Recommended Posts

my best friend went through a somewhat similar issue in canada when she completed all her degree requirements one term early. they didn't sue her but they wouldn't let her graduate because the student "had to be in school for 8 terms". she just made the best of it and went on a student exchange term to australia instead.

Unless they aren't using a typical 4.0 scale, a 2.3 GPA sounds pretty crappy anyway.

In the Germany university grading scale 2.3 is above average (1 = very good, 5 = very poor / fail). The 4.0 scale is 'typical' in USA/Canada, not in many other places.

In the Germany university grading scale 2.3 is above average. (1 = very good, 5 = very poor / fail)

A graduating GPA of a 2.3 is well below average for the USA. The average here is around 3.1 I believe. Important to note we have a different grading school. 1 is D(60-69%) and 4 is A(90-100%). However, for the average college student, that is a normal grade point average considering the time he took. Freshmen students do poorly usually. The first year of college is when the majority of dropouts happen. Considering the time schedule he was on, the grade seems about right since he wouldn't have had time to master any particular subject but just learned enough to pass the tests.

"Pohl completed his turbo degree by dividing up all the simultaneous lectures with two friends and then swapping notes. At the same time, he completed an apprenticeship in a bank."

How did he pass some of the classes without actually being there? IF I read that line right had had friends attend classes for him? Colleges by me would not allow that. The colleges I attended you had to attend a certain amount of classes. You couldnt just take a test.

"Pohl completed his turbo degree by dividing up all the simultaneous lectures with two friends and then swapping notes. At the same time, he completed an apprenticeship in a bank."

How did he pass some of the classes without actually being there? IF I read that line right had had friends attend classes for him? Colleges by me would not allow that. The colleges I attended you had to attend a certain amount of classes. You couldnt just take a test.

You read it wrong. He took one class, his friends took another. They exchanged notes and then used the notes to study for exams to take tests that allowed him to not have to take the classes at all. In the USA, we have what are called CLEP tests in general ed classes. They are designed to test general subjects like math and english so a student doesn't have to waste their time in a regular classroom if they already know all of the material. In this case, I would assume the school offered a sort of CLEP test for all of its courses. If that is the case, it is the schools own fault.

Testing out is commonplace here too - but you still have to pay for the credit.

The cost for taking a CLEP and getting the credit is 1/3 the cost of taking the course at the school I went to. I would have done this to safe time and money if they would have offered core courses as CLEP tests.

He cheated though. He had his friends attend classes for him

Thats not cheating if he wasn't ever enrolled in the class. It would be no different than him studing for the tests using google. Click on CLEP on this site and its the same thing for the USA.

http://www.free-test-online.com/clep-math-and-science/clep-calculus-tests

You read it wrong. He took one class, his friends took another. They exchanged notes and then used the notes to study for exams to take tests that allowed him to not have to take the classes at all. In the USA, we have what are called CLEP tests in general ed classes. They are designed to test general subjects like math and english so a student doesn't have to waste their time in a regular classroom if they already know all of the material. In this case, I would assume the school offered a sort of CLEP test for all of its courses. If that is the case, it is the schools own fault.

Yes but thats only available for general ed classes. IN actual degree classes you needed to have actually attended class. Most of my classes if you missed 3 classes you were automatically failed.

Yes but thats only available for general ed classes. IN actual degree classes you needed to have actually attended class. Most of my classes if you missed 3 classes you were automatically failed.

That may have been true where you went but thats not the case here. If it were, he wouldn't have passed or got to graduate. They are not suing him for cheating and getting away with it, they are suing him because he didn't pay for courses because he was able to test out of them. There is a difference. Had he cheated in any way, the school would have pulled his degree in a heartbeat since it risks them losing accrediating if they don't crack down on it.

"Pohl completed his turbo degree by dividing up all the simultaneous lectures with two friends and then swapping notes. At the same time, he completed an apprenticeship in a bank."

How did he pass some of the classes without actually being there? IF I read that line right had had friends attend classes for him? Colleges by me would not allow that. The colleges I attended you had to attend a certain amount of classes. You couldnt just take a test.

yeah I knew there was more to this then just he graduated early, basically he cheated by not attending the classes.. all the major universities around me attendance is required and they even make it part of the grade

That may have been true where you went but thats not the case here. If it were, he wouldn't have passed or got to graduate. They are not suing him for cheating and getting away with it, they are suing him because he didn't pay for courses because he was able to test out of them. There is a difference. Had he cheated in any way, the school would have pulled his degree in a heartbeat since it risks them losing accrediating if they don't crack down on it.

technically he did cheat and possibly stole, to have someone go to a class for your to get the course work to study from, you are taking something everyone else is paying for away from the univeristy for free basically then using it to your own advantage... thus theft and cheating

technically he did cheat and possibly stole, to have someone go to a class for your to get the course work to study from, you are taking something everyone else is paying for away from the univeristy for free basically then using it to your own advantage... thus theft and cheating

Read the article. It wasn't cheating or theft because he had permission to do it.

""We didn't get any freebies, and we agreed our plans in advance with the school," Pohl said."

yeah I knew there was more to this then just he graduated early, basically he cheated by not attending the classes.. all the major universities around me attendance is required and they even make it part of the grade

He didnt get grades for courses. He got grades for exams that he took instead of the courses. Huge difference. He was allowed to, with the schools permission, to take the exams instead of the courses.

this sounds so much like one of those stories everyone in the world would of said "Only in corporate greed america where you have to pay for school!" but oh wait, its not! it's in Germany!

in america he would have been sued for hundreds of thousands of dollars. he was sued for ?3000

He didnt get grades for courses. He got grades for exams that he took instead of the courses. Huge difference. He was allowed to, with the schools permission, to take the exams instead of the courses.

but the basis of their lawsuit is that he stole from them, hipocricy at it's best if they actually did grant permission

in america he would have been sued for hundreds of thousands of dollars. he was sued for ?3000

no he wouldn't of, they'd of sued for the value plus court / lawysers fees... courts don't just dish out larges sums of money without some type of backing... those outragious lawsuits you see are ones where they twist facts to get the numbers like the RIAA/MPAA saying one file share gave x thousand users a copy for free times the value to get some large number... technically the numbers are true values that COULD of been made, but we all know those people never would of bought it to start with... but that's another story for another topic

no he wouldn't of, they'd of sued for the value plus court / lawysers fees... courts don't just dish out larges sums of money without some type of backing... those outragious lawsuits you see are ones where they twist facts to get the numbers like the RIAA/MPAA saying one file share gave x thousand users a copy for free times the value to get some large number... technically the numbers are true, but we all know those people never would of bought it to start with... but that's another story for another topic

what I meant to imply was that the cost of higher education in the US is HIGH, not that they would randomly come up with a high figure to sue him.

what I meant to imply was that the cost of higher education in the US is HIGH, not that they would randomly come up with a high figure to sue him.

higher ed in the USA doesn't cost hundreds of thousands... you can easily go to a 4yr degree for under $20k at a public school (i am talking about degree, not room and board and all that other BS you COULD tack onto your education bill to stack it high)

but the basis of their lawsuit is that he stole from them, hipocricy at it's best if they actually did grant permission

What he "stole" is not paying for the credits. University fees are more complicated than a flat fee. You pay the base credit tuition, which is what they seem to be suing over. If I were to take a CLEP test, I would have to pay for the test itself which range from around 60-120 dollar here, regardless of if I pass or fail. If I pass, I then have to pay the school I want to apply the credits to for the hours it is worth. At the school I went to, they charged $159 per credit hour as the base tuition. If the class was biology, you got charged another $50 for lab supplies for example. There are other fees they tack on like Gym, technology, etc. If they take and pass the CLEP test, the school only charges you for a fraction of the tuition cost. The extra fees, such as lab supplies, are waivered since you were never in the lab.

Obviously this is Germany and not the USA though so his situation could be entirely different, however since the school apperently agreed to his method of completing the course, he didnt cheat. They gave him the degree after all. What they didn't agree with is the amount of payment.

What he "stole" is not paying for the credits. University fees are more complicated than a flat fee. You pay the base credit tuition, which is what they seem to be suing over. If I were to take a CLEP test, I would have to pay for the test itself which range from around 60-120 dollar here, regardless of if I pass or fail. If I pass, I then have to pay the school I want to apply the credits to for the hours it is worth. At the school I went to, they charged $159 per credit hour as the base tuition. If the class was biology, you got charged another $50 for lab supplies for example. There are other fees they tack on like Gym, technology, etc. If they take and pass the CLEP test, the school only charges you for a fraction of the tuition cost. The extra fees, such as lab supplies, are waivered since you were never in the lab.

Obviously this is Germany and not the USA though so his situation could be entirely different, however since the school apperently agreed to his method of completing the course, he didnt cheat. They gave him the degree after all. What they didn't agree with is the amount of payment.

yeah, I am going by the USA point of view, not ever going to a college in Germany so can't really speak for it

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I will keep my current devices for several years... no planning in upgrading until these devices stop working. Too pricey.
    • Apple raises MacBook and iPad prices as memory costs surge by Karthik Mudaliar Apple has raised the U.S. prices of several MacBook and iPad models, including the MacBook Neo, which it launched for $599 less than four months ago. The company’s cheapest laptop now starts at $699, while some MacBook Pro configurations have increased by $300. The changes affect the MacBook Neo, MacBook Air, MacBook Pro, iPad Air, and iPad Pro. Apple has not changed the hardware or storage included with these models, so customers are simply paying more for the same configurations. Here is how the new US pricing compares with the previous starting prices: Product Previous price New price Increase MacBook Neo $599 $699 $100 13-inch MacBook Air, 512GB $1,099 $1,299 $200 14-inch MacBook Pro, 1TB $1,699 $1,999 $300 16-inch MacBook Pro $2,699 $2,999 $300 11-inch iPad Air, 128GB $599 $749 $150 13-inch iPad Air, 128GB $799 $949 $150 11-inch iPad Pro, 256GB $999 $1,199 $200 13-inch iPad Pro, 256GB $1,299 $1,499 $200 The updated prices are already appearing on Apple’s U.S. online store. The MacBook Neo increase will probably attract the most attention. Apple introduced the laptop in March for $599, pitching it as a more affordable Mac for students and buyers considering Windows laptops or Chromebooks. It uses an A18 Pro processor and originally undercut Dell’s new $699 XPS 13 by $100. Following the increase, the two laptops now have the same starting price. The M5 MacBook Air has also lost the price Apple promoted when it launched in March. The 13-inch model arrived with 512GB of storage for $1,099, while Apple’s store now lists the MacBook Air range as starting at $1,299. The 14-inch MacBook Pro with an M5 chip and 1TB of storage has gone from $1,699 to $1,999. Apple has made similar changes to its iPads. The recently released M4 iPad Air, which launched at the same $599 starting price as its predecessor, now starts at $749 for the 11-inch version. The 13-inch version has risen from $799 to $949. The iPad Pro increases are larger in dollar terms. Apple’s 11-inch M5 iPad Pro now starts at $1,199, up from $999, while the 13-inch version has moved from $1,299 to $1,499. Both base models still include 256GB of storage. Apple blamed the increases on the rapidly rising cost of DRAM and NAND flash, which provide system memory and device storage. The company told Reuters that it had tried to shield customers from the increases but could no longer absorb them. “We have never seen a component price increase this much, this quickly,” Apple said. Tim Cook had already warned that price increases were coming. Cook said Apple’s existing component inventory had softened the immediate impact, but that higher memory costs would increasingly affect the company after the June quarter. Much of the pressure comes from the construction of AI data centers. Memory manufacturers are directing more production toward high-margin server products, leaving PC, tablet, and smartphone makers competing for the remaining supply. Apple has not said whether the new prices are temporary or whether further increases are planned. For now, the changes show that even Apple’s purchasing power has not been enough to keep the AI-driven memory shortage away from consumer devices.
    • Ventoy 1.1.16 is out.
    • This is a none story - these low volume Chinese models will always get new experimental features first because Apple and Samsung can't produce them in huge volume to meet demand.
    • Nvidia GeForce NOW gains support for Dark Scrolls, Empulse, and more by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe The final update of June for Nvidia's cloud gaming service GeForce NOW is now available, and it is touting support for six more games. The company is also drawing subscriber attention towards the summer sales kicking off across stores, so they can stock up on more cloud-supported titles. Of course, the Steam Summer Sale is the biggest promotion, which is kicking off later today. "Supported Steam games can be streamed across devices with GeForce NOW, making it easy to buy a game once, keep progress synced and pick up where the gameplay left off on PCs, Macs, handheld devices, phones, TVs and more," says the company. "In other words, the Steam Summer Sale brings the deals; GeForce NOW adds the flexibility." Don't forget that the GeForce NOW summer sale is still active as well. This limited-time offer drops the 12-month Performance membership from $99.99 to $64.99, saving members $35. At the same time, the 12-month Ultimate membership is currently going for $129.99, dropping the price by $70 from the original $199.99. Here are the games joining GeForce NOW's supported list this week: Dark Scrolls (New release on Steam, available June 22) SAND: Raiders of Sophie (New release on Steam, available June 22) Deer & Boy (New release on Steam, available June 23) EMPULSE (New release on Steam, available June 24) The Adventures of Elliot: The Millennium Tales (Steam) FATAL FURY: City of the Wolves (Steam) With the June expansions coming to an end, Nvidia should be announcing its July GeForce NOW plans next week. Keep in mind that, unlike subscription services like Game Pass or EA Play, a copy of a game must be owned by the GeForce NOW member (or at least have a license via PC Game Pass) to start playing via Nvidia's cloud servers. There is also a limit to how many hours subscribers can use the service per month.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      134
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      77
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!