Enable L2Cache.....in Windows XP/2000


Recommended Posts

From Tweaktown.com

The L2, or second-level, cache, is an integral part of your CPU. However, XP is very shoddy at detecting it, so setting it manually is sometimes necessary. It's easy to do, though, you simply have to navigate to

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINESYSTEMCurrentControlSetControlSession ManagerMemory Management

in the registry and find the value SecondLevelDataCache. You must then adjust it to the value (in kilobytes) of the L2 Cache of your processor.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/9904-enable-l2cachein-windows-xp2000/
Share on other sites

Look a here cowboy......you want a scientific proof.....then use "trial and error." Try the son of a b*tch out and if it don't do anything for you then that's your problem.....Not mine. I get much better performance.......what you still want numbers? Well too bad 'cause I got a life and I got stuff to do....girlfriends to do and that type of stuff. Give it a try. There's nothing more I can tell you!

I don't understand that the only way people can get rid of their own lack of knowledge is by being rude on various community groups.

By the way have you ever tried a utility (Free) which is called Mathlon that allows you to choose the speed of your L2 Cache where a lot of misbehaving is caused by the L2 is running to fast this utility will reconize most CPU'sbelow is the site you can download it from:

http://www.planetmirror.com/pub/3dfiles/tw...akfiles/memory/http://www.planetmirror.com/pub/3dfiles/tw...akfiles/memory/ :)

:) :) :)

some people just won't listen to the facts. fact: enabling the L2 cache boosts performance. There's no other way of me providing scientific proof than that. I didn't invent it...I'm just putting to use. And if you think I'm being rude....well then you try and explain to someone why Microsoft doesn't have it enabled by default. Hell who cares why!!! I don't work at microsoft and I don't care....just getting it to work is fine by me.

  Quote
I did the tweak as you said I enteren 256 as decimal but when I open the thread again it goes to hex and it is 100.

That is the way it is supposed to be. The hex value is 100 and the decimal value is 256. If you made the hex value 256 then the decimal value would be 598.

  Quote
it should say "SecondLevelDataCache"=dword:00000256 after you're done. Just enter 256 after going to modify by right clicking.

Well, if i enter 256 in Decimal...it doesn't turn out to be dword:00000256 , but instead it appears as:

"dword:00000100(256)"

???

:s

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yes, if the PCs aren’t upgraded, they’ll lack features like TPM and remain vulnerable to driver and hardware-level exploits. That includes CPU flaws, RAM vulnerabilities, boot and BIOS attacks, and so on. Realistically, there should have been a steady programme of hardware refreshes rather than allowing systems to age well past their practical and secure lifespan. Are we seriously entertaining the idea of running Linux on machines that are over a decade old as a long-term solution instead of upgrading? Would you entrust your financial data or medical records to a box from the early 2000s, with Windows XP removed and Linux installed in its place? Performance degradation is not just an inconvenience. It affects productivity. Slow machines cost time, and time costs money. Security flaws do too. Hardware and software upgrades should be part of a rolling, responsible IT strategy. They should not be treated as an afterthought. This kind of complacency is precisely the issue we’ve seen before. Just look at how that played out in the UK. We readily replace construction tools such as drills, saws, and other equipment on a regular basis, and many of those cost more than a standard desktop PC. Yet when it comes to computers, we’re still stuck in the mindset of "if it isn’t broken, don’t fix it." Just because something powers on doesn’t mean it is fit for purpose. The horse and cart did the job at one point too, but that didn’t mean it was wise to stick with it when something better came along.
    • Freshly released Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE is already discounted by Fiza Ali The Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE is already available at a discount, just two months after its debut, so you may want to check it out. The device is powered by the Samsung Exynos 1580 processor and equipped with 12GB of RAM and 256GB of internal storage, which can be expanded by up to 1TB via microSD. It features a 10.9‑inch LCD display with a resolution of 2,304 x 1,440 pixels and a 90 Hz refresh rate. Photography and video calls are handled by a 13MP rear camera and a 12MP ultra‑wide front‑facing camera. The device further includes dual AKG‑tuned speakers for immersive audio. The Galaxy Tab S10 FE offers Sub‑6 5G, dual‑band Wi‑Fi 6 with Wi‑Fi Direct support, and Bluetooth 5.3 for low‑latency wireless connections. Moreover, it incorporates S Pen functionality with handwriting assist, a Circle to Search feature for instant Google look‑ups, and Math Solver for converting handwritten equations into editable text and step‑by‑step solutions. The tablet comes pre‑loaded with a suite of creative and productivity apps, including LumaFusion, GoodNotes, Clip Studio Paint, Noteshelf, Sketchbook and PicsArt. The Galaxy Tab S10 FE is water‑resistant, safeguarding against spills, splashes, and brief immersion, and includes a dedicated AI hot‑key on its keyboard for quick access to on‑device artificial intelligence tools. Finally, the tablet houses an 8,000 mAh lithium‑ion battery (29.95Wh) that is said to deliver up to 20 hours of continuous use and supports Super Fast Charging. Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE: $519.99 (Amazon US) 9% off This Amazon deal is US-specific and not available in other regions unless specified. If you don't like it or want to look at more options, check out the Amazon US deals page here. Get Prime (SNAP), Prime Video, Audible Plus or Kindle / Music Unlimited. Free for 30 days. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Agree - and to that end, I’m not questioning a mods decision, as they didn’t perform an act of moderation on my posts - rather they seem to wish to keep creating drama where it doesn’t exist. However, point taken and will just use the Report functionality as you would any other user
    • Another point to consider: community rules say the following:   That is not to say that a moderator can't be wrong, but if there is an issue with moderation we would prefer that it gets brought to our attention privately rather than publicly. Making a spectacle of something would hardly endear me to the reporter's plight.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Explorer
      Case_f went up a rank
      Explorer
    • Conversation Starter
      Jamie Smith earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      NeoToad777 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      JoeV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      VAT Services in UAE earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      555
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      241
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      160
    4. 4
      +FloatingFatMan
      148
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      112
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!