I'm waiting till a actual change in Windows happens, it was almost like the just renamed everything for Vista, and slapped on a new Template. (Yes i know there is a bit more)
Hopefully Windows 7 is more of a jump than a step in a new direction.
| Closing the Door to Microsoft Vista | |
|---|---|
| Post #16 May 15 2008, 03:12 | |
Resident Elite Group: Registered Posts: 1,110 Joined: 3-December 07 From: Ottawa, CANADA Member No.: 242,722 |
|
![]() |
|
| Post #17 May 15 2008, 03:17 | |
Trill Group: Banned Posts: 898 Joined: 27-August 07 From: Vancouver Member No.: 235,215 |
Its not only a few companies in the US, theres a ton of corporations worldwide as well as government agencies that are opting not to use Vista. Not to mention the majority of gaming and enthusiast users.
|
![]() |
|
| Post #18 May 15 2008, 03:22 | |
|
Neowinian Senior Group: Registered Posts: 2,479 Joined: 20-January 05 From: Calgary, AB Member No.: 91,851 |
What makes them think Windows 7 will be any better for them? Granted it probably WILL be, but I don't see why they're skipping over the constantly improving Vista and going to dive head first into a new OS that'll surely have more compatibility issues than Vista will at that time.
Its not only a few companies in the US, theres a ton of corporations worldwide as well as government agencies that are opting not to use Vista. Not to mention the majority of gaming and enthusiast users. |
![]() |
|
| Post #19 May 15 2008, 03:22 | |
|
Resident Boiled Cabbage ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 6,418 Joined: 2-August 06 From: Greenville, SC Member No.: 175,510 |
Corporations with large networks don't upgrade quickly. The last corporation I worked for was still using NT4 two years after XP came out. They don't want to have to fool with configurations and upgrades that might affect profits. It has no reflection on the quality of the operating system they use. The Home Depot near my house is still using Windows 2000 on their registers. Does that mean XP is bad? No, it means 2000 still works.
|
![]() |
|
| Post #20 May 15 2008, 03:30 | |
Trill Group: Banned Posts: 898 Joined: 27-August 07 From: Vancouver Member No.: 235,215 |
Well according to Steams regularly updated hardware survey 80% of gamers out of 1.7 million hardware scans are still using XP. Go to any builders forum like NCIX's and post a Vista thread and you will see that the general consensus amongst builders\enthusiasts is that Vista is less than stellar. You act like I'm just one person making this up out of a personal vendetta against Vista, I use two different versions of Vista and I agree that its a lousy os especially after a 6 year stint using the same os, Vista comes along and offers nothing that we can't do with XP and at a cost of high overhead. |
![]() |
|
| Post #21 May 15 2008, 03:38 | |
|
Neowinian³ Group: Registered Posts: 312 Joined: 4-October 05 From: San Francisco, CA Member No.: 132,753 |
There is nothing wrong with Windows Vista. Companies don't want to buy new hardware....The economy is not doing so great right now. So why would a company be stupid and put money into upgrading right now? Hopefully the economy will be better when Windows 7 comes out.
And for those Vista complainers….A person with a 4 year old Mac would not upgrade to Leopard due to the hardware requirements needed for performance. The same goes for Vista. I guess, then, that I'm running Microsoft's "Epic Fail" flawlessly, on x64 no less. Amazing. Thank you |
![]() |
|
| Post #22 May 15 2008, 03:46 | |
Custom member title Group: Registered Posts: 7,188 Joined: 19-July 05 From: Los Angeles, CA Member No.: 119,000 |
|
![]() |
|
| Post #23 May 15 2008, 03:49 | |
Resident Fanatic Group: Registered Posts: 963 Joined: 24-December 04 From: BRASIL Member No.: 87,281 |
Why would they upgrade to a new os who just looks better and smells bad? Vista has nothing more than xp to offer for companies productivity. They are really smart on not buying this thing, wait for a decent release with some value added, not a cosmetic barbie doll. |
![]() |
|
| Post #24 May 15 2008, 03:54 | |
|
Neowinian³ Group: Registered Posts: 312 Joined: 4-October 05 From: San Francisco, CA Member No.: 132,753 |
Why would they upgrade to a new os who just looks better and smells bad? Vista has nothing more than xp to offer for companies productivity. They are really smart on not buying this thing, wait for a decent release with some value added, not a cosmetic barbie doll. Partially wrong.....it's..... if it works fine then don't touch it.....It's all about Money(hardware, testing, Labor, ext.) |
![]() |
|
| Post #25 May 15 2008, 03:55 | |
|
Neowinian Senior Group: Registered Posts: 2,479 Joined: 20-January 05 From: Calgary, AB Member No.: 91,851 |
Why would they upgrade to a new os who just looks better and smells bad? Vista has nothing more than xp to offer for companies productivity. They are really smart on not buying this thing, wait for a decent release with some value added, not a cosmetic barbie doll. lol what |
![]() |
|
| Post #26 May 15 2008, 03:57 | |
Neowinian Group: Registered Posts: 99 Joined: 17-October 04 Member No.: 76,582 |
Windows Seven a.k.a. Windows Vista Second Edition.
There's nothing wrong with Vista, at least in my opinion. I have ran it since it was released RTM to their beta testers and the only major problems that I caused were my own fault. I won't deny that Vista has heavier system requirements than XP, but XP had heavier system requirements than 98 or 2000 did, and was also greeted with the same warm reception that Vista has gotten. The only difference is that Microsoft dropped support for 98 and 2000 and that scared a lot of companies over to XP, and that is what it's going to take to get companies to switch to Vista or even Windows Seven. I'm sure that Seven won't have as huge of a system requirement that Vista has, but the days of a new OS running on 128 or even 256MB of RAM and a DX8 card are long gone, and the major corporations will hopefully realize that. What are they, as well as the general population, going to do when Seven is released and it is going to require a minimum 1GB of RAM or 10 - 15GB of hard drive space as well as a DX10 video card to run? Start a revolt against Seven also? I'm willing to bet that Seven will not be as light on resources or minimum system requirements as what Microsoft is hoping for. I realize that Uncle Bill has said that Seven won't be as big of a resource hog that Vista is, but does anyone really expect that it will run on less than 1GB of RAM? Even XP doesn't like to run smooth on less than that! OK, I'll climb back down from my soapbox now and await the continuation of the Vista bashing that is bound to happen, and anxiously await the bashing of Windows Seven to begin in a couple of years. |
![]() |
|
| Post #27 May 15 2008, 04:11 | |
|
Neowinian Wise One Group: Registered Posts: 4,440 Joined: 7-August 03 Member No.: 34,036 |
If the OS isn't going to do anything to increase productivity and reliability then its just good business sense. Personally, I run Vista Business x64 and like it very much, but TBO, it hasn't added much to my "experience" as Microsoft would call it other than eye candy. Previous Versions, Full image backups additional security and search functions are nice, but Big Corps like GM are going to be using Enterprise grade solutions in place of these anyway. Waiting for Windows 7 aka "Vista refined" is probably the way to go for most. When my friends ask if Vista is worth buying, I tell them its nice, list some of its features and then tell them to wait and get it with a new PC. Most of them want it cause its the newest thing out, not because its going to do anything for them that XP isn't doing already.
|
![]() |
|
| Post #28 May 15 2008, 04:26 | |
Trill Group: Banned Posts: 898 Joined: 27-August 07 From: Vancouver Member No.: 235,215 |
Thats just it, to me thats fine if an os requires more overhead, great...but I want something in exchange for it, sadly thats not the case with Vista, its a high overhead in exchange for what? Fancier looks? I could skin XP to look even better so big deal.
|
![]() |
|
| Post #29 May 15 2008, 05:24 | |
shell dude ![]() Group: +MVC Posts: 8,944 Joined: 8-June 03 From: Seattle, WA Member No.: 30,311 |
Windows Seven a.k.a. Windows Vista Second Edition. I am seriously baffled at how people can mock something they know nothing about. I mean seriously, all you know is its internal/working name. So where does this "a.k.a Windows Vista Second Edition" stuff come from? |
![]() |
|
| Post #30 May 15 2008, 05:30 | |
Resident Elite Group: Registered Posts: 1,366 Joined: 28-April 08 From: Australia Member No.: 251,981 |
Ok. I think mocking Vista being an Epic Fail etc. is stupid.
Sure I felt a bit like that previously, but I learned from it. I only posted this thread because I found the article interesting, not that I'm a Vista hater. Just to set the record straight. |
![]() |
|
| « Older · Back Page News · Newer » | |
13 Pages
Prev ... 1 [2] 3 4 ... Next : Last »
|
![]() |



















