Jump to content

Welcome Guest! To access all forums & features, please register an account or sign-in. → Why register?




Photo

Notice: Harmful site blocked?

neowin help

  • Please log in to reply
11 replies to this topic * * * * - 3 votes

#1 Neobond

Neobond

    Steven Parker

  • 26,482 posts
  • Location: Neowin HQ
  • OS: Windows 8 Pro

Posted 12 October 2011 - 09:07

Sometimes we get reports about virus (web) scanners marking something on Neowin as a harmful or malicious website.

This almost always has to do with member signatures that are hosted on external websites. We also allow PHP generated signature images, and when they are hosted on flagged sites, a virus scanner will throw up an alert.

Remember that you can also choose to disable all signatures, it saves bandwidth, and pages load quicker when external content isn't loaded.

On any forum post, click the little x on the right, and you can either disable that persons signature, or all:

.SNAG-0016.png

You can re-enable all signatures from the My Settings page: http://www.neowin.ne...ea=ignoredusers


#2 Anthony T.

Anthony T.

    Resident Elite

  • 1,041 posts
  • Location: Lockport, NY, USA

Posted 07 February 2012 - 03:00

This is a fantastic idea!!

#3 Chasethebase

Chasethebase

    Neowinian British One

  • 5,206 posts
  • Location: United Kingdom
  • OS: Windows 8
  • Phone: HTC One S

Posted 07 February 2012 - 13:11

It's a feature that was introduced with the IPB 3.2 upgrade (If I'm not mistaken) which makes it much quicker and easier to disable signatures. I personally leave them enabled because they're an identifier for me along with the avatar of a user so I know who's posted.

#4 +Fus10n

Fus10n

    It's Five O'Clock Somewhere

  • 2,328 posts
  • Location: East Cost
  • OS: Ubuntu 13.04 | Windows 7-8.1 | OSX 10.8.3
  • Phone: Samsung Galaxy S4 Rooted

Posted 07 February 2012 - 13:14

Great! :)

#5 +littleneutrino

littleneutrino

    I am the Little Neutrino

  • 13,524 posts
  • Location: Newark, Ohio
  • OS: Windows 8
  • Phone: Nokia Lumia 928

Posted 07 February 2012 - 13:17

Thankfully I have only seen these messages once or twice. However, it is nice to see something being done about it.

#6 vetPink Floyd

Pink Floyd

    Neowinian ULTRAKILL

  • 13,250 posts

Posted 08 February 2012 - 23:10

Personally, I disable them. Specially on users showing their speedtest 90mbps connection ;)

#7 +Kyle

Kyle

    Nerdin' it up!

  • 704 posts
  • Location: Michigan

Posted 19 March 2012 - 14:00

And now no one in this topic has a signature anymore. :p

haha. I love this feature.

#8 WizardCM

WizardCM

    Matt

  • 310 posts
  • Location: Melbourne, AUS
  • OS: Windows 8 Pro x64

Posted 20 March 2012 - 22:43

Best thing for something like this would be to auto-disable signatures when a user is not signed in to the website, so sites like Google don't decide to give warnings about viewing the site. However, I've never seen this issue arise so it's not really a big deal.

#9 Farstrider

Farstrider

    The Clash

  • 6,311 posts
  • Location: Somerset West, Cape Town, SA
  • OS: Arch Linux

Posted 22 March 2012 - 00:53

Have to say it's a good feature, but that said, you get used to all the different sigs and without them things look weird.

#10 mquiny

mquiny

    Just an average guy.

  • 75 posts

Posted 28 April 2012 - 11:52

Personally, I disable them. Specially on users showing their speedtest 90mbps connection ;)


Not to mention the people who show off their apparently amazing Pc's/Laptops - Intel core i7's, with 3.7GHz processor. 16gb ram and 2gb graphics card. Not to forget the 2TB hard-drives.

#11 Miuku.

Miuku.

    A damned noob

  • 4,885 posts
  • Location: Finland, EU
  • OS: :: OS X :: SLES ::

Posted 28 April 2012 - 11:53

Not to mention the people who show off their apparently amazing Pc's/Laptops - Intel core i7's, with 3.7GHz processor. 16gb ram and 2gb graphics card. Not to forget the 2TB hard-drives.

I'll take the hardware text only signatures over the flashing banner ad style signatures any day.

Also 16GiB isn't enough, 24GiB is enough - barely. VMware sucks memory like no other when running a few test boxes parallel ;>

#12 mquiny

mquiny

    Just an average guy.

  • 75 posts

Posted 04 May 2012 - 00:35

I'll take the hardware text only signatures over the flashing banner ad style signatures any day.

Also 16GiB isn't enough, 24GiB is enough - barely. VMware sucks memory like no other when running a few test boxes parallel ;>


I prefer saving my band-sandwiches for something a little more productive.



Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: neowin, help