Recommended Posts

This is not intended to start a flame war, just express my opinion and see if anyone else feels the same way.

Honestly I moved to OS 10.5 when I started to get tired of using XP and Vista's performance bugged me, pre-SP1. When Windows 7 came out I found it very interesting and I enjoy using it at work, but with a good MacBook still having life in it I had no reason to switch, I alo enjoyed 10.6, and to a lesser extent 10.7. With 10.8 coming out and not liking its direction I was looking forward to Windows 8. After playing with the first public release I hoped to disable the Metro UI with a registry hack (I do not know if this still works or not), and then use the Explorer interface that I'm used to with it's Windows 8 additions. Now that the newest Preview is out I find myself again finding OS X as the better option. Which honestly really annoys me as I was looking forward to migrating back to Windows to avoid 10.8.

This time instead of migrating from an OS I don't like to one I find interesting, I find I'm picking the lesser of two evils. What worries me most is that my parents are in their 50's and my mother has been using a Windows computer since 3.1, currently on 7, and when I put her in front of Windows 8, it frustrated her so much that she walked away, came back a few hours later and then got annoyed again. An OS upgrade should never frustrate a long time user to the point that they give up on it, and feel they need to force themselves to learn it. I will probably just be leaving them on Windows 7 until it's no longer supported or end up moving them to a Mac, as they enjoy using my iPad.

Does anyone else feel that Windows 8 is going to be a black mark for any PC user not on a touch screen?

I personally feel torn between an OS that I don't like where it is started going to 10.7/8 and one that I feel jumped right into everything I hate with Windows 8, which I hoped would be the OS to pull me back to Windows after how much I enjoyed Windows 7.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1081527-windows-8-vs-os-108/
Share on other sites

Do you really find the start screen that confusing? Windows 8 really isn't all that different from Windows 7.

While the apps right now might not be optimized for mouse, the start screen is very optimized for mouse users.

Don't forget that you have to learn how to use all software. Right click context menus aren't any more intuitive. What you consider to be intuitive is probably not as intuitive as you think.

New interfaces aren't for people with no desire to learn them. I suspect there's a generation gap on who's willing to adjust to the new stuff and who isn't.

I don't even know if it's that. I've been a Windows user since 3.0, so I've been through a "relearning" already when 95 came out, and so far Windows 8 hasn't been a problem for me either. In fact, I find it to be pretty good, especially when more Metro programs become available. I'd say it's perfect for tablets and touch screens, and the desktop is still there, so I don't see what all the fuss is about. I can use my old programs just fine like I could in Windows 7.

  • Like 4

WIndows 8 start screen is only useful if you're downloading Metro applications from their store.

Other than that, it's just like a start menu where you hunt/search for applications that you have download from your desktop.

I don't even know if it's that. I've been a Windows user since 3.0, so I've been through a "relearning" already when 95 came out, and so far Windows 8 hasn't been a problem for me either. In fact, I find it to be pretty good, especially when more Metro programs become available. I'd say it's perfect for tablets and touch screens, and the desktop is still there, so I don't see what all the fuss is about. I can use my old programs just fine like I could in Windows 7.

STOP MAKING SENSE!!! :)

  • Like 2

and the desktop is still there, so I don't see what all the fuss is about. I can use my old programs just fine like I could in Windows 7.

Exactly. You can completely ignore WinRT on desktops. The only new thing you have to learn is the start screen. And that's not very difficult to learn.

The important thing for mouse users to learn is that you don't have to scroll. The start screen automatically scrolls for you when you move the mouse to the edge of the screen.

Other than that, it's just like a start menu where you hunt/search for applications that you have download from your desktop.

True. And that's not a bad thing.

Maybe my biggest issue is that I look at Windows 7 and think: "that looks beautiful" but when I look at Metro I think: "cluttered, messy, ugly, POS" Just looking at it really makes me feel hateful I like the interface on Windows Phone, but every time I try it on a desktop I just find myself getting angry, probably because I try to do what makes sense to me and find out that nope, thats not how it works, then I have to figure out how its supposed to work.

I just don't find it intuitive at all. LIke I said, my parents understood the iPad instantly with out having ever used an previous Apple device. Windows 8, they get frustrated at till they walk away.

I'd be happy with Windows 8 if they gave the option to disable Metro, for those of us happy with our desktops that don't need touch interfaces.

On a touch-enabled device, i'd like Metro.

Give us the choice. It's not that hard, and I seriously believe it would make people on both sides quite happy.

  • Like 2

Maybe my biggest issue is that I look at Windows 7 and think: "that looks beautiful" but when I look at Metro I think: "cluttered, messy, ugly, POS" Just looking at it really makes me feel hateful I like the interface on Windows Phone, but every time I try it on a desktop I just find myself getting angry, probably because I try to do what makes sense to me and find out that nope, thats not how it works, then I have to figure out how its supposed to work.

I had that problem with Windows Phone 7, it took me about 6 months to customize the start screen to my liking. But once I got it how I like it, I wouldn't ever go back to any other phone. Give it some time, wait for some quality apps... See how it goes.

I'd be happy with Windows 8 if they gave the option to disable Metro, for those of us happy with our desktops that don't need touch interfaces.

On a touch-enabled device, i'd like Metro.

Give us the choice. It's not that hard, and I seriously believe it would make people on both sides quite happy.

The way I see it for the people not excited about Metro Apps......... stop thinking of it as a "Metro UI" and just think of it as a new start menu.

Remember Windows 2000 and earlier Windows classic Start menu? Remember that the default for XP was a wider non-classic Start menu? A few years later, Vista and then 7??

Where I work people are still stuck on the classic Start menu of XP in some cases.. They are in for a shock when they switch to 7..8... Don't use the Metro apps if you don't want to.. Get rid of all the link on the Metro Start page.??Put Desktop apps on it.. Then just think of it as a reallllly big Start menu.. Which, when you think about it, makes perfect sense.. How often do you click on the start menu to ponder over the stuff you have running in the background (behind the start menu anyway)? You click the start menu to to get to something in it.. Why not make it take up the whole screen so you can have access to even more?

This Start menu change has pretty much been happening ever since XP.

Regarding Windows 8 vs 10.8... Not thinking much of either vs their predecessors. Both are just improvements on the previous (7 and 10.7)... Mac users will probably stick with 10.8 and Windows users will probably stick with 8. Not likely to switch OS or something just because of the updates.

I find it interesting when Microsoft Angels come and tell you that "you have to learn" or that "it happened when 95 came out, or XP, whatever".

You guys are completely missing the point, because computers are now easier to use than before: the changes in UI were implemented because they added new features to improve people's productivity, That's not the case anymore. Microsoft has changed everything in Windows 8 not to make it more productive or add new features... The company made a MESS of an OS to try to grab the tablet market AND the desktop market.

It is clearly not pleasing any of those costumers because the OS is too heavy for a tablet (on heavy computer-like tablets) and it is a mess of an UI for desktop users.

Windows 8 did not improve the UI... It is a frankenstein UI. All of the other improvements in the desktop OS (which are great, BTW) are being totally eclipsed by this HORRIFYING, FRANKENSTEIN, NO SENSE UI.

Nobody has to "wait for the apps" or "wait for Microsoft" for this or that... There are already great OS that do the job, like Mac OS X and Windows 7.

This garbage is gonna flop hard. I can hardly believe a company the size of Microsoft, which does Windows for about 30 years could do such a shameless job with this OS.

After using RP I'm still pretty much where I was with CP.

I like the way Metro looks and I'd be happy to use it on a phone and tablet (I have WP7 and really like it), but I hate navigating it and the apps with the mouse (it's not that I can't use it, I just don't like it). Using the multitouch trackpad on my MacBook (and surface on my Magic Mouse) makes it slightly better.

I suspect that I'll never run any Metro apps, except for apps that provide information I want via a live tile so I can quickly switch to Metro, glance at what I want, and then switch back to the Desktop (like a twitter client, RSS reader, e-mail notifications - that sort of thing).

Also, pretty much all the software I use is for design and development. I don't believe the Metro workflow is going to be any good for these kinds of programs.

I also find myself getting annoyed by the charms bar showing up when I'm on the desktop.

That said, I quite like using the search for launching and finding programs, and at the end of the day I'll primarily be using it for.

That real problem I think Microsoft is going to have is not with users like us, but with average users. Every single person I've shown it to can't stand it, and at least half of them have said their next computer will be a Mac.

The changes in 10.7 and 10.8 are implemented in a much smarter way in my opinion.

omg damn you MS for changing something that takes even my sister (who knows squat about pcs btw) a day tops to learn and enjoy. The fact people talk about it like its so hard to use or that its crippling is making me doubt the *tech* intelligence of some people here.

omg damn you MS for changing something that takes even my sister (who knows squat about pcs btw) a day tops to learn and enjoy. The fact people talk about it like its so hard to use or that its crippling is making me doubt the *tech* intelligence of some people here.

Yeah, because we happen not to like something it just happens to logically follow that we simply must be idiots that don't understand it. I mean WinRT is simply so awesome that it's inconceivable for a person to have a legitimate reason to want not to use it. Perhaps we'd all be better off being drones that simply did what we are told and didn't dare to have opinions of our own.

Or in the words of Phillip J Fry "SHUT UP AND TAKE MY MONEY!!!!!!"

omg damn you MS for changing something that takes even my sister (who knows squat about pcs btw) a day tops to learn and enjoy. The fact people talk about it like its so hard to use or that its crippling is making me doubt the *tech* intelligence of some people here.

I wonder what your sister does with the PC other than messaging, web and photo browsing.

Give her an iPad and she will enjoy it even more.

I find it interesting when Microsoft Angels come and tell you that "you have to learn" or that "it happened when 95 came out, or XP, whatever".

You guys are completely missing the point, because computers are now easier to use than before: the changes in UI were implemented because they added new features to improve people's productivity, That's not the case anymore. Microsoft has changed everything in Windows 8 not to make it more productive or add new features... The company made a MESS of an OS to try to grab the tablet market AND the desktop market.

It is clearly not pleasing any of those costumers because the OS is too heavy for a tablet (on heavy computer-like tablets) and it is a mess of an UI for desktop users.

Windows 8 did not improve the UI... It is a frankenstein UI. All of the other improvements in the desktop OS (which are great, BTW) are being totally eclipsed by this HORRIFYING, FRANKENSTEIN, NO SENSE UI.

Nobody has to "wait for the apps" or "wait for Microsoft" for this or that... There are already great OS that do the job, like Mac OS X and Windows 7.

This garbage is gonna flop hard. I can hardly believe a company the size of Microsoft, which does Windows for about 30 years could do such a shameless job with this OS.

Your whole argument about productivity is the same as these, and fails in the same way:

  • ?Mice are nice ideas, but of dubious value for business users? (George Vinall, PC Week, April 24, 1984)
  • ?There is no evidence that people want to use these things.? (John C. Dvorak, San Francisco Examiner, February 19, 1984)
  • ?I was having lots of fun, but in the back of my corporate mind, I couldn't help but think about productivity.? (George Vinall, PC Week, April 24, 1984)
  • ?Does the mouse make the computer more accessible, more friendly, to certain target audiences such as executives? The answer is no.? (Computerworld, October 31, 1983)
  • ?There is no possibility that this device will feel more comfortable to the executive than the keyboard. Because of its ?rollability,? the mouse has the aura of a gimmick?? (Computerworld, October 31, 1983)
  • ?The mouse and its friends are merely diversions in this process. What sounds revolutionary does not necessarily help anyone with anything, and therein lies the true test of commercial longevity.? (David A. Kay, Datamation, October 1983)

Your whole argument about productivity is the same as these, and fails in the same way:

I don't even know why I'm gonna answer to this misunderstanding, because you can't even post something without a garbage and you copy and paste arguments out of nowhere.

Anyway... I did not bash the touch interface, I'm criticizing the complete bad use of it, trying to fit it with a mouse UI.

Can you understand that or is it too hard for you??

I don't even know why I'm gonna answer to this misunderstanding, because you can't even post something without a garbage and you copy and paste arguments out of nowhere.

Anyway... I did not bash the touch interface, I'm criticizing the complete bad use of it, trying to fit it with a mouse UI.

Can you understand that or is it too hard for you??

Uh...don't use metro apps on non-touch PCs? Pin only desktop apps and be done?

Uh...don't use metro apps on non-touch PCs? Pin only desktop apps and be done?

What do I do with the annoying "Charm Bar" showing up every time I point the mouse to the bottom right of the screen?

Why do I have to search for Administrative Tools inside the search box of the Control Panel only and not from the search in the Charm Bar?

What is this name "Charm Bar" anyway?

Why checkdisk is replaced with a black screen when I boot up?

Why can't I simply disable Metro?

Whats the benefit of pulling the screen down to view all of those tiles?

Why a high resolution display looks horrible even on high DPIs?

Those are only a few annoyances.

Uh...don't use metro apps on non-touch PCs? Pin only desktop apps and be done?

If you're using a desktop computer, this is what you should be doing.

Anyone complaining that metro apps don't work well on the desktop is trying to dig trenches with silver spoons... by choice! Don't like metro apps? Don't use them. The-Desktop-Is-Still-There.gif

The start screen is a nice task launcher, even on desktop computers. It's much easier to navigate with a mouse than the old start menu. No need to manually scroll.

I actually find windows 8 desktop to be faster then Windows 7. I really don't have a problem with metro interface but I don't use it..., Maybe on a table I would use it more. Anytime anyone changes anything for any reason people cry all the time just suck it up and use it or don't use it. But stop complaining.

I find it interesting when Microsoft Angels come and tell you that "you have to learn" or that "it happened when 95 came out, or XP, whatever".

You guys are completely missing the point, because computers are now easier to use than before: the changes in UI were implemented because they added new features to improve people's productivity, That's not the case anymore. Microsoft has changed everything in Windows 8 not to make it more productive or add new features... The company made a MESS of an OS to try to grab the tablet market AND the desktop market.

It is clearly not pleasing any of those costumers because the OS is too heavy for a tablet (on heavy computer-like tablets) and it is a mess of an UI for desktop users.

Windows 8 did not improve the UI... It is a frankenstein UI. All of the other improvements in the desktop OS (which are great, BTW) are being totally eclipsed by this HORRIFYING, FRANKENSTEIN, NO SENSE UI.

Nobody has to "wait for the apps" or "wait for Microsoft" for this or that... There are already great OS that do the job, like Mac OS X and Windows 7.

This garbage is gonna flop hard. I can hardly believe a company the size of Microsoft, which does Windows for about 30 years could do such a shameless job with this OS.

I'm an angel? Sweet. (*polishes obviously tarnished chrome halo*)

And I am far more productive in 8 than I was in 7. ON A DESKTOP! WOO!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Go for a Echo Dot or Pop instead. These Echo shows just advertise to you.
    • NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 by Razvan Serea NetSpeedTray is a lightweight, open-source Windows network monitor that shows live upload and download speeds directly on the Taskbar. Designed for efficiency, it quietly sits in the system tray, conserving CPU and battery with dynamic updates. It blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11, adapts to light/dark themes, and auto-positions to avoid overlaps. Features include accurate interface detection, customizable display, optional mini-graph, color coding, granular font and unit control, detailed per-interface history graphs, safe data management, and easy CSV export—bringing the network monitoring Windows forgot. NetSpeedTray key features: Lightweight & Efficient Runs quietly in your system tray without consuming resources. Features a "Dynamic Update Rate" that lowers refresh frequency when the network is idle to save CPU and battery life. Native Look & Feel Blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11 UI. Smart detection for light and dark taskbar themes ensures text is always visible. Intelligent & Adaptive Positioning Automatically finds empty space next to your system tray and shifts to make room for new icons, preventing overlaps. Seamless OS Integration Behaves like a native Windows component. Hides instantly with auto-hiding taskbar Hides when a fullscreen app is active Smart Network Monitoring Accurate by Default: Auto mode identifies your main internet connection and ignores noise from VPNs or virtual adapters. Easy Interface Selection: Switch effortlessly between Auto, All, or Selected network interfaces via intuitive radio buttons. Total Visual Customization Free Move Mode: Unlock and place the widget anywhere on your screen. Optional Mini-Graph: Real-time graph of recent network activity with adjustable opacity. Color Coding: Customize colors and speed thresholds to quickly see network status. Granular Display Control Text & Font: Adjust font family, size, weight, and alignment. Units: Automatic (B/s, KB/s, MB/s) or fixed Mbps display. Precision: Set decimal places and always show them for uniform appearance. Detailed & Intelligent History Graph Smart Scale: Logarithmic scale shows low-level traffic and large spikes clearly. Per-Interface Filtering: View speed history for specific adapters (Wi-Fi, Ethernet, VPN). Safe & Efficient Data Management: Adjustable retention, automatic cleanup, optimized database. Easy Data Export: Export raw data to .csv or save high-quality graphs for reports. NetSpeedTray v1.3.3: The Updater Fix A stabilization release that repairs a critical regression in v1.3.2: the app shipped without OpenSSL, which silently broke every HTTPS request — including the built-in update checker (the "Could not check for updates" error many of you hit). This release restores it, hardens the build so it can't happen again, and fixes a startup crash plus four other reported bugs. Changes: Fixed update checking — Resolved a critical issue that prevented the app from checking for updates ("Could not check for updates"). Fixed startup crash with Auto-Cycling — The app no longer crashes on launch after enabling Cycle display mode. Fixed incorrect network speeds on 10GbE adapters — Multi-gigabit network cards now display speeds correctly instead of being stuck at 0. Improved color coding — Default color is shown when idle, and color/threshold changes now apply immediately without restarting. Fullscreen visibility fix — The widget now correctly stays visible over fullscreen apps when Keep Visible is enabled. Improved AMD Ryzen temperature detection — More reliable CPU temperature monitoring for Ryzen processors. Cleaner upgrades — Installer now removes outdated application files during upgrades, preventing DLL/version conflicts while preserving user settings. Improved stability — Fixed potential DLL loading issues by excluding critical OpenSSL and NumPy components from UPX compression. Better settings window — Scrollbars removed and layout improved for a cleaner experience. Localization improvements — Updated translations and completed missing UI text across all supported languages. More reliable releases — Added regression tests covering recent critical fixes, bringing the test suite to 196 passing tests. [full release notes] Download: NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 | 87.9 MB (Open Source) Download: NetSpeedTray Portable | 101.0 MB View: NetSpeedTray Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Why Delta Chat is the best decentralized messenger you have probably never tried by Paul Hill There is no shortage of messaging apps out there; we have WhatsApp, Messenger, and Telegram, just to name a few. While Meta has taken steps to incorporate encryption into Messenger and WhatsApp, they still leave a lot to be desired. If you are in the market for a messaging app that promotes security, privacy, and optional anonymity, you'll want to read what I have to say about Delta Chat. For those not familiar with Delta Chat, rather than relying on centralized servers as you do with Facebook Messenger, it relies on email. Essentially, it is a chat interface that feels like a messaging app, but secretly in the background, it is firing off emails. In the past, you used to have to sign in with your email account. When you sent messages to people, it would just be sending encrypted messages to their inbox, which their Delta Chat client would decrypt. When I first learned about Delta Chat, it required users to sign in with an email account, but I was pleasantly surprised upon trying it in 2026 that this is no longer a requirement, or the preferred method was to use the app. Recently, I’ve tried UAD-ng on my old Nokia 3.4 to disable most of the Google apps because the bootloader is locked, and this is the next best option. While finding replacement apps in F-Droid, I came across Delta Chat again, and it has undergone quite a big change since I last used it, with its new chatmail relays, which no longer require you to sign in to your own email account, providing anonymity, and they offer greater security. Android and Desktop Delta Chat apps. Not only does it run on my de-googled phone, but it also works on desktop computers and iOS, making it truly ubiquitous. For me, Delta Chat is a wonderful alternative messenger because it gives you more control. It supports switching between different profiles, which you can set up super quickly; you don’t register a username, you don’t register a password. The only thing you do have is a random string email address on a chatmail relay (which you don’t have to memorize). To maintain access to your profile, you just need to add a second device to your account via QR code or make a backup of your account, which you can restore later. Fail to do these, your account is gone - as it should be if you don’t want to leave accounts that could get hacked later on. My decision to block Google stuff on my Nokia was done for practical reasons; the device sucked when it launched, and it sucks even more now. The nice thing about F-Droid and the apps within is that they’re usually lightweight, free of bloat, and work well on that device. What was inconvenient for me was that it was hard to send messages from that device, say if I wanted to copy a code over to my main phone or send family members a link from that device. That’s when I decided to look at the available chat apps and saw Delta Chat. Another nice thing about Delta Chat is its notifications. Some messaging apps rely on Google’s ecosystem for notification transport on Android; however, with Delta Chat, it can use Google’s solutions if you have Play Services or MicroG installed. Otherwise, it is able to keep a background connection to the chatmail relay server so that you can get notified when you receive a message. As free software, the code of Delta Chat is open for all who want to take it and build upon it. In the future, if the developers of Delta Chat make a catastrophically bad decision and take the app in an undesirable direction, users can take the code and fork the project. This contrasts with closed-source apps from corporations that can take their products in any direction they like. By relying on free software instead of closed-source programs, you actually control your computing. I’ve spoken at length about how running this type of software is like owning your own home rather than renting it. The same applies here; if you use Delta Chat, you don’t need to worry about it going away in the future. Whether it is Telegram, WhatsApp, or Messenger, you are required to register a username and password to use these services. A major flaw in this design is that anyone can try various passwords and potentially break into your account with your complete chat history intact. Sure, there is encryption in Messenger, where you need a second PIN and two-factor authentication in Telegram, but breaches happen all the time. Unlike before, when you used to sign in to your email account to send and receive messages, the primary way to do it now is to create an account on a chatmail relay. The resulting email address is a random string followed by the name of the relay you pick. This means you can start and begin adding contacts Without a username and password, you either need to ensure you have a backup or at least one device running your Delta Chat profile. The primary way to log in on another device is to go to the settings and add a second device. Then, you’ll just scan a QR code with your new device, and it’ll log in to your account and sync all your chat history and contacts. To end users, Delta Chat just looks like any instant messenger; however, it is really sending your messages as encrypted emails to your contact. This is pretty cool from a censorship perspective, as it makes the service more difficult to block. Previously, the main way to use the app was by logging in with email, but nowadays, it’s recommended that you use chatmail relays. Chatmail relays temporarily hold messages in case your device is offline. They are cheap, simple servers that don’t store data as group states. Other information, like your name and avatar, only exists on your device and the devices of those you share your contact information with. The relays are also decentralized and operated by various groups and individuals. It is even possible to set up your own chatmail relay, but most people will want to use one hosted elsewhere. To keep your messages secure, Delta Chat uses a secure subset of the OpenPGP standard that gives you automatic end-to-end encryption. It also uses Secure-Join to exchange encryption setup information through QR-code scanning or invite links. Autocrypt is also used to automatically establish end-to-end encryption between contacts and all members of group chat, but sometime this year Autocrypt v2 will be rolled out, bringing post-quantum resistant encryption and forward secrecy. The Delta Chat FAQ is an interesting read that explains many more details about the app. Credit: Pexels Delta Chat is unique among messaging apps because it is built on email, a technology that’s decades old and isn’t going anywhere soon. What’s more is that email is not centralized either, so it’s far more difficult for any authoritarian regime to disrupt the Delta Chat app. I haven’t spoken too much about features yet, so I will do that now. Delta Chat allows you to do one-on-one chats, group chats, and create channels. It also supports file sharing and making audio and video calls when chatting one-to-one, but it’s not available for group chats right now. At the time of writing, the calling functionality is disabled and can be enabled in Settings > Advanced > Debug Calls. I have used the video calling feature, and the quality is excellent. It works over WebRTC, another open standard. The app also lets you send voice notes, enables disappearing messages, and has its own app ecosystem. I did try playing chess one time there, but it was a bit spotty; though, we did manage to complete the game with a victory for me. To add people to Delta Chat, you can either give them your Delta Chat link or your QR code to scan. These are the only ways to add users, so you won't have any spam bots bothering you. If the people you want to chat with don't have the app yet, just send them your link, and it will take them to a webpage where they can install the app and then add you. It's really quick for them to install it and get started, which is nice. Credit: Microsoft. The Majorana 2 quantum chip unveiled in 2026. I do not think quantum computers are too far out now, and I do hope that Delta Chat is able to push out Autocrypt v2 sooner, rather than later, so bad actors do not attempt to collect encrypted communications and then decrypt them in the future using quantum computers. By getting people’s messages post-quantum-safe now, users won’t have to worry when quantum computers start cracking legacy encryption. Overall, I would recommend this app to people who are already past WhatsApp and Messenger and have perhaps begun using apps like Telegram or Session. It shares a lot of characteristics with these apps and goes a lot further than Telegram in terms of security. By being based on email, it is also resistant to censorship, and the lack of a username and password makes you anonymous (if you want to be) and safe from brute force password cracking attempts. Let me know in the comments if you’ve tried Delta Chat recently. Do you think it's a good bulwark against governments that are tightening their grip on the internet?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      474
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      220
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!