Android fans: pay for your apps, please

By +Frank B.
in Android Support

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

+Xinok Subscriber²

Posted
  • Subscriber²
Posted

As I've said before, while big corporations can deal with piracy, it hurts small companies like these, some of which suffer over 90% piracy rates. I've known enough people who stopped buying things altogether simply because they can get them for free, whether it be apps, games, music, movies, etc. The excuse that "most of them wouldn't buy it anyways" simply isn't true.

Grand Master

simplezz

Posted
Posted

As I've said before, while big corporations can deal with piracy, it hurts small companies like these, some of which suffer over 90% piracy rates.

What a load of rubbish. How can it hurt a company if people wouldn't have bought it anyway? It annoys me when people automatically assume a download equals a lost sale. This is MAFIAA propaganda.

The excuse that "most of them wouldn't buy it anyways" simply isn't true.

It's verifiably true. There have been studies conducted that prove it. In fact you only have to look at France's own figures to realise that stopping piracy had no effect in reducing falling physical music sales, in fact it's still falling. This alone blows a huge hole in the download = lost sale fallacy.

I couldn't possibly afford to buy all the stuff I download. And I wouldn't want to. If I couldn't get access to it, I'd just go without. It's really not that important to me.

Grand Master

HawkMan

Posted
Posted

I pirated a game on Android because I'd already given the developer my money when i bought it on iOS, didn't really wanna pay again just for changing ecosystems.

Yeah, because they're so expensive and android and iOS use the same code so the dev didn't need to do any work at all when porting the iOS version...

Veteran

Depicus

Posted
Posted

As a developer if* my apps are pirated then so be it, not great but if you need it that badly and are not willing to pay ?1 then just take it. Its affect on me is that it just means less money to buy new stuff to develop for which means it takes longer to update or create new stuff as the motivation isn't there. It does take time and it does cost (got to test on devices) but people will always develop for Android because it has such high numbers.

* yes they are :)

  • Sir Topham Hatt
  • Like 1
Grand Master

ichi

Posted
Posted

4) Have a realistic price.

Yes, many apps are as cheap as chips. But there are many which are completely overpriced. That is the main reason people pirate surely? Because they can't afford to buy the app. Cutting the price may encourage more people to buy.

I don't think people really "need" the apps they pirate, if they can't afford them (which I find strange considering the average price is well below 5?) they could either not use it or find a free/cheaper alternative.

IMO, if certain app is not realistically priced, then don't buy it. I've yet to find any expensive app that is an absolute must have, so either buy it or skip it.

So far I've bought every app I've felt like installing and that hasn't set me back more than 20?. I'm sure some people might not be able to afford spending 20? over a couple of years on apps for their 100?+ phone, but I don't think they are a majority.

I'd guess most pirates are either a)cheap, b)scared of using their credit card number on online transactions, or c)kids without a CC whose parents are unwilling to spend money on cellphone games.

Mentor

LightShadow

Posted
Posted

My opinion still stands that the problem remains with how easy it is to install pirated apps on Android. I mean with the .apk it's pretty easy due to Android allowing you to use apps from outside the Play store.

I know iOS has a lot of pirated apps, but you need to jailbreak to do that, which limits the number of devices, Android doesn't need a jailbreak, the ability is there in stock.

Grand Master

Detection

Posted
Posted

My opinion still stands that the problem remains with how easy it is to install pirated apps on Android. I mean with the .apk it's pretty easy due to Android allowing you to use apps from outside the Play store.

I know iOS has a lot of pirated apps, but you need to jailbreak to do that, which limits the number of devices, Android doesn't need a jailbreak, the ability is there in stock.

Yep, true. Although I guess it wouldn't really stop many people given how easy it is to root and flash custom roms / recovery etc on droid devices

And the fact you can buy an app, back it up, then get a refund

Grand Master

+BeLGaRaTh Subscriber¹

Posted
  • Subscriber¹
Posted

On the iphone front I know around 15 people who use them and all of them have the phone jailbroken and use Installous to download apps for free, none of them have ever bought an app for their phones. Of the 11 Android users I know , including myself, all have bought all of the apps in use.

I think that they are somewhat inflating the statistics there.

Contributor

Eminem25

Posted
Posted

They should blame pirace for this, take me for an example had my Galaxy S1 for over a year now, never installed one pirated file/game/app.

I always use free apps and if I didn't find an app that does what I need then, I don't need to do it.

Experienced

Manish

Posted
Posted

On the iphone front I know around 15 people who use them and all of them have the phone jailbroken and use Installous to download apps for free, none of them have ever bought an app for their phones. Of the 11 Android users I know , including myself, all have bought all of the apps in use.

I think that they are somewhat inflating the statistics there.

So the data that they have on their game might be incorrect based on your "study" of 20-30 people that you know? *rolls eyes*

Grand Master

Anibal P

Posted
Posted

I've never pirated an app, not on iOS or Android, IF the app is worth it, you gets my monies, otherwise you get jack, especially when there's a free alternative that's as good and usually better

Most of the Game companies that are bitching about "piracy" and Android are the ones that thing a mobile game will ever be worth $10+, guess what, your games are barely $5 DL games for any console, you aren't going to screw over that many iOS/Android users, well they seem to screw over many more iOS people than Android, and that's the crux of their complaint

Grand Master

Anibal P

Posted
Posted

So the data that they have on their game might be incorrect based on your "study" of 20-30 people that you know? *rolls eyes*

It's about as accurate as the "data" pointing at piracy, both sides are using incomplete and I dare say on the game maker's side, false data

Experienced

Manish

Posted
Posted

It's about as accurate as the "data" pointing at piracy

No it's not. Read the game developer's post on Wired (http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2012-05/02/android-market-game-piracy). His methods may not be flawless but the results are certainly more conclusive than one person thinking about how 30 people use their device. We're not talking about the overall piracy rate on Android either; the "5:1" statistic is about one game.

Grand Master

+BeLGaRaTh Subscriber¹

Posted
  • Subscriber¹
Posted

What I was trying to say is 100% of the people I know with an iphone pirate everything, and 100% of the people I know with android pirate nothing. It's not scientific, but fact non the less. Most of those with iphones said they only chose it so they could jailbreak and use cydia/installous to get their stuff.

  • 2 weeks later...
Grand Master

soldier1st

Posted
Posted

I don't think people really "need" the apps they pirate, if they can't afford them (which I find strange considering the average price is well below 5?) they could either not use it or find a free/cheaper alternative.

IMO, if certain app is not realistically priced, then don't buy it. I've yet to find any expensive app that is an absolute must have, so either buy it or skip it.

So far I've bought every app I've felt like installing and that hasn't set me back more than 20?. I'm sure some people might not be able to afford spending 20? over a couple of years on apps for their 100?+ phone, but I don't think they are a majority.

I'd guess most pirates are either a)cheap, b)scared of using their credit card number on online transactions, or c)kids without a CC whose parents are unwilling to spend money on cellphone games.

It's easy for you to say that you've bought all those apps, but then, you can afford them but with others, they can't and thus are forced to pirate stuff.

Grand Master

soldier1st

Posted
Posted

I'm all for supporting the devs but if one can't afford the app then don't blame them. People do need to feed their families. You can't eat an app. Rising costs and other valid reasons often prevent users from buying apps. If users can afford them*hint apple and rich buggers* then make them pay. Also, if your gonna buy an app or something then give something worthwhile for the price.

Grand Master

Raa

Posted
Posted

I've bought about 5 apps. The rest I use the free version, without blocking their ads.*

Develop good apps, and you'll get customers.

Studios are too quick to blame piracy, when really, it's their crappy port that's the problem. *cough*Crysis2*cough*

Grand Master

ichi

Posted
Posted

It's easy for you to say that you've bought all those apps, but then, you can afford them but with others, they can't and thus are forced to pirate stuff.

They aren't forced to pirate anything. We aren't talking about basic things they absolutely need, not for their lives nor even to use their phone.

Most things on Google Play are free, ad supported or freemium, and those that are not you can certainly live without. Whether they think that it's not a problem since they just couldn't buy them anyway and hence there's no lost sale is a different issue, but at least when it comes to apps for their smartphone there's certainly nothing forcing them to pirate.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Posts

    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2 to finally get one of the most requested features

      By Michal H. · Posted

      Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory

      By hellowalkman · Posted

      One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26

      By Copernic · Posted

      TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Anyone Here With Turbo Pascal Experience?

      By +virtorio · Posted

      Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone

      By Ivan Jenic · Posted

      Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.

  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      458
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!