Recommended Posts

Microsoft's visionary Office video focuses on the app. Particularly Office, and there's not much with software that can't be done today. Microsoft's designers simply don't have that much style. Apple's Keynote and Numbers come closer to that type of polish and cool productivity. Microsoft can't deliver that kind of app on Windows Phone though its quite capable today. Has nothing to do with Windows 8 or Metro.

Notably though, while content consumption can be managed by touching the screen on a mobile device in the video, the workstation had a keyboard and stylus/tablet input device. In fact, touch took place on an LCD/Screen on the keyboard. Not a workstation user reaching up touching their display all day long.

All of that is doable now (with regards to the software). I just don't think MS will ever deliver anything that slick, hopefully x86 app devs will. Somehow MS has to create tools to get more creative people designing application UIs. Microsoft can't even design nice icons so I don't know why anyone thinks they could deliver this vision themselves.

What? Are you Bill Gates you seem to know everything about MS. MS needs to create tools to get more creative people making UIs? That statement alone proves you never touched Visual Studio. And wtf is a x86 app developer? Stop talking out of your ass, your post is mostly nonsense

What? Are you Bill Gates you seem to know everything about MS. MS needs to create tools to get more creative people making UIs? That statement alone proves you never touched Visual Studio. And wtf is a x86 app developer? Stop talking out of your ass, your post is mostly nonsense

No, like you, I'm someone posting my opinion online.

Visual Studio, yes, that has resulted in users interfaces that are quite creative, please, show the examples. We are talking about UIs here as in the video, please show me the application UIs that Visual Studio has helped actual graphic designers who developed the imagery in the video deliver to desktop applications? Pull it out of your ass if you have to.

x86 app developers would be anyond developing applicaitons for today's PCs running intel processors derived from the x86 architecture which would be PCs and Macs. With Apple hiring more designers resulting in them developing productivity applications that come closer to the images in the video being discussed.

Visual Studio developers tend to be boring programmers and not graphic designers who tend to develop nicer UIs and Icons, and consistent look & feel than programmmers. And you are correct, I do not touch Visual Studio, I hire and fire those who do.

But I am interested in your examples since you believe that Visual Studio has delivered in these areas. I await your links, and less lip service.

No, like you, I'm someone posting my opinion online.

Visual Studio, yes, that has resulted in users interfaces that are quite creative, please, show the examples. We are talking about UIs here as in the video, please show me the application UIs that Visual Studio has helped actual graphic designers who developed the imagery in the video deliver to desktop applications? Pull it out of your ass if you have to.

x86 app developers would be anyond developing applicaitons for today's PCs running intel processors derived from the x86 architecture which would be PCs and Macs. With Apple hiring more designers resulting in them developing productivity applications that come closer to the images in the video being discussed.

Visual Studio developers tend to be boring programmers and not graphic designers who tend to develop nicer UIs and Icons, and consistent look & feel than programmmers. And you are correct, I do not touch Visual Studio, I hire and fire those who do.

But I am interested in your examples since you believe that Visual Studio has delivered in these areas. I await your links, and less lip service.

What are you smoking? Ever heard of WPF or Silverlight? What more can you do with another IDE? Wow.... Ignorance is strong with you. I can assure you that Visual Studio can make any UI you can imagine and faster than any other IDE available. Exemples? http://www.telerik.com/developer-productivity-tools.aspx is a good example of nice UI design and it's for Visual Studio.

What are you smoking? Ever heard of WPF or Siverlight? What more can you do with another IDE? Wow.... Ignorance is strong with you. I can assure you that Visual Studio can make any UI you can imagine.

I asked you to point me to the applications and if you cannot, I stand by my assertion that MS needs to, among other things, make tools that are more accesible and encourage more designers to create UIs as shown in the video.

I don't want to imagine the UI, that's what the video is for, I say show me. The tools you are referencing are here now, they've been here long enough for Silverlight to be tombstoned, so show me the applications, clearly you cannot, which I already know.

telerik is a nice UI, but it's remoteness proves my point. Neowin web has a better UI than most apps. Work/Tools are needed here. Metro and it's tools and the consumption of applets may encourage more designers to create these types of UIs as would tool targeted more toward the creative types, and not so much the programmatic types.

The questions are:

1.- Do we have the choice to choose colors for our start screen? I dont want that multicolored crap.

2.- Do we have the choice to disable push tiles? I dont want my OS to inform me of everything at all times.

I asked you to point me to the applications and if you cannot, I stand by my assertion that MS needs to, among other things, make tools that are more accesible and encourage more designers to create UIs as shown in the video.

I don't want to imagine the UI, that's what the video is for, I say show me. The tools you are referencing are here now, they've been here long enough for Silverlight to be tombstoned, so show me the applications, clearly you cannot, which I already know.

http://www.telerik.c...vity-tools.aspx Now please return from under the rock where you emerged. I'm a programmer and a UI designer and Visual Studio is by far the best thing out there. You fire people who use Visual Studio? You must have a really successful company :)

http://www.telerik.c...vity-tools.aspx Now please return from under the rock where you emerged. I'm a programmer and a UI designer and Visual Studio is by far the best thing out there.

I'm not going to debate whether or not Visual Studio is the best thing out there, I'll leave that to a programmer to choose. What my point is and remains, the tools that are out there, clearly are not reaching a whole lot of creative types. When tools are available that do reach these types, or that they want to use, we will see much better UIs.

I'm not going to debate whether or not Visual Studio is the best thing out there, I'll leave that to a programmer to choose. What my point is and remains, the tools that are out there, clearly are not reaching a whole lot of creative types. When tools are available that do reach these types, or that they want to use, we will see much better UIs.

Clearly you are living under a rock or you are some kind of Santa Claus or God from a parallel universe. Why don't you pay a little visit to www.dreamspark.com or www.xna.com to see if the tools are reaching the creative people yet. Wow.. I've never seen someone talk about something they have no idea about like you. Please educate yourself on the subject before replying, you may want to try "WPF" in a google search to put some little knowledge in that brain of yours.

Clearly you are living under a rock or you are some kind of Santa Claus or God from a parallel universe. Why don't you pay a little visit to www.dreamspark.com or www.xna.com to see if the tools are reaching the creative people yet. Wow.. I've never seen someone talk about something they have no idea about like you. Please educate yourself on the subject before replying, you may want to try "WPF" in a google search to put some little knowledge in that brain of yours.

I asked you for the applications not the tools. You think name calling like a spoiled child-like programmer will hide the fact that you can't backup your bull****?

This is why programmers generally stick to programming. You ask them for applications developed with the tools and they point you to sites for the tools.

I asked you for the applications not the tools. You think name calling like a spoiled child-like programmer will hide the fact that you can't backup your bull****?

This is why programmers generally stick to programming. You ask them for applications developed with the tools and they point you to sites for the tools.

http://www.metrotwit.com/

http://www.telerik.c...ucts/fdeck.aspx

http://origininterac...nd-development/

to name a few... now please stop being so ignorant... People are making great apps you're just pretending they are not. Tool makers would be out of business if no one made apps with them. Oh and keep pretending "x86 app developers" are a thing.. that's cute

The Start menu hasn't been fit for purpose for years (especially the Windows 95-style menu that you yearn for) and the Start screen fixes most of its predecessors problems:

  • It's no longer ridiculously cramped
  • You don't have to click through countless menus or search through endless lists of meaningless tiny icons to find things
  • You can finally group your most used apps in a variety of ways
  • The frequently used apps list, which never did anything after about a day of use, is (thankfully) gone.
  • More search results are visible and can be easily filtered

Hmmm, am I the only one that finds Windows 7 simpler than Windows 8? I can't be. I hit Winkey, type what I want, enter. Winkey + type calc + enter 1 second, its open. If I want Adobe Photoshop, I start typing Pho....there it is, enter. <shrug>

Hmmm, am I the only one that finds Windows 7 simpler than Windows 8? I can't be. I hit Winkey, type what I want, enter. Winkey + type calc + enter 1 second, its open. If I want Adobe Photoshop, I start typing Pho....there it is, enter. <shrug>

Ok and what's the difference with Windows 8?

The questions are:

1.- Do we have the choice to choose colors for our start screen? I dont want that multicolored crap.

2.- Do we have the choice to disable push tiles? I dont want my OS to inform me of everything at all times.

1- Yes you can pick up the accent color of your choice.

2- Yes. But I don't see why you want to disable live tile, just don't pin the apps if not needed. Also so apps are "notification" which is a little popup that pops in the corner of your screen, and this can be disabled too.

to name a few... now please stop being so ignorant... People are making great apps you're just pretending they are not. Tool makers would be out of business if no one made apps with them. Oh and keep pretending "x86 app developers" are a thing.. that's cute

None of those deliver the UI and Slick design as demonstrated in the future office video which was the context of my comments. In other words, you're just running off at the mouth. Whether or not the apps are "great" and do the job they were intended to do is not the point.

the X86 architecture isn't even a thing, it's made up, and no one develops applications for it. As I said, programmers generally should stick to what they know, programming.

Not in the sense Metro is. It's a static environment filled with icons. How interactive is that? Where's my social updates? News? Weather updates?

I don't have ADD/ADHD, I don't need all this stuff in my face every time I want to launch an app, if I want to find out what my friends are up to I launch a browser and go to facebook, if I want weather I will go to BBC Weather, if I want news I will load my newseader, I use my PC for work and games, anything else is just a distraction.

I don't have ADD/ADHD, I don't need all this stuff in my face every time I want to launch an app, if I want to find out what my friends are up to I launch a browser and go to facebook, if I want weather I will go to BBC Weather, if I want news I will load my newseader, I use my PC for work and games, anything else is just a distraction.

Interesting then that you can do all of that in the desktop on Win8 just like you do in Win7. People want to talk up the start screen vs start menu argument each and every time yet since Win7 and pinning apps to the taskbar my use of the start menu has dropped off a cliff. All of you self proclaimed power users (which i'm starting to question) should be pinning most if not everything you use daily to the taskbar anyways. If you still start all or most of your apps through the start menu even on Win7 then it's clear you're stuck in the 90's and haven't moved passed that one way of doing things.

I also find it funny that some of you want to bring up desktop Gadgets, something that went nowhere with Vista or Win7. It never was really taken advantage of, but that's beside the point. You talk about bringing up the start screen in win8 as "breaking workflow" and not letting you see your running apps just to get some info yet depending on how many desktop gadgets you have and how you place them you're going to have to move your windows out of the way to see the damn gadgets anyways. How is this really any different?

At the end of the day since Win7 MS has been working people off of the start menu, it's now gone, get over it, or use one of the 3rd party start menus, yay for choice! For that few seconds I do winkey+ appname and hit enter to start something having the start screen show is hardly an issue. I'll be in the desktop just like I've always been 99% of the time, the apps I need daily will be pinned on my taskbar like they have been and I'll do my work just like I always have. This notion that the start screen is now going to totally break everyones way of using the PC is FUD. It's been blown totally out of proportion for no real reason at all.

None of those deliver the UI and Slick design as demonstrated in the future office video which was the context of my comments. In other words, you're just running off at the mouth. Whether or not the apps are "great" and do the job they were intended to do is not the point.

the X86 architecture isn't even a thing, it's made up, and no one develops applications for it. As I said, programmers generally should stick to what they know, programming.

Yeah people make applications for Windows, Mac and Linux which are made for a version of the x86 architecture. Good luck having those apps run on Intel 8088's and you know what my Canon 7D and Xbox use the x86 architecture so it should run all those apps right? And I'm not simply a programmer I'm also a designer and an engineer so I think I know what I'm talking about.

Saying "I'm a x86 app developer" is like saying "I work in a building". Sounds pretty stupid right?

Interesting then that you can do all of that in the desktop on Win8 just like you do in Win7. People want to talk up the start screen vs start menu argument each and every time yet since Win7 and pinning apps to the taskbar my use of the start menu has dropped off a cliff. All of you self proclaimed power users (which i'm starting to question) should be pinning most if not everything you use daily to the taskbar anyways. If you still start all or most of your apps through the start menu even on Win7 then it's clear you're stuck in the 90's and haven't moved passed that one way of doing things.

Seriously?

I use about 20+ apps regularly, if I pinned them all to the taskbar it would just be a massive row of icons along the bottom. It's clear you don't have a clue about power users so please keep your opinions of how we are 'stuck in the 90's' to yourself.

  • Like 2

Yeah people make applications for Windows, Mac and Linux which are made for a version of the x86 architecture. Good luck having those apps run on Intel 8088's and you know what my Canon 7D and Xbox use the x86 architecture so it should run all those apps right? And I'm not a only programmer I'm also a designer and an engineer.

Saying "I'm a x86 app developer" is like saying "I work in a building"

As an engineer, though in fairness you didn't say what kind and I don't really want to know, you should know the Xbox 360, the only relevant Xbox today, uses an IBM processor based on the PowerPC architecture and instruction set. I'll take your word for it regarding the 7D.

Saying you're an x86 app developer today, means you working a building developing apps for Intel-base processors (excluding the now defunct Itanium which was IA64). But I'll concede the point if it'll make you feel better. The term will go away once WOA is available, and Intel is not very happy about it at all.

Seriously?

I use about 20+ apps regularly, if I pinned them all to the taskbar it would just be a massive row of icons along the bottom. It's clear you don't have a clue about power users so please keep your opinions of how we are 'stuck in the 90's' to yourself.

If you use them regularly then it stands to reason they're open most of the time unless you like to open and close things over and over, another habit from the past. I have around 12-15 apps and windows open all the time, I don't go in and out and close things over and over. A number of them are minimized to the systray so they don't take up all of my taskbar space, or I guess you don't use apps that support that at all huh?

Regardless, as I've said, I use the start menu to open apps that I don't use as much, maybe once a week, it's a quck 2-3 sec of winkey+ appname and hit enter something that's just the same under Win8, nothings changed. And if I really wanted to use more apps and have more open all the time I'd want to upgrade to Win8 even more just for the added multimonitor support it now has, even more taskbar space to pin everything I need.

And for the record, I'll voice any opinion I have, if you don't like it cry me a river.

As an engineer, though in fairness you didn't say what kind and I don't really want to know, you should know the Xbox 360, the only relevant Xbox today, uses an IBM processor based on the PowerPC architecture and instruction set. I'll take your word for it regarding the 7D.

Saying you're an x86 app developer today, means you working a building developing apps for Intel-base processors (excluding the now defunct Itanium which was IA64). But I'll concede the point if it'll make you feel better.

I was talking about the first Xbox which uses a standard Pentium 3, relevant today or not it's still next to my TV.

You talk about bringing up the start screen in win8 as "breaking workflow" and not letting you see your running apps just to get some info...

Don't forget, now with the new multi-monitor enhancements, you can now do this. ;)

Don't forget, now with the new multi-monitor enhancements, you can now do this. ;)

Lol :p I don't get people who are concerned about "breaking workflow". Must be really important for them to see what they were doing while they are trying to do something else for a couple second.

*Opens start menu* Oh no I forgot what I was doing before.. what's my name again?

Not pointing fingers but, yes, this is how stupid some people sound.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Can you give an example of when you would want to use Rufus over the other or vice versa? Just wondering which is the "best".
    • Oh no...the wallet is already screaming. So many games and so little time. Being old and responsible is awful!
    • LibreWolf 152.0.2-1 by Razvan Serea LibreWolf is an independent “fork” of Firefox, with the primary goals of privacy security and user freedom. It is the community run successor to LibreFox. LibreWolf is designed to increase protection against tracking and fingerprinting techniques, while also including a few security improvements. This is achieved through our privacy and security oriented settings and patches. LibreWolf also aims to remove all the telemetry, data collection and annoyances, as well as disabling anti-freedom features like DRM. LibreWolf features: Latest Firefox — LibreWolf is compiled directly from the latest build of Firefox Stable. You will have the the latest features, and security updates. Independent Build — LibreWolf uses a build independent of Firefox and has its own settings, profile folder and installation path. As a result, it can be installed alongside Firefox or any other browser. No phoning home — Embedded server links and other calling home functions are removed. In other words, minimal background connections by default. User settings updates Extensions firewall: limit internet access for extensions. Multi-platform (Windows/Linux/Mac/and soon Android) Community-Driven Dark theme (classic and advanced) LibreWolf privacy features: Delete cookies and website data on close. Include only privacy respecting search engines like DuckDuckGo and Searx. Include uBlockOrigin with custom default filter lists, and Tracking Protection in strict mode, to block trackers and ads. Strip tracking elements from URLs, both natively and through uBO. Enable dFPI, also known as Total Cookie Protection. Enable RFP which is part of the Tor Uplift project. RFP is considered the best in class anti-fingerprinting solution, and its goal is to make users look the same and cover as many metrics as possible, in an effort to block fingerprinting techniques. Always display user language as en-US to websites, in order to protect the language used in the browser and in the OS. Disable WebGL, as it is a strong fingerprinting vector. Prevent access to the location services of the OS, and use Mozilla's location API instead of Google's API. Limit ICE candidates generation to a single interface when sharing video or audio during a videoconference. Force DNS and WebRTC inside the proxy, when one is being used. Trim cross-origin referrers, so that they don't include the full URI. Disable link prefetching and speculative connections. Disable disk cache and clear temporary files on close. Disable form autofill. Disable search and form history...and more. Download: LibreWolf 64-bit | Portable 64-bit | ~100.0 MB (Open Source) Download: ARM64 | Portable ARM64 Links: LibreWolf Home Page | Addons | Screenshot | Reddit Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hands on with iFlyTek AINote 2 E-Ink tablet: insanely thin and smart by Taras Buria During Amazon Prime Day 2026, iFlyTek is offering its E-Ink tablets with big discounts. The AINOTE 2 is now available at 20% off, allowing you to save quite a lot on one of the thinnest E-Ink tablets out there. I was offered a chance to look at the device, so here are my impressions. The AINOTE 2 is a large 10.65-inch E-Ink tablet that strikes you the moment you take it out of the box. It is extremely thin. At just 4.2 mm, this tablet is at the edge of what is possible for a device with a USB Type-C port. It is also very light, which makes it comfortable and enjoyable during long reading sessions. The tablet has a gold metal chassis with the front and back made of plastic. The back also features four rubber feet that prevent it from sliding around your desk when writing. Besides a USB Type-C port and an LED indicator, there are two buttons mounted on the top edge: a power button with a built-in fingerprint scanner and a dedicated AI button. I would say the fingerprint scanner is quite mid. Given that iFlyTek positions the device as a digital notebook, it makes sense to have a biometric scanner to protect sensitive information. However, it is not the fastest fingerprint reader, and sometimes it fails to recognize my finger. I assume that is due to the tablet's insane thinness. A dedicated AI button is an interesting choice, especially in the middle of the top edge. I can see this button being useful for those who heavily rely on AI and use it frequently, but I cannot help but think its placement is impractical. Having it on one of the longer sides would make so much more sense. The AINOTE 2 is a very pretty device. Gold finish with thin chassis and nearly symmetrical front bezels create a fantastic combination, and iFlyTek cleverly hides the front chin with a section that looks like an extension of the screen, housing two touch-capacitive buttons: one for AI and one for quick notes. This section can also scroll pages when you swipe from the middle to the left or right. It is a cool idea, and very handy when you need to scroll tens of pages at once. AINOTE 2's elegant look extends from its exterior to its software. The user interface is very clean and not cluttered with an abundance of buttons. The tablet prioritizes the note-taking experience, and when you unlock it, it defaults to the list of all notes and folders. Additionally, there is a separate "Schedule" section with your calendar, tasks, memos, and other productivity features. You can connect your Outlook or Google account or use a local calendar. The tablet has quite a lot of AI features powered by OpenAI's GPT-5 and Google's Gemini 3. Besides a standard app with all your chats, you can invoke AI by pressing its dedicated button and dictating your request. It is not limited to just chats. It works with the built-in calendar, and you can tell it to create events, tasks, notes, and more. Additionally, AI features are integrated into the built-in notepad, allowing you to summarize notes, ask questions about your notes, and more. The tablet can OCR handwritten text in different languages (about 120 languages, which is very impressive), and it surprised me with very good accuracy. Voice note transcription is also available, including a "multiplayer" mode where the tablet detects each speaker. Unfortunately, the AINOTE 2 has no built-in speakers (even though it somehow makes a tapping noise when you flip pages using the Quick Bar), so the only way to listen to something is to connect a Bluetooth speaker or headphones. However, there are four front-facing mics for dictation, voice notes, AI chats, and more. Unfortunately, certain features require a Pro subscription that costs $5.99/mo or $59.99/year. Those include offline voice transcription, access to better AI models, the ability to edit notes on a PC or mobile app, and extended service coverage similar to Apple Care. It is a bummer to see yet another app, especially in a device that costs $649, but at least they give a free 90-day trial so that you can see if the benefits justify the price. As for the reader, it supports PDF, EPUB, TXT, MOBI, AZW3, DOC(X), XLS(X), PPT(X), JPEG, JPG, and PNG. The app is quite customizable, with features like text contrast/boldness/size adjustments, margins and spacing customization, and the ability to load custom fonts. Plus, you can annotate books with the stylus, add text notes, and use AI to work with them. Just keep in mind that most AI features require an active internet connection. Like with other E-Ink tablets with Android inside, you can load any other reader you want from the Google Play Store or a third-party source. Despite its hefty price tag of $629 or $519 by the time of publishing this article during Prime Day 2026, the AINOTE 2 has quite modest hardware inside. There is only 4 GB of RAM and about 42GB of storage. It is powered by the RockChip RK3576 processor with 8 cores at 2.2 GHz. Given that the tablet runs Android 14 and has Google Play, you can install Android apps, but do not expect much from this thing performance-wise. As for the battery, there is a 4,000 Li-Ion battery, which, on full charge, lasted me for about one week of active daily use of reading and note-taking. The screen has a resolution of 1920x2560 pixels, which equals 300 PPI, a perfect spot for a sharp, nice-to-read display. It supports EMR styluses that do not require charging, and I have to say that the note-taking experience on this tablet is fantastic. Stylus lag is nearly imperceivable, creating a very natural, paper-like feel. The stylus comes in the box (including two extra nibs), and it features an extra button for various actions and an eraser on top. It magnetically attaches to the tablet and stays safely secured. The stylus has a very nice coarse texture, and thanks to using Wacom tech, you can swap it for any other EMR pen if you wish. The AINOTE 2 has no front light, and because of that, the display sits very close to the screen surface, reducing the distance between the stylus tip/your finger and the display to a minimum. No front light is certainly an inconvenience in certain scenarios, but the screen makes up for that with a seriously impressive paper-like feel and writing experience. In dark conditions, you will have to find a lamp, but the good thing is that the screen has a solid anti-glare surface that diffuses light. The display has two modes: Crisp and Fast. Crisp ensures the image stays, well, crisp and sharp, while Fast speeds up refresh rate and response by toning down display resolution and making everything a bit more jagged. In my testing, I only used Fast mode when browsing the web for a much faster render time. The iFlyTek AINOTE is an impressive device, but it's not flawless. A few things disappointed me during a week of using it. Software localization has a bunch of not necessarily broken, but certainly awkward, machine-translated English. System navigation is not good, as there is no universal "Home" gesture. To go to the main page, you have to swipe up and then press the Home button from the multi-tasking window. There are many gestures for various actions, such as display cleanup, screenshot, undo/redo, but no back/forward or Home gestures. I really hate that the tablet won't let me update its software without creating an iFlyTek account first. Finally, privacy could be a concern for some, as most tablets' features require an active internet connection, an iFlyTek account, and sharing data when using AI. If you can overlook its quirks, some of which could be addressed with software updates (I received two with massive changelogs over a single week), and accept a $519 price tag (with a discount), you will be happy with the AINOTE 2. However, if you do not need that many AI features in an E-Ink reader or you want something a bit more affordable, you'd better look at cheaper competitors from BOOX or Amazon, such as the BOOX Go 10.3 Gen 2 or the Kindle Scribe, which is currently 24% off during Prime Day sales. Buy iFlyTek AINOTE 2 on Amazon - $519 | 20% off with Prime What I liked What I disliked Very impressive hardware Beautiful design Fantastic display with an EMR stylus Supports offline voice transcription Easy-to-use software Clever, useful, and well-made AI features A fingerprint scanner Very expensive Some features require a subscription Poor system navigation Mandates a user account No speakers Privacy could be a concern Note: iFlyTek provided the review unit without any editorial input or review guidance. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Look up "greed". If you are willing to buy that it's only inflation, I've got a bridge to sell you.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      416
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      168
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      132
    4. 4
      Xenon
      73
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!