Will DDR3 1333MHz work in a DDR3 1066MHz Mobo?


Recommended Posts

  On 16/05/2011 at 00:24, SHoTTa35 said:

Sure, just will run at the slower speed.

Not entirely true, some machines may not even turn on with memory speeds higher than what the board is capable. Only real way to find out is to test it.

  On 16/05/2011 at 00:24, SHoTTa35 said:

Sure, just will run at the slower speed.

Not correct. if the mobo supports up to 1066 and nothing higher then it will not work. the only time that it will run at the slower speed is when you put say a DDR3 800 and a DDR3 1066 module in then the memory will run at the slowest speed err the DDR3 800. to avoid that, put matching speed rated sticks in to run at the highest speed.If you have a mobo that supports DDR3 up to 1333 or PC10600 and you put DDR3 800 sticks in, then it will run at the DDR3 800 speed until you replace the DDR3 800 sticks and put higher rated sticks in, up to the max rated that the mobo supports.

Another thing to keep in mind is RAM voltages. Make sure to adjust your BIOS and set the required voltage (there are printed on the RAM sticks). This is something I did when working with DDR2 memory, but I'm not sure if DDR3 makers are putting out stick with different voltages other than 1.5v...

As articuno1au said, you can certainly overclock you mobo to run them at 1333mhz.

The Mac won't do it because their firmware is locked in place for the memory apple want to use. That's the only reason Mac won't do it :\ Macs are entirely capable of running faster memory -_-

NeowinRam.png

See those Jedec values? The motherboard will pick the first available safe value for the board and run it..

In the case of my memory with your board: Jedec #3 at 533 (dual sided = 1066).

@ Ajua - Yeah, a lot of them require voltage changes. You just have to be careful with Intel's i3, i5 and i7 processors because they don't support voltages above 1.65v for the onboard memory controller :\

I'm running mine higher >.>

  On 16/05/2011 at 01:09, articuno1au said:

The Mac won't do it because their firmware is locked in place for the memory apple want to use. That's the only reason Mac won't do it :\ Macs are entirely capable of running faster memory -_-

:rolleyes:

Screen+shot+2011-05-15+at+6.23.48+PM.png

I agree, any computer that isnt a mac should suppport the ram. PC 10600(1333mhz) is backwards compatible with PC 8500 (1066mhz). However you will be bottlenecked by the slowest component front side bus for your processor, or motherboard. If either supports only a fsb max at 1066mhz, the ram will run at 1066mhz.

  On 16/05/2011 at 00:46, articuno1au said:

Everything that isn't a Mac will run it.

You can also overclock your board to run it at 1333 if you want :)

My x58 only supports 1066 and I have my ram running at 1600 (with really tight timings (How I love thee OCZ)).

  On 16/05/2011 at 01:26, articuno1au said:

/headdesk x 100000000

I meant to systems that don't support it natively you ignoramus.

That was quite clearly the topic of this conversation.

God damn Mac users :\

you first said everything that isn't a mac will run it, i showed you one that will... and the original topic was will it work in his mobo and i spit out an example of where it will not and soldier1st perfectly explained why it won't. you're the one that trolled in and said it won't work with any mac which has nothing to do with the original topic. this has nothing to do with being a mac user, it has everything to do with hardware of PCs, with both macs and windows machines use the same type of computer hardware.

  On 16/05/2011 at 01:28, carson2255 said:

I agree, any computer that isnt a mac should suppport the ram. PC 10600(1333mhz) is backwards compatible with PC 8500 (1066mhz).

instead of just feeding your ignorance because you didn't read the above posts at all which tell you that it may not work, i'll just quote this one again...

  On 16/05/2011 at 00:53, soldier1st said:

Not correct. if the mobo supports up to 1066 and nothing higher then it will not work. the only time that it will run at the slower speed is when you put say a DDR3 800 and a DDR3 1066 module in then the memory will run at the slowest speed err the DDR3 800. to avoid that, put matching speed rated sticks in to run at the highest speed.If you have a mobo that supports DDR3 up to 1333 or PC10600 and you put DDR3 800 sticks in, then it will run at the DDR3 800 speed until you replace the DDR3 800 sticks and put higher rated sticks in, up to the max rated that the mobo supports.

  On 16/05/2011 at 01:36, rajputwarrior said:

you first said everything that isn't a mac will run it, i showed you one that will... and the original topic was will it work in his mobo and i spit out an example of where it will not and soldier1st perfectly explained why it won't. you're the one that trolled in and said it won't work with any mac which has nothing to do with the original topic.

instead of just feeding your ignorance because you didn't read the above posts at all which tell you that it may not work, i'll just quote this one again...

  On 16/05/2011 at 00:44, rajputwarrior said:

^ you are right. depends on the mobo if it'll downclock it. my macbook wouldn't clock ddr3 1333 ram so i had to eff around with the firmware to manual change the clock speeds. only thing you can do is test it.

Feel free to read your first reply to the topic. You brought Macs into it. I was talking about frequencies above the rated values, and was saying that anything that wasn't a Mac would run it. It doesn't mean Macs can't run it, it merely means that things that aren't Macs will.

I wasn't trying to imply it wouldn't work with any Mac. I don't think anyone would read it that way, and if they did, bumpkiss to them.

@ the last part of your quote:

  On 16/05/2011 at 01:09, articuno1au said:

The Mac won't do it because their firmware is locked in place for the memory apple want to use. That's the only reason Mac won't do it :\ Macs are entirely capable of running faster memory -_-

NeowinRam.png

See those Jedec values? The motherboard will pick the first available safe value for the board and run it..

In the case of my memory with your board: Jedec #3 at 533 (dual sided = 1066).

@ Ajua - Yeah, a lot of them require voltage changes. You just have to be careful with Intel's i3, i5 and i7 processors because they don't support voltages above 1.65v for the onboard memory controller :\

I'm running mine higher >.>

Also note in this reply my statement: "The Mac" referring to yours as mentioned in your first post :\

  On 16/05/2011 at 01:45, articuno1au said:

Feel free to read your first reply to the topic. You brought Macs into it. I was talking about frequencies above the rated values, and was saying that anything that wasn't a Mac would run it. It doesn't mean Macs can't run it, it merely means that things that aren't Macs will.

I wasn't trying to imply it wouldn't work with any Mac. I don't think anyone would read it that way, and if they did, bumpkiss to them.

im glad you skipped the part of why i brought the mac example in and how i said that i was just an example of computer hardware not working with said higher clocked ram speed....

And you blithely ignored the part where I said things that aren't a Mac and wasn't directly commenting on what you said?

Seriously..

This is bordering on the edge of vegetative state stupidity. If you are hung up on my previous post, I'm sorry but that's not my issue :\

Is it just me or do most Mac owners have a MASSIVE inferiority complex :\

  On 16/05/2011 at 01:36, rajputwarrior said:

you first said everything that isn't a mac will run it, i showed you one that will... and the original topic was will it work in his mobo and i spit out an example of where it will not and soldier1st perfectly explained why it won't. you're the one that trolled in and said it won't work with any mac which has nothing to do with the original topic. this has nothing to do with being a mac user, it has everything to do with hardware of PCs, with both macs and windows machines use the same type of computer hardware.

instead of just feeding your ignorance because you didn't read the above posts at all which tell you that it may not work, i'll just quote this one again...

I also did not mean that all macs cant run with this ram, I meant that some macs will not run without modifications, because of firmware apple adds to prevent modifications to the machine. Macs do run on the same X86 architechture as other PCs. The only difference is they try to lockdown what can be modified through adding firmware. Apple computers also contains very few parts made by apple if any at all, most is licensed from other companies (intel, ati, nvidia, asus, etc.). Just look what they did to their harddrives.... http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/05/14/imac_hard_drive_replacement_woes/

Self deprecating sarcasm, that doesn't sound like me at all..

Thanks captain underpants..

Good to see your "points" have come down to personal attacks. At least I am weaving fact and logic into my assertions that you are an ignoramus.

  On 16/05/2011 at 01:56, articuno1au said:

Self deprecating sarcasm, that doesn't sound like me at all..

Thanks captain underpants..

Good to see your "points" have come down to personal attacks. At least I am weaving fact and logic into my assertions that you are an ignoramus.

no knows

/cares

who you are around here. and i haven't personally attacked anyone. it's you doing it towards me this entire time with classics like "captain underpants"

on topic: just throw it in the motherboard and see what happens....

  On 16/05/2011 at 01:28, carson2255 said:

I agree, any computer that isnt a mac should suppport the ram. PC 10600(1333mhz) is backwards compatible with PC 8500 (1066mhz). However you will be bottlenecked by the slowest component front side bus for your processor, or motherboard. If either supports only a fsb max at 1066mhz, the ram will run at 1066mhz.

Best answer I have seen so far on this thread. Karma++ to tech heads.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The user is always the weak point at the end of the day. It doesn't really matter what service is used if a attacker gets in they can pretty much do anything.
    • Zen Browser 1.13.1b by Razvan Serea Zen Browser is a privacy-focused, open-source web browser built on Mozilla Firefox, offering users a secure and customizable browsing experience. It emphasizes privacy by blocking trackers, ads, and ensuring your data isn't collected. With Zen Mods, users can enhance their browser experience with various customization options, including features like split views and vertical tabs. The browser is designed for efficiency, providing fast browsing speeds and a lightweight interface. Zen Browser prioritizes user control over the browsing experience, offering a minimal yet powerful alternative to traditional web browsers while keeping your online activity private. Zen Browser’s DRM limitation Zen Browser currently lacks support for DRM-protected content, meaning streaming services like Netflix and HBO Max are inaccessible. This is due to the absence of a Widevine license, which requires significant costs and is financially unfeasible for the developer. Additionally, applying for this license would require Zen to be part of a larger company, similar to Mozilla or Brave. Therefore, DRM-protected media won't be supported in Zen Browser for the foreseeable future. Zen Browser offers features that improve user experience, privacy, and customization: Privacy-Focused: Blocks trackers and minimizes data collection. Automatic Updates: Keeps the browser updated with security patches. Zen Mods: Customizable themes and layouts. Workspaces: Organize tabs into different workspaces. Compact Mode: Maximizes screen space by minimizing UI elements. Zen Glance: Quick website previews. Split Views: View multiple tabs in the same window. Sidebar: Access bookmarks and tools quickly. Vertical Tabs: Manage tabs vertically. Container Tabs: Separate browsing sessions. Fast Profile Switcher: Switch between profiles easily. Tab Folders: Organize tabs into folders. Customizable UI: Personalize browser interface. Security Features: Inherits Firefox’s robust security. Fast Performance: Lightweight and optimized for speed. Zen Mods Customization: Deep customization with mods. Quick Access: Easy access to favorite websites. Open Source: Built on Mozilla Firefox with community collaboration. Community-Driven: Active development and feedback from users. GitHub Repository: Contribute and review the source code. Zen Browser 1.13b changelog: New Features There's a new way to manage spaces, which brings a more intuitive and user-friendly experience Updated to firefox 139.0.4 Added support for Google safebrowsing for better security Collapsed toolbarr gets a slight UI redesign Fixes Fixed issues related to glance and split view Fixed performance issues and high GPU usage for some users Other small fixes and improvements Breaking Changes Customizable UI buttons at the bottom has been reset to a new default state Zen Browser 1.13.1b fixes: Small fixes from the previous release. Download: Zen Browser | 73.6 MB (Open Source) Download: Zen Browser ARM64 | Other Operating Systems View: Zen Browser Home Page | Screenshots 1 | 2 | Reddit Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Sadly not, unless I'm mistaken, it's still impossible
    • Just hope it will not be as bad as History of the World: Part II...
    • +1 for LibreOffice. At least you should try it. The one from M$ is just a bloated turd at this point.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Jdoe25 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Explorer
      Legend20 went up a rank
      Explorer
    • One Month Later
      jezzzy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      CSpera earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      MIR JOHNNY BLAZE earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      617
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      277
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      179
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      151
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      116
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!