How Pro Windows 8 users want Anti Windows 8 users to use Windows 8


Recommended Posts

How can you prefer this :

http://blogs.msdn.co...00_5E72E680.png

Other that : (note that it's been slightly modified in the RTM, but you got the idea)

http://blogs.msdn.co...00_1548C5BD.png

Both are accessible through a single click and one shows more results than the other, guess which one : blogs.msdn.com/b/b8/archive/2011/10/11/reflecting-on-your-comments-on-the-start-screen.aspx

Easy, search (which doesn't work that well in win8 for some reason). Plus I know where things are in win7. Having 100 icons on my desktop or quick launch bar, it will take me just as long, if not longer to find something than using the old start bar.

And as I said, there's more problems to win8 than just pinning icons hence why I'm (and a lot of others I know, MVPs included) are sticking with Win7.

It'll be good for tablets and if there's a decent affordable tablet that comes out I'll probably get it, possibly netbooks too (I already own one and may upgrade that). But as a Desktop OS, IMO its garbage.

Learn the new shortcuts, it's not that hard to memorize them.

That's a good solution, but he has a point. I, for one, would prefer if the results showed entries from all search sources, or at least from the ones I pin (yeah you can pin search sources)

You should pin very common desktop apps to the taskbar.

You should pin common apps to the Start Screen.

You should search for other apps you use occasionally.

Why is this so hard to understand?

That's a good solution, but he has a point. I, for one, would prefer if the results showed entries from all search sources, or at least from the ones I pin (yeah you can pin search sources)

That would be nice, and organize the search results per source but show them all.

I don't think MS is going to wait 3 years to release a new OS. My guess is that by summer 2013 we will see an update to the WinRT framework and maybe they include things like you mentioned.

They have to go to a quicker release cycle if they want to compete with Android an iOS

That's a good solution, but he has a point. I, for one, would prefer if the results showed entries from all search sources, or at least from the ones I pin (yeah you can pin search sources)

You prefer having files popping in the results when you are looking for an app?

You should pin very common desktop apps to the taskbar.

You should pin common apps to the Start Screen.

You should search for other apps you use occasionally.

Why is this so hard to understand?

Acting like a kid on the internet is easier.
  • Like 3

for the last time, windows 8 default search is worse than the ones in vista or 7.

Type in power... where is how to change power settings in 8? Oh you have to use the mouse to get that?

Type in display... the same results

The search is separated.... Metro needs a lot of tweaks, and changes way to much from the way the system was used before.

I'm looking for a way to group the search results, and make metro act as my desktop background. It needs a 'status bar'.

WXFyC.png

yDw56.png

I don't get what you mean by where is anything. Its all there.

  • Like 2

No, I just want them to stop complaining and whining because it's different, or that Windows 8 will fail because they don't like it, 3 of their friends and their Uncle Cletus dont like it either.

You should pin very common desktop apps to the taskbar.

You should pin common apps to the Start Screen.

You should search for other apps you use occasionally.

Why is this so hard to understand?

Why should we change how we've been using the PC since Windows 95 just because Microsoft decided to change the OS for the sake of changing it and not for any credible reason?

Why should we change how we've been using the PC since Windows 95 just because Microsoft decided to change the OS for the sake of changing it and not for any credible reason?

So you don't like change, we get it

Why should we change how we've been using the PC since Windows 95 just because Microsoft decided to change the OS for the sake of changing it and not for any credible reason?

Hey, you shouldn't. If you are so stuck in your ways you are unable to adapt to a new interface and would prefer to use one nearly 20 years old then Microsoft has an OS just for you. It's called Windows 7. Unless you bitched when they changed the start menu layout when XP was launched, too, in which case Windows 2000 or Me might be best suited to your needs.

@Warwagon: I found the OP to be hilarious, but I must observe that there's a nifty app called Bins that would make it much cleaner when pinning that many apps than doubling the size of the taskbar.

Metro lovers JUST DON'T get it. A lot of people find opening the full screen Start "Menu" to search for or open programs JARRING. Instead of the clean, small and elegant menu like before, you now are forced to see it fill up the ENTIRE screen! And the bigger the monitor, the worse the effect!

I get it. I just think it's a crap complaint.

The Start Menu is anything but clean and it's small size is the reason why it needs fixing.

So you don't like change, we get it

Hey, you shouldn't. If you are so stuck in your ways you are unable to adapt to a new interface and would prefer to use one nearly 20 years old then Microsoft has an OS just for you. It's called Windows 7. Unless you bitched when they changed the start menu layout when XP was launched, too, in which case Windows 2000 or Me might be best suited to your needs.

@Warwagon: I found the OP to be hilarious, but I must observe that there's a nifty app called Bins that would make it much cleaner when pinning that many apps than doubling the size of the taskbar.

Never said I didn't like change, I just don't like change for the sake of change, there is nothing that Metro does that Windows 7 cannot do, all for the sake of trying to appeal to the iPad crowd.

I would just stick with Windows 7 but 8 has a lot of under the hood improvements that I would lose for the sake of Metro, its ridiculous.

Ok let me explain the joke. In EVERY thread all the pro metro users tell the anti Metro users.... If you don't like the Metro screen "It's simple!!! Just pin the apps you use to your taskbar!"

No, what we say is if you don't want to use Windows 8 then don't. Simple. We'll use it and enjoy it.

Another purposefully moronic flame video. He, of course, ignored the fact that you can just press the down arrow, then enter to switch to the settings category instead of the apps category.

A lot of people slating Windows 8 seem to forget it's not primarily aimed at you (or anyone else who is very adept with Windows), it's aimed at people who aren't experienced or expert at using computers. It's aimed at people who just want to quickly get what they need, i.e. Web, Facebook, E-Mail, News, etc. Which is the majority of computer users, that's why it's not aimed at you. It's aimed at people who don't really see the need to go flicking about in the control panel everyday, if their computer works then they just use it. Which is the MAJORITY of users.

If you feel the need to have an OS aimed specifically at you, then make one.

We completed a study with regards to the costs of upgrading to Windows 8 where I work, over 40,000 users. Just the training portion of that study was well into the 6 figures to get users comfortable and competant in using it. Final decision hasn't been made but looks like my workplace won't be upgrading any time soon either.

No, what we say is if you don't want to use Windows 8 then don't. Simple. We'll use it and enjoy it.

No, I'm pretty sure I read a lot of "Pin it to the taskbar reply's"

  • Like 1
Never said I didn't like change, I just don't like change for the sake of change, there is nothing that Metro does that Windows 7 cannot do

Actually, the All Programs menu in Windows 8 can display everything installed on the computer on a single screen, without any scrolling and without needing to click to expand folders; it can't do that in Windows 7. Windows 7 can't display live tiles, you can't change the background colour / pattern, you can't pin as many programs to it, etc. The start screen in Windows 8 does more than is possible in Windows 7.

You may not like the changes but it offers improved functionality and customisability over Windows 7.

Never said I didn't like change, I just don't like change for the sake of change, there is nothing that Metro does that Windows 7 cannot do, all for the sake of trying to appeal to the iPad crowd.

I would just stick with Windows 7 but 8 has a lot of under the hood improvements that I would lose for the sake of Metro, its ridiculous.

I only somewhat agree. I don't miss the start menu, but I'm not a gigantic metro fan, either. I'm used to it after having my Windows Phone for so long, but it isn't the same on Windows, either. However, I don't go into every Windows 8 thread simply to state that I don't like it and won't use it. Most of the time those posts are completely irrelevant to the topic at hand and have become tiresome and irritating. I'll use Windows 8, I'll adapt to the new UI, if I absolutely have to I'll use a 3rd party app launcher, and I won't be trolling every Windows 8 thread bitching about the extremely minor inconvenience it's causing me. Maybe MS made Metro for no apparent reason, or maybe they had a great reason that is just incomprehensible to us; regardless of how and why it came to be about it's here now and there's nothing to be done about it except deal with it until Windows 9 comes out (which will more than likely not bring back the start menu) or stick with an older OS. I plan to just deal with it.
  • Like 3
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Can you give an example of when you would want to use Rufus over the other or vice versa? Just wondering which is the "best".
    • Oh no...the wallet is already screaming. So many games and so little time. Being old and responsible is awful!
    • LibreWolf 152.0.2-1 by Razvan Serea LibreWolf is an independent “fork” of Firefox, with the primary goals of privacy security and user freedom. It is the community run successor to LibreFox. LibreWolf is designed to increase protection against tracking and fingerprinting techniques, while also including a few security improvements. This is achieved through our privacy and security oriented settings and patches. LibreWolf also aims to remove all the telemetry, data collection and annoyances, as well as disabling anti-freedom features like DRM. LibreWolf features: Latest Firefox — LibreWolf is compiled directly from the latest build of Firefox Stable. You will have the the latest features, and security updates. Independent Build — LibreWolf uses a build independent of Firefox and has its own settings, profile folder and installation path. As a result, it can be installed alongside Firefox or any other browser. No phoning home — Embedded server links and other calling home functions are removed. In other words, minimal background connections by default. User settings updates Extensions firewall: limit internet access for extensions. Multi-platform (Windows/Linux/Mac/and soon Android) Community-Driven Dark theme (classic and advanced) LibreWolf privacy features: Delete cookies and website data on close. Include only privacy respecting search engines like DuckDuckGo and Searx. Include uBlockOrigin with custom default filter lists, and Tracking Protection in strict mode, to block trackers and ads. Strip tracking elements from URLs, both natively and through uBO. Enable dFPI, also known as Total Cookie Protection. Enable RFP which is part of the Tor Uplift project. RFP is considered the best in class anti-fingerprinting solution, and its goal is to make users look the same and cover as many metrics as possible, in an effort to block fingerprinting techniques. Always display user language as en-US to websites, in order to protect the language used in the browser and in the OS. Disable WebGL, as it is a strong fingerprinting vector. Prevent access to the location services of the OS, and use Mozilla's location API instead of Google's API. Limit ICE candidates generation to a single interface when sharing video or audio during a videoconference. Force DNS and WebRTC inside the proxy, when one is being used. Trim cross-origin referrers, so that they don't include the full URI. Disable link prefetching and speculative connections. Disable disk cache and clear temporary files on close. Disable form autofill. Disable search and form history...and more. Download: LibreWolf 64-bit | Portable 64-bit | ~100.0 MB (Open Source) Download: ARM64 | Portable ARM64 Links: LibreWolf Home Page | Addons | Screenshot | Reddit Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hands on with iFlyTek AINote 2 E-Ink tablet: insanely thin and smart by Taras Buria During Amazon Prime Day 2026, iFlyTek is offering its E-Ink tablets with big discounts. The AINOTE 2 is now available at 20% off, allowing you to save quite a lot on one of the thinnest E-Ink tablets out there. I was offered a chance to look at the device, so here are my impressions. The AINOTE 2 is a large 10.65-inch E-Ink tablet that strikes you the moment you take it out of the box. It is extremely thin. At just 4.2 mm, this tablet is at the edge of what is possible for a device with a USB Type-C port. It is also very light, which makes it comfortable and enjoyable during long reading sessions. The tablet has a gold metal chassis with the front and back made of plastic. The back also features four rubber feet that prevent it from sliding around your desk when writing. Besides a USB Type-C port and an LED indicator, there are two buttons mounted on the top edge: a power button with a built-in fingerprint scanner and a dedicated AI button. I would say the fingerprint scanner is quite mid. Given that iFlyTek positions the device as a digital notebook, it makes sense to have a biometric scanner to protect sensitive information. However, it is not the fastest fingerprint reader, and sometimes it fails to recognize my finger. I assume that is due to the tablet's insane thinness. A dedicated AI button is an interesting choice, especially in the middle of the top edge. I can see this button being useful for those who heavily rely on AI and use it frequently, but I cannot help but think its placement is impractical. Having it on one of the longer sides would make so much more sense. The AINOTE 2 is a very pretty device. Gold finish with thin chassis and nearly symmetrical front bezels create a fantastic combination, and iFlyTek cleverly hides the front chin with a section that looks like an extension of the screen, housing two touch-capacitive buttons: one for AI and one for quick notes. This section can also scroll pages when you swipe from the middle to the left or right. It is a cool idea, and very handy when you need to scroll tens of pages at once. AINOTE 2's elegant look extends from its exterior to its software. The user interface is very clean and not cluttered with an abundance of buttons. The tablet prioritizes the note-taking experience, and when you unlock it, it defaults to the list of all notes and folders. Additionally, there is a separate "Schedule" section with your calendar, tasks, memos, and other productivity features. You can connect your Outlook or Google account or use a local calendar. The tablet has quite a lot of AI features powered by OpenAI's GPT-5 and Google's Gemini 3. Besides a standard app with all your chats, you can invoke AI by pressing its dedicated button and dictating your request. It is not limited to just chats. It works with the built-in calendar, and you can tell it to create events, tasks, notes, and more. Additionally, AI features are integrated into the built-in notepad, allowing you to summarize notes, ask questions about your notes, and more. The tablet can OCR handwritten text in different languages (about 120 languages, which is very impressive), and it surprised me with very good accuracy. Voice note transcription is also available, including a "multiplayer" mode where the tablet detects each speaker. Unfortunately, the AINOTE 2 has no built-in speakers (even though it somehow makes a tapping noise when you flip pages using the Quick Bar), so the only way to listen to something is to connect a Bluetooth speaker or headphones. However, there are four front-facing mics for dictation, voice notes, AI chats, and more. Unfortunately, certain features require a Pro subscription that costs $5.99/mo or $59.99/year. Those include offline voice transcription, access to better AI models, the ability to edit notes on a PC or mobile app, and extended service coverage similar to Apple Care. It is a bummer to see yet another app, especially in a device that costs $649, but at least they give a free 90-day trial so that you can see if the benefits justify the price. As for the reader, it supports PDF, EPUB, TXT, MOBI, AZW3, DOC(X), XLS(X), PPT(X), JPEG, JPG, and PNG. The app is quite customizable, with features like text contrast/boldness/size adjustments, margins and spacing customization, and the ability to load custom fonts. Plus, you can annotate books with the stylus, add text notes, and use AI to work with them. Just keep in mind that most AI features require an active internet connection. Like with other E-Ink tablets with Android inside, you can load any other reader you want from the Google Play Store or a third-party source. Despite its hefty price tag of $629 or $519 by the time of publishing this article during Prime Day 2026, the AINOTE 2 has quite modest hardware inside. There is only 4 GB of RAM and about 42GB of storage. It is powered by the RockChip RK3576 processor with 8 cores at 2.2 GHz. Given that the tablet runs Android 14 and has Google Play, you can install Android apps, but do not expect much from this thing performance-wise. As for the battery, there is a 4,000 Li-Ion battery, which, on full charge, lasted me for about one week of active daily use of reading and note-taking. The screen has a resolution of 1920x2560 pixels, which equals 300 PPI, a perfect spot for a sharp, nice-to-read display. It supports EMR styluses that do not require charging, and I have to say that the note-taking experience on this tablet is fantastic. Stylus lag is nearly imperceivable, creating a very natural, paper-like feel. The stylus comes in the box (including two extra nibs), and it features an extra button for various actions and an eraser on top. It magnetically attaches to the tablet and stays safely secured. The stylus has a very nice coarse texture, and thanks to using Wacom tech, you can swap it for any other EMR pen if you wish. The AINOTE 2 has no front light, and because of that, the display sits very close to the screen surface, reducing the distance between the stylus tip/your finger and the display to a minimum. No front light is certainly an inconvenience in certain scenarios, but the screen makes up for that with a seriously impressive paper-like feel and writing experience. In dark conditions, you will have to find a lamp, but the good thing is that the screen has a solid anti-glare surface that diffuses light. The display has two modes: Crisp and Fast. Crisp ensures the image stays, well, crisp and sharp, while Fast speeds up refresh rate and response by toning down display resolution and making everything a bit more jagged. In my testing, I only used Fast mode when browsing the web for a much faster render time. The iFlyTek AINOTE is an impressive device, but it's not flawless. A few things disappointed me during a week of using it. Software localization has a bunch of not necessarily broken, but certainly awkward, machine-translated English. System navigation is not good, as there is no universal "Home" gesture. To go to the main page, you have to swipe up and then press the Home button from the multi-tasking window. There are many gestures for various actions, such as display cleanup, screenshot, undo/redo, but no back/forward or Home gestures. I really hate that the tablet won't let me update its software without creating an iFlyTek account first. Finally, privacy could be a concern for some, as most tablets' features require an active internet connection, an iFlyTek account, and sharing data when using AI. If you can overlook its quirks, some of which could be addressed with software updates (I received two with massive changelogs over a single week), and accept a $519 price tag (with a discount), you will be happy with the AINOTE 2. However, if you do not need that many AI features in an E-Ink reader or you want something a bit more affordable, you'd better look at cheaper competitors from BOOX or Amazon, such as the BOOX Go 10.3 Gen 2 or the Kindle Scribe, which is currently 24% off during Prime Day sales. Buy iFlyTek AINOTE 2 on Amazon - $519 | 20% off with Prime What I liked What I disliked Very impressive hardware Beautiful design Fantastic display with an EMR stylus Supports offline voice transcription Easy-to-use software Clever, useful, and well-made AI features A fingerprint scanner Very expensive Some features require a subscription Poor system navigation Mandates a user account No speakers Privacy could be a concern Note: iFlyTek provided the review unit without any editorial input or review guidance. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Look up "greed". If you are willing to buy that it's only inflation, I've got a bridge to sell you.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      416
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      168
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      132
    4. 4
      Xenon
      73
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!