Is WWE wrestling fake or real?


Recommended Posts

Its scripted as the story line and who wins the matches but, as far as the moves they are designed to look painfull while doing minimum damage which is really a credit to the wrestlers because it takes alot of skill to pull off alot of the moves that they do without injuring the person they are up against and when they do happen to injure someone during a match or something unexpected happens (not a wrestler comming out with a chair) such as a table not breaking or a miscaculation of a jump its very interesting how they handle the sitituation needless to say its a very dangerous sport.

It's ridiculous that many call it "fake." It's real as in it's actually happening; in that sense, it cannot be fake. It is staged and scripted, with predetermined outcomes; some spots in matches are sometimes improvised, but most are decided upon beforehand. The referees and others often help remind the superstars what they're supposed to be doing at any given moment, but most tend to remember (Sting is an example of a superstar who often forgets spots).

The vast majority of storylines and promos are scripted, with the superstars not having much room to improvise with what they say. A notable example of an unscripted WWE event was at Survivor Series 1997 when Vince McMahon ended the Shawn Michaels vs. Bret Hart match early (and in a disrespectful way to Bret Hart) because it was expected that Bret Hart wouldn't allow himself to be pinned for a 3-count when the time came. An example of when a promo was unscripted is when Edge announced his retirement on WWE Raw last week.

The superstars do actually hurt themselves quite frequently, which is often not considered by those branding it as "fake." When a superstar jumps off the top rope onto an opponent, it hurts; there is no way for that not to hurt. It may not hurt as much as the superstars make out, but it hurts somewhat. The ring base is actually very hard and certainly isn't comfortable for the superstar when they are slammed down hard onto it. Punches aren't real punches with closed fists; likewise, the superstar isn't actually dropped onto his or her head during the tombstone move (apart from when the move is incorrectly executed, like when Owen Hart tombstoned Stone Cold Steve Austin and broke his neck). When WWE used to include bleeding in their matches, it was real blood; the superstar would inconspicuously cut themselves when the camera was not on them.

Professional wrestling is a very tough for the performers, and it takes its toll on the body. Many have injured themselves, some to the point of paralysis or death, trying to entertain people in this way.

What's even more ridiculous than people calling it "fake" is the people who say they "don't watch it because it's fake." It's funny because most of those people watch movies and other entertainment programmes. . . .

I remember when they used to use Black & White scenes to 'censor' the blood? Or something? I'm not sure what the point of that was...

They did that a few years before they decided to make their programming completely PG, and I believe they only did that on the SmackDown show because that appeals more to kids and has always been the more PG show anyway. Showing the match in black and white when a superstar is bleeding makes it harder to distinguish the blood.

It's ridiculous that many call it "fake." It's real as in it's actually happening; in that sense, it cannot be fake. It is staged and scripted, with predetermined outcomes; some spots in matches are sometimes improvised, but most are decided upon beforehand. The referees and others often help remind the superstars what they're supposed to be doing at any given moment, but most tend to remember (Sting is an example of a superstar who often forgets spots).

The vast majority of storylines and promos are scripted, with the superstars not having much room to improvise with what they say. A notable example of an unscripted WWE event was at Survivor Series 1997 when Vince McMahon ended the Shawn Michaels vs. Bret Hart match early (and in a disrespectful way to Bret Hart) because it was expected that Bret Hart wouldn't allow himself to be pinned for a 3-count when the time came. An example of when a promo was unscripted is when Edge announced his retirement on WWE Raw last week.

The superstars do actually hurt themselves quite frequently, which is often not considered by those branding it as "fake." When a superstar jumps off the top rope onto an opponent, it hurts; there is no way for that not to hurt. It may not hurt as much as the superstars make out, but it hurts somewhat. The ring base is actually very hard and certainly isn't comfortable for the superstar when they are slammed down hard onto it. Punches aren't real punches with closed fists; likewise, the superstar isn't actually dropped onto his or her head during the tombstone move (apart from when the move is incorrectly executed, like when Owen Hart tombstoned Stone Cold Steve Austin and broke his neck). When WWE used to include bleeding in their matches, it was real blood; the superstar would inconspicuously cut themselves when the camera was not on them.

Professional wrestling is a very tough for the performers, and it takes its toll on the body. Many have injured themselves, some to the point of paralysis or death, trying to entertain people in this way.

What's even more ridiculous than people calling it "fake" is the people who say they "don't watch it because it's fake." It's funny because most of those people watch movies and other entertainment programmes. . . .

1. Some performers are on scripts, some are not. It depends on what they like to do and how trusted they are. Jericho, Cena, Edge, Stone Cold are all unscripted. Newer competitors, and ones not as good on the mic are usually scripted. Now, they are nearly always storyline (or kayfabe) - you have to be careful when using script and story interchangeably.

2. The ring base - at least the major promotions - isn't really that hard. Its more like a giant trampoline. Did it used to be rigid, like 15+ years ago? Yes. But around the time of the 'Attitude Era', they made it much softer and more springy.

3. Blood is not always from blading.

4. It is fake. Its just as fake as anything else on TV, excluding news and sports.

Personally cannot watch it. Literally makes me cringe watching a bunch of grown men prancing around in leotards and god knows what else, show-boating in the most ridiculous manor and pretending (very badly) to fight. Then there's all the farcical backstage drama. It's more like panto than a soap. :x

No offence to anybody that's into it, but that's honestly how I feel about it.

1. Some performers are on scripts, some are not. It depends on what they like to do and how trusted they are. Jericho, Cena, Edge, Stone Cold are all unscripted. Newer competitors, and ones not as good on the mic are usually scripted. Now, they are nearly always storyline (or kayfabe) - you have to be careful when using script and story interchangeably.

2. The ring base - at least the major promotions - isn't really that hard. Its more like a giant trampoline. Did it used to be rigid, like 15+ years ago? Yes. But around the time of the 'Attitude Era', they made it much softer and more springy.

3. Blood is not always from blading.

4. It is fake. Its just as fake as anything else on TV, excluding news and sports.

I'd have to see some sources for your first three points before I believe them because my post explains the knowledge I have acquired over time, after reading dirtsheets for many years, watching documentaries about wrestling, and talking with my friend who is a pro wrestler.

As for your fourth point, referring to it as "fake" doesn't make sense to me, just like referring to movies as fake doesn't. I think it's more appropriate to refer to it as "scripted" or/and "staged."

I'd have to see some sources for your first three points before I believe them because my post explains the knowledge I have acquired over time, after reading dirtsheets for many years, watching documentaries about wrestling, and talking with my friend who is a pro wrestler.

As for your fourth point, referring to it as "fake" doesn't make sense to me, just like referring to movies as fake doesn't. I think it's more appropriate to refer to it as "scripted" or/and "staged."

First point - read interviews and books. The recent Randy Orton interview with ESPN where he slams The Rock for doing his promos on a script, while Cena does not. Jericho's recent book, Undisputed, goes into some depth about how much leeway he was given on promos, which, from day 1, was nearly total. On a side note, an amazing WWE fact over every other promotion is that they script nearly the entire match beforehand, where most places only script a few major spots that they want to it.

Second point - just watch the ring when they fall on it. It completely moves all over. The aprons are rigid, like a trampoline would be, but the center is on a gigantic spring that moves up and down. In one of the spots where UT or Kane came through the ring and pulled someone underneath 'to hell', you can see the substructure through the opening as its happening.

Third point - blood happens. Yes, as does blading. But its not always blading.

You're right, scripted is more accurate.

First point - read interviews and books. The recent Randy Orton interview with ESPN where he slams The Rock for doing his promos on a script, while Cena does not. Jericho's recent book, Undisputed, goes into some depth about how much leeway he was given on promos, which, from day 1, was nearly total. On a side note, an amazing WWE fact over every other promotion is that they script nearly the entire match beforehand, where most places only script a few major spots that they want to it.

Second point - just watch the ring when they fall on it. It completely moves all over. The aprons are rigid, like a trampoline would be, but the center is on a gigantic spring that moves up and down. In one of the spots where UT or Kane came through the ring and pulled someone underneath 'to hell', you can see the substructure through the opening as its happening.

Third point - blood happens. Yes, as does blading. But its not always blading.

You're right, scripted is more accurate.

Orton said The Rock has his lines written for him, but Cena does not; there is still a script, it's just that Cena writes a lot of (if not all of) his lines. It's the same with Jericho; there is still a script, but Jericho prepares his own lines for it. I should have made it more clear that that is what I'm getting at. I'm not sure how much of the matches are scripted beforehand in other promotions, but as you point out they're pretty much completely scripted in WWE; I'll take your word about other promotions because that makes sense.

In this video, Brock Lesnar discusses how hard the base of the ring is and talks about some of his friends' reactions after he bodyslammed them on his (which is built the same as a WWE ring).

I'll take your point on the blood then, unless I can find anything that contradicts you. I saw Flair blading himself once in about 2005, so I'm not sure whether WWE did anything else but blading. How else did they show blood without blading? Some sort of fake blood?

I'll take your point on the blood then, unless I can find anything that contradicts you. I saw Flair blading himself once in about 2005, so I'm not sure whether WWE did anything else but blading. How else did they show blood without blading? Some sort of fake blood?

I've heard that there are some blood packs (especially for the mouth) and for wrestlers not wanting to cut themselves, they can hide it in hair lines and just make sure to not pop it unless they need to.

I have no evidence to back that up, as it was a verbal thing.. however it does seem likely.

1. Some performers are on scripts, some are not. It depends on what they like to do and how trusted they are. Jericho, Cena, Edge, Stone Cold are all unscripted. Newer competitors, and ones not as good on the mic are usually scripted. Now, they are nearly always storyline (or kayfabe) - you have to be careful when using script and story interchangeably.

2. The ring base - at least the major promotions - isn't really that hard. Its more like a giant trampoline. Did it used to be rigid, like 15+ years ago? Yes. But around the time of the 'Attitude Era', they made it much softer and more springy.

3. Blood is not always from blading.

4. It is fake. Its just as fake as anything else on TV, excluding news and sports.

I dunno about your fourth point... the news (at least in America) is pretty dubious too ;)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!