Shooting at Wisconsin Sikh temple


Recommended Posts

Police officer 'among injured' in Wisconsin shooting

_62056586_us_oakcreek_0508.gif

Police have confirmed that a shooting has taken place at a Sikh temple in Oak Creek in the US state of Wisconsin.

A police spokesman said an officer had been shot multiple times but was expected to survive. There are reports of other casualties but no confirmed numbers.

The spokesman said one suspect had been shot, but another gunman might still be on the loose inside the temple.

"This is an ongoing and very fluid situation," he said.

Local police said that a call had been made to them at about 10:30 local time (15:30 GMT).

Police have corralled journalists outside the temple and urged them not to broadcast aerial footage that could compromise the operation.

Oak Creek is a town of about 30,000 people in the south-east corner of the state.

'Many injured'

Parminder Kaleka, who was waiting outside the temple, told the Milwaukee-Wisconsin Journal Sentinel that she had phoned her brother-in-law - who she said was the priest of the temple - who was inside "at that time [the] shooting happened".

"He told me 25 or more people got shot, at that time they don't even know if they are dead or alive, so a lot of people got injured."

She said she had heard her brother-in-law had also been shot, and said desperate families were gathered outside the temple waiting for news.

"This is a big tragedy for our church," she said, saying everyone had always assumed it would be a place of safety.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-19138754

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1096235-shooting-at-wisconsin-sikh-temple/
Share on other sites

Yea, like a knife never killed anyone -- http://www.news.com....v-1226441838914

Yes, forks can kill, baseball bats, vehicles, a plastic bag, the list literally goes on and on and on and on of all of the different items that can be used to kill. We all know this to be fact.

With that said, if anyone in their right mind is going to try and tell me that guns are not the most efficient means for killing, then that is truly ridiculous. End of story.

So keep on trying to use this as some kind of counter argument. I will still know guns make it a hell of a lot easier to kill then anything else out there.

Yea, like a knife never killed anyone -- http://www.news.com....v-1226441838914

There have already been several high profile shootings in the US in recent months and yet you're using one knife attack in China to try to justify the ineffectual gun restrictions in the US?

"Those who sacrifice liberty for security deserve neither"

You can't use that as a blanket statement to avoid sensible restrictions on firearms. By that logic people shouldn't be required to have a driving licence as everybody should have the liberty to drive as they please. Liberties only extend to the point that they impact other people and in the US it is clear that the lack of adequate regulations is costing more lives than it is protecting.

You can't use that as a blanket statement to avoid sensible restrictions on firearms. By that logic people shouldn't be required to have a driving licence as everybody should have the liberty to drive as they please. Liberties only extend to the point that they impact other people and in the US it is clear that the lack of adequate regulations is costing more lives than it is protecting.

Look how the Prohibition Era turned out! people still did things regardless of what regulations are on the books so your comment is null N void!

Look how the Prohibition Era turned out! people still did things regardless of what regulations are on the books so your comment is null N void!

did you miss the word sensible? if you use extremes like banned completely or free for all theres gonna be problems. most solutions are in the middle.

by that logic iran should have a nuke...why regulate them right.

Look how the Prohibition Era turned out! people still did things regardless of what regulations are on the books so your comment is null N void!

Gun restrictions have been proven to work in numerous countries, including the UK and Germany. This isn't some hypothetical scenario - gun restrictions reduce firearms fatalities.

  • Like 3

did you miss the word sensible? if you use extremes like banned completely or free for all theres gonna be problems. most solutions are in the middle.

by that logic iran should have a nuke...why regulate them right.

Clearly you missed my point

My point was no matter what regulations/laws etc there are people are still going to do what they want to do regardless. it's been proven every single day when someone breaks the law etc. Iran is perfect example they are heavily regulated and guess what they are still doing what they want with regards to their nuclear program! The reason they should NOT have a nuke is because the fear they will use it to take out Israel since Iran is a known terrorist regime and supporters of terrorist groups.

Gun restrictions have been proven to work in numerous countries, including the UK and Germany. This isn't some hypothetical scenario - gun restrictions reduce firearms fatalities.

And there are still shootings in those countries!

This is about guns, stay on topic before the merry go round please

:rofl:

This is not about guns, as I demonstrated. How about you stay on friggen topic. It about a wacko killing people, and he used a weapon. There are an estimated 200 million guns in the US and a few wackos makes every one bad? That's like saying everyone that uses the internet is a software pirate and should be treated as such. There will always be wackos and they will always act out for one reason or another. Don't blame those are not doing wrong for those that are.

I keep and carry my guns in a safe manor. I have been fully trained and have trained my kids the same. Many do the same, and we are all tired of the bigotry from those that don't like guns or think they are better then those who have or use guns.

Here we go again, Im betting there are going to be gun advocates on this board and many others saying we need to start arming people in religious institutions. There was a great article in TIME the other day about how we as a country really need to get this crap figured out. Obama even said its long overdue and that its not all about gun control but how to find crazies like this guy and in Colorado. Face it, no matter what people think or say, we have a big big problem here with not only guns but crazies that want to kill.

And crazies who want to kill will find a way to do it.

The worst school massacre in the US happened in Bath, Michigan May 18, 1927 when a crazy named Andrew Kehoe beat his wife to death then killed 38 elementary children, 2 teachers, 4 other adults and himself with bombs. 44 dead and 58 others injured.

It's the people, stupid.

  • Like 1
And there are still shootings in those countries!

Nobody claimed there weren't. However, they occur at a dramatically lower rate and very rarely are there such high profile shootings as this. The firearms mortality rate in the US is over twenty times higher than the UK. The last high-profile shooting in the UK - that I can recall - occurred two years ago and resulted in one death and one injured. It's bizarre to suggest that because you can't eliminate gun crime altogether that it's best to do nothing at all.

Gun restrictions in the US are woefully lacking and it's rather concerning that so few are interested in addressing it.

And crazies who want to kill will find a way to do it.

The worst school massacre in the US didn't involve guns at all - it happened in Bath, Michigan May 18, 1927 when a crazy named Andrew Kehoe killed 38 elementary children, 2 teachers, 4 other adults and himself with a bomb.

That's not the issue - it's the frequency and severity of mass shootings that's the issue, which is a direct result of poor gun regulations. It's great that you have found one example of a worse atrocity nearly a hundred years ago but that doesn't diminish the fact that poor gun control results in the needless deaths of thousands of people a year.

If the Revolutionary War never happend most likely the 2nd Amendment of today would be very different!

That's exactly the point, the US govt still controls guns in the same way they did when there were civil wars, etc. It's a different world and it's time for different laws, the present gun control laws are obviously doing nothing. It seems that anyone can get a gun, as much ammo as they want and then carry out their "judgement" on anyone they please. Teenage hormones are extremely dangerous in a country where anyone can get their hands on a gun.

Yea, like a knife never killed anyone -- http://www.news.com....v-1226441838914

Not aware of a lot of knife massacres.

"Those who sacrifice liberty for security deserve neither"

What liberty would really be impacted on sensible gun regulation? Your right to own high powered, automatic weapons? Why do people even own them? Why not flame throwers and rocket propelled grenade launchers, too? Automatic weapons have no practical use in civilized society, so why not allow other forms of arms which are also impractical and downright dangerous?

No, really, I'm curious. Someone care to enlighten me?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • All these CEOs got the biggest boners thinking about firing employees for AI. Turned out it was just a wet dream.
    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!