BioShock PS3 confirmed


Recommended Posts

The rumours are true: critically acclaimed Take-Two shooter BioShock is finally, definitely coming to PlayStation 3.

Details are thin on the ground at the moment (i.e. there are none), but the next issue of UK PlayStation mag PSM3 - which is on UK newsstands June 5 - promises a lengthy preview of the PS3 version along with a depth charge of screenshots.

The highly lauded shooter was originally an Xbox 360 exclusive, but rumours of a PS3 version have been surfacing even before its release.

We called Take-Two's UK office who would only give us a flat "no comment". That being the case, expect an official announcement somewhere down the line.

There's another European mag that's touting the game in its upcoming issue too. We're beginning to see a pattern emerging here...

We've no idea what, if anything, the PS3 version will get in the way of extra content. The only extra stuff 360 and PC versions got post-release were new plasmids. But frankly we had such a bloody good time exploring Rapture on PC and 360 that we're well up for another dive on PS3.

Read our gushing Xbox 360 review here.

Source: http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=189519

(Y)

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/638506-bioshock-ps3-confirmed/
Share on other sites

I say what is the point. The game has been and gone last August and they had anytime before Christmas to release it. Personally i think it is a waste of time when they could just bring BioShock 2 to the PS3 or something.

No doubt it will run at lower Resolution and have no AA enabled like many games compared to 360 (This isn't a bash at PS3, it might look like it but it is the truth)

Bioshock isn't in the same league as the MGS saga ;)

I hope this is a joke. I mean both games can't be compared but i said it once and ill say it again, the best MGS was the first one. Where this great Saga u talk of? MGS2 and MGS3 were beyond poor. I am not saying MGS4 will be though and i hope it's not.

I say what is the point. The game has been and gone last August and they had anytime before Christmas to release it. Personally i think it is a waste of time when they could just bring BioShock 2 to the PS3 or something.

No doubt it will run at lower Resolution and have no AA enabled like many games compared to 360 (This isn't a bash at PS3, it might look like it but it is the truth)

The point is, not everybody bought a 360. The PS3 will get Bioshock and Bioshock 2.

As for the whole porting thing, maybe, maybe not - they may actually invest some time and do a proper job and implement those things in. The PS3 is more than capable.

I say what is the point. The game has been and gone last August and they had anytime before Christmas to release it. Personally i think it is a waste of time when they could just bring BioShock 2 to the PS3 or something.

No doubt it will run at lower Resolution and have no AA enabled like many games compared to 360 (This isn't a bash at PS3, it might look like it but it is the truth)

I hope this is a joke. I mean both games can't be compared but i said it once and ill say it again, the best MGS was the first one. Where this great Saga u talk of? MGS2 and MGS3 were beyond poor. I am not saying MGS4 will be though and i hope it's not.

Did you not read my post above? I was talking about ease of porting.

If you two want to challenge me on importance anyway, I'll admit I do believe the MGS saga (spanning 6 main games, and what 3/4 portable now?) is much bigger than the one title that Bioshock is - That's not comparing how good the games are, it's comparing their fanbase and size.

No doubt it will run at lower Resolution and have no AA enabled like many games compared to 360 (This isn't a bash at PS3, it might look like it but it is the truth)

And I wouldn't expect you to think any differently.

I hope this is a joke. I mean both games can't be compared but i said it once and ill say it again, the best MGS was the first one. Where this great Saga u talk of? MGS2 and MGS3 were beyond poor. I am not saying MGS4 will be though and i hope it's not.

He meant from a porting point of view.

Its your opinion on MGS2 and 3. Personally I found them all to be excellent.

I meant in terms of being easily ported.

Ah I see

As for Bioshock, I wouldn't count on a fantastic port tbh, especially when 2K are working on a sequel and they only advertised for PS3 developers after the game was released. Anyone who works with software dev knows that it's a royal pain trying to work out how something was built that you never worked on yourself.

But good to see it reach another audience (Y)

The point is, not everybody bought a 360. The PS3 will get Bioshock and Bioshock 2.

As for the whole porting thing, maybe, maybe not - they may actually invest some time and do a proper job and implement those things in. The PS3 is more than capable.

Oh i think maybe it will just by looking at every game released thus far on both PS3 and X360. I never said the PS3 wasn't more than capable, just it will run inferior probably to the X360, just like the PC version outruns the X360 version with the right hardware.

I have no doubts It'll look amazing, but as many developers has said, porting a 360 Game to Playstation 3 is a lot more difficult than the other way around. So I'm almost sure we are gonna see some downscaling, texture, resolution or other.

I agree. While the main Developers will be working/or probably already working on BioShock 2 they will pass on the development code to someone else in 2K games to port it, hence why i think the PS3 version will be inferior.

come to think of it, bioshock is UE3 based right? UT3 on PS3 looks and plays fantastically, all the hard work of bringing the game over to the PS3 codebase is essentially there.

That's a fair point, can anyone confirm it does run on the Unreal 3 engine?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Hello, Also known for https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2009/jan/29/adware-internet.   Regards, Aryeh Goretsky    
    • Hello, I have used a few TEAM Group SSDs, USB flash drives, and Micro SDXC cards in the past. They all seemed to work fine. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky
    • "just $100 per TB"? Just? Are we trying to make this seem like the new normal? Kinda weird to make it sound like that is not a ridiculously expensive asking price.
    • The reviews you refer to mean nothing. Where there is no journalism there is no reason to call the gaming media's opinion pieces "reviews". For GP games there is indeed a metric for success - increasing subscriptions. Which turns in revenue. The only circumstance in which subs do not rise when great is being released is a Game Pass system where the company is close to fully saturated with customers in a subscription. However, in that case as the theory goes you spend aplenty in all kind of games - from shady live service cash cows and customer offending agitprop crap in purple colours to robust and entertaining single player games. And keep a solid level of profitability. Ignoring the simply innocuous but mid games MGS has released primarily of the second kind.
    • Report: Microsoft to use AWS to help GitHub deal with a major surge in demand by Pradeep Viswanathan Thanks to the surge of coding AI agents, GitHub's usage has skyrocketed over the past 12 months. To meet this demand, GitHub started with a plan in October 2025 to increase capacity by 10x. However, by early this year, the company realized that it needed 30x scale. This rapid growth has caused severe strain on the platform's reliability, resulting in several small outages over the past few months. In April, GitHub published a long blog post explaining the steps it is taking to resolve these reliability issues. In the post, the company also confirmed that it is working toward a multi-cloud architecture for better resilience. Today, Business Insider reported that GitHub is turning to Amazon Web Services to help deal with a major surge in AI-driven coding activity. It is important to note that GitHub is still in the process of moving completely to the Azure cloud. The current plan is to move the platform fully to Azure by 2027 so that it can scale better as per developer demand. Therefore, the current decision to utilize AWS might be part of a short-term plan to meet immediate demand. A Microsoft spokesperson confirmed that GitHub is using multiple cloud providers with the following statement: For Microsoft, the decision highlights the operational pressure behind the AI boom. GitHub has to stay reliable for developers at a time when rivals such as Codex, Cursor, Claude Code, and other AI coding tools are gaining attention. And the decision to use AWS for computing capacity seems practical given the circumstances.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      vjlex earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Conversation Starter
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      Console General earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      106
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!