down access for Chinese clients to specific AI chips. Huawei had cleverly exploited loopholes to hoard millions of GPU dies for its Ascend AI chip program, a direct attempt to build a homegrown alternative to Nvidia's dominant hardware. For Taiwan, this feels less like a trade issue and more like a matter of survival. The island's lead in chipmaking, largely thanks to TSMC, is often seen as its "silicon shield." The idea is that global reliance on Taiwanese chips makes any military action by China a huge risk for the world. Letting its most advanced tech reach the country that threatens its very existence could seriously weaken that shield. Source: CNBC
    • Anything is "news worthy" if it's new and someone writes about it. Something like an inconsequential note about "correcting a typo in the readme file" buried deep in the changelog could become "news worthy". And, on related note, anything can be used as a justification to complain about something one is clearly already biased against. Say, if someone's biased against Windows 11, they could see even an inconsequential change like an added time display as a reason to rant about "Microsoft these days"... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
    • I expect i will always have the choice, I doubt I will be around to see self drive cars on the roads in any great amounts. I can understand where your wife is coming from, but then being in a car alone can have other problems.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Explorer
      Legend20 went up a rank
      Explorer
    • One Month Later
      jezzzy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      CSpera earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      MIR JOHNNY BLAZE earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Apprentice
      Wireless wookie went up a rank
      Apprentice
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      615
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      277
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      180
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      150
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      115
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!