Why are people so confused on Win8?

By pack34
in The Fast Ring (Insider Previews)

 Share

Recommended Posts

Mentor

iuerg87yerg879e0rg9erugjer

Posted
Posted

windows 8 is going to be a universal support OS on most platforms including now confirmed ARM. That is it, there may be slight differences between PCs, tablets and possibly mobile devices. what people are getting confused about is why the UI is more focused towards the mobile world and leaving the PC guys behind.

Grand Master

TheLegendOfMart

Posted
Posted

Every once in a while I head over to ZDnet and everyone seems so confused on what Windows 8 is, specifically on ARM.

Maybe I'm just ignorant but:

- Win on Arm: Metro tablet similar to your iPads and Androids

- Win on x86: Metro and traditional desktop

No ones confused, we just don't want Metro. Also Windows 8 on ARM will have desktop also.

Grand Master

George P Global Moderator

Posted
  • Global Moderator
Posted

There shouldn't be any confusion but keeping the desktop on the ARM version seems to be what some are hung up on. We need more details on that part of things but for the most it's like you say. ARM devices will be tablets while there could be a few x86 as well but not much imo.

Right now MS needs to give more detail on how/if 3rd party devs can even target the desktop after passing some MS cert process or if it will be locked down tight to only limited partners.

Either way it's not like people who buy a tablet with WOA will be thinking about using the desktop much if ever. Hell I think MS kept it in there more for Office apps than anything else. Only time will tell in the end, I'll wait to see what the newest SDK for it will let you do as far as the desktop and ARM are concerned.

Grand Master

George P Global Moderator

Posted
  • Global Moderator
Posted

Honestly the desktop will be on the way out over time. Once you guys see the systray changed to something else then you'll know. Probably in Win9 next.

  • Muhammad Farrukh
  • Like 1
Grand Master

Zain Adeel

Posted
Posted

I want the start screen everywhere!

from my TV to my mobile! i already have that :D WP7 FTW..

but imagine a TV a gaming console.. all with that design. So u know how everything in ur house works. Kinect or Bing speech with TellMe.

Embrace the future kids.

Although yes desktop is here to stay for windows 8. Till we find a way to port heavy apps to metro design language.

  • ffMathy and subcld
  • Like 2
Mentor

pack34

Posted
  • Author
Posted

There shouldn't be any confusion but keeping the desktop on the ARM version seems to be what some are hung up on. We need more details on that part of things but for the most it's like you say. ARM devices will be tablets while there could be a few x86 as well but not much imo.

Right now MS needs to give more detail on how/if 3rd party devs can even target the desktop after passing some MS cert process or if it will be locked down tight to only limited partners.

Either way it's not like people who buy a tablet with WOA will be thinking about using the desktop much if ever. Hell I think MS kept it in there more for Office apps than anything else. Only time will tell in the end, I'll wait to see what the newest SDK for it will let you do as far as the desktop and ARM are concerned.

The answer is no. There will be no third party applications on desktop ARM. If you want third party desktop apps then you want an x86 device.

Collaborator

Cereal Bawks

Posted
Posted

Everyone getting their panties in a twist over that would practically amount to simply a different start menu. Pin your crap to the start menu and/or put shortcuts on your desktop, and you'll never have to see any Metro beyond boot-up and occasionally searching for files.

Grand Master

+Frank B. Subscriber²

Posted
  • Subscriber²
Posted

What some of you fail to see is how Windows 8 is Microsoft's first step into the post-PC era.

Look at the market. PC sales are slowing down while smartphones and tablets are gaining traction. Then think back to CES and some of the Ultrabook concepts on display.

It's more than obvious that Microsoft considers the traditional desktop PC a dying breed, to be relegated to a niche market. The Windows desktop is set for the same fate - a second-class citizen for 'power users' and to run what is likely to be the last non-Metro version of Office. I fully expect Office 16 to be a set of immersive apps.

Games? They too can be integrated into the Metro UI. You don't need the Windows desktop for them. Alternatively, just get an Xbox.

Windows 8 is one step towards a unified user experience across Microsoft products. WP7/8, Xbox, soon Windows. It is not aimed at traditionalists, it is aimed at the post-PC crowd who are now busy buying iPads, iPhones and the like.

  • DJ-Light and Jan
  • Like 2
Collaborator

fsX

Posted
Posted

People are confused because Microsoft made the "mistake" of showing off Windows 8 before its release. If they had kept completely quiet until release, people wouldn't speculate so much about Metro and its place on the desktop.

Also, most people are mentally too old and too stupid to understand new things.

Grand Master

Stoffel

Posted
Posted

MS has to make sure it communicates the difference between WOA and Win8 very clearly.

If they manage to do that then they are golden, if they fail we might see a lot of angry and confused people when they buy an WOA tablet and can't use all their favorite Win apps.

But for now let's give them the benefit of the doubt.

I for one am looking really forward to the CP of Win8

Grand Master

PGHammer

Posted
Posted

There shouldn't be any confusion but keeping the desktop on the ARM version seems to be what some are hung up on. We need more details on that part of things but for the most it's like you say. ARM devices will be tablets while there could be a few x86 as well but not much imo.

Right now MS needs to give more detail on how/if 3rd party devs can even target the desktop after passing some MS cert process or if it will be locked down tight to only limited partners.

Either way it's not like people who buy a tablet with WOA will be thinking about using the desktop much if ever. Hell I think MS kept it in there more for Office apps than anything else. Only time will tell in the end, I'll wait to see what the newest SDK for it will let you do as far as the desktop and ARM are concerned.

ARM devices will NOT just be tablets - that's where the confusion

Every once in a while I head over to ZDnet and everyone seems so confused on what Windows 8 is, specifically on ARM.

Maybe I'm just ignorant but:

- Win on Arm: Metro tablet similar to your iPads and Androids

- Win on x86: Metro and traditional desktop

ARM devices won't only be tabvlets/slates; however, I Have only one idea where you got that assumption from - ARM *to date* has only appeared on tablets. (There's a reason for the *tablet-only* appearance of ARM to date - has anyone created an OS for ARM that supports keyboards and mice?)

If you had watched the video that accompanied that rather lengthy blog post, you would have seen both an ARM-based netbook and a docked tablet/slate (similar to the IdeaPad with its dock) in addition to the dead-center ARM tablet. In short, the same formfactors for ARM (except for desktops) as is the case with x86/x64 today.

That mean ARM-based netbooks - with longer (far longer) battery life than the x86/x64 equivalents.

However, there's a massive (depending on your needs) tradeoff when choosing ARM as your default (even with WOA/Windows on ARM) - no Win32 API/applicaiton support. Office for WinRT will be included with ARM-based computers for exactly that reason - the current version of Office won't run on ARM. (The current version of Office *does* run on the WDP today, and will run on Windows 8 Consumer (or later) Preview, and RTM when it ships.)

The common UI is both a point of commonality (the UI of previous *niche* versions of Windows was so wildly different - it had practically zero connection to Windows on the desktop) and a point of practicality - not all ARM formfactors or hardware will support touch - some will be plain-Dick-and-Jane netbooks, with no touch support, standard keyboards, and a pointing device of some sort.

I'd be open to an ARM netbook as an adjunct to my current traditional desktop (which will absolutely positively be upgraded to Windows 8 when it RTMs, and the WDP partition will be replaced with a WCP partition when it becomes available). In answer to the question "Why a netbook, as opposed to a tablet or slate?" has to do with my likely uses for such a netbook (Web browsing, e-mail, and writing/text-entry) and that I *loathe with a passion* virtual keyboards. (It's not unique to Windows - I hate them just as much in Linux distributions and Android - no smartphone I have recommended - and they have all been Android-based - relies on one; they all have physical slide-out keyboards.) Therefore, give me (if ARM) a netbook as an adjunct- powered by WOA - and I'd be a happy camper.

The dual-API nature of Windows 8 on x86/64 means that the WinRT apps developed for ARM will *also* work on x86/64. That is a massive paradigm-breaker - with limited exceptions, apps and games developed for iOS won't run on OS X. Found and downloaded a nice WinRT app or game on your ARM-based tablet/slate/netbook? Take that same app and put it on your x86 Ultrabook. Heck, put it on your *gaming desktop* with Eyefinity or SLI and the extra display(s). WinRT means the only limits are those of the API itself. (No more of the niche-ification and fractuization that is present today.)

There shouldn't be any confusion but keeping the desktop on the ARM version seems to be what some are hung up on. We need more details on that part of things but for the most it's like you say. ARM devices will be tablets while there could be a few x86 as well but not much imo.

Right now MS needs to give more detail on how/if 3rd party devs can even target the desktop after passing some MS cert process or if it will be locked down tight to only limited partners.

Either way it's not like people who buy a tablet with WOA will be thinking about using the desktop much if ever. Hell I think MS kept it in there more for Office apps than anything else. Only time will tell in the end, I'll wait to see what the newest SDK for it will let you do as far as the desktop and ARM are concerned.

ARM devices will NOT just be tablets - that's where the confusion

Every once in a while I head over to ZDnet and everyone seems so confused on what Windows 8 is, specifically on ARM.

Maybe I'm just ignorant but:

- Win on Arm: Metro tablet similar to your iPads and Androids

- Win on x86: Metro and traditional desktop

ARM devices won't only be tabvlets/slates; however, I Have only one idea where you got that assumption from - ARM *to date* has only appeared on tablets. (There's a reason for the *tablet-only* appearance of ARM to date - has anyone created an OS for ARM that supports keyboards and mice?)

If you had watched the video that accompanied that rather lengthy blog post, you would have seen both an ARM-based netbook and a docked tablet/slate (similar to the IdeaPad with its dock) in addition to the dead-center ARM tablet. In short, the same formfactors for ARM (except for desktops) as is the case with x86/x64 today.

That mean ARM-based netbooks - with longer (far longer) battery life than the x86/x64 equivalents.

However, there's a massive (depending on your needs) tradeoff when choosing ARM as your default (even with WOA/Windows on ARM) - no Win32 API/applicaiton support. Office for WinRT will be included with ARM-based computers for exactly that reason - the current version of Office won't run on ARM. (The current version of Office *does* run on the WDP today, and will run on Windows 8 Consumer (or later) Preview, and RTM when it ships.)

The common UI is both a point of commonality (the UI of previous *niche* versions of Windows was so wildly different - it had practically zero connection to Windows on the desktop) and a point of practicality - not all ARM formfactors or hardware will support touch - some will be plain-Dick-and-Jane netbooks, with no touch support, standard keyboards, and a pointing device of some sort.

I'd be open to an ARM netbook as an adjunct to my current traditional desktop (which will absolutely positively be upgraded to Windows 8 when it RTMs, and the WDP partition will be replaced with a WCP partition when it becomes available). In answer to the question "Why a netbook, as opposed to a tablet or slate?" has to do with my likely uses for such a netbook (Web browsing, e-mail, and writing/text-entry) and that I *loathe with a passion* virtual keyboards. (It's not unique to Windows - I hate them just as much in Linux distributions and Android - no smartphone I have recommended - and they have all been Android-based - relies on one; they all have physical slide-out keyboards.) Therefore, give me (if ARM) a netbook as an adjunct- powered by WOA - and I'd be a happy camper.

The dual-API nature of Windows 8 on x86/64 means that the WinRT apps developed for ARM will *also* work on x86/64. That is a massive paradigm-breaker - with limited exceptions, apps and games developed for iOS won't run on OS X. Found and downloaded a nice WinRT app or game on your ARM-based tablet/slate/netbook? Take that same app and put it on your x86 Ultrabook. Heck, put it on your *gaming desktop* with Eyefinity or SLI and the extra display(s). WinRT means the only limits are those of the API itself. (No more of the niche-ification and fractuization that is present today.)

Grand Master

PGHammer

Posted
Posted

What some of you fail to see is how Windows 8 is Microsoft's first step into the post-PC era.

Look at the market. PC sales are slowing down while smartphones and tablets are gaining traction. Then think back to CES and some of the Ultrabook concepts on display.

It's more than obvious that Microsoft considers the traditional desktop PC a dying breed, to be relegated to a niche market. The Windows desktop is set for the same fate - a second-class citizen for 'power users' and to run what is likely to be the last non-Metro version of Office. I fully expect Office 16 to be a set of immersive apps.

Games? They too can be integrated into the Metro UI. You don't need the Windows desktop for them. Alternatively, just get an Xbox.

Windows 8 is one step towards a unified user experience across Microsoft products. WP7/8, Xbox, soon Windows. It is not aimed at traditionalists, it is aimed at the post-PC crowd who are now busy buying iPads, iPhones and the like.

Actually, it's a hedge-bet.

Part of the reason that PC sales are flat (if not declining) is a crappy global economy (consumers) and a business world under horrendous pressure (enterprises). As you pointed out, tablet and slate sales (right now, it's Android and iOS that rule that roost, because Microsoft has had nothing) are up - with price being the entire driving factor. However, it's both a threat - and an opportunity - for Microsoft. Think about a version of Windows with the same look and feel as the Windows we are most familiar with, with the only difference in fact being optimization for the ultra-lower-energy-using tablet/slate CPUs (ARM in particular). However, further up the line (in x86/x64, where we are today), re-engineer Windows to have a similar (if not identical) UI to the lower-energy Windows (which has become WOA) while still having the backward compatibility we have all demanded.

Talk about your one-two punches!

That is what Windows 8 and WOA represent. Unlike iOS, you can take WinRT apps from ARM devices to Windows 8 x86/x64 hardware completely unchanged. Unlike either iOS or Android, the learning curve is zero in migrating from a tablet or slate (or even a netbook - are there Android-based netbooks today?) - the UI is one you largely already know. No matter WHICH way the market goes in the future (whether tablets, slates, and other low-power devices continue their strong sales numbers, or whether the PC makes a comeback as the economy improves) - Microsoft's backside is covered, and the user wins.

Heck, I'm fifty, with an IT past that predates the PC and goes back to IBM Major League Mainframes (speficially, the old System360) and *I* get it.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Posts

    • Meta is reusing old DDR4 RAM in its servers instead of buying new hardware

      By Nick H. · Posted

      Well, it's good to know that they have found a workaround to a problem that they helped create, I guess...
    • Meta is reusing old DDR4 RAM in its servers instead of buying new hardware

      By Ivan Jenic · Posted

      Meta is reusing old DDR4 RAM in its servers instead of buying new hardware by Ivan Jenic Image: Meta The global hardware shortage isn’t exactly news, as the entire world has been struggling with rising component prices for quite some time now. And while big companies certainly aren’t as affected as the average consumer, even they aren’t opposed to the idea of saving a few (million) bucks. Meta appears to have found a way to spend less on new hardware while also putting its outdated infrastructure to use, essentially killing two birds with one stone. The company has built a custom chip that lets it reuse memory from retired servers rather than buying new hardware. The chip is called Vistara and allows for connecting old DDR4 RAM from obsolete servers into new servers that rely on DDR5. The problem Vistara solves goes back to a basic mismatch in how long hardware lasts. Meta replaces its servers every three to five years, but the memory modules inside them are good for seven to ten. When a server gets decommissioned, perfectly usable DDR4 RAM goes with it. Meta is presenting the new method at today’s ISCA symposium, but The Register has got hold of a paper that explains how Vistara works. It's a custom ASIC that bridges DDR4 memory to newer processors via aCXL 2.0/1.1 interface over PCIe Gen5 x16. Meta pulls DDR4 sticks from old machines and installs them in dedicated units it calls MemServers, each of which pairs 768GB of DDR5 with 256GB of recovered DDR4. The operating system sees the DDR4 as an additional memory node and draws from it when the primary DDR5 is running low. Off-the-shelf CXL hardware couldn't do this, so Meta built its own. Existing interfaces bundle their own memory with the controller, which makes reusing old RAM sticks impossible. But Vistara separates the controller from the memory entirely, so Meta can plug in whatever DDR4 sticks it has on hand. Meta plans to deploy the new architecture in hyperscale infrastructure with millions of servers, which should mean that Meta’s AI datacenters will now be more efficient. The company is investing heavily in AI infrastructure, especially with its new AI model, Muse Spark, now widely available. All of this doesn't mean that Meta will exclusively rely on "recycled" RAM, but the company is still looking at considerable savings at scale.
    • Save up to 87% on ChatPlayground AI lifetime subscriptions

      By News Staff · Posted

      Save up to 87% on ChatPlayground AI lifetime subscriptions by Steven Parker Today's highlighted deal comes via our Apps + Software section of the Neowin Deals store, where for only a limited time, you can save up to 87% on ChatPlayground AI: lifetime subscriptions. ChatPlayground AI puts the world’s top AI models in one powerful interface, letting you enter a single prompt and instantly compare outputs from multiple models to choose the perfect response for your needs. Boost productivity and creativity with access to the latest AI giants like GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet 4, Gemini 1.5 Flash, DeepSeek V3, and dozens more — all in one window. Whether you’re chatting, coding, generating images, or refining prompts, ChatPlayground AI equips you with advanced tools like prompt engineering, image/PDF chat, saved conversations, and AI image creation, plus priority support to keep your workflow seamless. Access the world’s best AI models Side-by-Side Comparisons: Enter one prompt & instantly view results from multiple AI models to find the best output for your needs 40+ AI Models: Includes GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet 4, Gemini 1.5 Flash, DeepSeek V3, Llama, Perplexity, and many more Multi-Function Platform: Access AI for chat, image generation & coding all within a single interface Web Browser Extension: Offers a Chrome extension to seamlessly integrate the platform into your browsing workflow Boost productivity with powerful features ChatPlayground Interface: Designed for seamless AI model comparison in one window Prompt Engineering: Refine & optimize your prompts for better, more accurate responses Chat with Images & PDFs: Upload visuals and documents to get context-aware answers Saved Chat History: Keep track of past conversations for reference & ongoing projects AI Image Generation: Create high-quality visuals powered by top AI image models Priority Customer Support: Get faster assistance whenever you need it What you'll get with the Unlimited Plan Includes unlimited messages/month Built for prompt engineers, startups, and teams who run experiments nonstop Includes priority access to new features and future models Good to know Length of access: lifetime Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Access options: Desktop Max number of device(s): Unlimited Available to both NEW & Existing users Updates included A lifetime subscription to ChatPlayground AI (Unlimited Plan) normally costs $619, but you can pick it up for just $79 for a limited time - that represents a saving of $530 (87% off). Click the link below for more details, always check terms and specifications before making a purchase. Get this ChatPlayground AI (Unlimited) for $79 (was $619) There are also two other discounted plans to choose from. Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. Why we post these deals We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. So for those that keep moaning and complaining, be thankful we're still online for you to even do that. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
    • Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 Ergonomic Office Chair review: The Ikea of chairs

      By Steven P. · Posted

      Not on my Aeron Remastered no.
    • Tidal won't monetize AI slop music, company says

      By Steven P. · Posted

      I like Tidal, but it still does not control devices from the mobile/app and still no surround support. And yeah re: above comment I still get a lot of network errors and I am on a 4/4 Gbit Fiber connection.

  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      539
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!