Android fans: pay for your apps, please


Recommended Posts

As I've said before, while big corporations can deal with piracy, it hurts small companies like these, some of which suffer over 90% piracy rates. I've known enough people who stopped buying things altogether simply because they can get them for free, whether it be apps, games, music, movies, etc. The excuse that "most of them wouldn't buy it anyways" simply isn't true.

As I've said before, while big corporations can deal with piracy, it hurts small companies like these, some of which suffer over 90% piracy rates.

What a load of rubbish. How can it hurt a company if people wouldn't have bought it anyway? It annoys me when people automatically assume a download equals a lost sale. This is MAFIAA propaganda.

The excuse that "most of them wouldn't buy it anyways" simply isn't true.

It's verifiably true. There have been studies conducted that prove it. In fact you only have to look at France's own figures to realise that stopping piracy had no effect in reducing falling physical music sales, in fact it's still falling. This alone blows a huge hole in the download = lost sale fallacy.

I couldn't possibly afford to buy all the stuff I download. And I wouldn't want to. If I couldn't get access to it, I'd just go without. It's really not that important to me.

I pirated a game on Android because I'd already given the developer my money when i bought it on iOS, didn't really wanna pay again just for changing ecosystems.

Yeah, because they're so expensive and android and iOS use the same code so the dev didn't need to do any work at all when porting the iOS version...

As a developer if* my apps are pirated then so be it, not great but if you need it that badly and are not willing to pay ?1 then just take it. Its affect on me is that it just means less money to buy new stuff to develop for which means it takes longer to update or create new stuff as the motivation isn't there. It does take time and it does cost (got to test on devices) but people will always develop for Android because it has such high numbers.

* yes they are :)

  • Like 1

4) Have a realistic price.

Yes, many apps are as cheap as chips. But there are many which are completely overpriced. That is the main reason people pirate surely? Because they can't afford to buy the app. Cutting the price may encourage more people to buy.

I don't think people really "need" the apps they pirate, if they can't afford them (which I find strange considering the average price is well below 5?) they could either not use it or find a free/cheaper alternative.

IMO, if certain app is not realistically priced, then don't buy it. I've yet to find any expensive app that is an absolute must have, so either buy it or skip it.

So far I've bought every app I've felt like installing and that hasn't set me back more than 20?. I'm sure some people might not be able to afford spending 20? over a couple of years on apps for their 100?+ phone, but I don't think they are a majority.

I'd guess most pirates are either a)cheap, b)scared of using their credit card number on online transactions, or c)kids without a CC whose parents are unwilling to spend money on cellphone games.

My opinion still stands that the problem remains with how easy it is to install pirated apps on Android. I mean with the .apk it's pretty easy due to Android allowing you to use apps from outside the Play store.

I know iOS has a lot of pirated apps, but you need to jailbreak to do that, which limits the number of devices, Android doesn't need a jailbreak, the ability is there in stock.

My opinion still stands that the problem remains with how easy it is to install pirated apps on Android. I mean with the .apk it's pretty easy due to Android allowing you to use apps from outside the Play store.

I know iOS has a lot of pirated apps, but you need to jailbreak to do that, which limits the number of devices, Android doesn't need a jailbreak, the ability is there in stock.

Yep, true. Although I guess it wouldn't really stop many people given how easy it is to root and flash custom roms / recovery etc on droid devices

And the fact you can buy an app, back it up, then get a refund

On the iphone front I know around 15 people who use them and all of them have the phone jailbroken and use Installous to download apps for free, none of them have ever bought an app for their phones. Of the 11 Android users I know , including myself, all have bought all of the apps in use.

I think that they are somewhat inflating the statistics there.

They should blame pirace for this, take me for an example had my Galaxy S1 for over a year now, never installed one pirated file/game/app.

I always use free apps and if I didn't find an app that does what I need then, I don't need to do it.

On the iphone front I know around 15 people who use them and all of them have the phone jailbroken and use Installous to download apps for free, none of them have ever bought an app for their phones. Of the 11 Android users I know , including myself, all have bought all of the apps in use.

I think that they are somewhat inflating the statistics there.

So the data that they have on their game might be incorrect based on your "study" of 20-30 people that you know? *rolls eyes*

I've never pirated an app, not on iOS or Android, IF the app is worth it, you gets my monies, otherwise you get jack, especially when there's a free alternative that's as good and usually better

Most of the Game companies that are bitching about "piracy" and Android are the ones that thing a mobile game will ever be worth $10+, guess what, your games are barely $5 DL games for any console, you aren't going to screw over that many iOS/Android users, well they seem to screw over many more iOS people than Android, and that's the crux of their complaint

So the data that they have on their game might be incorrect based on your "study" of 20-30 people that you know? *rolls eyes*

It's about as accurate as the "data" pointing at piracy, both sides are using incomplete and I dare say on the game maker's side, false data

It's about as accurate as the "data" pointing at piracy

No it's not. Read the game developer's post on Wired (http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2012-05/02/android-market-game-piracy). His methods may not be flawless but the results are certainly more conclusive than one person thinking about how 30 people use their device. We're not talking about the overall piracy rate on Android either; the "5:1" statistic is about one game.

What I was trying to say is 100% of the people I know with an iphone pirate everything, and 100% of the people I know with android pirate nothing. It's not scientific, but fact non the less. Most of those with iphones said they only chose it so they could jailbreak and use cydia/installous to get their stuff.

  • 2 weeks later...

I don't think people really "need" the apps they pirate, if they can't afford them (which I find strange considering the average price is well below 5?) they could either not use it or find a free/cheaper alternative.

IMO, if certain app is not realistically priced, then don't buy it. I've yet to find any expensive app that is an absolute must have, so either buy it or skip it.

So far I've bought every app I've felt like installing and that hasn't set me back more than 20?. I'm sure some people might not be able to afford spending 20? over a couple of years on apps for their 100?+ phone, but I don't think they are a majority.

I'd guess most pirates are either a)cheap, b)scared of using their credit card number on online transactions, or c)kids without a CC whose parents are unwilling to spend money on cellphone games.

It's easy for you to say that you've bought all those apps, but then, you can afford them but with others, they can't and thus are forced to pirate stuff.

I'm all for supporting the devs but if one can't afford the app then don't blame them. People do need to feed their families. You can't eat an app. Rising costs and other valid reasons often prevent users from buying apps. If users can afford them*hint apple and rich buggers* then make them pay. Also, if your gonna buy an app or something then give something worthwhile for the price.

I've bought about 5 apps. The rest I use the free version, without blocking their ads.*

Develop good apps, and you'll get customers.

Studios are too quick to blame piracy, when really, it's their crappy port that's the problem. *cough*Crysis2*cough*

It's easy for you to say that you've bought all those apps, but then, you can afford them but with others, they can't and thus are forced to pirate stuff.

They aren't forced to pirate anything. We aren't talking about basic things they absolutely need, not for their lives nor even to use their phone.

Most things on Google Play are free, ad supported or freemium, and those that are not you can certainly live without. Whether they think that it's not a problem since they just couldn't buy them anyway and hence there's no lost sale is a different issue, but at least when it comes to apps for their smartphone there's certainly nothing forcing them to pirate.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
    • A $300 price hike is insane! No one is going to want to pay that much!
    • Since the 1st one flopped, there is really no reason to make another one. It's just losing money left and right.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!