2012 Nintendo E3 Press Conference


Recommended Posts

I don't know about that - Zombi U definitely demonstrates a good job at adding immersion by making you shuffle through your back-pack using a touch screen, or entering in a keycode on a touch screen while a bunch of zombies are chasing you. It's a bit more realistic then twitching your thumbs to move an analogue stick around.

sort of better, BUT it still breaks you out of the game to do it, AND resistive screen.

sort of better, BUT it still breaks you out of the game to do it, AND resistive screen.

No you are not took out of the game at all as well just as in real life if you was in that situation you have to stop take your backpack from behind you and look through for more ammo or something else . also this provides more Tension or Fear because your busy focusing on this and ya look back up at the screen OH **** a Zombie what do you do.

So it provides more immersion did you even watch the Developer video on it omg. it provides pure immersion but at the same time it frees up the big screen for other stuff liek oh how about no hud as an option as they pointed out you can take the UI stuff away . so i dont see how you feel it takes you away from the game also to point out 99.8% of the time in other games when ya need something from your inventory the game is paused while ya look for what ya need here it is not as things are all in motion while your looking through your junk on the gamepad.

Survival Horror is what the game is and well they did a good job at it From what i been hearing on other forums is the version of Zombie U we saw was from an earlier Development kit so everyone is assuming

No you are not took out of the game at all as well just as in real life if you was in that situation you have to stop take your backpack from behind you and look through for more ammo or something else . also this provides more Tension or Fear because your busy focusing on this and ya look back up at the screen OH **** a Zombie what do you do.

so when im in the middle of a battlefield in real life and i decide to check my backpack, suddenly i'm in my living room and when i put my backpack on, I'm suddenly in the middle of the battlefield again.

sorry but thats bs, as soon as you have to look away from the screen to look onanother screen, you break immersion, you're taken out of the game.

and no it doesnt add fear or tension, just annoyance, you get the same with an on screen inventory that doesnt break immersion. and in real life when I'm checking my backpack, i can still see zombies coming.

so when im in the middle of a battlefield in real life and i decide to check my backpack, suddenly i'm in my living room and when i put my backpack on, I'm suddenly in the middle of the battlefield again.

sorry but thats bs, as soon as you have to look away from the screen to look onanother screen, you break immersion, you're taken out of the game.

and no it doesnt add fear or tension, just annoyance, you get the same with an on screen inventory that doesnt break immersion. and in real life when I'm checking my backpack, i can still see zombies coming.

annoyance to you i guess cause to me and i am sure many other gamer it adds depth because

As the Developer states in the Developer video to the IGN guy on what he is doing she says he is searching through his Pack on the GP all in real time so he is not out of danger so he could get attacked at any moment .

annoyance to you i guess cause to me and i am sure many other gamer it adds depth because

As the Developer states in the Developer video to the IGN guy on what he is doing she says he is searching through his Pack on the GP all in real time so he is not out of danger so he could get attacked at any moment .

And you can do exactly the same, without being bumped out of the game. you can do the exact same thing on the screen. Going throught he backpack on screen doesn't need to pause the game. if I don't remember wrong, skyrim works this way. that or some other PC RPG. and most action games do.

Making you still be in danger while searching the backpack, but without dumping you out of the game world to search it.

And you can do exactly the same, without being bumped out of the game. you can do the exact same thing on the screen. Going throught he backpack on screen doesn't need to pause the game. if I don't remember wrong, skyrim works this way. that or some other PC RPG. and most action games do.

Making you still be in danger while searching the backpack, but without dumping you out of the game world to search it.

ok a good example is the resident evil games the menu system overlays on the screen when need to do something and you cant see much if anything else on the screen when this happens but the game is still running in real-time so you cant see if a zombie you might hear is to close to you are farther away. with the Gamepad you can see everything on the big screen you just have to take the risk at looking back and fourth from the GP to the big screen not knowing if your luck has run out.

Agian you are still in the gameworld in the same spot you just bend down to look in your pack or so and everything is still happening on the big screen your just nealed down to find something or grab another weapon or so.

S Explain to me an other how this takes you out of your game or the game i mean it is not like the Wii U GP is placed on the Floor or something and ya have to look straight down at your floor.

ok a good example is the resident evil games the menu system overlays on the screen when need to do something and you cant see much if anything else on the screen when this happens but the game is still running in real-time so you cant see if a zombie you might hear is to close to you are farther away. with the Gamepad you can see everything on the big screen you just have to take the risk at looking back and fourth from the GP to the big screen not knowing if your luck has run out.

Agian you are still in the gameworld in the same spot you just bend down to look in your pack or so and everything is still happening on the big screen your just nealed down to find something or grab another weapon or so.

S Explain to me an other how this takes you out of your game or the game i mean it is not like the Wii U GP is placed on the Floor or something and ya have to look straight down at your floor.

Oh, so you have magic eyes that can look at two screens at once ? ... or may be you want to awkardly hold up your pad controller in front of the screen,s, which of course will block the screen due to perspective in additions to being akward and wearing out your hands.

Sure you can hold it so you see the screen out the corner of yoru eye, sort of. you still have to be taken out of the gameworld to use it, which is stupid and breaks immersion.

a semi transparent backpack that doesn't take the full screen is an infinitely better design and solution.

As soon as your eyes and focus leaves the big screen and you're no longer focused on it, it break immersion and drops you out of the gameworld. Suspension of disbelief goes poof. You're out of the scary hallways and in your living room with a windows on the wall showing a moving picture of the no longer that scary hallways with zombies.

some text taken form an IGN impressions on the game or so

http://www.ign.com/a...survival-horror

f having to look up and down between the screen in your hands and the screen on your TV seems a bit awkward, well, it is ? but it works, because it creates tension. If you?re looking through the loot on someone?s corpse, you?re focussed on the screen in your hands, leaving yourself exposed to attack. It means that you?re constantly flicking your gaze upwards fearfully whilst you rifle through someone's pockets or your own backpack, like you would look over your shoulder if you were doing so in real life. You're pressured to do things as fast as possible in case something creeps up behind you and you don't have your hands on your gun.

ZombiU is the standout title on Wii U at the moment. It's tense, innovative and genuinely scary, using the touchscreen controller to build tension and force you to think differently as well as expedite control.

When you're looting, your inventory pops up on the Wii U controller, letting you rearrange items by tapping and dragging. You can't carry much, so it's important to prioritise.

ZombiU is effective because it doesn't overdo the scares. You don't actually come across zombies all that often, so when you do it's bloody terrifying. You're constantly stopping, scanning, checking your inventory, reloading, holding your breath when you walk into a new room

f having to look up and down between the screen in your hands and the screen on your TV seems a bit awkward, well, it is ? but it works, because it creates tension. If you?re looking through the loot on someone?s corpse, you?re focussed on the screen in your hands, leaving yourself exposed to attack. It means that you?re constantly flicking your gaze upwards fearfully whilst you rifle through someone's pockets or your own backpack, like you would look over your shoulder if you were doing so in real life. You're pressured to do things as fast as possible in case something creeps up behind you and you don't have your hands on your gun.

So circular argumentation, going back to where we where 3 posts ago.

again. an on screen inventory screen, that's semi trasnparent with delays before and after activation as ou open and put away the backpack, adds at least as much tension if not more, and does not break immersion.

the pad controller solution is awkward, badly designed and doesn't work as good. especially since it uses a resistive screen on top of all the other negatives.

So circular argumentation, going back to where we where 3 posts ago.

again. an on screen inventory screen, that's semi trasnparent with delays before and after activation as ou open and put away the backpack, adds at least as much tension if not more, and does not break immersion.

the pad controller solution is awkward, badly designed and doesn't work as good. especially since it uses a resistive screen on top of all the other negatives.

We know, you hate it. Get over it. It's not going anywhere.

Just because YOU think it's not going to immerse you any more into a game. There are thousands upon millions who will be.

I know of very few games that allow you to do what you suggest, in searching your inventory without pausing the game. That is immersion breaking.

This is more immersive. I hate a cluttery UI on screen. That's not like real life at all. I don't see a health bar in front of my face.

So circular argumentation, going back to where we where 3 posts ago.

again. an on screen inventory screen, that's semi trasnparent with delays before and after activation as ou open and put away the backpack, adds at least as much tension if not more, and does not break immersion.

the pad controller solution is awkward, badly designed and doesn't work as good. especially since it uses a resistive screen on top of all the other negatives.

Badly designed... in your opinion. A second screen has worked quite nicely for hte DS and the 3DS. And it'll work quite nicely for the Wii U too, even if it just makes switching things quicker or viewing options without having to pause or things like that.

ZombiU is the standout title on Wii U at the moment. It's tense, innovative and genuinely scary, using the touchscreen controller to build tension and force you to think differently as well as expedite control.

When you're looting, your inventory pops up on the Wii U controller, letting you rearrange items by tapping and dragging. You can't carry much, so it's important to prioritise.

ZombiU is effective because it doesn't overdo the scares. You don't actually come across zombies all that often, so when you do it's bloody terrifying. You're constantly stopping, scanning, checking your inventory, reloading, holding your breath when you walk into a new room

Sadly, that's about all that stood out for me with the Wii U too. And then I watched the other press conferences that actually had games that appealed to me, not because of a controller, but because of how it was put together in itself. Coming back to look at ZombieU afterwards, I was rather saddened that ZombieU was all I could find interest in. Hell, Nintendo even brought up the next Paper Mario, but the guy talking about it sounded so unenthusiastic that I lost interest in listening to him. :/

I think Ubisoft will have a bright future ahead of it though (after seeing everything they plan to put out), especially seeing as they gave a better demo of the Wii U's new controller than Nintendo did themselves too. Usually Nintendo is the one that outshines the third-parties.

As for the WiiU: I'm just not sold on it. There are some places it can be useful, but I don't know if that's enough to warrant buying a whole new console, especially if the Wii U is going to be left behind on the list of games that come out across all three platforms once again anyway. Many of us aren't asking for much, except for Nintendo to keep up so that we can have more developers releasing to their console as well. I don't see why some folks have to bitch each other out for wanting Nintendo to actually keep up...

I have some doubts on the Wii-U concept, but I am excited about being able to play a Zelda where I don't have to pause and wait for the menu to load to change my currently held items multiple times a minute. :) Although the Wii Zeldas weren't as bad as previous consoles, there were still frequent immersion breakers.

Badly designed... in your opinion. A second screen has worked quite nicely for hte DS and the 3DS. And it'll work quite nicely for the Wii U too, even if it just makes switching things quicker or viewing options without having to pause or things like that.

Bad example. the DS is so small, that you will see both screen at all time anyway.

Bad example. the DS is so small, that you will see both screen at all time anyway.

Not a bad example - it's still impossible to focus on both at once. If you want to actually use the other you have to focus on it - same here.

not entirely, and the field of view is still completely different, and the ds was never created for full immersion anyway, you can't get "i to" a tiny hand held screen as you can on a big screen game. they're also different games where immersion isn't necessarily an issue. Mario and gears of war for example don't use the same immersion, only one of them has a game world you truly immerse yourself into, sure ou get immersed in Mario as well, but differently.

personally I'm 95% sure I'll buy a Wii U, but the games i'll play on it will be Mario and some Zelda. hardcore games i'll avoid the pad as much as possible. if i have to use the pad for the motion tracker on aliens, i will get the game on my xbox or pc instead where they have it on screen like it should be(look at the ameplay videos of the game) which works a lot better than on a outside screen. hopefully they're smart enough to let you choose if you want the gimmicky immesion breaking tracker or the same proper tracker that my character actually holds in his hands.

In most well designed games you don't need to spend much time if any time in your inventory during high impact moments anyway.

I can see a lot of "we designed the game like this to get you to use the screen on the controller" type moments.

That article on cracked is also very true IMO.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why Delta Chat is the best decentralized messenger you have probably never tried by Paul Hill There is no shortage of messaging apps out there; we have WhatsApp, Messenger, and Telegram, just to name a few. While Meta has taken steps to incorporate encryption into Messenger and WhatsApp, they still leave a lot to be desired. If you are in the market for a messaging app that promotes security, privacy, and optional anonymity, you'll want to read what I have to say about Delta Chat. For those not familiar with Delta Chat, rather than relying on centralized servers as you do with Facebook Messenger, it relies on email. Essentially, it is a chat interface that feels like a messaging app, but secretly in the background, it is firing off emails. In the past, you used to have to sign in with your email account. When you sent messages to people, it would just be sending encrypted messages to their inbox, which their Delta Chat client would decrypt. When I first learned about Delta Chat, it required users to sign in with an email account, but I was pleasantly surprised upon trying it in 2026 that this is no longer a requirement, or the preferred method was to use the app. Recently, I’ve tried UAD-ng on my old Nokia 3.4 to disable most of the Google apps because the bootloader is locked, and this is the next best option. While finding replacement apps in F-Droid, I came across Delta Chat again, and it has undergone quite a big change since I last used it, with its new chatmail relays, which no longer require you to sign in to your own email account, providing anonymity, and they offer greater security. Android and Desktop Delta Chat apps. Not only does it run on my de-googled phone, but it also works on desktop computers and iOS, making it truly ubiquitous. For me, Delta Chat is a wonderful alternative messenger because it gives you more control. It supports switching between different profiles, which you can set up super quickly; you don’t register a username, you don’t register a password. The only thing you do have is a random string email address on a chatmail relay (which you don’t have to memorize). To maintain access to your profile, you just need to add a second device to your account via QR code or make a backup of your account, which you can restore later. Fail to do these, your account is gone - as it should be if you don’t want to leave accounts that could get hacked later on. My decision to block Google stuff on my Nokia was done for practical reasons; the device sucked when it launched, and it sucks even more now. The nice thing about F-Droid and the apps within is that they’re usually lightweight, free of bloat, and work well on that device. What was inconvenient for me was that it was hard to send messages from that device, say if I wanted to copy a code over to my main phone or send family members a link from that device. That’s when I decided to look at the available chat apps and saw Delta Chat. Another nice thing about Delta Chat is its notifications. Some messaging apps rely on Google’s ecosystem for notification transport on Android; however, with Delta Chat, it can use Google’s solutions if you have Play Services or MicroG installed. Otherwise, it is able to keep a background connection to the chatmail relay server so that you can get notified when you receive a message. As free software, the code of Delta Chat is open for all who want to take it and build upon it. In the future, if the developers of Delta Chat make a catastrophically bad decision and take the app in an undesirable direction, users can take the code and fork the project. This contrasts with closed-source apps from corporations that can take their products in any direction they like. By relying on free software instead of closed-source programs, you actually control your computing. I’ve spoken at length about how running this type of software is like owning your own home rather than renting it. The same applies here; if you use Delta Chat, you don’t need to worry about it going away in the future. Whether it is Telegram, WhatsApp, or Messenger, you are required to register a username and password to use these services. A major flaw in this design is that anyone can try various passwords and potentially break into your account with your complete chat history intact. Sure, there is encryption in Messenger, where you need a second PIN and two-factor authentication in Telegram, but breaches happen all the time. Unlike before, when you used to sign in to your email account to send and receive messages, the primary way to do it now is to create an account on a chatmail relay. The resulting email address is a random string followed by the name of the relay you pick. This means you can start and begin adding contacts Without a username and password, you either need to ensure you have a backup or at least one device running your Delta Chat profile. The primary way to log in on another device is to go to the settings and add a second device. Then, you’ll just scan a QR code with your new device, and it’ll log in to your account and sync all your chat history and contacts. To end users, Delta Chat just looks like any instant messenger; however, it is really sending your messages as encrypted emails to your contact. This is pretty cool from a censorship perspective, as it makes the service more difficult to block. Previously, the main way to use the app was by logging in with email, but nowadays, it’s recommended that you use chatmail relays. Chatmail relays temporarily hold messages in case your device is offline. They are cheap, simple servers that don’t store data as group states. Other information, like your name and avatar, only exists on your device and the devices of those you share your contact information with. The relays are also decentralized and operated by various groups and individuals. It is even possible to set up your own chatmail relay, but most people will want to use one hosted elsewhere. To keep your messages secure, Delta Chat uses a secure subset of the OpenPGP standard that gives you automatic end-to-end encryption. It also uses Secure-Join to exchange encryption setup information through QR-code scanning or invite links. Autocrypt is also used to automatically establish end-to-end encryption between contacts and all members of group chat, but sometime this year Autocrypt v2 will be rolled out, bringing post-quantum resistant encryption and forward secrecy. The Delta Chat FAQ is an interesting read that explains many more details about the app. Credit: Pexels Delta Chat is unique among messaging apps because it is built on email, a technology that’s decades old and isn’t going anywhere soon. What’s more is that email is not centralized either, so it’s far more difficult for any authoritarian regime to disrupt the Delta Chat app. I haven’t spoken too much about features yet, so I will do that now. Delta Chat allows you to do one-on-one chats, group chats, and create channels. It also supports file sharing and making audio and video calls when chatting one-to-one, but it’s not available for group chats right now. At the time of writing, the calling functionality is disabled and can be enabled in Settings > Advanced > Debug Calls. I have used the video calling feature, and the quality is excellent. It works over WebRTC, another open standard. The app also lets you send voice notes, enables disappearing messages, and has its own app ecosystem. I did try playing chess one time there, but it was a bit spotty; though, we did manage to complete the game with a victory for me. To add people to Delta Chat, you can either give them your Delta Chat link or your QR code to scan. These are the only ways to add users, so you won't have any spam bots bothering you. If the people you want to chat with don't have the app yet, just send them your link, and it will take them to a webpage where they can install the app and then add you. It's really quick for them to install it and get started, which is nice. Credit: Microsoft. The Majorana 2 quantum chip unveiled in 2026. I do not think quantum computers are too far out now, and I do hope that Delta Chat is able to push out Autocrypt v2 sooner, rather than later, so bad actors do not attempt to collect encrypted communications and then decrypt them in the future using quantum computers. By getting people’s messages post-quantum-safe now, users won’t have to worry when quantum computers start cracking legacy encryption. Overall, I would recommend this app to people who are already past WhatsApp and Messenger and have perhaps begun using apps like Telegram or Session. It shares a lot of characteristics with these apps and goes a lot further than Telegram in terms of security. By being based on email, it is also resistant to censorship, and the lack of a username and password makes you anonymous (if you want to be) and safe from brute force password cracking attempts. Let me know in the comments if you’ve tried Delta Chat recently. Do you think it's a good bulwark against governments that are tightening their grip on the internet?
    • Putin was behind Farage/Brexit and behind Trump/MAGA. Different idiot lying beasts, same fascist master. Same screwed up results for both nations.
    • For me the Final Fantasy games, Langrisser I & II, Hardspace: Shipbreaker, Horizon Forbidden West Complete Edition, Metaphor: ReFantazio and LUNAR Remastered Collection
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      465
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      217
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      155
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!