Recommended Posts

1. I want the desktop to be more metrofied

2. Folders for Metro Apps

3. Run metro apps in a window on the desktop

1. Not possible for Windows 8. The desktop will remain similar to Windows 7 to help keep training costs down.

2. These aren't really needed. The Start Screen's capability to group tiles should suffice.

3. Maybe have a WinRT "desktop", where WinRT apps can interact with each other. But Metro apps shouldn't be on the 9x desktop.

I'd like it if the metro apps could talk to the desktop ones. To maintain security they could try to use SkyDrive so an app could write to an AppData folder on SkyDrive that is shared by the desktop application.

Also, better favorite management. As it stands you have to pin your favorites to the home screen. It would be nice if they had an about:favorites page that would show a hierarchal list.

Greetings! I believe every aspect of Windows 8 is absolutely stunning! However, it does require minute bug fixes and enhancements to improve the overall OS. The enhancements have been listed on this site numerous times and would be redundant to state them again.

On another note, this is a great site! I've been getting all my Windows 8 news here for the past 5 months and decided to join just the other day. Here goes my first post!

--Terra

  • Like 2

I would like all of the system icons (including those in Windows Explorer) to be white, just like the icons on the tiles in the Metro experience. I doubt we'll see this, though. Further, I still don't think I like the mismatch of colours on the Start Screen (the different tiles), so perhaps some refinements regarding that would be good, if possible. Unless it's just a case of me needing to get used to how all of the different tiles look together :p

Greetings! I believe every aspect of Windows 8 is absolutely stunning! However, it does require minute bug fixes and enhancements to improve the overall OS. The enhancements have been listed on this site numerous times and would be redundant to state them again.

On another note, this is a great site! I've been getting all my Windows 8 news here for the past 5 months and decided to join just the other day. Here goes my first post!

--Terra

Welcome to Neowin :) That's a great first post, if I do say so myself :p

My main gripe is the close gesture for Metro apps, it's not exactly...smooth...to execute with a mouse, but I supposed I can get used to it. It is downright horrid on a touchpad (on my eeePC) With this touchpad driver bizzo it would be cool if you could do CTRL+touchscreen gesture on the touchpad.

I'm liking that they have finally changed the mouse cursors in the RP. Even warming to a few Metro Apps (Wikipedia/Sports). The Release Preview both feels and looks fantastic. I'm still hoping for a higher quality to included Metro apps, and 3rd party apps, come RTM.

EDIT: What about a Metro Windows Explorer Equivalent? (haven't seen any file management in WinRT demos... surely they will sort that out?)

I would like all of the system icons (including those in Windows Explorer) to be white, just like the icons on the tiles in the Metro experience. I doubt we'll see this, though. Further, I still don't think I like the mismatch of colours on the Start Screen (the different tiles), so perhaps some refinements regarding that would be good, if possible. Unless it's just a case of me needing to get used to how all of the different tiles look together :p

Welcome to Neowin :) That's a great first post, if I do say so myself :p

Thank you for the warm welcome Calum! I also strongly agree with you regarding the icons. No worries, though Microsoft promised new refined icons din't they?

EDIT: What about a Metro Windows Explorer Equivalent? (haven't seen any file management in WinRT demos... surely they will sort that out?)

Yes! Why isn't there a Metro file manager? Quite odd to tell you the truth.

  • Like 2

For Microsoft to realise that Metro isn't the be all and end all thus as a result actually lay out a long term road map that addresses the traditional desktop that'll hopefully including the ability to develop traditional applications using WinRT/XAML to replace win32 in the long run. The problem I have with Windows 8 isn't anything necessarily what exists today but what their roadmap is going forward - if we know what the road map is then you can step back and realise that this release is but one in a many steps towards some sort of end goal thus the jarring effect of win32/Metro can be overlooked in favour of the long term vision.

Yes! Why isn't there a Metro file manager? Quite odd to tell you the truth.

In the Metro world you don't manage the files, the operating system does hence the reason why there is no file management tools that are available.

In the Metro world you don't manage the files, the operating system does hence the reason why there is no file management tools that are available.

I think I can finally see why folders are on the way out - they're a departure from the reality that all of our files are just ones and zeroes, contiguously or otherwise spread out on spinning platters (SSD-folk excluded, of course). The hierarchical organization made sense back when search and indexing was primitive and underdeveloped, like back when the Web was AOL, Yahoo, and Altavista. I still remember Yahoo Groups, or something like that, where sites were organized hierarchically, and you'd browse to a site like Neowin by clicking on some sequence of links like "Communities > Forums > Technology."

Then actual searching came along, and at least search engines haven't been the same since, but the Desktop has kinda lagged behind. It is a little surprising if you think about it - a lot of people have completely different workflows for finding "bieber remix.mp3" online as opposed to finding "technical documentation 14662.docx" on their own computer - especially people from the days of XP, when hierarchical organization was still more or less the only way to go about anything locally. Now, file content can be indexed, and isn't that really what is important? It isn't the name or the place that we saved something that is actually relevant when we're looking for it. We want the content, and search - if powerful enough - eliminates the need for this fantastical overhead of where some file exists on our spinning platters.

Oh, as far as Windows 8 goes, I'd like for them to tone down the auto-Aero colorization, or make cool colors the dominant determinant of the window frame color. I'd like for them to continue working on performance. I think this issue is especially noticable since 8 is shipping with some apps, while Windows 7 shipped with almost nothing but the barebones OS. They should continue to work to improve the Music, Mail (IMAP!), Videos, and Photos apps.

I still think that they should include a quick and easy editing pane that allows users to set their own Start Screen background - simply apply a blur and desaturate in the appropriate areas - should be enough to fix most images. Of course, they need to include a feature that slaps the user should they still manage to create something ugly.

I would the desktop as start up and option to turn off metro and go to classic and of course the start menu to the left side, not the right side. Who ever come up with these concepts were probably on some type of drugs. With all these changes are not brought with innovation, the only innovation I keep hearing about is the performance under the hood. Just cause you have people saying its okay you will adapt to turning off your computer in 4 steps versus the 2 steps on Windows 7. Come on you are kidding with that darn Windows 8 tutorial? Its confusing enough.

1. I would have loved the boot animation dots ported to cursors. Probably someone from deviantart can come up with that.

2. Ability to choose a custom tile for those horrid non-metro apps

3. Bigger size text in desktop mode to match the size used in metro mode. (Not that pathetic DPI scaling nonsense)

4. New default font with better cleartype.

5. The black charms bar should not overlap taskbar.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • All these CEOs got the biggest boners thinking about firing employees for AI. Turned out it was just a wet dream.
    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!