Core i3-2100 vs Phenom II X4 955


Recommended Posts

I'm putting together a new build (with a really tight budget ;) ), and these are my CPU options, after reading some articles, I'm leaning towards the i3, but I decided to ask for some opinions here too :) It's gonna be used mostly for gaming, other components are 4 GB RAM, Radeon 6850 1GB. I'm not planning on doing any OC.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/992464-core-i3-2100-vs-phenom-ii-x4-955/
Share on other sites

Well it looks like the i3 is better for gaming, so you should go with that. But what about the motherboard?

Usually, but not always, AMD motherboards are cheaper.

So consider this, try to save as much as possible, & upgrade your GPU from a 6850 to a 6950. It's about 90-100$ more expensive, but If you're gaming, then that'll give you a huge boost

  • Like 3

Well it looks like the i3 is better for gaming, so you should go with that. But what about the motherboard?

Usually, but not always, AMD motherboards are cheaper.

So consider this, try to save as much as possible, & upgrade your GPU from a 6850 to a 6950. It's about 90-100$ more expensive, but If you're gaming, then that'll give you a huge boost

I got motherboards for both picked and they are about the same price, 90-100$ more is way above my budget :D

I got motherboards for both picked and they are about the same price, 90-100$ more is way above my budget :D

Hahaha I know what you mean, I upgraded my 4850 to a 6950 & it's an unbelievable upgrade. I still have my Q6600 in, I'll upgrade both the CPU & motherboard in the summer. I've had the same setup running for 2 years & 9 months.

Really man try to save as much as possible, or upgrade in steps because the final result will be fantastic. I am telling you this because that's what I did & I veeeery am happy.

Look at this: http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/291?vs=292 , the 6950 can be upgraded easily to a 6970.

Anyway, if you can do it, then do it. But if you can't, go with your current setup including the i3.

If you don't plan on overclocking, the i3 is probably a decent choice. I just got an i3-2120 (It's 200MHz faster :p ) last week and it's looking good. Obviously it's no 2500K like my main desktop but it's good performance for the money.

  • Like 2

They're all fine processors for gaming. Obviously the i5 and i7 offer some performance improvements (the extra 2 cores sorta help :p), but the whole Sandy Bridge line is way ahead of the Phenom II in terms of single-threaded performance, which is the most important for gaming.

i think the i3's were the low end intel processors. i thought the i7's were for gaming, which would be more equivilant to the phenom's?

When I read the topic, I was also thinking that this seemed like an odd comparison. I Know the i3 series is the low-end, and I thought Phenom was AMD's high end, but I'm not as knowledgeable with AMD, so I dunno.

i3 is dual core i believe and Phenom II X4 955 is 4 core which is good for gaming.

i7 is what you should go for gaming in intel but i3 is not bad. I would go with Phenom II X4 955 since it has 2 extra core and more computing power.

Games don't need more cores, just more computing power.

When I read the topic, I was also thinking that this seemed like an odd comparison.

When my friend told me I'd be better off with the i3 I thought so too, but the benchmarks speak for themselves:

(upper ones are OC'ed to 3,8 GHz which I wasn't planning to do anyways)

Black Ops:

861337890.jpg

Far Cry 2:

150349806.jpg

NFS Shift:

796093139.jpg

Starcraft II:

707005420.jpg

When my friend told me I'd be better off with the i3 I thought so too, but the benchmarks speak for themselves:

(upper ones are OC'ed to 3,8 GHz which I wasn't planning to do anyways)

Black Ops:

861337890.jpg

Far Cry 2:

150349806.jpg

NFS Shift:

796093139.jpg

Starcraft II:

707005420.jpg

You might want to check some other benchmarks, but I think you?ve supplied the answer to your own question here. Go with the i3.

It?s kind of sad to see AMD?s processor, with twice as many cores and a higher clock, measure at the same level as Intel?s low end options. It just goes to show the importance of good architecture.

It?s kind of sad to see AMD?s processor, with twice as many cores and a higher clock, measure at the same level as Intel?s low end options.
The Phenom II architecture is now 3 and a half years old, and it wasn't that fast to being with. AMD really needs to step up their game NOW.

The Phenom II architecture is now 3 and a half years old, and it wasn't that fast to being with. AMD really needs to step up their game NOW.

Wasn't everybody going on about how AMD was finally making a comeback, not too long ago? What happened?

So he can extract a rar quicker, big wow

Geez man, just because your computer doesn't have the best/latest hardware, doesn't mean you need to get bitter and defensive. No one was trying to insult you. I still run a Core 2 Duo in my own machine.

Wasn't everybody going on about how AMD was finally making a comeback, not too long ago? What happened?

Geez man, just because your computer doesn't have the best/latest hardware, doesn't mean you need to get bitter and defensive. No one was trying to insult you. I still run a Core 2 Duo in my own machine.

I didn't mean to come across like that. I was just making the point that the average gamer doesn't need a massively powerful number crunching processor.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I sort of agree with you on that. I had a telescope - a real hefty thing, although only around 500CHF - that got me so fascinated about the stars and planets. I would stare for hours, amazed that I could see the craters of the moon or the rings of Saturn in "realtime" (quotations because, y'know, speed of light and whatnot). A friend of mine has a telescope like the one mentioned in the review, and the pictures are amazing to look at. But there is something missing for me. I may as well just go to NASA's website and look through their gallery.
    • As opposed to catching bad press because it's the engine's fault? The engine has all the tools a dev needs to optimize their game, Epic isn't gonna hold their hand to make sure they use them. Also, Epic isn't forcing anyone to use Lumen, Nanite or super high resolution meshes and textures. Just because Nanite can render meshes with millions of polygons doesn't mean you should use it like that, in fact, Epic recommends you avoid doing that. Most of the stuttering can easily be fixed by cutting down on unique shaders by using master materials and generating a PSO cache and compiling every shader before loading the game and also managing what must be loaded and unloaded at runtime, it's up to the developer to set all that up properly.
    • I think it depends on what you're looking for to do, and the time you have to spare. With my Dwarf 3, I easily spend 3-4 hour sessions; half an hour driving to an un-light polluted place, another half hour unpacking and setting up the smart scope + tripod for equatorial tracking, then 15 more minutes mucking around with settings and shooting calibration frames, spending a few hours shooting, merging with past photo sessions, etc. It's crazy how time flies and I often get home later than I expected. It's something I still need to set aside a good part of an evening to do, all in all. For one session, where you often need like four for best results when it comes to deep space objects. Even with a smart scope like Dwarf 3, regular non-astro photography is still way more approachable to people getting into photography. I find this is a time consuming niche no matter how I go about it. With practice, I can probably begin cutting time here but I think where smart scopes find their home is among people who love to shoot the night sky but don't have the spare time to go deep with the "navigator level" attunement to the night sky itself in addition to everything else. Having said this, _if_ you have even more time to spend on this hobby, it will probably be even more rewarding to do it more by hand and learn the skies and the details of how it all works.
    • I misread the title and thought Teams itself would be redesigned. Imagine having this one as a native WinUI app.
    • Dell, HP PCs ran into endless reboot, BitLocker recovery loops but Windows 11 isn't to blame by Sayan Sen Last month Neowin reported on a major issue on Dell systems wherein a bug in its official support tool was leading to endless blue screen of death (BSOD) and restarts. Following our report, Dell officially acknowledged its SupportAssist-related crash issue, confirming that the culprit is not Microsoft's operating system but rather a faulty version of its own remediation software. In a newly published support advisory, Dell stated that version 5.5.16.0 of Dell SupportAssist Remediation and Alienware SupportAssist Remediation can trigger blue screen errors and unexpected system restarts. The company notes that the problematic component operates independently of the main SupportAssist application, meaning users should not remove the primary SupportAssist software when troubleshooting the issue. According to Dell, the crashes are linked specifically to the SupportAssist Remediation service, which is bundled with SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools, and as such it has since released an updated version, 5.5.16.1, which is said to resolve the problem. Affected users are advised to first verify whether version 5.5.16.0 is installed by checking the Installed Apps section in Windows Settings. If so, Dell recommends updating SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools through either SupportAssist's "Update Software" feature or Dell Command Update. Dell also advises users to back up important data before performing the update and to ensure systems remain connected to power throughout the installation process. If you are still having issues though make sure to report to the Dell support forum. As it turns out though Dell is not the only PC maker currently dealing with update-related headaches as HP is also facing a separate but probably equally frustrating issue involving recent Windows Secure Boot updates that were released with recent Windows 11 Patch Tuesdays. Similar to Dell, HP also put up its own support article where it explains the issue. The company says that affected devices could hit a brick wall when booting as they run into a BitLocker recovery loop after the April 2026 updates. The problem appears to affect systems wherein the new UEFI Secure Boot CA 2023 certificates fail to apply properly. As such affected users will find themselves entering their recovery key over and over again despite the system otherwise functioning normally. HP says such PCs should be updated to the latest available BIOS version and configured with the necessary Secure Boot certificates before installing Microsoft's Windows 11 Patch Tuesday updates. Systems that are already experiencing the problem may require BIOS configuration changes to restore normal boot behavior. Admins can find information regarding that in the support article here on HP's official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      246
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!