Cannot get 3rd party themes working on Windows 7


Recommended Posts

Hi all,

Just wondering if anyone may be able to shed some light on this problem I have with my Windows 7 install and using 3rd party themes.

I was a big fan of 3rd party themes when I used Windows XP, and although I have been relatively happy with the appearance of Windows 7 so far, I'm getting bored with it. I saw the Elune theme posted elsewhere so I thought I would try it.

My Windows 7 version is Home Premium 64-bit (Build 7600).

First I tried an application called CustoPack Tools. This allowed me to download and apply theme... by all accounts, it was meant to do the patching etc for me. However, when it tried to apply it I was greeted with Windows Classic rather than the theme I was expecting. Fair enough, my immediate thought from my XP days was that the system files were not correctly patched.

So, I downloaded the UniversalThemePatcher and ran the x64 version as administrator, but it told me that my files were already patched. I restarted, no difference. I unpatched and re-patched, and restarted. Still cannot apply the themes.

Tried downloading another theme, exactly the same problem.

I then tried the UX Style Core Beta, which installs a system service to apply unsigned themes. I verified this was running correctly in services, but my machine will STILL not apply the themes.

I can apply the Aero theme no problems, and the themes service is running.

I am out of ideas. Does anyone else have any ideas?

The only thing I can think of as to why it isn't working is that it is the Windows that is preloaded on my laptop so not a "Vanilla" version of windows (it's a Sony Vaio E-Series FWIW).

Very disappointing. I would be most grateful for any help I could get.

Cheers, Paul

did you patch all 3 files? sometimes you will have to unpatch and repatch then restart.

http://deepxw.blogspot.com/2008/11/universal-theme-patcher.html

Right, I unpatched the 64-bit files and restarted, now I run the x86 Theme Patcher, but the themeservice.dll file (the top one of the three is missing).

I've checked and the file is definitely there in C:\Windows\System 32 and I've changed the permissions so I have full control but the file is still not listed when I run the 32-bit patcher, so could this be my problem, and if so how do I get this program to find the file that is there?

Edit: I've just tried patching the 5 files but it still will not apply the theme :(

From the screenshot, I _might_ know why the themes never applied, do you use the default DPI value?

No, I use the "125%" setting....?

Edit: WE HAVE A WINNER!!! I've just set it to default and its working!!! Cheers mate :) though its a shame I seem unable to use the higher DPI setting (I use a 15" laptop with a 1080 display)

No, I use the "125%" setting....?

Edit: WE HAVE A WINNER!!! I've just set it to default and its working!!! Cheers mate :) though its a shame I seem unable to use the higher DPI setting (I use a 15" laptop with a 1080 display)

Glad I could help^^ Your screenshot looked a bit off DPI-wise and I knew there was another thread on DPI and themes recently, so I figured it might be the case here too. It's unfortunate that it doesn't work with other DPI serrings yeah, well technically it would work, the theme designers would just need to redo the theme for each value :pinch:

  • 1 year later...
  • 1 month later...

i have same problem . . themeservices.dll missing . . current & backup empty . . help me please . . :cry:

Glad I could help^^ Your screenshot looked a bit off DPI-wise and I knew there was another thread on DPI and themes recently, so I figured it might be the case here too. It's unfortunate that it doesn't work with other DPI serrings yeah, well technically it would work, the theme designers would just need to redo the theme for each value :pinch:

i have same problem . . themeservices.dll missing . . current & backup empty . . help me please . . :cry:
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Glad these prices are starting to come down, but that is still crazy. I bought the 2TB 9100 Pro (slightly more expensive version with PCIe 5.0) last year for $240.
    • The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months by Sayan Sen Yesterday, we covered a really good deal wherein you can get a 4TB TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 NVMe PCIe Gen4 SSD for a low price of just $400 with a special discount coupon. That's just $100 per TB, making it a very good offer during these hard times. The deal is still live, so you can check it out in its dedicated article here if you do not want to miss out. Meanwhile, if you don't have that kind of budget but still wish to buy an SSD for a good price, the 2TB variant of the TeamGroup SSD at $280 its lowest price in over three months. Meanwhile, those seeking 2TB but faster performance can check out Samsung's 990 PRO, which has hit the lowest price also in the last quarter or so, as it's on sale for $370 (purchase links under the specs table down below). Thus, you want a faster drive, get the 990 Pro, or you want more capacity, grab the TeamGroup 4TB linked in the first para. The 990 PRO is a PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD and still one of the fastest drives available today for under $500. Speaking of fast, sequential reads and writes are rated at 7450 MB/s and 6900 MB/s, respectively. The random throughputs for reads and writes are 1400K IOPS and 1550K IOPS, respectively. The 990 PRO is based on Samsung's 7th Gen V-NAND flash, and it too is TLC. It packs 2 gigs of LPDDR4 DRAM cache, which helps the random performance. The endurance rating for this is 1200 TBW (terabytes written), which should be sufficient for most users. The Samsung 990 PRO is compatible with the PlayStation 5, but if you are going to use the 990 PRO on a PC, check out the Samsung Magician app that lets you track your drive's health, update its firmware, customize various settings, and more. The tech specs are given below: Specification TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 2TB Samsung 990 PRO 2TB Interface PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe 1.4 PCIe Gen 4.0 x4, NVMe 2.0 Form Factor M.2 2280 M.2 2280 Controller InnoGrit Controller Samsung In-house Controller NAND Flash 3D TLC 3D TLC DRAM Cache None (HMB supported) 2GB LPDDR4 Sequential Read (Max) 5,000 MB/s 7,450 MB/s Sequential Write (Max) 4,500 MB/s 6,900 MB/s Random Read (4K) Up to 600,000 IOPS Up to 1,400,000 IOPS Random Write (4K) Up to 700,000 IOPS Up to 1,550,000 IOPS TBW (Endurance) 1,300 TBW 1,200 TBW MTBF 3,000,000 hours 1,500,000 hours Operating Temperature 0°C to 70°C 0°C to 70°C Storage Temperature -40°C to 85°C -40°C to 85°C Shock Resistance 1,500G / 0.5ms 1,500G / 0.5ms Heatsink Patented Graphene Heat Spreader No Get them at the links below: Samsung 990 PRO SSD 2TB (MZ-V9P2T0B/AM): $369.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 2TB SSD (TM8FFE002T0C129): $279.99 (Sold by TeamGroup, Shipped by Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • If you can't spell a simple word that 2nd graders learn, your entire argument is suspect.
    • And here goes the "Won't someone think of the children" brigade. Get stuffed mate. This has NOTHING to do with making the internet safe. It's about tracking adults, spying on your online activity, and sending the boys around when they don't like something you post. Also, again, parliament have voted TWICE against this, and Starmer is going ahead anyway. THAT is anti-democratic bullsh**. They will use this law to track you, they will use this law to control you, and they will use this law to punish you if they don't like what you do, even if it's legal. And your data? Say bye bye to that. It'll be on the darkweb in weeks. I'm not some rando online. I've been an IT professional for 40 years, many of it in security. I know exactly what this means and what will happen to your data. I do not consent and I will not comply.
    • "...but it may not be Microsoft's fault" seems like a reasonable way to tease what is going on without leaving the user with a false impression that an update is the problem. A title isn't a summery, it is meant to entice the user to read the article. It should not contain a misleading premise; which this title does not. You could maybe complain that the first paragraph should have included that detail. The writing style popularized over 100 years ago in newspapers will cover the most important information as soon as possible with details and nuance added later; the idea being that with each new paragraph you have less of the reader's focus.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      520
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!