[Shell Patcher] Super Turbo Tango Patcher 6000


Recommended Posts

Note: Due to other things going on in my life (work, cars, video games, hanging out with friends, etc), work on this project has essentially ceased.

The Tango shell patcher is designed to make integrating icons from the Tango project and its descendants a fairly simple process. It works by modifying your current system files, and inserting the modified versions back into the system; at it's heart, it is simply a tool for batched, automated resource hacking and system file replacement. This version is intended for use on Windows Vista.

Notes:

  • It supports (in theory) all languages and editions of 32-bit Windows Vista and Server 2008; 64-bit versions are NOT supported, nor will be anytime soon (the tools to make it happen just don't exist).
    • I'm almost positive that this will break horribly on non-English setups, and certain dual-boot scenarios. If you don't have a standard c:\windows setup, you may need to perform a search-and-replace on the paths hardcoded in FileList.xml. I really have no idea how XPero's handling this in Vize, I guess I need to either look into it or write some code myself. Don't uncomment the line in FileList.xml for user32.dll unless you're feeling brave and are comfortable talking to the activation support machines/people – but please, let me know what happens if you do / I'm not buying you a new license if it gets you on a WGA blacklist. If you are editing FileList.xml, remember to start notepad with admin credentials, or you won't be able to save your changes.

    [*]I know I'll regret it as soon as I've posted this, but I'm ready for people to start posting their skinning requests so I can prioritize and make the most efficient impact with what little time I do have free for the patcher these days.

Current Release: 8.03 (2008/04/01)

Highlights from my SVN log:

  • Remove the "identifier" overlays from the battery meter
  • At least the beginnings of Tangoization on iexplore, wimp, wab, hh, msi, cleanmgr, games also in gnome-games, and a few miscellaneous things that were in 2600
  • Add branding images for each Vista+Srv2k8 edition
  • Classic start button bitmap (Srv2k8 OOB default)
  • Tweaks to folder icons, and add an icon for the home folder
  • Miscellaneous fixes to the installer and patcher

Information on 64-bit support (Last updated 2008/07/07):

  • I've got CFF Explorer working as a reshack wrapper.
  • Which means... reasonably simple-to-implement 64-bit support... finally! I've been a 64-bit Vista user myself now, for a few months, so that pleases User #0, too.
  • So I've got a test build up to play with.
  • Resources and file-list are identical to the 8.03 release - I haven't added extra entries for ProgFiles (x86) or SysWOW64.
  • It's not ready for mass use, just because it requires more testing.
  • Anything that goes wrong, I disavow all knowledge ;)
  • http://rapidshare.com/files/128270709/Tiiz...SVNr54.exe.html

Future plans (Last updated 2008/07/07):

  • I'm just hacking away at it, converting scripts from STTP 2600 where applicable, converting resources, and tweaking the stuff I made bespoke to STTP 6000(+1)
  • I haven't done a whole lot in the past few months, but now that I've got 64-bit support sussed out, it's time to start digging through the piles of resources again.

Edited by vertigosity

^Hey, nice :)

It works, half at least... I had to manually make me owner of the modded files and give me the rights to overwrite them.

Even an elevated command prompt couldn't do it, don't know why. Maybe it's just my vista install but strange behaviour nonetheless. The vertical folders are great!

I think that counts as not working, as far as I'm concerned, since the script should be setting ownership and permissions for itself. What'd you have to do to take ownership of everything, and did you do it from the GUI or the command line?

Well, basically I edited the rights via the file properties (Security tab --> Advanced --> Owner tab --> make me owner; Security tab --> Edit --> give me full access).

From what I could see in the batch script, the patcher HAD changed permissions but still couldn't overwrite the file...

great to see Vista Patcher, unfortunately I cannot/don't want to test it right now (because I do not have backup of my Win and no CD either - laptop OEM X_x)

but I'm looking forward to see it expanding, maybe proper instalator in future.

^Hey, nice :)

It works, half at least... I had to manually make me owner of the modded files and give me the rights to overwrite them.

Even an elevated command prompt couldn't do it, don't know why. Maybe it's just my vista install but strange behaviour nonetheless. The vertical folders are great!

Did you try running the script while Vista is in safe mode?

Well, basically I edited the rights via the file properties (Security tab --> Advanced --> Owner tab --> make me owner; Security tab --> Edit --> give me full access).

From what I could see in the batch script, the patcher HAD changed permissions but still couldn't overwrite the file...

hmm. Are the commands the patcher is using for ownership-taking dumping any negative output?

To test that seperate of the patcher, replace %1 with something nonessential and not already yours (say, %windir%\system32\notepad.exe), and execute the code block in a command prompt (elevated, of course):

takeown /f "%1"
 echo y|cacls "%1" /g everyone:f

...and then see if you can manipulate your target file in explorer (rename, delete, etc). If you can't, we'll have to work out some way to compare the your ACLs against your ACLs after pushing buttons, and the ACLs of an install that the patcher's working on, but it's late, so I'm not going to think up a nice repeatable test procedure ATM.

^The first part succesfully made me owner of mspaint.exe :D

However, the second part didn't work:

C:\Windows\system32>echo y|cacls "%windir%\system32\mspaint.exe" /g everyone:f
Zuordnungen von Kontennamen und Sicherheitskennungen wurden nicht durchgef?hrt.

(which roughly translates to "Nope, didn't work" :pinch:: )

I already found out that this doesn't occur if I change the group parameter to something non-existant. Then the "are you sure" prompt appears how it should (but this doesn't change the rights either).

But well, I'm for a week in venice now so I can't try out further things... but next week I will, of course!

Hmmm... a little bit of googling finds this German Technet article which some more creative googling matches up with it's English counterpart. Just a hunch, but I bet your "everyone" object isn't called that, but a German translation - when you (or anybody else having this sort of trouble on non-English Windows) get back, try replacing "everyone" with "%username%", since I suspect that environment variable does always have the same name, and it'll always return a valid user on the system since it's the username of the person running the command.

everyone is called "jeder" in german vista, but it didn't patch anything for me. I also tried it with %username%, but that didn't change anything. is there any kind of log that would be helpful if i post it? the cmd prompt is way to fast for me to see anything whats going on while patching, so i can't tell where the fault is.

i removed the rem and replaced everyone with %username%, and here is what i get: (see attachement)

"erfolgreich" means succesfull, "Sind Sie sicher" is are you sure, "Zugriff verweigert" is acces denied and "Dateiname existiert bereits, oder die Datei konnte nicht gefunden werden" means filename already exists or the file could not be found.

i dont know if you still need the log or if XPero can offer you the solution (which i hope so :D ), but i'll post it anyway :)

when i look at this

Doit: Creating uninstaller for basebrd.dll.
Backup: Creating restore info for basebrd.dll.
		1 Datei(en) kopiert.
Backup: basebrd.dll copied.
Doit: Prepare basebrd.dll.
Preparing basebrd.dll.
Prepare: Reshacking basebrd.dll
		1 Datei(en) kopiert.
Das System kann die angegebene Datei nicht finden. (the system could not find the file)
		1 Datei(en) verschoben.
Doit: Implant basebrd.dll.
Surgically implanting NewFiles\2_basebrd.dll.
Swapping C:\Windows\Branding\Basebrd\basebrd.dll for the NewFiles one.

ERFOLGREICH: Der Benutzer "C:\Windows\Branding\Basebrd\basebrd.dll" ist jetzt de
r Besitzer der Datei (oder des Ordners) "cpl-PC\cpl".
Sind Sie sicher (J/N)?Zugriff verweigert - C:\Windows\Branding\Basebrd\basebrd.d
ll
		1 Datei(en) kopiert.
Zugriff verweigert
Dateiname existiert bereits, oder die Datei
konnte nicht gefunden werden.

it seems like the script is making the file itself the owner of the file. (?)

hack_o_matic_log.txt

I will start the "Vize" project very soon. It is the XPize for Vista. I've successfully patched Vista system files, so the only thing I need is time to develop it! :) I will not use XPize Installer System, I will be rewriting everything using C#, except the Reshacker thing (I'm waiting for a cool C# library from a guy at TheCodeProject).

@Vertigosity:

Do not hesitate in contacting me for help.

Cheers

I will start the "Vize" project very soon. It is the XPize for Vista. I've successfully patched Vista system files, so the only thing I need is time to develop it! :) I will not use XPize Installer System, I will be rewriting everything using C#, except the Reshacker thing (I'm waiting for a cool C# library from a guy at TheCodeProject).

@Vertigosity:

Do not hesitate in contacting me for help.

Cheers

Now THAT sounds shiny, especially the bit about not using Reshacker, since that's pretty much a massive licensing violation (at least for me, since I've never tracked down the author and beat specific permission out of him). How much of that are you planning on sharing? I've been exploring using PowerShell or Python (I'd kinda like everything to be in an interpreted language, since I've declared user-editable patch targets to be a necessary feature for me and mine, but it's pretty obvious NT batch script is a bit limited) for program logic, but they'd still be calling reshack, so I'd love to get my hands on something like your C# library, doubly so if it supports Win64.

For now I'm not thinking in sharing, but I can share privately ;)

Also, that C# library is not mine, it is being developed by a guy at TheCodeProject and I don't know when it will be released :(. I'm thinking on starting the project with reshacker but I don't have the time for it. We shall see :)

Also, that C# library is not mine, it is being developed by a guy at TheCodeProject and I don't know when it will be released :(. I'm thinking on starting the project with reshacker but I don't have the time for it. We shall see :)

Wonderful! :D

I hope you get something for Vista x64 too

  • 2 weeks later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8, Flip 8, Z Fold Wide: Everything you need to know The ONLY thing I need to know is the price, which I know will be way higher than I (and most people) are willing to pay for a phone... so basically nothing here I need to know. PS: Nice job getting that Apple reference to a non-existent and unrevealed product as "competition" in there. Cheque is in the mail.
    • Well I really think the repasting helped if your higher clocks have returned, maybe the next thing to look at is if there is a problem with your case airflow? I guess this because your 3080 has returned to optimal state, but is still staying too warm, which might suggest it was thermal throttling before you repasted, of which the only logical conclusion could be outside factors.
    • Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8, Flip 8, Z Fold Wide: Everything you need to know by Hamid Ganji Galaxy Z Fold 7 - Image via Samsung The next generation of Samsung foldables is set to be unveiled next month at the second Unpacked event of the year. Samsung’s 2026 foldables are not expected to offer significant upgrades over their predecessors, with the Korean firm instead focusing on design refinements and conventional upgrades such as faster processors and better cameras. However, Samsung is reportedly planning to unveil an all-new passport-style foldable this year to rival Apple’s first foldable iPhone, which is expected to debut this September. Here’s a roundup of everything we know about Samsung’s upcoming foldable devices ahead of their official debut. When can we expect Samsung’s new foldables? The Galaxy Z Fold 7 and Z Flip 7 series were unveiled in July, and Samsung is expected to maintain this timeframe in 2026. Based on previous reports from Korean sources, Samsung will hold its Unpacked event on July 22 in London, UK, to pull back the curtain on the Galaxy Z Fold 8 series. The devices are also expected to hit the shelves a few weeks after launch. However, Samsung has yet to announce an official date. A new naming scheme? One of the most interesting changes we might see this year is a new naming scheme for Samsung’s latest foldables. SamMobile reported that since Samsung is expected to unveil three foldables this year, it has adopted a new naming strategy to simplify product identification for customers. Accordingly, the standard Galaxy Z Fold 8 will reportedly be called the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and will serve as the direct successor to last year’s Galaxy Z Fold 7. The “Ultra” suffix suggests the phone could feature higher-end specifications, such as additional rear camera modules. Samsung’s new passport-style foldable is expected to carry the Galaxy Z Fold 8 name without any suffix. This model is reportedly equipped with two rear cameras. No major changes are expected for the Flip model. Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and Z Flip 8 anticipated specs Rumors over the past few months suggest Samsung is preparing several upgrades for its upcoming foldables, although the devices may continue to rely on larger batteries and faster charging speeds rather than dramatic design changes. The primary focus this year is expected to be the Galaxy Z Fold 8 and its wide-screen design. Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra official CAD renders - Image via AndroidHeadlines Here are the anticipated specifications for the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra based on previous leaks: 6.5-inch outer display and 8-inch inner display, 120Hz refresh rate, and 2,600 nits peak brightness Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor, paired with 12GB or 16GB of RAM and 256GB, 512GB, or 1TB of storage 4.1mm thickness when unfolded and a weight of 210g 200MP main camera, 50MP ultrawide camera, 10MP or 12MP telephoto camera, 10MP cover camera, and 10MP selfie camera 5,000mAh battery with 45W wired charging Android 17 and One UI 9 As for the Galaxy Z Flip 8, the device is not expected to be a major departure from its predecessor, although it could become slightly slimmer. Expected specifications include: Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 or Exynos 2600 processor 12GB of RAM with 256GB and 512GB storage options 6.9-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X inner dispaly and 4.1-inch Super AMOLED outer dispaly 50MP main camera, 12MP ultrawide camera, and 10MP selfie camera 4,300mAh battery with 25W wired charging Android 17 and One UI 9 Samsung’s foldables are also expected to launch with Gemini Intelligence, Google’s AI suite for automating tasks in Android ecosystem. Moreover, given current memory and component costs, some Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and Z Flip 8 variants could see a price hike. Galaxy Z Fold 8 adopts a wide-screen design The centerpiece of the upcoming Unpacked event could be the Galaxy Z Fold 8, previously rumored as the Galaxy Z Fold Wide. This model adopts a passport-style form factor and is expected to compete directly with Apple’s iPhone Fold. Galaxy Z Fold 8 official CAD renders - Image via AndroidHeadlines Here’s what to expect: 7.6-inch primary OLED display and 5.4-inch cover display, 120Hz refresh rate, 2,600 nits peak brightness, and 4:3 aspect ratio Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor, 12GB or 16GB of RAM, and 256GB, 512GB, or 1TB storage options 4,800mAh battery with 45W wired charging 50MP main camera, 50MP ultrawide camera, and 10MP selfie camera Android 17 and One UI 9 The three new foldable phones are unlikely to be the only devices unveiled at Samsung’s Unpacked event. The company is also expected to introduce the Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 and the Galaxy Watch 9 series.
    • Thanks
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      505
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      140
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      89
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!