Recommended Posts

I don't understand why people are so up in arms about Windows 8. Change is good. However, it appears most of us can't handle it when Microsoft changes something drastically. This is why Apple succeeds IMO, they do small, incremental updates that contribute towards the bigger one, so that people aren't confused when it happens. Subtly.

I don't think there is any subtle way of introducing a new Start menu implementation. After all even as subtle as the new XP menu was, it was still met with pitchforks and torches. Hell, it was even hated by few up until and including Windows 7's release.

I don't think there is any subtle way of introducing a new Start menu implementation. After all even as subtle as the new XP menu was, it was still met with pitchforks and torches. Hell, it was even hated by few up until and including Windows 7's release.

What do you mean-- ? I thought all the fuss was when all the icons moved from the desktop to the start menu (Windows 3.x to Windows 95) , wait now the start menu is the desktop and my icons are back. Oh look you added the functionality I used to have on XP back in 2000 with sideshow to show me my websites, stock prices, and my weather... neat (being sarcastic here a bit) .... but I guess all ideas do come full circle in time.

I think people don't want to see the bigger picture about Win8

The new start screen is just a tiny bit of everything that is new in Win8

If MS succeeds in their setup you get an amazing platform where you write an app once and can distribute it to anything from a phone to a tablet, to a laptop/pc to a tv with XBOX.

The other cool new thing for me is the sharing charm so apps can share any kind of information between them without knowing about the other app.

I'm also a run box ######. If I want to get to a location on my hard drive I don't search for it and I don't go click click click click click click click click click ...I do a windows key + R type were I want to go and press enter. For some of the more popular folders I even have an app which lets me create hot keys for certain folders. For instance

my d:\video folder is Windows key + alt + V

downloads directory is Windows key + alt + D

Then for websites like Amazon I have Ctrl + Windows key + A and BOOM i'm at Amazon.

Then for an outlook template I created for things like "Payment received" I just press ctrl+ shift + P

warwagon - if anything, I'm a bigger Runbox ###### than you (thanks largely, oddly enough, to Windows 2000 Professional and the integration of Index Server into the OS core).

That's right. A PRE-XP feature.

Oddly enough, despite running Windows 2000 at home for nearly a year before my first experience with it in an enterprise setting, it was in the enterprise that the Runbox whoring really took off - way too many enterprise/business applications to put a crapton of desktop shortcuts on the desktop.

And all the Runboxing I learned to leverage with Windows 2000 has worked with every OS since. It pretty much makes the extended Start menu (in Vista and 7) moot for a keyboard jockey.

Sheesh.

I think people don't want to see the bigger picture about Win8

The new start screen is just a tiny bit of everything that is new in Win8

If MS succeeds in their setup you get an amazing platform where you write an app once and can distribute it to anything from a phone to a tablet, to a laptop/pc to a tv with XBOX.

The other cool new thing for me is the sharing charm so apps can share any kind of information between them without knowing about the other app.

What kind of information you are talking about?

What kind of information you are talking about?

Metro apps can incorporate contract, to share certain data and consume data.

So if you write a metro app that can consume different thing, like pictures, contacts, or anything else you can come up with.

Other apps can actually consume that data as long as they incorporate a contract for that type of data.

This is a pretty cool feature because people can develop apps independently and still share common data

I agree but you really don't need Metro interface on both platforms for such thing. For example i can sync my Windows Phone using iTunes or Windows Media Player and it works perfect. Another example would be like Facebook Contacts or Outlook Contacts. PC feeds itself with that information without need to be synched with the Phone, again even Phone does that on its own because the source of information is not PC nor Phone but Live Account, Facebook, or any other Server. Again sharing pictures between two devices PC and Phone for example can be done via Sky Drive or by connecting Windows Phone to your PC but again you don't need Metro for it (I should say Metro App). It does sound all cool but in my mind it is all duplication. Let's say i Install Windows 8, i will still sync my mysic between Phone and PC using Windows Media Player launched from Desktop without involving Metro App.

From my understanding MS goal is to remove Desktop from PC and everything run in Metro interface probably with Windows 9, essentially locking PC users from things like browsing Windows Folder and looking at individual files. Role of OS is going end up serving Apps through which you can only manipulate files appropriate for that App. I believe that is an approach MS taking in the future.

Windows 8 is like hybrid between Windows 7 and what we had so far and future Windows where everything will run in Metro. Obviously they couldn't remove Desktop just like that, it would too much of change. I bet in $100 that Desktop interface wont exist in Windows 9. It is not necessary bad because at least i will be in same visual flow.

Windows 9:

Desktop inteface gone

Windows Explorer gone

Concept of C, D, E ... drives gone

Users are going to be locked from doing anything to Windows even accessing registry

Only way to manipulate with folders and files will be through Metro App itself. Each Metro App is appropriate for certain file types like Word for doc, Powerpoint for ppt and any other type shared between.

Mouse and Keyboard will be around for long time

System Updates and Driver Update will be done through Metro Update App. No control over it like we do now. However, there should be no failure point.

Complete UI consistency between all devices running Windows

You start computer and you see Metro and apps in there and that's all you gonna see

In order to create account you will be prompted to provide or create Live account.

Live account is going to be your login account for PC, Tablet, Phone, Cloud Storage, Email etc

To save file (let's say from Word), you can do in three possible location. Sky Drive, Media such as USB/DVD, local storage. You wont be able to choose location on your local storage infact you wont be even prompts to browse for such location because concept of Windows Explorer is gone however Windows will save it to dedicate partition or location in your drive for specific file type.

Only way you can access files is again using appropriate Metro app which wil be capable of sharing any content with other Windows devices using same or similar interface adjusted for the nature of very device.

Anything you save locally can be saved to Sky Drive and synced to other devices

Games will be downloaded, installed and launched from Metro. It wont matter if you are PC, Console or Phone user you will be able to play against each other and share game information between.

DX11 API will run on all platforms. Graphic Settings and Quality will be adjusted according to hardware specs of each device.

Sounds pretty clean and cool to me but i will be on Linux at that point. I like freedom :)

Techguy, I HIGHLY doubt the desktop is gone completely in Windows 9.

The reason i am saying is that very little is left on Desktop. Taskbar is duplication of Metro Start Menu which let's you pin things. I believe that Windows Media Player we know will be gone from Windows 9, replaced by Music/Video in Metro etc. I also believe that WordPad from Windows 9 will be gone replaced with something similar as part of Windows Live Package and so on. I think people misunderstood me here. I don't mind Metro as long as classic Desktop is gone but i also don't mind classic Desktop as long as Metro is gone :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Personally, I’ve found that it’s usually worth investing in the infrastructure you don’t want to replace later, especially cabling. Running Cat6A (or better, depending on your needs) during an upgrade is relatively inexpensive compared to having to re-cable a few years down the road. For switches I try to balance current specs with realistic growth. If my budget allows it Ill choose switches with higher uplink speeds which leaves room for expanding later on, but I don’t necessarily overspend on access ports if the endpoints won’t benefit from them anytime soon. One lesson I’ve learned is that planning for scalability pays off. It’s much easier to add devices, VLANs, or higher-bandwidth workloads when your network infrastructure already supports it than to replace hardware later.  What is your budget like?
    • I hate the term, "future-proof." We saw it back in the 90's / 2000's, if not before. You cannot future-proof anything, since there is no definition of how far into the future you plan on prepping for. Best idea is to tell us what you currently have and what its use is at the moment, and we can then offer ideas about some areas that might need an upgrade and other areas that can be left alone.
    • I can agree that it is being used in a small capacity. I worked for a company where their engineers still used XP, and when asked why it was because their sensor software wasn't compatible with newer operating systems and the software was discontinued so they couldn't upgrade the software. Given that the sensors were still in use by companies, they had to continue using XP to support the sensor, otherwise the price to the company would have gone into the millions or billions. Our response was simple: Ok, you can keep the XP machine. But we're removing it from the network. "But then it can't access the Internet or folder shares!" Yup, kinda the point. If someone wants to continue using an unsecure OS they can do, I have no problem with that. But it should be isolated. Simple. I had a fight with a guy in the engineering department for weeks before he finally relented. But we digress.   What do I plan on doing to commemorate the anniversary? Nothing. I have fond memories of the OS, but at the end of the day it's just an OS. If I had some time I might see if I could install it on my Raspberry Pi for a laugh. But my reflex memory with today's OS ideas would probably get me frustrated and I'd uninstall it after 5 mins.
    • Shutter Encoder 20.2 by Razvan Serea Shutter Encoder is one of the best video converter software and image, audio available today. It has been designed by video editors in order to be as accessible and efficient as possible. It is one of the few free professional tools. Based on FFmpeg, it has the largest codec library available. You can thus convert your files into many different formats. Complete settings for the most advanced Shutter Encoder has a panel containing a large number of settings, in order to define your own choices based on your files and perfect your video or audio output. Well-thought-out settings, with parameters predefined to create files quickly and easily. List of functions Without conversion: Cut without re-encoding, Replace audio, Rewrap, Conform, Merge, Extract, Subtitling, Video inserts Sound conversions: WAV, AIFF, FLAC, MP3, AAC, AC3, OPUS, OGG Editing codecs: DNxHD, DNxHR, Apple ProRes, QT Animation, GoPro CineForm, Uncompressed YUV Output codecs: H.264, H.265, VP9, AV1, OGV Broadcast codecs XDCAM HD422, AVC-Intra 100, XAVC, HAP....and much more. Shutter Encoder 20.2 changelog: Added "Intel Quick Sync" hardware acceleration for Linux Added 'Identify speakers' option for "Audio transcription" function Improved installer package Improved video player performance Improved timecode display with drop-frame videos Improved naming convention for surround audio files Fixed splash screen freeze Fixed bug with file hanging Fixed bugs with presets loading Fixed bugs with video player's buffer Fixed bug with 'Total length of file' option Fixed bugs with 'Record screen/device' option Fixed bug with "XAVC" & "XAVC Long GOP" functions Rollback to XPDF tool for PDF conversion Removed unused binary architecture for Mac Various corrections Various improvements Download: Shutter Encoder 20.2 | 166.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Shutter Encoder Portable | 185.0 MB Links: Shutter Encoder Home Page | FAQ / Tips | macOS | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • did you give it permission to do so? its probably on the ToS. After that South Park episode I'm paying attention to them lol
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      534
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      265
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      152
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      99
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!