Recommended Posts

so unsupported drivers can be the reason?

I'd say yeah, driver error would do it or hardware itself locked up. Like a HDD crapping out and locking up would do it or a video cards GPU giving out. Typically though with Windows new WDDM 1.x model at least if the graphics drivers do crash then they'll restart so as long as the hardware itself isn't the problem you'll just see the screen flicker (maybe drop out of Aero into basic) and then come back up after the driver restarts. More and more parts of Windows are now driven by hardware acceleration and stuff so any funky graphics drivers will probably give you these problems. Best to update to the newest drivers you can find and see if it changes.

I'd say yeah, driver error would do it or hardware itself locked up. Like a HDD crapping out and locking up would do it or a video cards GPU giving out. Typically though with Windows new WDDM 1.x model at least if the graphics drivers do crash then they'll restart so as long as the hardware itself isn't the problem you'll just see the screen flicker (maybe drop out of Aero into basic) and then come back up after the driver restarts. More and more parts of Windows are now driven by hardware acceleration and stuff so any funky graphics drivers will probably give you these problems. Best to update to the newest drivers you can find and see if it changes.

I don't have those problems when using Windows 7 so I guess I'll just dual boot but I'll try updating the drivers or maybe just use the ones provided by Win8 by default. Thanks, btw :)

so unsupported drivers can be the reason?

Can be, but more and more unlikely as MS is splitting the OS kernel up to prevent drivers from crashing the OS and moving drivers out of kernel and into user space. the biggest culprit, the VGA driver can rarely cause a BSOD anymore.

I hate the fact that the Maps application manages to give me 0 results for EVERYTHING I search

How is this possible? Did Microsoft even remember there is a world beside the U.S?

What are you searching for? I just Win-Q'ed Jakarta, Timbuktu and Picadilly Circus and it zoomed right to them.

Bing Maps seems to accept quite a few qualifiers. (i.e.: "Odessa Europe", "Avon UK")

What are you searching for? I just Win-Q'ed Jakarta, Timbuktu and Picadilly Circus and it zoomed right to them.

Bing Maps seems to accept quite a few qualifiers. (i.e.: "Odessa Europe", "Avon UK")

My street for exemple. Or even the main street of Lisbon (Avenida da Liberdade) failed to get any results.

Just tried searching for Picadilly, and it failed.

Something is wrong here.

Ok, so I have a question...

Personally I have no paricular like/dislike's for Windows 8 vs Windows 7. I get that things change. I understand both sides of the coin. My questions is this...

I don't just have a "few" applications I use. I don't have 10 or 20. I have HUNDREDS of applications. 20-30 difference racing simulation titles, other games, virtualization applications, networking tools, programming tools, Microsoft Office, etc etc etc etc etc.

So, having said that, in Windows 7 and prior to, with the Start Menu/button, I was able to sort through all of those quickly and Pin what I used most often, but could still quickly get to what I wanted because it was alphabetized in a sorted list. In Windows 8, as I install one application after another, I have hundreds, if not thousands of tiles now, page after page after page of useless garbage that is getting in the way of my productivity. I get that once I find an application I can Pin it, but I'm struggling with the efficiency of the Metro interface for someone that uses their PC the way I do.

So for those in the know, how do I...

1) Automatically sort the applications on the Metro UI.

2) or Automatically move newly installed/created box/icons to the first MetroUI page so i can find them easily.

3) Sort per application, like a folder. I have to be doing this wrong, but it would be nice if I could combine applications specific Metro boxes into a single box that I could highlight/hover and it would pop-out to that application box with those apps/links isolated.

4) Per 3, I have many applications that don't just install a single application link, but have many other, sometimes nested, applications links for other applications tools. (think Microsoft Office 2010).

I think you can see my dilema here. I want to be able to properly manage these in Windows 8. I get I may have to do it different then I did before, but what's really killing it for me right now is how poorly it manages older software that is expected a Start Menu folder to put something into. Even the Administrator Tools when enabled on the MetroUI spam the UI with 10-15 boxes. Would be nice to have 1 box, that when I hover or click on would pop out another mini UI that has JUST those apps/boxes in it.

Help!!!

Thanks!

Ok, so I have a question...

Personally I have no paricular like/dislike's for Windows 8 vs Windows 7. I get that things change. I understand both sides of the coin. My questions is this...

I don't just have a "few" applications I use. I don't have 10 or 20. I have HUNDREDS of applications. 20-30 difference racing simulation titles, other games, virtualization applications, networking tools, programming tools, Microsoft Office, etc etc etc etc etc.

So, having said that, in Windows 7 and prior to, with the Start Menu/button, I was able to sort through all of those quickly and Pin what I used most often, but could still quickly get to what I wanted because it was alphabetized in a sorted list. In Windows 8, as I install one application after another, I have hundreds, if not thousands of tiles now, page after page after page of useless garbage that is getting in the way of my productivity. I get that once I find an application I can Pin it, but I'm struggling with the efficiency of the Metro interface for someone that uses their PC the way I do.

So for those in the know, how do I...

1) Automatically sort the applications on the Metro UI.

2) or Automatically move newly installed/created box/icons to the first MetroUI page so i can find them easily.

3) Sort per application, like a folder. I have to be doing this wrong, but it would be nice if I could combine applications specific Metro boxes into a single box that I could highlight/hover and it would pop-out to that application box with those apps/links isolated.

4) Per 3, I have many applications that don't just install a single application link, but have many other, sometimes nested, applications links for other applications tools. (think Microsoft Office 2010).

I think you can see my dilema here. I want to be able to properly manage these in Windows 8. I get I may have to do it different then I did before, but what's really killing it for me right now is how poorly it manages older software that is expected a Start Menu folder to put something into. Even the Administrator Tools when enabled on the MetroUI spam the UI with 10-15 boxes. Would be nice to have 1 box, that when I hover or click on would pop out another mini UI that has JUST those apps/boxes in it.

Help!!!

Thanks!

Windows 8 wasn't designed for you. It was designed for someone who lives on Facebook all day. So you should probably stick with "The Real Mans OS" Windows 7.

Honestly with that many used applications, the Start screen does in fact seem designed for him, since he can have them all pinned to the start screen, organized just as he wishes into named group. and to find all he can simply zoom out or to go all apps and have it all sorted alphabetically, with headers, and groups, just like the old start menu, just far more organized.

I thought i'd reserve my opinion until actually getting a feel of Windows 8 and trying it out. I'm quite disappointed with it after a few days of running it side by side with my Windows 7 machine. I'm pretty sure the longer I continue using Windows 8, the more I will come to dislike it. I don't expect a new OS to be exactly the same as its predecessor but Windows 8 feels like quite a big step backwards without offering much.

Some of the things i picked up on-

1) Just like in office, there was nothing wrong with explorer file menu. Ribbon over complicates things are looks fugly and ironically I stopped using office years ago partly because of this.

2) Metro and desktops don't go together. I want my machines to boot straight to my desktop. I don't want to waste time navigating through metro just to get into desktop.

3) Being the lazy person I am, I use start for all my program needs in Windows 7, just type whatever I need and viola there it is. In Windows 8 I hit the Windows key + F and search for whatever I need but wait, but I then need to click and define if my search is for an app or files (dont we already have file search in explorer, Computer->Search?)

4) Full screen music/video playback seriously? If I wanted a media centre i'd be using my PS3

TL;DR. Don't fix it if it ain't broke.

2) Metro and desktops don't go together. I want my machines to boot straight to my desktop. I don't want to waste time navigating through metro just to get into desktop.

You'd rather waste time by first opening your email program... nope, no new emails. Then opening your calendar, nope nothing on calendar. Then opening weather... no rain today. It goes on and on. It streamlines tasks.

After checking these things, the next thing I would do on Windows 7 is open the start menu and search for Visual Studio or something like that. In Windows 8, I already have all the email, weather, calendar information and already have the start menu open.

So Windows 8 starts, I check info, type 'vi' and press enter and I'm being productive - not Facebooking. How long would it take me to do all that on Win7?

3) Being the lazy person I am, I use start for all my program needs in Windows 7, just type whatever I need and viola there it is. In Windows 8 I hit the Windows key + F and search for whatever I need but wait, but I then need to click and define if my search is for an app or files (dont we already have file search in explorer, Computer->Search?)

Just like in Windows 7, you can hit Windows key, and just start typing. It will search for apps. Hitting Windows key + F, then clicking on apps to search for apps is a silly procedure. If that's what you want, hit Windows key to search apps and Windows key + W to search settings. Windows key + F is just for searching for files.

4) Full screen music/video playback seriously? If I wanted a media centre i'd be using my PS3

Windows Media Player is still there, just like in Windows 7. And you can still install any media player you like, just like in Windows 7.

Ok, so I have a question...

Personally I have no paricular like/dislike's for Windows 8 vs Windows 7. I get that things change. I understand both sides of the coin. My questions is this...

I don't just have a "few" applications I use. I don't have 10 or 20. I have HUNDREDS of applications. 20-30 difference racing simulation titles, other games, virtualization applications, networking tools, programming tools, Microsoft Office, etc etc etc etc etc.

So, having said that, in Windows 7 and prior to, with the Start Menu/button, I was able to sort through all of those quickly and Pin what I used most often, but could still quickly get to what I wanted because it was alphabetized in a sorted list. In Windows 8, as I install one application after another, I have hundreds, if not thousands of tiles now, page after page after page of useless garbage that is getting in the way of my productivity. I get that once I find an application I can Pin it, but I'm struggling with the efficiency of the Metro interface for someone that uses their PC the way I do.

So for those in the know, how do I...

1) Automatically sort the applications on the Metro UI.

2) or Automatically move newly installed/created box/icons to the first MetroUI page so i can find them easily.

3) Sort per application, like a folder. I have to be doing this wrong, but it would be nice if I could combine applications specific Metro boxes into a single box that I could highlight/hover and it would pop-out to that application box with those apps/links isolated.

4) Per 3, I have many applications that don't just install a single application link, but have many other, sometimes nested, applications links for other applications tools. (think Microsoft Office 2010).

I think you can see my dilema here. I want to be able to properly manage these in Windows 8. I get I may have to do it different then I did before, but what's really killing it for me right now is how poorly it manages older software that is expected a Start Menu folder to put something into. Even the Administrator Tools when enabled on the MetroUI spam the UI with 10-15 boxes. Would be nice to have 1 box, that when I hover or click on would pop out another mini UI that has JUST those apps/boxes in it.

Help!!!

Thanks!

Ok, I'll try to hit everthing, but that's a lot to respond to.

1) Unpin tiles you don't neeed.

First, yes new software goes to the far right of the start screen. If you install lots of software, you will have lots of tiles. Any tiles you don't wait, unpin them. This will make it way more manageable.

2) Organize tiles into groups.

You can organize tiles into groups. Search for instruction how to do this, it's dead easy.

3) Name your tile groups.

Again, search for instructions if you don't know how.

4) Don't have an app pinned? Search for it. Open the start screen and just start typing.

5) Remember, the All Programs menu is still there, just like in Windows 7.

The All Programs menu in Windows 8 is also an alphabetically sorted list, just like in Windows 7.

In Windows 7, you could only pin a couple programs to your start menu. Today, in Windows 8, you have to option of pinning many many more.

You'd rather waste time by first opening your email program... nope, no new emails. Then opening your calendar, nope nothing on calendar. Then opening weather... no rain today. It goes on and on. It streamlines tasks.

After checking these things, the next thing I would do on Windows 7 is open the start menu and search for Visual Studio or something like that. In Windows 8, I already have all the email, weather, calendar information and already have the start menu open.

So Windows 8 starts, I check info, type 'vi' and press enter and I'm being productive - not Facebooking. How long would it take me to do all that on Win7?

I actually have a e-mail/calendar & weather gadget in Windows 7 with the advantage of these being that they are non instrusive.

Just like in Windows 7, you can hit Windows key, and just start typing. It will search for apps. Hitting Windows key + F, then clicking on apps to search for apps is a silly procedure. If that's what you want, hit Windows key to search apps and Windows key + W to search settings. Windows key + F is just for searching for files.

Hitting the Windows key did nothing for me in RP so I assumed Windows Key + F was the only method around this. SIlly indeed.

You'd rather waste time by first opening your email program... nope, no new emails. Then opening your calendar, nope nothing on calendar. Then opening weather... no rain today. It goes on and on. It streamlines tasks.

Which one of the fantastic Metro is replacing Live Mail or Outlook again? I like how you kinda pretend that 'live notifications' are somehow new or unique cause they are anchored to a tile.

After checking these things, the next thing I would do on Windows 7 is open the start menu and search for Visual Studio or something like that. In Windows 8, I already have all the email, weather, calendar information and already have the start menu open.

So Windows 8 starts, I check info, type 'vi' and press enter and I'm being productive - not Facebooking. How long would it take me to do all that on Win7?

On Win7, I've already clicked my pinned icons for VS and my 'real' email app while glancing at my weather gadget.

Windows Media Player is still there, just like in Windows 7. And you can still install any media player you like, just like in Windows 7.

Yet another case where Metro is defended simply because the current apps are so ill conceived for the most part.

Yet another case where Metro is defended simply because the current apps are so ill conceived for the most part.

Well, it's like saying Windows sucks because you're forced to use Internet Explorer... it completely ignores the fact that alternative browsers exist. Why complain about the metro video app when you can use Windows Media Player? Or VLC? Or any one of the hundreds of alternatives? Especially when many of you like to use Chrome (or Firefox) and VLC anyway.

If you ignore metro apps you don't like, in the worst case you're no worse off than you were before. Best case, you find some useful metro apps you like that will never be available for Windows 7. This will be more obvious once the Windows Store is open to all developers to submit apps.

Right now, developers have to attend an AE (Application Excellence) lab (typically on-site at a Microsoft location, but sometimes over the telephone/sktype/watever I think) and have their app reviewed and approved by a Microsoft engineer. If it's not approved, you have to wait until the Store opens for all developers.

3) Being the lazy person I am, I use start for all my program needs in Windows 7, just type whatever I need and viola there it is. In Windows 8 I hit the Windows key + F and search for whatever I need but wait, but I then need to click and define if my search is for an app or files (dont we already have file search in explorer, Computer->Search?)

I'm a bit confused here. You seem to say you don't want to use the Start menu or screen to search for files because you can just search in Explorer. You also complain that you have to choose between apps and files when searching on the Start screen even though apps is chosen by default.

Fair point, I guess it just seems repetitive that everytime a deficiency is voiced about a poorly implemented Metro app, the desktop solution is the first response instead of agreement of the problem.

Well, hasn't the response to a deficiency in a desktop app always been to use something else? I don't see the difference. Sure the metro apps right now lack things, they're pretty new and really like v1.0 apps. We can agree that they've got problems but if you don't want to wait for them to get upgraded and fixed then the only option is to fall back to another app.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Limited time Prime Day deal cuts price of this Hisense 65" 4K smart TV in half by Ivan Jenic It’s Amazon Prime Day, and brands are offering great deals to consumers. One of the best deals of the day is definitely this Hisense 65" U7, which is currently $799.99 on Amazon, down from $1,499.99. That's nearly 50% off and $700 saved on this feature-packed 4K TV (purchase link down below). The U7 uses Mini-LED backlighting with up to 3,000 local dimming zones and up to 3,000 nits of peak brightness. That means blacks are truly deep and highlights are punchy enough to hold up even in bright rooms. The screen is covered with a dual-layer anti-reflection coating, which prevents the afternoon overhead lights from washing the picture. For gaming, the native 165Hz refresh rate and VRR 330 support make this one a great TV option for PS5 and Xbox Series X. The TV even features a native game mode, which should help minimize the input lag for a better gaming experience. Audio is handled by a 2.1.2 channel system tuned by Devialet, which is a notable partnership for a TV at this price. Additionally, Dolby Vision IQ, Dolby Atmos, and IMAX Enhanced are all supported. It runs Fire TV with Alexa+ built in. So, if you’re looking for a sharp, large screen to watch the World Cup on, the U7 at this price is definitely an attractive option. Speaking of which, Hisense is the official sponsor of the World Cup, which should mean absolutely nothing to you, and isn’t the reason why you should by this TV. The reason why you should buy it is that it’s “la bella televisione, HDTV-compatible, beautiful,” and available at half the price. Hisense 65" U7 Mini-LED 4K Smart Fire TV - $799.99 | 47% off on Amazon Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • eM Client 10.4.5600.0 by Razvan Serea eM Client is a full featured e-mail client with a modern and easy to use interface. eM Client also offers calendar, tasks, contacts and chat. eM Client supports all major services including Gmail, Exchange, iCloud, and Outlook.com. You can easily import your data from most of the other e-mail clients. This includes Microsoft Outlook, Outlook Express, Windows Mail, Windows Live Mail, Thunderbird, The Bat and more. eM Client fully supports touch devices like touch-enabled laptops, tablets and hybrid devices. Use your email client easily in a modern way. eM Client PRO vs. Free version While the Free license allows you to set up the maximum of two accounts in the application, it is possible to add an unlimited number of accounts with the PRO license. The PRO license also enables you to use eM Client for commercial purposes. Commercial use is any activity that helps you make profit, the Free license therefore cannot be used in company settings or on personal computers for business correspondence. PRO users also gain access to the dedicated support system and to the licensing manager. eM Client has been fully optimized to run smoothly on Windows Vista, 7, 8, 10 and 11. eM Client 10.4.5600.0 changelog: Improved memory management Improved MS Teams support A lot of other fixes Download: eM Client 10.4.5600 | 128.0 MB (Free, paid upgrade available) View: eM Client Website | eM Client Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Re: Capitalism. It's just 1 of dozens of economic models currently-adopted worldwide; most national models separate money from politics thereby limiting the influence wealth carries over the economy (due to limited tentacles wealth politics has over the broader economy). The "American model" of unfettered financial influence should NOT be the variant of pure capitalism adopted worldwide. More regulations formulated within this variant is effectively useless due to the misalignment between regulatory objectives and fundamental influence wealth politics carry over the market. Re: enough money. Without constraining the breadth/depth/scope/scale that any measure of money/wealth can have within a market, there will always inherently be those who have "enough money" and those who do not. Those without "enough money" will always lose -- regardless if a bedroom DJ, indie developer, or million-dollar corporation going against a billion-dollar mega-corporation. The evil is the absence of guardrails against the influence of wealth; not the mere existence of wealth. Re: dragged through the courts. The liberalist nature of litigation does not exclude anyone, anywhere, for any reason for getting dragged through the courts. Rather than formalize remediation pathways for various perceived ills, everything is left up to flawed interpretations... and this is where a litigation-averse community fails to thrive (thus a losing proposition when dragged to courts). Everyone should have more protections and clear remediation strategies! Going to an alternate remediation arbitration is OK so long as the case review and remediation processes are clear and transparent. For corporations, hit them where it hurts: automatic financial penalties. (PS: This is where corporate risk management strategies would do well to behave more ethically.) Overall, failure to truly shake-up the incentive core and regulatory extremities of the economic market will necessarily mean that all other actions are simply applying lipstick on a pig. Change begins from the inside. Is the root cause of the problem that a majority of consumers within a market goes for Option Brand-name versus Option Indie? Or that brand-name is spending foreign money to control domestic markets? Or that money is the objective measure for success across all walks of life? Or that deep pockets dictate the moral and ethical rights/wrongs of entire societies? Regardless of the answer (and there's nothing inherently wrong with being a socialist or communist or whatever label your surroundings deem 'cool' or 'uncool') there's a common thread: If a market truly wants to nurture domestic innovation, then performative finger-wagging will do nothing to that end.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      407
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      167
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      71
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!