Gizmodo: Nokia Lumia 900 "selling like crazy


Recommended Posts

[/color]

What I dislike is using low stock as proof of demand when there's hardly any stock to begin with. It's self defeating. I wish Nokia and the Lumia all the best, but such fake hype is just pointless.

We'll know when we get the official statements from ATT and Nokia

[/color]

What I dislike is using low stock as proof of demand when there's hardly any stock to begin with. It's self defeating. I wish Nokia and the Lumia all the best, but such fake hype is just pointless.

How is it pointless? Because you don't know anything about marketing.

"Our phone is selling out in stores". The public think, wow, it must be popular to be selling out. Nokia hasn't told a lie, and it will cause people to think, I should look at this device since it's popular.

It's simple. They need people to buy them, so they make people think they are super popular.

It's simple. They need people to buy them, so they make people think they are super popular.

I understand the realities of the situation (perception manipulation), however I don't like being deceived. That's just a personal opinion anyway.

I understand the realities of the situation (perception manipulation), however I don't like being deceived. That's just a personal opinion anyway.

Well you seem to know the truth, so how you personally are being deceived is beyond me. Did you plan on buying one? Do you have one?

Well you seem to know the truth, so how you personally are being deceived is beyond me.

Only after going to the source article and seeing the information I quoted. I suppose you are right though. It's just marketing tactics.

You guys forget all the phones Nokia shipped to Amazon, also was out of stock for a few days, and Walmart has them as well. Probably some other places like Best Buy?

Also, I like how you guys totally omit the fact that most sales are now done online and not through the retail shops. Last I read it was at least half of all sales were online and that was months ago so it's probably switched now. Lots of people will go into a shop to check out a device but then go back home and order it online for less. Walmart and Amazon both had a better deal over AT&T at one point. Whatever the case, and whatever the final sales numbers for the 900 are we'll know when we get it from Nokia or AT&T since they'll be able to give us a broader picture of sales from all of the different outlets that have the phone.

Has anyone actually calculated how many phones have been sold, whilst 10 phones per store sounds small, how many stores are there? how many did Amazon ship? Do they get restocked daily, or weekly.

Working out the bigger picture it sounds more like 200,000 could have been sold in a week in one country, which would be very strong sales.

Not at all. I just like to get at the real facts. Like how this was conveniently omitted from the original post:

The stock was already low to begin with. There's nothing worse than fake hype. Just like the picture of people queuing at an AT&T store waiting to buy an iPhone being used as proof of demand for the Lumia.

so assuming they only got 8 per store and each store only sold 4/day to sell out of the stock. If they continue that rate, it's 4 * 90 * 2200 = 792,00 which is not really bad just for AT&T stores.

Shouldn't it be - "given away like crazy? ? Considering AT&T are effectively giving them away for free (not including contract price of course).

They note however that initial stock was very low to start with, with most stores starting with only 3-4 of each colour, giving a maximum of 8 per store. AT&T has about 2,200 locations in USA.

they might sell a whole 100,000 Lumia's 900 by the year's end. :D

  • Like 2
I'm a bit surprised at the low stocking levels given how hard Nokia has been pushing this launch.

For the same reason Apple does it - to give the appearance of great demand which generates hype in the belief that shortages equal a really good product thus creates its own hype.

For the same reason Apple does it - to give the appearance of great demand which generates hype in the belief that shortages equal a really good product thus creates its own hype.

Except Apple sold 3 million iPhone 4s' during its first 3 days ... :rolleyes:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I'm not unblocking my camera for this crapola. Sorry, Google.
    • Ummmm that is what is it supposed to do. Just turn if off in settings if you do not want it analyzing your open tabs. Chrome does the same thing with Gemini. Sarfari will do the samething after Apple's AI and even more so with the release of their 27 versions that is now powered by Googles LLM/ML models. Understanding why it is doing it and how it can help you vs jumping to some conspiracy theroy is a much better approach. As long as it can be turned off, all is good. Yes the default should be off but the a lot of people would never discover these features.
    • Just another reason (aside from many others) not to use Edge. Firefox 153.0b5 DEx64 has a similar feature added recently in prior builds that I will turn off at some point when I get around to it. It's the new "Something looks suspicious" page that pops up here and there. It cleverly hides itself between web pages that I've actually visited; as a result, you know, of selecting a web page and telling the browser where to go. The interesting thing is that it does not produce these warnings from pages that I, as the only intelligent user of the browser in my system, have ever directed the browser to open! What seems to be happening is that the browser looks at all the goofy ad links on a web page I do actually open and selects one that "looks suspicious" and then creates the "something looks suspicious" web page, which is neatly inserted, as mentioned, between web pages my RB ("real brain") has directed the browser to load in a session. The thing is, I usually look at links I am considering to follow before I ask the browser to load them, and in cases I have noticed where the link does indeed look suspicious, most of the time I will choose to not follow the link at all. Doesn't everyone do this or something similar? I am picky about what I voluntarily load... (I don't like links that start off fine, with a site designaiton that seems normal enough but then is followed by indecipherable alphanumeric strings many, many lines long, etc. I tend to reject those because they look suspicious. They may not be, but I don't care... I'll stay with Firefox, of course, if for no other reason than they usually let you turn off the junk you don't like. And because it isn't Edge... But at some point Microsoft will come to realize that putting your bookmarks on the left side is a Good Thing for a lot of people, just as Microsoft discovered when it had the bright idea of nailing the Windows taskbar to the bottom of the screen, when for decades Microsoft browsers had left that placement up to the user. They have finally reversed the obscenity of that decision. Finally.
    • Google was using the old CATPCHAs data to train their LLMs. What is the say they won't use this camera data of users to train their LLM? these companies need some strict regulations!
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      carols23 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      Tom Willson earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      259
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      94
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!