Neowin FPS BF3 vs MW3 Purchase Poll


  

236 members have voted

  1. 1. Which game?

    • BF3
      133
    • MW3
      26
    • Neither
      23
    • Both
      54


Recommended Posts

As it states this a poll for which game you'll be or intending on purchasing, between just these two. To make it simple on thread viewers feel free to state your:

- choice in game

- If single player or multiplayer is the deciding factor

- platform you'll be most likely to purchase for

- other deciding factors such as "community" "graphics" etc

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/999770-neowin-fps-bf3-vs-mw3-purchase-poll/
Share on other sites

Both, more than likely. I like the look of both Singleplayer campaigns, and I enjoy playing the MP of the CoD series. I'm a bit hesitant about Battlefield's MP, but I'll certainly give it a go.

Both for the PS3.

Battlefield MP is probably one of the best online games you can play!

Perhaps, but I've not played a Battlefield game in years, and Dice's handling of the multiplayer aspect of Medal of Honor has left me wary.

I hadn't played a battlefield games either myself until 2 days ago; BF:Bad Company 2, single player with only an hour or two of MP, highly recommend it even if you just rent it. For now I'm still playing CoD:Black Ops multiplayer 5th or 6th prestige, so it's not like I'm bias. =)

Lack of desire or platform? Just curious.

Platform, my Xbox has been broken for more than a year, and I haven't felt the need to replace it since I didn't use it all that much.

My PC won't be able to run it since it barely ran Black Ops, and there will be numerous engine enhancements from the MW2 engine.

I personally hate how BF fans are slating MW3 and praising BF3 even though they've played neither and neither is anywhere near finished :/

------

Anyways, going to purchase both for Xbox 360.

Going off previous experience, it has nothing to do with being a fanboy. With BF3 theyve made huge updates to the engine, IW keep using the same old crap over and over and over again to tell the same story in different settings.

Both, but Battlefield 3 over Modern Warfare 3. I prefer the gameplay of Battlefield and I'm eager to get some time with Frostbite 2.0. The Modern Warfare 3 trailer did not appeal to me all that much, to be honest. Sure, it'll be a decent game but Frostbite 2.0 is going to be a real game-changer. Modern Warfare 3 looks like more of the same - which might not be a bad thing assuming that it has decent online.

If I had to choose between them I would pick BF3 over MW3 about a gazillion times but I don't have to choose between them so I will eventually get both but I doubt MW3 will get 5% of my overall gaming time for this fall. To put it in perspective I have easily spent over 3000 - 3500 hours clocked in on BF2 with many different accounts. I suspect BF3 will be no different (Y)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Too soon, I'm still not over this death!
    • Normally, I admit when a title is clickbait (unfortunately, it's become somewhat necessary in AI-dominated news sections today), but in this case, all supported versions is implied and doesn't need to be spelled out in the title. Of course, I'm covering a Patch Tuesday update but that is only available to supported Windows SKUs. All our coverage relates to supported Windows software and SKUs only unless we expressly state that it's "unsupported", "unofficial", or "third-party". I'm sorry, but supported/official SKUs don't need to be spelled out as such in every Neowin headline.
    • ALL versions or ALL SUPPORTED versions? Neowin does it again.
    • But the reality is it will work for people's needs, and they don't care about the technology that makes it. Clearly not everyone's needs, but that low end space where personal laptops were only used to type emails, watch content and browse websites, but they didn't want to do that on a small screen device. Heck, writing that out I can now see the connection and reason it'll do so well. Apple is about experience. If the experience is bad, they don't release it. Low end Windows laptop manufacturers up until this point have not taken that into consideration ever before, so slow laggy usage with brittle slimey plastic shells were common. I hope that the low end space at least creates better physical products that last a bit longer, and if Microsoft get their act together, they could also have a solid OS on such low end hardware that would actually make the experience work for what the hardware was intended for. The fact that the CPU is a "cellphone", sorry mobile phone processor is irrelevant. It's about the experience, and so far, that sounds quite solid.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      586
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      184
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      77
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!