Five Reasons why Windows 8 will be dead on arrival


Recommended Posts

And yet every device is not a PC. Mixing Apples and Oranges again. I am gonna watch movie on PC and use VLC player to project it via HDMI cable to big screen in leaving room in HD1080 format with 3D Capability. I am not going to watch same movie in my little phone. Your argument is so Invalid, it is beyond commedy. Perhaps you should install Ubuntu 11.10 and see different world and possibilities.

Or, put movie on phone, plug phone into TV? Portable 1080p videos that you can easily carry around to any HDMI equipped TV.

Actually whole Neowin forum should pay me $100 for saying that Vista is going to be a flop [...]

We could, but that would be silly considering you apparently joined Neowin after Windows 7 came out Vista had already been publicly perceived as unsuccessful. :p

  • Like 1

MS has a history of being wrong on every other version...... Millenium - wrong, XP - right, Vista - Wrong, 7 - Right, from the way people are talking, 8 will be following this pattern again... remember talk sometimes means more then function..... vista for me worked fine, but it was a failure in everyones eyes

MS has a history of being wrong on every other version...... Millenium - wrong, XP - right, Vista - Wrong, 7 - Right, from the way people are talking, 8 will be following this pattern again... remember talk sometimes means more then function..... vista for me worked fine, but it was a failure in everyones eyes

That's a very black-and-white view on Windows' history, your last sentence proves that. Just after XP came out, many people actually hated it. Same with Vista, but the difference is it hasn't been forgotten yet. Before the actual Windows 7 came out, it got bashed as well (so that means Windows 8 isn't going to certainly fail).

Microsoft is also certainly not playing a good-bad-good-bad game.. People will actually always try to find patterns everywhere, but it doesn't mean that the future is clearly predictable.

  • Like 1

i approve this thread and as ive said i may just skip w8 and stick to osx lion and w7 as a backup. im almost certain w7 will get a 2nd service pack. im tired of microsoft pushing metro down our throats, it's a horrid user interface IMO. windows did not need a refresh already, they had it almost perfect with w7.

That's a very black-and-white view on Windows' history, your last sentence proves that. Just after XP came out, many people actually hated it. Same with Vista, but the difference is it hasn't been forgotten yet. Before the actual Windows 7 came out, it got bashed as well (so that means Windows 8 isn't going to certainly fail).

Microsoft is also certainly not playing a good-bad-good-bad game.. People will actually always try to find patterns everywhere, but it doesn't mean that the future is clearly predictable.

I'm ONLY going by public opinnion after it was out for a while, not when its released, people still hate millennium, people still hate vista, it just seems to be the publics perception for some reason with microsoft

windows 7 wasn't really bashed, it was more praised as the fix all, windows vista was looked at as a failure from the start of the longhorn alpha.... XP was only "bashed" because of the UI Theme, and the fact this pattern exists isn't me saying its going to fail, I'm just saying they already planted the seeds of failure in peoples heads with some of the radical stories out there on it... and no mater what it wont fail, every new PC will have it... VIsta didnt "fail" it just was precieved as crap

  • Like 1

I'm ONLY going by public opinnion after it was out for a while, not when its released, people still hate millennium, people still hate vista, it just seems to be the publics perception for some reason with microsoft

Sadly enough public opinion is created by more technologically advanced people, like the people on this site.

They are already shooting Win8 down while it's not even in it's beta stage.

  • Like 1

When its in Beta I will stick it on a seperate HDD, put it into my laptop, make my own mind up and decide if I will update on release. All other 'reference/recomendations/opinions' will be taken with a pinch of salt.

As long as all my hardware and software is supported then Im happy.

It's amazing how people just keep saying they'll switch to another OS because of some really early version of an OS they might not like..

It's still a DEVELOPER PREVIEW!

?which means there are developers out there that are currently working on apps that fit this Windows 8 ecosystem. Isn?t it alarming ?

Plus, Windows 8 will be released mid-late 2012. This is this year. They have about 8 months remaining to work on this if they want it to be in stores in November.

My god, twenty posts for a comment that is a link to an article that is really little more than flame-bait and, or trolling (or both). I, however, will contribute much two cents with:

1. No one needs Windows 8 on the desktop.

Wrong... incremental upgrades, are still upgrades.

2. Metro: An ugly, useless interface.

It is not a final product. Once you actually use it for a while, it grows on you. That said, however, is not to say that there does not need to be some significant tweaks for it to work smoothly on the desktop.

3. Where are the Windows 8 Applications?

I think it might have to do with the fact that it runs legacy apps. The applications taking advantage of the new API are likely going to be slow in coming, though they will be here in due time.

4. Vexed Windows developers.

See above.

5. Too little, too late for the smartphone/tablet market

Microsoft has a track record of always winning in the end. When in Vegas, you don't bet against the house. When in the tech industry, do not bet against Microsoft. They always win because they have the most to lose by not doing so.

?which means there are developers out there that are currently working on apps that fit this Windows 8 ecosystem. Isn?t it alarming ?

Plus, Windows 8 will be released mid-late 2012. This is this year. They have about 8 months remaining to work on this if they want it to be in stores in November.

Well everybody is bitching about a version that was delivered almost 5months ago. The people at MS are not sitting still, they've been working around the clock to fix problems and make it more useable.

I feel it will be a resounding success. Everyone I've showed the DP to has been quite pleased with it and it's not even feature-complete. :/

There's a difference between showing someone something, and them using it on a daily basis.

I'll reserve my judgement of Windows 8 until I see it myself, but all indications are leading towards DOA a la Vista as the article states. If it is DOA, I don't know how Ballmer can possibly remain in his current position.

OK, so this thread was started by whomever to provoke everyone's response. Regardless the OP's motivation, it worked, & all these contributions made for a very interesting read -- some posts will undoubtedly be right, some of course will be wrong, but IMO the real value is in seeing what everyone thinks about win8 so close to the release of the public beta. As with past Windows versions, taken alltogether those opinions will have a lot to do with how fast win8 is adopted, & might even determine its eventual success, or lack thereof.

My own 2 cents, purely FWIW...

Historically, from what I remember, win95 made it past a lack of both software & drivers because it had a lot of new, better stuff to offer. 98 & 98SE were similarly seen as tech steps forward. Maybe because they didn't really promote ME, maybe because it was too different, it hardly seems a blip on the timeline -- I remember seeing it on new hardware, but hardly anywhere else... then like now I hardly noticed it mentioned on-line or off. Then came XP, with an intro that in hindsight seems most notable because the more hard core tech folks eventually where outvoted & ignored -- how many remember the heckling XP got for its Fisher Price GUI? But the world got past that & wound up accepting XP like no other Windows version before it -- something helped along by the rapidly increasing numbers of PCs/laptops sold. Then came the abject marketing failure that was Vista... At its core Vista was a great OS -- the hugely popular win7 is more-or-less Vista SE afterall -- but MS failed miserably when it came to marketing, which includes making sure what you're selling & what customers buy are for the most part the same thing. However you feel/felt about Steve Jobs, that's one thing he Really excelled at. Microsoft went on to learn from their mistakes, and that learning brought us Windows 7. Yes, win7 is newer/better than Vista in all sorts of ways, but if you look at what went wrong with Vista, then look at win7, it's fairly easy to see Microsoft's lessons learned.

I think win8 [or whatever it comes to be called] is a break from tradition, as they try to turn the behemoth that is Microsoft in new, not soley PC-centric directions. Up until now one part of MS did well with some hardware, another did corp IT, another brought us the Xbox etc... I think it only logical, common sense really, that they try to bring those various parts closer together for a more efficient whole. The Apple & Google Microsoft's competing with today & in the future are not the same companies they were 10 or even 5 years ago. As big as Facebook is, how long before they start thinking about other streams of revenue? IMO win8 is a logical step that had to happen, & if it sells a lot of copies, great -- if not MS can & will live with that.

Microsoft is doing a lot to promote their brand, & they'd like to lock you into using their on-line services, as long as that locking part doesn't start to hurt their numbers re: those on-line services. If win8 doesn't sell enough fast enough you'll likely be able to do the same things re: those on-line services in win7. MS is betting [maybe more than they originally thought] that maybe more casual users will love Metro & the whole idea of a unified screen across different hardware devices -- those that don't like it can easily turn it off & get a faster, more efficient Windows 7. If Metro takes off, it'll undoubtedly become more integrated -- if not, it'll become easier to get the traditional desktop. MS would like everyone to upgrade from win7 to win8, & to encourage that they've added new stuff, but nothing as radical as the move from XP to Vista -- it's all carrots & no sticks. In terms of total sales win8 could turn out to be another ME, but tech-wise, since the biggest change seems to be Metro, & you can turn that off if you like, I don't believe it'll ever be another Vista.

There's a difference between showing someone something, and them using it on a daily basis.

I'll reserve my judgement of Windows 8 until I see it myself, but all indications are leading towards DOA a la Vista as the article states. If it is DOA, I don't know how Ballmer can possibly remain in his current position.

i agree with this too, ballmer will be gone if both wp7 & w8 is a failure. i give them props for trying but i just do not see good things coming out of this. i believe w8 could be the next windows me.

1. No one needs Windows 8 on the desktop.

Wrong... incremental upgrades, are still upgrades.

I think the point was that, from a desktop user's point of view, Windows 8's nothing more than a small service pack. In terms of new features which benefit desktop users specifically, I think that view point is correct.

2. Metro: An ugly, useless interface.

It is not a final product. Once you actually use it for a while, it grows on you. That said, however, is not to say that there does not need to be some significant tweaks for it to work smoothly on the desktop.

It's true that beauty is in the eye of the beholder / subjective, but I can't help feeling myself, that while the tile UI might work on small 3/4 inch screens, anything bigger than that just doesn't look right (tablets, 20"+ screens).

3. Where are the Windows 8 Applications?

I think it might have to do with the fact that it runs legacy apps. The applications taking advantage of the new API are likely going to be slow in coming, though they will be here in due time.

I was under the impression that the ARM tablet versions won't run native legacy apps?

4. Vexed Windows developers.

See above.

Will Windows Phone 7 silverlight apps run on Windows 8? That would definately ease the pain for developers i'd imagine.

5. Too little, too late for the smartphone/tablet market

Microsoft has a track record of always winning in the end. When in Vegas, you don't bet against the house. When in the tech industry, do not bet against Microsoft. They always win because they have the most to lose by not doing so.

In the end I think it's going to come down to the price of Windows 8 tablets. If they're going to be selling for $800+, no one's going to buy one, except perhaps a few rich kids or businesses with cash to burn. That's going to be a challenge because Windows has traditionally needed greater hardware resources than competing operating systems, which in turn bumps up the BOM.

I think the point was that, from a desktop user's point of view, Windows 8's nothing more than a small service pack. In terms of new features which benefit desktop users specifically, I think that view point is correct.

This point is moot. See Windows 7.

It's true that beauty is in the eye of the beholder / subjective, but I can't help feeling myself, that while the tile UI might work on small 3/4 inch screens, anything bigger than that just doesn't look right (tablets, 20"+ screens).

The start screen is supposed to have desktop improvements. We'll see how it all fleshes out with the consumer preview.

I was under the impression that the ARM tablet versions won't run native legacy apps?

There will be x86 based tablets.

Will Windows Phone 7 silverlight apps run on Windows 8? That would definately ease the pain for developers i'd imagine.

Yes they will

In the end I think it's going to come down to the price of Windows 8 tablets. If they're going to be selling for $800+, no one's going to buy one, except perhaps a few rich kids or businesses with cash to burn. That's going to be a challenge because Windows has traditionally needed greater hardware resources than competing operating systems, which in turn bumps up the BOM.

The $800+ figure is for x86 tablets. ARM based ones will be cheaper.

i approve this thread and as ive said i may just skip w8 and stick to osx lion and w7 as a backup. im almost certain w7 will get a 2nd service pack. im tired of microsoft pushing metro down our throats, it's a horrid user interface IMO. windows did not need a refresh already, they had it almost perfect with w7.

The Desktop PC has never really moved beyond it's original, jack of all trades purpose -- the same basic hardware can be used for a server, an audio workstation, gaming etc... Yet the other half of that Jack of all trades thing is: Master Of None. More specialized hardware is & has been inevitable, whether you're talking cell phones or entertainment devices/hardware or refrigerators. MS would like to be an essential part of all that -- after all more people buy more new cell phones for example than they do PCs. Metro is a step in that direction, one that can work across devices/screens. On PCs it's also something than can, & often will be turned off.

With that in mind, I don't think MS is pushing anything down anyone's throat -- as I said in my earlier post, it's all carrots & no sticks... I can boot into XP Pro on this rig, & haven't seen any penalties from Microsoft because I was using their 2 generations old OS. My wife likes so-called casual games, & while she can boot into win7 64 whenever she likes, she prefers Vista where she feels they run faster/better -- she hasn't seen any penalties from Microsoft for using Vista. So if anyone doesn't like Metro, turn it off -- if you don't like having to trun it off, run win7. :)

Again 2 of those screens are used for work majority of the time. I have one screen (computer) dedicated for charting, another (30") dedicated for trading and the middle screen is used for browsing, gaming and what ever else 90% of the time. Once in a blue moon Ill use that screen for extra trading info. So I may be a "outlier" in terms of hardware but when it comes to avg computing, Im really no different then anyone else. So my screens may be a bit larger then the avg user, that doesnt change the standard usage any less.

Which is *precisely* why they are called niche-customers and outliers.

If your hardware (or software) needs are vastly different from the median/base user of an operating system (any operating system) trying to cater to those outliers will (not may) detract into taking care of the needs of the majority of the user base.

It's not meant to be (or designed to be) a criticism - just the reality of where you as a user (in fact, most Neowinians that use Windows of any flavor) fit.

Also, Gerowen, if you only offer *incremental upgrades* to an operating system (service packs and the like) you get what happened between XP and Vista (it was *how long* between XP and Longhorn, for that matter?).

There's a difference between showing someone something, and them using it on a daily basis.

I'll reserve my judgement of Windows 8 until I see it myself, but all indications are leading towards DOA a la Vista as the article states. If it is DOA, I don't know how Ballmer can possibly remain in his current position.

What indications? I have yet to see any that would lead me to believe Windows 8 will be DOA. And some trolling post by some OSS idiot is hardly an indication.

Who. Gives. a. crap.

Seeing people arguing about something that isn't even out yet..............................................................

Again. WHO CARES its just a damn OS! Does your life depend on it? I've seen caring people care less about their marriages/jobs then the way some of you are acting....

I may get flamed for this post but guess what.....its the internet.

For anyone concerned about Windows 8 ARM running legacy apps, you should check out the "Going Native" conference over at channel9.msdn.com

They say a huge push in getting C++ 11 done was to get ARM processor support in the compiler.

While this may not mean much to the folks out there who do not develop software, those who do should understand.

Linux is rock solid and awesome for web servers and stuff like that, but it still lacks in the desktop marketspace. It's ok for some stuff but still needs more work and a lot of the community keeps arguing instead of innovating.

I've tested over 30 distros...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 by Razvan Serea NetSpeedTray is a lightweight, open-source Windows network monitor that shows live upload and download speeds directly on the Taskbar. Designed for efficiency, it quietly sits in the system tray, conserving CPU and battery with dynamic updates. It blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11, adapts to light/dark themes, and auto-positions to avoid overlaps. Features include accurate interface detection, customizable display, optional mini-graph, color coding, granular font and unit control, detailed per-interface history graphs, safe data management, and easy CSV export—bringing the network monitoring Windows forgot. NetSpeedTray key features: Lightweight & Efficient Runs quietly in your system tray without consuming resources. Features a "Dynamic Update Rate" that lowers refresh frequency when the network is idle to save CPU and battery life. Native Look & Feel Blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11 UI. Smart detection for light and dark taskbar themes ensures text is always visible. Intelligent & Adaptive Positioning Automatically finds empty space next to your system tray and shifts to make room for new icons, preventing overlaps. Seamless OS Integration Behaves like a native Windows component. Hides instantly with auto-hiding taskbar Hides when a fullscreen app is active Smart Network Monitoring Accurate by Default: Auto mode identifies your main internet connection and ignores noise from VPNs or virtual adapters. Easy Interface Selection: Switch effortlessly between Auto, All, or Selected network interfaces via intuitive radio buttons. Total Visual Customization Free Move Mode: Unlock and place the widget anywhere on your screen. Optional Mini-Graph: Real-time graph of recent network activity with adjustable opacity. Color Coding: Customize colors and speed thresholds to quickly see network status. Granular Display Control Text & Font: Adjust font family, size, weight, and alignment. Units: Automatic (B/s, KB/s, MB/s) or fixed Mbps display. Precision: Set decimal places and always show them for uniform appearance. Detailed & Intelligent History Graph Smart Scale: Logarithmic scale shows low-level traffic and large spikes clearly. Per-Interface Filtering: View speed history for specific adapters (Wi-Fi, Ethernet, VPN). Safe & Efficient Data Management: Adjustable retention, automatic cleanup, optimized database. Easy Data Export: Export raw data to .csv or save high-quality graphs for reports. NetSpeedTray v1.3.3: The Updater Fix A stabilization release that repairs a critical regression in v1.3.2: the app shipped without OpenSSL, which silently broke every HTTPS request — including the built-in update checker (the "Could not check for updates" error many of you hit). This release restores it, hardens the build so it can't happen again, and fixes a startup crash plus four other reported bugs. Changes: Fixed update checking — Resolved a critical issue that prevented the app from checking for updates ("Could not check for updates"). Fixed startup crash with Auto-Cycling — The app no longer crashes on launch after enabling Cycle display mode. Fixed incorrect network speeds on 10GbE adapters — Multi-gigabit network cards now display speeds correctly instead of being stuck at 0. Improved color coding — Default color is shown when idle, and color/threshold changes now apply immediately without restarting. Fullscreen visibility fix — The widget now correctly stays visible over fullscreen apps when Keep Visible is enabled. Improved AMD Ryzen temperature detection — More reliable CPU temperature monitoring for Ryzen processors. Cleaner upgrades — Installer now removes outdated application files during upgrades, preventing DLL/version conflicts while preserving user settings. Improved stability — Fixed potential DLL loading issues by excluding critical OpenSSL and NumPy components from UPX compression. Better settings window — Scrollbars removed and layout improved for a cleaner experience. Localization improvements — Updated translations and completed missing UI text across all supported languages. More reliable releases — Added regression tests covering recent critical fixes, bringing the test suite to 196 passing tests. [full release notes] Download: NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 | 87.9 MB (Open Source) Download: NetSpeedTray Portable | 101.0 MB View: NetSpeedTray Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Why Delta Chat is the best decentralized messenger you have probably never tried by Paul Hill There is no shortage of messaging apps out there; we have WhatsApp, Messenger, and Telegram, just to name a few. While Meta has taken steps to incorporate encryption into Messenger and WhatsApp, they still leave a lot to be desired. If you are in the market for a messaging app that promotes security, privacy, and optional anonymity, you'll want to read what I have to say about Delta Chat. For those not familiar with Delta Chat, rather than relying on centralized servers as you do with Facebook Messenger, it relies on email. Essentially, it is a chat interface that feels like a messaging app, but secretly in the background, it is firing off emails. In the past, you used to have to sign in with your email account. When you sent messages to people, it would just be sending encrypted messages to their inbox, which their Delta Chat client would decrypt. When I first learned about Delta Chat, it required users to sign in with an email account, but I was pleasantly surprised upon trying it in 2026 that this is no longer a requirement, or the preferred method was to use the app. Recently, I’ve tried UAD-ng on my old Nokia 3.4 to disable most of the Google apps because the bootloader is locked, and this is the next best option. While finding replacement apps in F-Droid, I came across Delta Chat again, and it has undergone quite a big change since I last used it, with its new chatmail relays, which no longer require you to sign in to your own email account, providing anonymity, and they offer greater security. Android and Desktop Delta Chat apps. Not only does it run on my de-googled phone, but it also works on desktop computers and iOS, making it truly ubiquitous. For me, Delta Chat is a wonderful alternative messenger because it gives you more control. It supports switching between different profiles, which you can set up super quickly; you don’t register a username, you don’t register a password. The only thing you do have is a random string email address on a chatmail relay (which you don’t have to memorize). To maintain access to your profile, you just need to add a second device to your account via QR code or make a backup of your account, which you can restore later. Fail to do these, your account is gone - as it should be if you don’t want to leave accounts that could get hacked later on. My decision to block Google stuff on my Nokia was done for practical reasons; the device sucked when it launched, and it sucks even more now. The nice thing about F-Droid and the apps within is that they’re usually lightweight, free of bloat, and work well on that device. What was inconvenient for me was that it was hard to send messages from that device, say if I wanted to copy a code over to my main phone or send family members a link from that device. That’s when I decided to look at the available chat apps and saw Delta Chat. Another nice thing about Delta Chat is its notifications. Some messaging apps rely on Google’s ecosystem for notification transport on Android; however, with Delta Chat, it can use Google’s solutions if you have Play Services or MicroG installed. Otherwise, it is able to keep a background connection to the chatmail relay server so that you can get notified when you receive a message. As free software, the code of Delta Chat is open for all who want to take it and build upon it. In the future, if the developers of Delta Chat make a catastrophically bad decision and take the app in an undesirable direction, users can take the code and fork the project. This contrasts with closed-source apps from corporations that can take their products in any direction they like. By relying on free software instead of closed-source programs, you actually control your computing. I’ve spoken at length about how running this type of software is like owning your own home rather than renting it. The same applies here; if you use Delta Chat, you don’t need to worry about it going away in the future. Whether it is Telegram, WhatsApp, or Messenger, you are required to register a username and password to use these services. A major flaw in this design is that anyone can try various passwords and potentially break into your account with your complete chat history intact. Sure, there is encryption in Messenger, where you need a second PIN and two-factor authentication in Telegram, but breaches happen all the time. Unlike before, when you used to sign in to your email account to send and receive messages, the primary way to do it now is to create an account on a chatmail relay. The resulting email address is a random string followed by the name of the relay you pick. This means you can start and begin adding contacts Without a username and password, you either need to ensure you have a backup or at least one device running your Delta Chat profile. The primary way to log in on another device is to go to the settings and add a second device. Then, you’ll just scan a QR code with your new device, and it’ll log in to your account and sync all your chat history and contacts. To end users, Delta Chat just looks like any instant messenger; however, it is really sending your messages as encrypted emails to your contact. This is pretty cool from a censorship perspective, as it makes the service more difficult to block. Previously, the main way to use the app was by logging in with email, but nowadays, it’s recommended that you use chatmail relays. Chatmail relays temporarily hold messages in case your device is offline. They are cheap, simple servers that don’t store data as group states. Other information, like your name and avatar, only exists on your device and the devices of those you share your contact information with. The relays are also decentralized and operated by various groups and individuals. It is even possible to set up your own chatmail relay, but most people will want to use one hosted elsewhere. To keep your messages secure, Delta Chat uses a secure subset of the OpenPGP standard that gives you automatic end-to-end encryption. It also uses Secure-Join to exchange encryption setup information through QR-code scanning or invite links. Autocrypt is also used to automatically establish end-to-end encryption between contacts and all members of group chat, but sometime this year Autocrypt v2 will be rolled out, bringing post-quantum resistant encryption and forward secrecy. The Delta Chat FAQ is an interesting read that explains many more details about the app. Credit: Pexels Delta Chat is unique among messaging apps because it is built on email, a technology that’s decades old and isn’t going anywhere soon. What’s more is that email is not centralized either, so it’s far more difficult for any authoritarian regime to disrupt the Delta Chat app. I haven’t spoken too much about features yet, so I will do that now. Delta Chat allows you to do one-on-one chats, group chats, and create channels. It also supports file sharing and making audio and video calls when chatting one-to-one, but it’s not available for group chats right now. At the time of writing, the calling functionality is disabled and can be enabled in Settings > Advanced > Debug Calls. I have used the video calling feature, and the quality is excellent. It works over WebRTC, another open standard. The app also lets you send voice notes, enables disappearing messages, and has its own app ecosystem. I did try playing chess one time there, but it was a bit spotty; though, we did manage to complete the game with a victory for me. To add people to Delta Chat, you can either give them your Delta Chat link or your QR code to scan. These are the only ways to add users, so you won't have any spam bots bothering you. If the people you want to chat with don't have the app yet, just send them your link, and it will take them to a webpage where they can install the app and then add you. It's really quick for them to install it and get started, which is nice. Credit: Microsoft. The Majorana 2 quantum chip unveiled in 2026. I do not think quantum computers are too far out now, and I do hope that Delta Chat is able to push out Autocrypt v2 sooner, rather than later, so bad actors do not attempt to collect encrypted communications and then decrypt them in the future using quantum computers. By getting people’s messages post-quantum-safe now, users won’t have to worry when quantum computers start cracking legacy encryption. Overall, I would recommend this app to people who are already past WhatsApp and Messenger and have perhaps begun using apps like Telegram or Session. It shares a lot of characteristics with these apps and goes a lot further than Telegram in terms of security. By being based on email, it is also resistant to censorship, and the lack of a username and password makes you anonymous (if you want to be) and safe from brute force password cracking attempts. Let me know in the comments if you’ve tried Delta Chat recently. Do you think it's a good bulwark against governments that are tightening their grip on the internet?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      471
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      217
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!