Recommended Posts

A private German economics and business university is suing one of its students for lost income after he finished his Bachelors and Masters degrees in about a quarter of the normal time.

Marcel Pohl completed 60 examinations in 20 months, gaining a grade of 2.3, and was officially ex-matriculated in August 2011. Such a course usually takes 11 semesters, but he only needed three.

Now the Essen-based School of Economics and Management (FOM) want the 22-year-old to pay his fees up the end of 2011 - an extra ?3,000.

"When I got the lawsuit, I thought it couldn't be true," Pohl, who now works for a bank in Frankfurt, told the Bild newspaper. "Performance is supposed to be worth something."

Pohl completed his turbo degree by dividing up all the simultaneous lectures with two friends and then swapping notes. At the same time, he completed an apprenticeship in a bank.

"We didn't get any freebies, and we agreed our plans in advance with the school," Pohl said.

"We're always against slow students," said his lawyer Bernhard Kraas. "But when someone hurries and finishes early, suddenly he has to pay. That can't be right."

But the FOM argues that its fees are the total price for the studies, independent of how long the studies last. But if that it is the case, it remains unclear why they are only calling for a part of the cost for 11 semesters.

"We do not want to comment on the case before it has reached court," a university spokesman said.

source

It won't standup in court.. if for no other reason than the Uni was aware of it from the beginning. Plus they are the ones that LET him.. You can't just decide to take a exam, you need to be allowed too, the prof needs to give the credit.. so they were fine till after he finished.. ergo it's too late.

  • Like 3

It won't standup in court.. if for no other reason than the Uni was aware of it from the beginning. Plus they are the ones that LET him.. You can't just decide to take a exam, you need to be allowed too, the prof needs to give the credit.. so they were fine till after he finished.. ergo it's too late.

yeah really, where I went we could take a maximum 17.9 credits a semester with what we paid for tuition wise, anything over that we needed approval and we had to pay more for... there was no way to finish school without paying for the credits you took even if you did it in half the time

Wouldn't a course be a one flat price ... ? They are here in the USA. :huh:

in the USA you pay per semester if you are a full time student, that gets you x number of credits per semester, then you pay a flat rate per credit over that.. most major universities here follow that rule, you'd think other countries would do it similar

They already do that sort of. In my MBA, if you take longer than 6 years, you are not allowed to graduate.

yeah upper level degrees like masters, MBA (which is a masters program really) and PhD you have a set period to complete, if not tough luck, but under grad you can take a long time... heck you could go a year take 4 off take another 2yrs finish your last 1 a few years later.. as long as you meet the requirements when you graduate... because over time requirements do change

On the surface this sounds more than a little absurd, but do they not pay per credit over there? If that were the case it wouldn't matter how long he took to finish the course... I thought that's how most schools worked, but could be wrong...

On the surface this sounds more than a little absurd, but do they not pay per credit over there? If that were the case it wouldn't matter how long he took to finish the course... I thought that's how most schools worked, but could be wrong...

Exactly what I was thinking. We pay by credit hour here, so it doesn't matter if you take 20 credit-hours in one semester, or one credit-hour each semester for 20 semesters, you'd essentially pay the same price.

Wouldn't a course be a one flat price ... ? They are here in the USA. :huh:

Same here in Australia to my knowledge. You pay per course. Finish it in 1 week or 1 semester - but if you don't complete in a certain timeframe, you're required to pay again to complete it (if you wish)

yeah upper level degrees like masters, MBA (which is a masters program really) and PhD you have a set period to complete, if not tough luck, but under grad you can take a long time... heck you could go a year take 4 off take another 2yrs finish your last 1 a few years later.. as long as you meet the requirements when you graduate... because over time requirements do change

Just to add to this, it also costs a different amount if you are not a full time student by taking less than 12 credits. They liked to bundle 12-18 credits (over costed extra) when I went through undergrad, and my master's was always pay-per-credits.

Unless they aren't using a typical 4.0 scale, a 2.3 GPA sounds pretty crappy anyway.

I was wondering the same thing. That's a smidge under a C+ average, which even with the short time would have him firmly under my company's "ignore" pile. Guess that might explain a lot about the banks though. Hopefully this is just a different grading scale.

My sister completed her master's degree program in Ed Admin in 2 and a half years. Hell I knew one girl who completed it in one academic year!

Just to add to this, it also costs a different amount if you are not a full time student by taking less than 12 credits. They liked to bundle 12-18 credits (over costed extra) when I went through undergrad, and my master's was always pay-per-credits.

I was wondering the same thing. That's a smidge under a C+ average, which even with the short time would have him firmly under my company's "ignore" pile. Guess that might explain a lot about the banks though. Hopefully this is just a different grading scale.

guess what. Companies dont give a damn what your gpa Is. They care you have.the degree.

yeah really, where I went we could take a maximum 17.9 credits a semester with what we paid for tuition wise, anything over that we needed approval and we had to pay more for... there was no way to finish school without paying for the credits you took even if you did it in half the time

Here in the University of California and California State University systems, although you needed administrative approval to register for more units, you didn't need to pay additional to the standard full time fee.

guess what. Companies dont give a damn what your gpa Is. They care you have.the degree.

not really, if you are a first timer they do give a crap about your GPA... if you have worked in the field for x number of years then they no longer care and only care about your experience.. first time getting a job, they usually want to see transcripts to prove you completed the degree and how well you did... most places ask for sealed transcripts from a recent grad just so they know they were not tampered with or to be sent directly from the university/college to them

My sister completed her master's degree program in Ed Admin in 2 and a half years. Hell I knew one girl who completed it in one academic year!

So your sister was 6 months slow in doing her degree. Bachelors degree is 4 years with around 120 hours doing between 12-20 hours per semester. A masters degree is around 32 hours doing 6 to 9 hours per semester. Those are estimates based on going the average amount of classes per semester and what they expect it to take you. Doing a masters in a single year isn't that hard though. 12 hours, which is 4 classes per semester and then another 8 or 9 during the summer. If you don't work full time, it isn't unheard of. The average masters students, however, work full time unless they are law or med school students.
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Micron reveals AI companies are spending billions to lock up its memory years in advance by Karthik Mudaliar The demand for more memory is far from over, and Micron is turning the AI-driven memory shortage into a much more predictable business. The company has revealed that it has signed 16 strategic supply agreements backed by roughly $22 billion in customer deposits and other financial commitments. The contracts cover DRAM and NAND deliveries over several years, with some running through 2030. With the AI boom, demand for high-bandwidth memory (HBM) has grown so quickly that large customers are now prepared to help finance future production in exchange for a guaranteed supply. According to Micron’s latest financial results, the company received commitments worth about $22 billion across its new agreements. Around $18 billion is expected to arrive as cash deposits, while the rest will come through other financial arrangements. Micron says the agreements could generate approximately $100 billion in future contracted obligations. They cover around 20% of its expected DRAM shipments and one-third of its NAND shipments during their respective terms. It should be noted that although AI infrastructure is the main force behind the current shortage, not all 16 agreements with Micron involve AI companies. Micron said the customers also include consumer electronics and automotive businesses, two sectors that increasingly compete with data centers for the same manufacturing capacity. HBM is consuming an increasing share of that supply. Unlike conventional desktop or server RAM, HBM stacks multiple memory dies vertically and places them close to an AI accelerator. This gives GPUs and other AI chips access to data at much higher speeds, but it also requires more complicated manufacturing and packaging. Micron says its 12-layer HBM4 memory is now shipping in high volume for a lead customer, with samples also supplied to other companies. The chipmaker has already generated more than $1 billion in HBM4 revenue and says the product is ramping twice as quickly as its earlier HBM3E generation. Samsung has similarly warned that the memory shortage could continue into 2027 and beyond. Consumer memory companies have also had to address sharp increases in DDR5 pricing, suggesting the effects are already reaching beyond the data center. For consumers, that could mean the AI memory crunch lasts longer than expected, even as manufacturers invest heavily in new production.
    • XnConvert 1.112 by Razvan Serea  XnConvert is a cross-platform batch image-converter and resizer with a powerful and ease of use experience. All common picture and graphics formats are supported (i.e. JPG, PNG, TIFF, GIF, Camera RAW, JPEG2000, WebP, OpenEXR) as well as supporting over 500 other image formats. Also available within the batch operations include rotating, adding of watermarks, adding of text along with many image-adjustment features such as brightness, shadows and more. Among the features included are: Batch adding of files and folders Support for drag and drop of files Batch rotating, cropping, resizing and more Adding of photo masks Preserving or removing image metadata in conversions Multipage image file support (i.e animated GIF, APNG, TIFF) Command line integration via NConvert Filters - such as 'Blur', 'Gaussian Blur', 'Emboss', "Sharpen' and much more Effects - such as 'Old camera' and much more Download: XnConvert 64-bit | Standalone | ~30.0 MB (Freeware) Download: XnConvert 32-bit | Standalone Links: XnConvert Website | Screenshot | Release Announcement Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Microsoft updates Visual Studio Code with chat cost tracking and multi-agent chats by Paul Hill Microsoft has just launched Visual Studio Code 1.126, its latest weekly release. This time, the company has focused on letting you see the total cost of chat sessions to spot expensive conversations; enabling multiple chats per session that run side-by-side in one agent host Copilot session; and letting you browse new folders safely in restricted mode. We have now reached the stage where free AI in IDEs is coming to an end. To help you keep track of your costs, VS Code now lets you see the entire cost of a chat session, rather than just individual turns. This should give you more transparency about which sessions consume the most credits, so you can better manage your usage over time and spend less. For those of you using the Agents window, you know it is possible to run and manage multiple agent sessions at once. In this update, a Copilot session started from an agent host can hold several chats at once. Explaining how this feature works, Microsoft writes: Finally, from this update forward, Microsoft will remove the pop-up when opening an untrusted folder. When you open a new folder now, it will automatically open in Restricted Mode. You will see a banner that lets you manage the trust level of the folder. Microsoft has made this change so that it’s easier to start inspecting code without giving it trust right away. If you have VS Code, you can check for updates within the app now to get this new version. Otherwise, you can download it from the Visual Studio Code website.
    • Anthropic accuses Alibaba of using 25,000 fake accounts to copy Claude's capabilities by Karthik Mudaliar Anthropic has accused Alibaba of using nearly 25,000 fraudulent accounts to extract capabilities from Claude on a huge scale. According to a report from Reuters, Anthropic told US lawmakers that operators linked to Alibaba and the company’s Qwen AI team generated 28.8 million exchanges with Claude between April 22 and June 5, 2026. That is a lot of Claude conversations, but Anthropic says this was not ordinary chatbot use. The company believes the accounts were part of a coordinated effort to collect answers that could help train or improve rival AI systems. The alleged campaign reportedly focused on some of Claude’s most valuable skills, including software development, multi-step reasoning, and agentic tasks. In practical terms, that means getting an AI model to plan and complete work across several stages rather than simply answering a single question. This is called 'distillation,' where AI companies use outputs from a larger model to train a smaller and cheaper one. The smaller model learns to imitate useful parts of the more capable system without needing the same amount of computing power. The distillation process isn't automatically suspicious, but the problem comes when one company gathers another provider's outputs without permission and at an industrial scale. Also, this does not mean Alibaba obtained Claude’s source code, model weights, or original training data. Instead, Anthropic claims the accounts repeatedly asked Claude carefully designed questions and collected the answers. Those answers could then be used as training material for another model. Anthropic has made similar accusations against DeepSeek, Moonshot AI, and MiniMax earlier this year. As Neowin previously reported, Anthropic said those three companies collectively generated more than 16 million Claude exchanges through roughly 24,000 accounts. Anthropic says the new campaign produced almost twice as many exchanges in a matter of weeks. Anthropic reportedly told lawmakers that the campaign could help Chinese AI developers approach the capabilities of its Mythos Preview model. Mythos is focused on advanced cybersecurity work, including finding and exploiting complex software vulnerabilities. via Reuters | Photo via DepositPhotos.com
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      441
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      175
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      134
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!